Is it immoral to kill someone in a vegative state if...

Is it more 'convenient' to take someone off life support so that the community doesn't incur the costs of endlessly prolonging a life, or to abort a clump of cells that could potentially kill the mother and prevent her from having a 'normal' life, without incurring the cost and responsibility of 18+ years of financial and emotional support of a child she doesn't want?

That whole paragraph is lol.

...and yet my response was answered 'in kind' and n the same kind of language as your emotive exaggerated nonsensical reply.

No. If anything vegetative killings would be moral of abortion were considered moral. The two don’t contradict each other.

An embryo or early fetus is entirely dependent on someone else's body for its continued existence.

Consequently, its rights are entirely subservient to the needs and desires of the person in whom it is growing.

I would say a lot of abortions are mostly based off a woman not receiving enough emotional support from people when she needs it. People are first to care about an unborn child because of it being an innocent life, yet people still neglect the emotional state of the woman who in fact can also be considered an innocent life. I feel like these unnecessary abortions happen because circumstances like these leave some women to feel there isn't an another option, and not because it was more convenient based off what they wanted. Obviously they never wanted to be pregnant to begin with so they wouldn't want to have an abortion either. I think the act of abortion is typically more out of desperation and fear of shame than actually wanting to have one. 

I'm more so pro-life because I can't imagine abortions causing a positive effect of the woman's emotional state having one, especially if she was raped. If anything I feel like the concept of taking away an innocent life would cause her even more problems on top of what she previously had to go through. "I was raped and now I killed my un-born child" In that scenario you're taking a negative and making another negative out of it. How does that help the woman who's experienced trauma in any way?

But I could definitely imagine a woman deciding to go though the pregnancy and giving her child to adoptive parents who can raise and support it as positively affecting her because in that scenario she turned a negative into a positive. That makes a traumatizing experience such as rape easier to recover from knowing you did something good for the sake of someone else in return.  

I'm on the same page as the pro-life message but I still emphasize the emotional support for the woman because she is ultimately the one making the decision. 

For me the fundamental moral issue with abortion is bodily autonomy. If you forbid abortion you are compelling a woman to host a fetus as part of her body whether she wants to or not.

This would not apply to a person in a vegetative state, whose body functions independently.

The moral difference in my opinion is: John is a person. A fetus is not.