|
|
Post by Carl LaFong on Dec 20, 2017 16:41:27 GMT
|
|
Father Jack
Junior Member
@arsebiscuits
Posts: 2,407
Likes: 1,190
|
Post by Father Jack on Dec 20, 2017 17:55:53 GMT
They've got a cheek calling themselves MK Dons.
|
|
|
|
Post by WullieFort on Dec 20, 2017 18:11:48 GMT
Could be
MK Montague-Fotheringham
or
MK United
or
MK Hammer
or
MK.com.
or
MK Biscuit Tin
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 20, 2017 19:23:20 GMT
Wimbledon should request some kind of fee for their name.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 20, 2017 19:31:21 GMT
An unnecessary display of petty animus. As things are going it's looking increasingly likely that AFC Wimbledon are going to eclipse MK Dons in the near future anyway. They're even poised to 'return' to Plough Lane (albeit a bit up the road, but still).
They're winning. Once they understand that the fruits of their anger and labour are actually paying dividends they'll relax.
|
|
|
|
Post by runie on Dec 20, 2017 20:24:21 GMT
well the true (hardcore)AFC actually abandoned wimbledon when they moved to palace anyway and a new afc was being set up pre MK move - then the few k that did go to selhurst games where not seen as true fans anymore but retained the dons tag.
its convoluted.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 20, 2017 23:17:07 GMT
So, while this whole situation sounds stupid, what were Wimbledon trying to prove with this pettiness?
|
|
