|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 8, 2017 5:07:59 GMT
Thanks to everyone who answered the questions. Like I said, I never read Norse mythology so I was trying to find out more about it. I have another question:
3. Was Asgard a misogynistic society? The reason I ask is because, as Odin's oldest child, Hela should've been the legal and rightful heir to the throne. So Thor, Loki, Heimdall, Valkyrie and all the other Asgardians who fought against Hela were committing treason against their Queen.
Unless Asgardian law gives preference to male children over female children. Then in that case, Asgardian law would give Thor a stronger legal claim to the throne than Hela had. She was banished and exiled. That means she was subjected to attainder and removed from the line of succession.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 8, 2017 5:13:41 GMT
Thanks to everyone who answered the questions. Like I said, I never read Norse mythology so I was trying to find out more about it. I have another question:
3. Was Asgard a misogynistic society? The reason I ask is because, as Odin's oldest child, Hela should've been the legal and rightful heir to the throne. So Thor, Loki, Heimdall, Valkyrie and all the other Asgardians who fought against Hela were committing treason against their Queen.
Unless Asgardian law gives preference to male children over female children. Then in that case, Asgardian law would give Thor a stronger legal claim to the throne than Hela had. She was banished and exiled. That means she was subjected to attainder and removed from the line of succession. Banished and exiled doesn't remove someone's claim to the throne. Henry VII was banished and exiled but he still had a claim to the throne of England and did become King after Richard III died in the Battle of Bosworth.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 8, 2017 5:17:10 GMT
She was banished and exiled. That means she was subjected to attainder and removed from the line of succession. Dude, don't actually answer his questions. He knows. I don't know Asgardian law. That's why I'm asking. Because usually, the eldest child is next in the line of succession. Unless the eldest child is female and their law gives preference to male children over female children. I'm just asking if Asgardian society gives preference to male children over female children.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 8, 2017 5:20:52 GMT
Dude, don't actually answer his questions. He knows. I don't know Asgardian law. That's why I'm asking. Because usually, the eldest child is next in the line of succession. Unless the eldest child is female and their law gives preference to male children over female children. I'm just asking if Asgardian society gives preference to male children over female children. So either you're as stupid as you make yourself out to be or you're trolling. So which is it, because the film explained why she was banished.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 8, 2017 5:34:16 GMT
As if he actually believes that. He just wants to piss people off. Too quick to judge? DC-Fan had his chance to be given the benefit of the doubt and he's killed it. If there is anything at all he can do to throw shade at Marvel and its fans, he'll do it, right up to and including insulting us by telling us we disgrace our military. And implying the Disney is pushing a terrorist agenda through Howard Stark. DC-Fan doesn't get the benefit of the doubt because he's made his motivations clear. So he throws some shade at Marvel I'm not throwing any shade. Like I said, I've never read Norse mythology so I'm just trying to find out more information as to whether Asgardian law gave preference to male children over female children.
Contrary to the claims by MCU fans here, I don't have any anti-MCU agenda here. I always ask a lot of questions when I watch movies or TV shows. When I watched The White Queen TV series, I posted a similar question on the old IMDb message boards regarding the line of succession. My question was:
"Edward IV had a claim to the throne because he was a great-great-grandson of Edward III. Likewise, Henry VI had a claim to the throne because he was also a great-great-grandson of Edward III.
Henry VI's parents were Henry V (great-grandson of Edward III) and Catherine of Valois. After Henry V died, Catherine of Valois had a child with Owen Tudor. The child was Edmund Tudor, father of Henry Tudor (Henry VII). Since Catherine of Valois had married into the House of Lancaster and wasn't a descendant of Edward III, her descendants with Owen Tudor weren't part of the royal bloodline. So what was Henry Tudor's initial claim to the throne based on?
After defeating Richard III's army, Henry Tudor married Elizabeth of York (who was Edward IV's eldest daughter and thus a part of the royal bloodline) so that solidified Henry Tudors' claim to the throne. But at the beginning of the series, Margaret Beaufort kept saying that her son Henry Tudor would be King someday. But since Henry Tudor wasn't a descendant of Edward III and thus wasn't part of the royal bloodline, what was the basis for Margaret Beaufort thinking that her son Henry Tudor should be King?"
I didn't know the information at the time so I asked the question. Someone answered the question and cleared it up for me. And they didn't get upset or attack me for asking a question, like MCU fans here always do.
I don't know why MCU fans here always attack me when I ask questions about something that's shown in the movies or the trailers. What do MCU fans have against people asking questions? Do MCU fans just expect everyone to not question what's shown in the movies or trailers?
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 8, 2017 5:38:00 GMT
This is about him being a troll! I'm not a troll. I don't know Asgardian law. That's why I'm asking. Because usually, the eldest child is next in the line of succession. Unless the eldest child is female and their law gives preference to male children over female children. I'm just asking if Asgardian society gives preference to male children over female children. So either you're as stupid as you make yourself out to be or you're trolling. So which is it, because the film explained why she was banished. I'm not asking about why she was banished. I'm asking if Asgard is a misogynistic society that gives preference to female children over male children. Being banished has nothing to do with the line of succession since being banished doesn't remove someone's claim to the throne. Henry VII was banished but he still had a claim to the throne of England and did become King after Richard III died in the Battle of Bosworth.
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Nov 8, 2017 7:29:44 GMT
@weirdraptor
Just let him be. Let him ask his questions in peace. He isn't insulting anybody or even putting the MCU down. You're getting worked up over nothing.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 8, 2017 14:04:49 GMT
She was banished and exiled. That means she was subjected to attainder and removed from the line of succession. Banished and exiled doesn't remove someone's claim to the throne. Being subject to attainder does. If Odin wiped her from history he also subjected her to attainder.
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Nov 8, 2017 18:02:38 GMT
1. Like most people, I never read Norse mythology. So Hela is the Norse mythology version of Hades? And the Valkyrie (a group of female Warriors) are the Norse mythology version of the Amazons?
I haven't yet seen Thor: Ragnarok, DC-Fan, so I can't answer your second question, but I can answer this one. (I've been fascinated by both Greco-Roman and Norse mythologies since I was very young.) I don't know how it works in the comics, but in mythology Hel[⁄a] is the daughter of Loki and the giantess Angrboda. Like Hades, she rules over the dead, and her realm (Hel) is named after her, as Hades's is named after him. (Indeed, we derive our English word hell from this goddess.) Unlike Hades, however, who rules over all of the dead (then divided into the infernal Tartarus, the purgatorial Asphodel Meadows, and the paradisiacal Elysium), Hel only receives that portion of the dead who died from disease or old age. Those who died gloriously in battle are taken to the golden hall of Valhalla by Odin's warrior-maidens, the Valkyries. Odin, a solitary, lonely god (very different from Zeus), one should note, is as much a death god in Norse Mythology as Hel is (there is also another deity who keeps the souls of those who died at sea, Ægir, assisted by his wife Ran and their nine daughters); indeed, other than both ruling over the dead, Hel and Hades have precious few similarities. Hel is an unapologetic enemy of the Æsir gods in Norse mythology, whereas Hades is an Olympian god in the Greek (though he has been made a villain by, say, the movie Hercules--and Wonder Woman [?]). The Valkyries and the Amazons are also very different. Despite their prevalence in pop-culture, the Amazons' appearances in Greek myth are few and far between, whereas the Valkyries are ever-present in the Norse. The Amazons tend to be villainous when they appear, whereas the Valkyries are on the side of the gods. Both are warrior-women, but the Amazons are not goddesses (Heracles kills many of them in his 9th labor); the Valkyries are (with the caveat that Norse deities are not immortal as their Greco-Roman counterparts are). While the similarities between these disparate mythologies are often surprising because of the general lack of cultural diffusion, there are also a number of very striking differences. EDIT: I see that JudgeJuryDredd and merh have already replied similarly. Well, just some more reference notes for your interest, DC-Fan . As Merh said, you should read Norse (and Greek) mythology; it's wonderful.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 9, 2017 0:22:35 GMT
Banished and exiled doesn't remove someone's claim to the throne. Being subject to attainder does. If Odin wiped her from history he also subjected her to attainder. Irrelevant. Royal succession is based on bloodline and birthright. Neither banishment, exile, nor even attainder can change someone's bloodline or birthright.
Case in point, I'll use your own example of attainder. Before Anne Boleyn's execution, Henry VIII used attainder to annul their marriage and take away her title as Queen Consort. That meant their daughter Elizabeth was illegimate, which should've removed her from the line of succession.
But like Anne Boleyn's last words in Anne of the Thousand Days:
"Elizabeth - child of Anne the Whore and Henry the Blood-Stained Lecher - shall be Queen! And remember this: Elizabeth shall be a greater queen than any king of yours! She shall rule a greater England than you could ever have built! Yes - MY Elizabeth SHALL BE QUEEN!"
Henry VIII used attainder to annul his marriage to Anne Boleyn and take away her title and make their daughter illegitimate, but Elizabeth I still became Queen of England. That's because royal succession is based on bloodline and birthright, and not even attainder can change someone's bloodline or birthright.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 9, 2017 0:23:41 GMT
Being subject to attainder does. If Odin wiped her from history he also subjected her to attainder. Irrelevant. Royal succession is based on bloodline and birthright. Neither banishment, exile, nor even attainder can change someone's bloodline or birthright.
Yes it can. Children can be disinherited. When the disinherited kids get the Throne it's usually just because they have enough political support and a big enough army no one is willing to challenge them.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 9, 2017 0:27:48 GMT
1. Like most people, I never read Norse mythology. So Hela is the Norse mythology version of Hades? And the Valkyrie (a group of female Warriors) are the Norse mythology version of the Amazons?
you should read Norse (and Greek) mythology; it's wonderful. Thanks for the explanations. I read a lot of Greek mythology in college but that was about 3 decades ago. But I've never read Norse mythology. That's why I asked the questions.
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Nov 9, 2017 0:36:24 GMT
DC-Fan As I said to Lord Death Man on another topic, sorry to play the pedant, but that's not exactly true. Henry passed the Third Succession Act, July 1543 through Parliament to restore both Mary and Elizabeth to the line of succession. It was a pointed exception, as otherwise both would be illegitimate; by passing the act, Henry legitimized them, and they were restored to the succession not because of blood but because of law. Henry's only legitimate son to survive to adulthood took the throne after his father's death as Edward VI; he tried to bypass the Act and name Lady Jane Grey as his heir, at which he was unsuccessful because the ability to change a previous act rested with Parliament, which wanted to keep the succession. ...which is why poor Lady Jane was executed in the Tower in 1554. Again, it was a matter of law and the sovereignty of Parliament, not of blood and the arbitrariness of kings.
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Nov 9, 2017 0:36:46 GMT
you should read Norse (and Greek) mythology; it's wonderful. Thanks for the explanations. I read a lot of Greek mythology in college but that was about 3 decades ago. But I've never read Norse mythology. That's why I asked the questions. Of course, don't mention it! Thanks for the kind words!
|
|
|
Post by merh on Nov 9, 2017 8:54:32 GMT
Being subject to attainder does. If Odin wiped her from history he also subjected her to attainder. Irrelevant. Royal succession is based on bloodline and birthright. Neither banishment, exile, nor even attainder can change someone's bloodline or birthright.
Case in point, I'll use your own example of attainder. Before Anne Boleyn's execution, Henry VIII used attainder to annul their marriage and take away her title as Queen Consort. That meant their daughter Elizabeth was illegimate, which should've removed her from the line of succession.
But like Anne Boleyn's last words in Anne of the Thousand Days:
"Elizabeth - child of Anne the Whore and Henry the Blood-Stained Lecher - shall be Queen! And remember this: Elizabeth shall be a greater queen than any king of yours! She shall rule a greater England than you could ever have built! Yes - MY Elizabeth SHALL BE QUEEN!"
Henry VIII used attainder to annul his marriage to Anne Boleyn and take away her title and make their daughter illegitimate, but Elizabeth I still became Queen of England. That's because royal succession is based on bloodline and birthright, and not even attainder can change someone's bloodline or birthright.
Henry was a man. Odin is a God. Hela possesses certain powers banishment doesn't necessarily eliminate. As is pointed out in the movie, Hela draws power from Asgard so banishment reduced her power, but only so long as Odin was there to keep her away. Once she returned, her power grew. This being Marvel, not mythology. Ragnarok is something the Norse God's were aware of. Knowing Loki's place in it, they let him stay. For all the mischief he made, they let him stay. The Norse gods are very human. When the enemy sent Odin's old advisor's head back to him, Odin preserved Mimir's head so that it could continue to offer him advice Odin did not lose his eye in battle, but sacrificed it to gain certain knowledge. He sacrificed himself to himself to gain sacred runes. Odin is more a God of War & of kings & is known by over 100 names. He sends his 2 ravens out every morning & they return at dinnertime to tell Odin what was going on in the world. Thor was more the every man's god. Odin sought to make a powerful son by impregnating the embodiment of Earth making Thor the son of a sky God & earth. There was a fascinating usefulness to their mythology. Thor rides in a chariot drawn by 2 goats which he can eat The God Freyr possesses a ship which always has a favorable breeze, but can be folded up & placed in his pocket when not needed
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 9, 2017 17:13:42 GMT
I've been fascinated by both Greco-Roman and Norse mythologies since I was very young. As Merh said, you should read Norse (and Greek) mythology; it's wonderful. The most famous story in Greek mythology is The Illiad. What would you say is the most famous story in Norse mythology? Are there any famous stories in Norse mythology?
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Nov 9, 2017 17:54:19 GMT
DC-Fan In many ways, I'd say the most famous story in classical mythology is Homer's sequel, the Odyssey, but that's neither here nor here. OK, famous stories in Norse mythology... (One should note that, unlike the huge amount of material we have about classical [i.e., Greco-Roman] mythology, our primary sources about the Norse are really only the Christianized Eddas [Poetic and Prose].) Offhand, the theft of Thor's hammer is very famous, having been depicted in probably thousands of children's books, but I'd say the death of Bald[e]r is probably the key tale in Norse mythology. It is the moment that begins Ragnarok, the death of the gods, and turns Loki, previously a trickster-deity who helped the Æsir and was Odin's blood-brother, into an unremitted villain. In his memoir Surprised by Joy, C.S. Lewis wrote this about his discovery of the tale: The Baldr story has been cited and recited countless times, including in Longfellow's poem " Tegnér's Drapa," which prompted Lewis's experience. So, yes, offhand I would state the death of Baldr is the most famous story in Norse mythology--certainly the most seminal.
|
|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Nov 9, 2017 17:59:25 GMT
What would you say is the most famous story in Norse mythology? Are there any famous stories in Norse mythology?
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Nov 9, 2017 18:18:27 GMT
DC-Fan I should have added Wagner's Ring Cycle in there if only as a caveat, as it is without a doubt the most famous story based on Norse/Germanic mythology, even if our knowledge of it is based on Wagner and not on the original sources. It depends on where you parse Norse mythology as opposed to Germanic (they're nigh-identical) and whether one wants the original stories or not. We owe so much of elements in our cultural understanding to Wagner's interpretation thereof: the Flying Dutchman, the Ring Saga, the term "twilight of the gods," Tristan and Isolde, the Grail Quest, the Bridal March...
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 10, 2017 8:40:27 GMT
DC-Fan In many ways, I'd say the most famous story in classical mythology is Homer's sequel, the Odyssey The Iliad and The Odyssey are the 2 most famous stories in Greek mythology and an argument can be made for either as #1. It's similar to how Superman and Batman are the 2 most famous, popular, and iconic superheroes in American comics and an argument can be made for either as #1.
How about movies on mythology? I've seen the following movies that are based on Greek mythology:
Helen of Troy (1956) Hercules (1958) Hercules Unchained (1959) Jason and the Argonauts (1963) Clash of the Titans (1981) Troy (2004) Clash of the Titans (2010) Wrath of the Titans (2012) Wonder Woman (2017)
But other than the 3 Thor movies, I don't think I've seen any movies based on Norse mythology. Are there any good movies based on Norse mythology?
|
|