|
Post by Wolverine10005 on Mar 27, 2022 12:09:50 GMT
I don't like the "Thor-esque" take on the character: please no sword, shield or any golden armour. That's just not my Wonder Woman.
Gadot is not the right choice. I would love a total reboot of the DCEU now, with new actors, and Robert Pattinson as Batman.
|
|
|
Post by Wolverine10005 on Mar 27, 2022 12:01:59 GMT
Any chance it will reach the 800 million dollars mark, before disappearing forever?
|
|
|
Post by Wolverine10005 on Mar 27, 2022 11:24:16 GMT
Which one?
He was excellent in all the X-Men movies where he starred in as Beast, but I deeply loved his performance and visual appearance in "Dark Phoenix", and regarded it as the best.
Nicholas Hoult was terrific.
My rank list:
1- Hoult's Beast in "Dark Phoenix" 2- Hoult's Beast in DOFP 3- Hoult's Beast in "First Class" 4- Hoult's Beast in "Apocalypse" (still brilliant)
|
|
|
Post by Wolverine10005 on Mar 27, 2022 2:06:20 GMT
Xavier from the X-Men movie universe appearing here proves that "Logan" is an alternate universe.
|
|
|
Post by Wolverine10005 on Mar 27, 2022 0:46:34 GMT
Do you live outside of the US and Canada? I was wondering if it wasn't available for you if you were living elsewhere.
I live in Italy. I'm Italian. I must check it out here.
|
|
|
Post by Wolverine10005 on Mar 25, 2022 23:46:06 GMT
It already came out on Disney+.
Great! I didn't catch it.
|
|
|
Post by Wolverine10005 on Mar 25, 2022 18:00:46 GMT
When?
|
|
|
Post by Wolverine10005 on Mar 24, 2022 23:08:14 GMT
Jesus Christ.
He's very ugly and has no "physique du role" in regards to Wolvie.
No please.
|
|
|
Post by Wolverine10005 on Mar 24, 2022 22:50:41 GMT
Hey!
|
|
|
Post by Wolverine10005 on Mar 24, 2022 22:48:43 GMT
Talking about the OPTICALS in MM2:
"They've smoothed over most of the transitions, with whatever 'grain' is left behind showing off that smeary effect around movement, and in some of them they even seem to have selectively blurred the chroma channels, like on the close-up of Max playing with the music box that then fades out or dissolves into the next scene. The colour literally bleeds out for a few pixels around his head, the pink skin leeching into the blu sky, and it looks so bad. Not every optical is as janky as that, a few even look half decent, but when a movie is as full of editorial opticals as MM2 it means that a LOT of material is going to be dupe negative and it still baffles me that even though we're in the 21st century there's no better way of dealing with them than this. Do the people performing these grades actually think that it makes them less conspicuous than if they'd left them alone? Sure, HDR is not a friend to grain/noise and the excessive grain that some opticals carry is going to be a problem in that space, but this kind of treatment is so heavy-handed it makes the opticals stand out like a sore thumb anyway. *le sigh*
There is the possibility of having opticals rebuilt digitally by using trims of the original camera negative and Warners have done this a few times for new transfers recently, like the opening title sequence of The Goonies and the dissolves/fades in Shawshank Redemption, but this is contingent on several factors like whether the trims were even archived to begin with (as they were sent off to the optical house to have the effects applied, this OG material was sometimes lost or discarded as happened with Taxi Driver's final showdown) and if they were, do the filmmakers have enough clout to push for the opticals to be rebuilt and will the studio want to spend the extra cash? The Goonies was produced by Señor Spielbergo, Shawshank is a beloved favourite that was lensed by Roger Deakins who is now a two-time Oscar-winner, and Coppola owns his movies anyway so he kept everything and redid the opticals for the latest transfer of The Outsiders. But most everyone/everything else just has to put up with it, it's a pity that no-one's come up with an innovative solution like using AI to extract the colour and luminance from a 1st gen equivalent of the optical shot (many opticals cut to a 1st gen version of the same shot moments later/prior) and overlay it onto a de-noised version of the optical. Or, if they don't want to spend any mo money than they have to, JUST LEAVE THE OPTICALS AS THEY ARE."
|
|
|
Post by Wolverine10005 on Mar 23, 2022 22:19:06 GMT
Was it ever really in the XCU? Collosus didn’t match.
Not only Colossus.
It's just another universe. That's good.
|
|
|
Post by Wolverine10005 on Mar 23, 2022 2:05:27 GMT
An old user of the Superhero Hype Board posted this in 2006:
"Why, at the end of one of the X3 T.V.spots, in the side profile of Wolverine's arm, with claws extended, we hear a gust of wind, and it looks like his claws wobble--like they're rubber! Also, in X2, when the cat is licking Wolverine's center claw, that too is wobbling."
EXPLANATION:
1- In both the sequences, Wolverine was moving/adjusting his fingers. The claws are connected to his hand muscles anyway, they are "near" the fingers, so if Logan moves the fingers, they (the claws) can SLIGHTLY shake. It's cleary evident that this "wobbling" is nothing more than Wolverine tightening his fingers.
I rewatched the two sequences, and the "wobbling" is 100% microscopical. Stupid nitpicking.
What do you think about it?
|
|
|
Post by Wolverine10005 on Mar 23, 2022 1:53:39 GMT
Out of the X-Men Cinematic Multiverse?
So people will finally stop trying to trim the first 2 Deadpool movies into the new timeline of the X-Men mainstream universe. Great.
|
|
|
Post by Wolverine10005 on Mar 22, 2022 1:11:27 GMT
Kelsey Grammer did a terrific job. I think he really captured that mature, thoughtful beast that could be a scientist, poet, wordsmith and a beast all in one.
Absolutely! Did you like his facial make-up and hair?
|
|
|
Post by Wolverine10005 on Mar 22, 2022 1:10:42 GMT
2. Logans hair and physique change throughout his appearances. Some look better than others. He definitely had a bit of a shaggy box top in this one tho.
I'm not American. English is not my native language. Do you mean that he resembles Shaggy from Scooby-Doo?
|
|
|
Post by Wolverine10005 on Mar 20, 2022 20:05:42 GMT
593.000 dollars worldwide today. It will not reach the 1 billion mark, let alone surpass it.
It's over.
Too bad, I was hoping for a great result.
|
|
|
Post by Wolverine10005 on Mar 20, 2022 19:56:35 GMT
No Ash, no party.
|
|
|
Post by Wolverine10005 on Mar 20, 2022 0:22:45 GMT
YOU RASCALS.
|
|
|
Post by Wolverine10005 on Mar 20, 2022 0:12:14 GMT
Because the lead character is 100% Russian.
|
|
|
Post by Wolverine10005 on Mar 20, 2022 0:06:21 GMT
I just rewatched "The Last Stand" after a very long time.
By the way:
1- Kelsey Grammer's make-up was terrific, but I was noticing that he looked like a MUCH OLDER Beast in comparison with Nicholas Hoult's Beast in "Dark Phoenix" (set in 1992). In terms of skin (it didn't look like a young skin) and hair (you can see thin white streaks here and there). Am I right? Kelsey was 50 at the time, anyway.
2- Logan's hair were way too "puffed up", swollen/bloated, he looks like Edward Scissorhands in some scenes LOL. Did you like his hair in this movie? Were they different from his hair in X1/X2?
3- Is it me or the Bridge Scene is IMPRESSIVE and ranks as one of the most spectacular sequences of the whole saga? Pure destruction.
|
|