Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2018 2:56:04 GMT
Horrible, almost pointless movie. It's hampered mostly by Hopkins looking and sounding nothing like Hitchcock. He just looks like Hopkins with some thyroid condition. The book was much, much better and more interesting.
2/10.
|
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on Jan 18, 2018 2:58:32 GMT
Well it's not like Hopkins was a dead ringer for Richard Nixon either.
|
|
|
|
Post by movielover on Jan 18, 2018 2:59:57 GMT
7/10 - It could've been better, but it wasn't that bad. Just average.
|
|
Ban
Sophomore
@tepebenjamin
Posts: 423
Likes: 141
 
|
Post by Ban on Jan 18, 2018 3:11:22 GMT
Meh, pretty boring
|
|
|
|
Post by Archelaus on Jan 18, 2018 4:35:20 GMT
It was pretty good, but it could have been better. Despite that, Helen Mirren was fantastic. However, the film gives too much credit to Alma Reveille during the filming of Psycho even depicting her serving as director when Alfred is sick, which is historically inaccurate.
|
|
|
|
Post by moviebuffbrad on Jan 18, 2018 6:28:52 GMT
It was pretty good, but it could have been better. Despite that, Helen Mirren was fantastic. However, the film gives too much credit to Alma Reveille during the filming of Psycho even depicting her serving as director when Alfred is sick, which is historically inaccurate. They also made a point to say he mentioned her in his Oscar speech. IRL, his entire speech was five words long: "Thank you, very much indeed". Watching this movie is like reading the IMDb trivia section for Psycho, only it takes you two hours. |
|
|
|
Post by Fox in the Snow on Jan 18, 2018 6:42:46 GMT
I didn't mind it, but it was nothing special, 6/10Have you seen 78/52? An interesting companion piece. |
|
