|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on May 17, 2018 18:36:03 GMT
The Gyllenhals are awesome! If it were up to me, I would have chosen them to play Han and Leia's children!  |
|
|
|
Post by Primemovermithrax Pejorative on May 17, 2018 18:39:38 GMT
The second was a much better actress.
I was going to say that she wasn't really good looking but everyone in that movie looked on the ugly side so I guess it didnt matter.
|
|
|
|
Post by anthonyrocks on May 17, 2018 21:17:09 GMT
Maggie Gyllenhaal
|
|
|
|
Post by Spike Del Rey on May 17, 2018 21:21:07 GMT
Katie Holmes. Maggie might be a better actress, but for the part of Rachel I thought that:
One, Katie did a fine job.
Two, and this was especially apparent in The Dark Knight, she's far better looking than Maggie, who IMHO is butt-ugly. I was simply not convinced that Bruce and Harvey would be such rivals for the affections of anybody who looked like her.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lebowskidoo 🦞 on May 17, 2018 22:03:14 GMT
Maggie rips your heart out in The Dark Knight, too bad Katie listened to Tom Cruise and dropped out of this sequel that went on to legendary status.
|
|
|
|
Post by James on May 17, 2018 23:37:10 GMT
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Katie was more apparent in her movie than Maggie was in hers. Still, even if there was less for Gyllenhaal to do after being killed midway(ish) in the movie, I still think the point goes to her for being a bit more fleshed out.
I didn't think Holmes was that bad, however.
|
|
|
|
Post by darkknightofgotham on May 18, 2018 0:21:31 GMT
I didn't really like either of them in the Batman movies. The Rachel character is one of few things I didn't like about the Nolan Batman flicks.
Katie is attractive, but didn't play the role very well. Maggie was OK, but I don't find her very attractive.
I would've personally preferred someone else for Batman's love interest. Vicki Vale would've been a much better choice imo.
|
|
|
|
Post by mslo79 on May 23, 2018 21:25:59 GMT
I don't care for either to be honest.
|
|
