Can MCU fans answer these questions without attacks/insults?

1. One MCU fan defended MCU's constant jokes and 1-liners during battles by saying "I grew up with a couple of terminally ill cousins down the road. We laughed & had fun & didn't talk about the fact they wouldn't see their 18th birthdays. You can't be somber all the time"

Well, that's a case of someone who knows they have a terminal illness and is trying to use humor to take their mind off of their impending fate. It's a lot different than people who are in imminent danger suddenly cracking jokes and 1-liners. For example, recently hundreds of people attended a concert in Vegas when a sniper starting shooting at the crowd from a hotel window across the street. How many of those people do MCU fans here think were cracking jokes and 1-liners while they were running for their lives?

I'm pretty sure the answer is ZERO. That's 1 of the reasons (and a very valid and legitimate reason) why I give such low ratings to MCU movies. Because MCU movies always treat war and people getting killed as a big joke and always diminishes serious moments with a bunch of jokes and 1-liners.


2. MCU fans always criticize Superman for kissing Lois after the World Engine was destroyed and the Kryptonians were neutralized. But there was nothing wrong with Superman kissing Lois at that moment. The human race was almost destroyed in the war with the Kryptonians, but they survived the war so the natural reaction for anyone in that situation is to hug and/or kiss someone they love. Going back to the example of the Vegas sniper, many of the people attending the concert were there with family or friends. When the people who were running for their lives not knowing if they were going to make it out of there alive finally got to safety, how many of those people do MCU fans here think the 1st thing they did when they realize they were safe and unharmed was to hug and/or kiss someone they love?

I'm pretty sure most of the people surviving that traumatic experience the 1st thing they did when they realize they were safe and unharmed was hug and/or kiss someone they love. Sure, there were over 50 people killed and over 400 people injured. But for anyone surviving that traumatic experience, the natural reaction is to immediately hug and/or kiss someone you love. So are MCU fans here criticizing all the people who survived that shooting and the 1st thing they did was hug and/or kiss someone they love?


3. Why does Captain America always appoint himself judge and jury?

Age of Ultron - Strucker is unarmed and just standing there and not making any attempt to attack Cap. Strucker is no threat at that moment and all Cap has to do is arrest Strucker and then Strucker would stand trial and a jury would decide if Strucker was guilty of the crimes he would be charged with. But Cap appointed himself judge and jury and decided that Strucker should be punished without any trial so Cap kicked his shield (which is made of the strongest metal on Earth and is strong enough to stop Thor's hammer) with such violent force into Strucker that it sent Strucker crashing into the wall behind him. That was an brutal and violent assault and criminal action committed by Cap.

Civil War - Double-murderer Bucky has been arrested and will be extradited to stand trial so Bucky's lawyers would have their chance to present their arguments to a jury. But once again Cap appointed himself judge and jury and decided that Bucky shouldn't be punished for the 2 murders that he committed so Cap aids and abets Bucky to flee, forcing law enforcement to divert valuable resources and manpower away from protecting innocent people and catching other criminals in order to try to track down and arrest Bucky and Cap.

1 person appointing himself judge and jury is often the 1st step towards tyranny, and that's what Cap seems to favor by always appointing himself judge and jury. MCU fans have tried to defend Cap's tyrannical actions by claiming that Bucky wouldn't have received any trial, but that's false.

The media had reported that Bucky was wanted by the law. Bucky was arrested in public after a chase through a busy thoroughfare so there were plenty of witnesses who saw the police arrest Bucky. So there was no way the government could cover up Bucky's arrest or hold Bucky without a trial beacuse the media would've demanded to have access to the trial to report on it. So the government was definitely going to give Bucky a trial so Bucky's lawyers would have a chance to present their arguments to a jury. But like a tyrant, Cap appointed himself judge and jury and decided that Bucky shouldn't be punished for the 2 murders that he committed.


4. Why are MCU's "heroes" so ruthless and always hell-bent on revenge and vengeance?

In BvS, Superman saves Lex from getting pulverized by Doomsday, even though Lex kidnapped and threatened to kill his mother. In Wonder Woman, Diana could've squashed Doctor Poison (who created the poisonous gas that killed an entire village of people and that Steve Trevor made the ultimate sacrifice to destroy) with the tank but she showed mercy.

In Ragnarok, Thor puts the Grandmaster's neutralizer device on Loki's back and leaves his brother to be captured or killed. Loki was fortunate that the other prisoners found him, but Thor was a ruthless and merciless dickhead who just abandoned his brother to be captured or killed.