Post by shadyvsesham on Mar 21, 2017 8:43:02 GMT
WEAK ARGUMENT! You're still too slow to understand it so I'll explain it to you slowly. It DOESN'T MATTER that there was free agency and the Cowboys were able to keep some of their players. EVERY TEAM back then was also able to keep some of their players, but NO TEAM other than the Cowboys were able to have 20 straight winning seasons. And no team since then has been able to have 20 straight winning seasons.
No, it matters, you can scream weak all day, do you see everyone is at this point laughing at you? Do you get it, what NE did was more impressive, ask Atlanta fans about all them pennants with 1 World series cash. 20 straight with 2 cashes, only you, a Dallas fanboy, is impressed. How does it feel being all alone. BTW screaming weak argument and stomping your feet impresses no one.
20 seasons, 2 titles
20 seasons, 2 titles
16 seasons, 5 titles
16 seasons, 5 titles.
Make the poll fan boy.
Nope, I destroyed ctown28's arguments just like I destroyed your weak arguments.
Of course you think that, which is why every comment Ive seen laughs at you. You can scream "victory" all day, whatever helps you sleep. He crushed you, I did, youre weak sauce.
LOL!!! You've just proven how dumb you are! You're trying to compare scoring 13 points in a Super Bowl in 1970 to scoring just 14 points in a Super Bowl in 2007, when the rules have been changed a lot to favor the offense heavily?
16-13, you lost buddy boy. This is also what you do, scream,"YOURE DUMB, IM RIGHT" how old are you 6? Little temper tantrum of a child.
Scoring 14 points in a Super Bowl in 1970 isn't bad. When the 1972 Dolphins completed the ONLY undefeated season in NFL history, they won the Super Bowl with 14 points. Scoring 14 points in a Super Bowl in 2007 is awful, especially when your playing against a defense ranked #17 in the NFL (ranked in the bottom half of the NFL) in points allowed. Brady choked I 007, plain and simple.
Whatever helps you sleep.
5 superbowls, 2 cashed checks. womp womp womp.
And at least 4 of those checks are bad checks, tainted by cheating and have asterisks.
Yet, no asterisks shown, sorry, you lose again. Brady has 5 rings, Armstrong is out the books, Rosie out the books, Reggie Bush didnt keep his heisman..Brady has all 5 rings, didnt give up one.
Your argument doesnt hold up.
NE was at 18*-0. But they couldn't get to 19*-0. So NE at 16 still means nothing because NE still doesn't have 20 and won't get to 20 (just like they couldn't get to 19*-0).
Who cares, again, what is more impressive baby boy
20 winning seasons 2 titles
16 winning seasons 5 titles
THEY GOT MORE S IN LESS WINNING SEASONS, LOL.
Like I said before, NE was at 18*-0. But they couldn't get to 19*-0. So NE at 16 still means nothing because NE still doesn't have 20 and won't get to 20 (just like they couldn't get to 19*-0).
No other team got to 18-0, and like youd say, WEAK ARGUMENT, Brady got more rings > Dallas.
Typcial dumb Patriots fan, trying to use revisionist history. The Cowboys have 5 (not 2) Super Bowl wins in addition to an NFL-record 20 straight winning seasons.
Youre not bright. Youre really not, we are discussing the 20 winning season, how many titles they have during that 20 winning season, durrr hurrr. Yes, they got 3 other titles, we all know. This is comparing the 16 season to the 20 season, jesus christ.....are you this insane?
Oh yeah, the Cowboys also have the highest winning percentage of all NFL teams. That's not highest winning percentage for 1 year or 5 years or 10 years or 15 years or 20 years. That's highest winning percentage for the entire history of the franchise.
And yet, same amount of super bowls NE has. No one is impressed by this nonsense, people want titles, not,"YAY WE GOT WINS, YAY WE GOT A 20 SEASON WINNING STREAK." They want the goods. Titles baby, it's about the titles.
Both the Cowboys and Patriots had their inaugural seasons in 1960 (the Cowboys in the NFL and the Patriots in the AFL before the merger). So they've had the same number of seasons. In addition to 5 Super Bowl wins, the Cowboys have the highest winning percentage among all NFL franchises. Clearly, the Cowboys have been a better and more successful franchise than the Patriots.
Nope, sorry fanboy. NE > Dallas
Like I said before, NE was at 18*-0. But they couldn't get to 19*-0. So NE at 16 still means nothing because NE still doesn't have 20 and won't get to 20 (just like they couldn't get to 19*-0).
When they do, theyll probably cash another check, thatll be 6 superbowls and Dallas will be behind. You aint going no where with Romo on your books, lmao.
The Cowboys have 5 (not 2) Super Bowl wins in addition to an NFL-record 20 straight winning seasons.
Youre as dense as a rock. Comparing the 20 winning season to NE, not all the titles. It's baffling to me how big of a Dallas fan boy you are.
Also Im a Texan fan, you cant call me a NE fan boy. I just respect true greatness, I respect NE winning streak with 5 cashes over Dallas 20 streak with 2 cashes. (YES WE KNOW, THEY WON 3 OTHER SUPERBOWLS, BUT NOT DURING THAT SPAN OF THE 20 STREAK, YIKES)
Oh yeah, the Cowboys also have the highest winning percentage of all NFL teams. That's not highest winning percentage for 1 year or 5 years or 10 years or 15 years or 20 years. That's highest winning percentage for the entire history of the franchise.
Yet, same amount of titles NE does.
Youre repeating yourself, youre getting weak and weaker.