|
Post by general313 on Dec 8, 2017 19:54:43 GMT
Well?
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Dec 8, 2017 20:54:59 GMT
I need more evidence.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 8, 2017 22:32:25 GMT
Of course not
Come on
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Dec 8, 2017 22:40:48 GMT
WHAT is truth? said jesting Pilate, and would not stay for an answer.
|
|
|
Post by maya55555 on Dec 9, 2017 1:26:47 GMT
I thought the gist of this HAD TO BE A FOUNDER of a religion?
|
|
|
Post by Karl Aksel on Dec 9, 2017 13:36:02 GMT
What sort of question is this? Of course he'd be for the death penalty. Notwithstanding Philo's and Josephus' accounts of his habitual cruelty and murders, it is inconceivable that Rome would have anyone governing a territory full of Jews who was not very much for the death penalty.
|
|
|
Post by drystyx on Dec 9, 2017 16:02:35 GMT
The more one researches the trial and execution of Jesus, particularly in what is not reported, the more one will probably deduce that Pontius, being at enmity with Herod and the priests, fully meant to make a statement with the execution of Barrabbas, the one who probably did harm to Roman authority, and meant to release Jesus, the "no threat" guy whose freedom would irk the lead Jews.
Which explains his disgust and washing of hands, which probably did happen, despite the way that apologists try to negate that. There really wasn't a reason to make that up. The feeble minded will claim it was made up to entice Romans to become Christians, but this doesn't make sense due to the fact that it would alienate most Roman citizens.
When Pilate lost this little political battle, it gave him something in common with Herod, which explains how their enmity was repaired. He thought the crowd would choose Jesus for release. Still, he had no qualms in crucifying the king. His only interest in the release was a political statement. That he was in authority. Therefore, he had to wash his hands and insist he was disinterested. Had to be a blow to his ego.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Dec 9, 2017 18:34:34 GMT
When in Rome...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2017 18:41:41 GMT
What sort of question is this? Of course he'd be for the death penalty. Notwithstanding Philo's and Josephus' accounts of his habitual cruelty and murders, it is inconceivable that Rome would have anyone governing a territory full of Jews who was not very much for the death penalty. Step back from the screen a bit, man...
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Dec 9, 2017 18:44:19 GMT
What sort of question is this? A question made by someone who has the audacity to not take things seriously.
|
|