Post by lenlenlen1 on Oct 31, 2017 23:15:21 GMT
www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/heres-the-best-place-to-survive-if-theres-a-nuclear-apocalypse/ar-AAuhMBL?li=BBnbcA1&ocid=mailsignout
From the article: If Kim Jong Un or another nuclear-minded world leader ever launched an attack, Kansas City would be the best place to survive because collectively the city has the highest percentage of:
- Home listings with a lake or pond (for drinking water)
- Listings with a safe room
- Listings with a bunker or fallout shelter
- Listings with solar panels in case the electrical grid goes dark
- Percentage of health care workers
Other factors included: population density, state gun score, and presence of active military, federal government employees or manufacturing workers, which Realtor.com deemed likely targets of a nuclear attack.
All nonsense! If Kansas city gets hit with a nuclear bomb its all just going to be a crater!
A lake or pond would be evaporated or irradiated.
A safe room would go down with the house.
A bunker or fallout shelter still needs to be far enough away from the blast.
Solar panels will be useless due to the dust/smoke clouds.
Health care workers would be dead or taking care of their own.
And population density, state gun score, and presence of active military would just mean more armed people to fight against for extremely limited resources.
Was the writer (Max Londberg of The Kansas City Star) on drugs when he wrote this? lol
