Post by The Herald Erjen on Oct 22, 2017 11:14:24 GMT
Another great presentation by Icke. Enjoy. 
Disclaimer: The usual.
My thoughts: Reminds me of a conversation I had with a coworker back in the 90's. I said that I had been willing to give Michael Jackson the benefit of the doubt on the kiddy-fiddling thing until he paid off the parents by settling out of court. I thought (and still think) that if he had gone to court and lost his credibility would have fared better. My coworker said that with him it was just the opposite. He said he didn't give Michael Jackson the benefit of the doubt until after he paid off. I asked him why, and he asked me if I had a kid who was molested would there be any monetary settlement I would accept to forget about it, and I told him no there wasn't, but I tried to tell him that just because he and I would not do it (BTW both of us were old bachelors in our thirties unlikely to ever produce offspring), it doesn't mean someone else wouldn't do it, in a world where in poor countries parents break the arms and legs of excess children so they can put them out in the street to beg. I don't think he ever got it. I think he still put what someone else would do or not do in terms of what he would do or not do. It's a pitfall which comes with a belief in the basic good in humans.
Disclaimer: The usual.
My thoughts: Reminds me of a conversation I had with a coworker back in the 90's. I said that I had been willing to give Michael Jackson the benefit of the doubt on the kiddy-fiddling thing until he paid off the parents by settling out of court. I thought (and still think) that if he had gone to court and lost his credibility would have fared better. My coworker said that with him it was just the opposite. He said he didn't give Michael Jackson the benefit of the doubt until after he paid off. I asked him why, and he asked me if I had a kid who was molested would there be any monetary settlement I would accept to forget about it, and I told him no there wasn't, but I tried to tell him that just because he and I would not do it (BTW both of us were old bachelors in our thirties unlikely to ever produce offspring), it doesn't mean someone else wouldn't do it, in a world where in poor countries parents break the arms and legs of excess children so they can put them out in the street to beg. I don't think he ever got it. I think he still put what someone else would do or not do in terms of what he would do or not do. It's a pitfall which comes with a belief in the basic good in humans.