|
Post by scienceisgod on Dec 10, 2017 0:40:29 GMT
I don’t see why people with obvious conflicts of interest are better suited to scrutinize than the general public. Take news for instance. All the articles that appear on mainstream sites like Washington Post have been reviewed by editors. Yet the comment sections are without exception, unanimous in opposing even the author’s right to exist. Comment sections were once welcomed by media as a “democratizing force”, but are now being turned off because they are “cesspools of ‘hate’”. Imagine if publicly funded scientific journals were required to have comment sections. Anyone who tried to pass off pseudoscience could get the rape threats they deserve.
Discuss:
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Dec 10, 2017 23:07:54 GMT
Who do you think deserve to receive rape threats out of curiosity? The hell is wrong with you?
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on Dec 11, 2017 19:17:18 GMT
I don’t see why people with obvious conflicts of interest are better suited to scrutinize than the general public. Take news for instance. All the articles that appear on mainstream sites like Washington Post have been reviewed by editors. Yet the comment sections are without exception, unanimous in opposing even the author’s right to exist. Comment sections were once welcomed by media as a “democratizing force”, but are now being turned off because they are “cesspools of ‘hate’”. Imagine if publicly funded scientific journals were required to have comment sections. Anyone who tried to pass off pseudoscience could get the rape threats they deserve. Discuss: No. We will not discuss.
|
|
|
Post by scienceisgod on Dec 13, 2017 16:52:48 GMT
Who do you think deserve to receive rape threats out of curiosity? The hell is wrong with you? Most of them, and that would be letting them off easy. You think a mere rape threat is in any way comparable to the damage caused by technocracy?
|
|
|
Post by marsexplorer on Dec 16, 2017 13:46:05 GMT
Who do you think deserve to receive rape threats out of curiosity? The hell is wrong with you? a mere rape threat By saying those words you lose any credibility that you could of had.
|
|
|
Post by scienceisgod on Dec 18, 2017 4:42:19 GMT
By saying those words you lose any credibility that you could of had. The whole point of this is to take credibility out of the equation.
|
|
|
Post by johnblutarsky on Jan 2, 2018 21:19:10 GMT
The Troll-O-Meter barely registers a 1/10 for this post.
|
|