|
|
Post by Matthew the Swordsman on Oct 13, 2017 16:09:45 GMT
Note: This is a remake of a thread I posted on the politics board. I also posted a similar thread on General Discussion. But posts on both of those boards are ephemeral, while the polls board is more of a long-term thing.
Yes, this is a very silly thread.
I voted yes, but only if swords are used.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 13, 2017 22:05:52 GMT
I vote for this option that don`t exist
North and South Dakota join forces with Montana and invade Wyoming and when they have crushed them. They should keep going first Idaho. than Minnestota, down to Nebraska and they finish it by taking Oregon and Washington.
|
|
|
|
Post by permutojoe on Oct 14, 2017 0:07:39 GMT
One way or another the two need to become one state. 4 Senators is way too many for that few people.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Oct 14, 2017 0:11:08 GMT
End the bloodshed. Unite the Dakotas.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2017 4:41:26 GMT
I voted no. They should unite with Nebraska and Iowa and take over Minnesota. Actually, either of the Dakotas could take over Minnesota by themselves.
|
|
|
|
Post by twothousandonemark on Oct 20, 2017 4:41:40 GMT
Dakotas should unite if any US territory were to ever gain state title, keeping 50 states number in tact. Although to be fair, Puerto Rico is 80% still in the dark & drinking toxic water, so that's not likely any time soon. Trump gives himself a 10/10.
|
|
|
|
Post by chalk2 on Oct 20, 2017 4:45:25 GMT
Invade you lazy dogs.
|
|
|
|
Post by SciFive on Oct 25, 2017 21:56:49 GMT
No, South Dakota is too Southern.
|
|
|
|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on Jun 25, 2018 10:03:06 GMT
No
|
|
|
|
Post by alfromni on Sept 19, 2018 9:12:09 GMT
Why was the border created in the first place? Guess there must be a reason. Beats me.
|
|
|
|
Post by ant-mac on Oct 31, 2018 2:13:16 GMT
Sure.
North verses south...
What could possibly go wrong with that infallible plan?
|
|
