|
Post by novastar6 on Feb 20, 2017 7:34:14 GMT
I know everybody's going to disagree with me, but Super Mario Bros...it's a fun movie, and that's all it was meant to be. Everybody complains 'ooh it's not like the game', then play the game...and how boring of a movie would that be, 90 minutes of them just hopping up and down ladders, etc?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2017 9:21:38 GMT
The Star Wars prequels
Honestly i think most movies that gets a lot of hate does not deserve it. Or people are exaggerating about how bad they are. There are few movies that are truly awful most movies are average.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2017 12:18:40 GMT
The first three Spider-Man movies. Come on guys, you loved them at the time! 1 is a classic and 3 is not as bad as everyone makes it out to be. (2 however is actually overrated; Sam just made the same movie 3 times) Now Amazing Spider-Man 1-2, those are bullshit. Finally we see what would have happened if someone with no love or understanding of the character made a movie about him. Nothing more than shlock trying to cash in on the fads of the time.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2017 13:10:55 GMT
Spider-Man 3: I can understand why people might not like the Sam Raimi SM movies in general, but it always baffled me how so many people could call the first two films masterpieces and then hate the third one for being "too silly." That's like hating "Toy Story 3" for being a lot like the first two movies in tone. It's just a bit hypocritical. Speaking of which, while I do agree about two criticisms (Venom in this movie sucks, and that dancing scene is atrocious), everything else just feels like either nitpicking or being way too harsh on the movie for not being close to its source material. As for the complaint about the movie being too cluttered, the only real casualty was Venom. Peter, Mary Jane, Harry, and Sandman all had fully fleshed out character arcs. I just feel like people took the butchering of one character and applied it to the whole movie. Ironically, "Iron Man 2" did a far worse job of balancing multiple characters and sub-plots, but got a free pass because people really love Robert Downey Jr, I guess (so do I, but that's not the point). But at least S3 was entertaining, whereas IM2 was outright boring. Should have just quoted your post and said yes to this. Spider-Man 3 might actually be my favorite of the trilogy. I roll my eyes when people say it's crap but act like 2 was a masterpiece- come on guys, he made the same movie 3 times! All are just as goofy and full of plot holes, 3 is not some dip in quality. I love them, and even I question why Peter takes his mask off about five separate times for five different people in the third act of 2 lol.
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Feb 20, 2017 15:09:20 GMT
The Star Wars prequels seem to get more (unnecessary) hate than everything and anything else combined.
|
|