|
Post by moviebuffbrad on Aug 28, 2021 22:36:55 GMT
To be fair this isn’t a debate, it’s a movie. It is literally meant to entertain. movies with complex themes and messages entertain all the time as well, I mean since the dawn of all cinema. Since the dawn of storytelling... I'm pretty sure that Homer fellow had a little more on his mind than one eyed monsters. Now, some writers get too caught up in the subtext and lose sight of the plot. Personally, I don't think this Candyman movie did, nor do I like it just for talking about police brutality and "that fact alone". If anything, the police brutality is kind of a clunky afterthought at the end that could have been woven into the story better.
|
|
|
Post by Marv on Aug 29, 2021 2:37:34 GMT
To be fair this isn’t a debate, it’s a movie. It is literally meant to entertain. movies with complex themes and messages entertain all the time as well, I mean since the dawn of all cinema. Agreed, but you made it sound like entertainment should be secondary to understanding the message. I’m saying entertainment is first priority 99% of the time.
|
|
|
Post by darkreviewer2013 on Aug 29, 2021 8:03:17 GMT
Somewhat. The puppet trailer released some time ago was exceptionally creative and novel. I love the 1992 film and it'll be a tough one to match, but I'm cautiously optimistic about this new one.
|
|
|
Post by kolchak92 on Aug 31, 2021 21:19:39 GMT
Just saw it today. I really liked it a lot, but the original is better.
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on Aug 31, 2021 21:21:23 GMT
Somewhat. The puppet trailer released some time ago was exceptionally creative and novel. I love the 1992 film and it'll be a tough one to match, but I'm cautiously optimistic about this new one. Yeah that puppet trailer was a great mood piece.
|
|
|
Post by Vits on Nov 1, 2021 9:29:32 GMT
CANDYMAN PART 1 5/10 CANDYMAN PART 2: FAREWELL TO THE FLESH 4/10 CANDYMAN PART 3: DAY OF THE DEAD 3/10 Why is CANDYMAN PART 4 (yes, that's essentially the real title) the best of the franchise? Well, PART 1 relied too much on jump scares. PART 2 spent most of the running time recycling its predecessor's elements. PART 3 was another rehash and, to top it all, it had bad performances. This new installment tries new things by expanding the lore and it executes them with well-crafted set pieces. Unfortunately, it doesn't reach its full potential. You see, the original combined a slasher flick plot with a gothic romance atmosphere. In fact, when the title character's tragic origin is told (as an urban legend), the scene contains the visual elements of a happy dream. Not to mention that listening to what happened is much more powerful than showing it... so naturally, the first two sequels made the super duper smart decision of providing a flashback. Anyway, the social commentary was used as a companion to a story where the emotions kept rising and rising, culminating in an operatic finale. Here, it always feels like the individuals who appear on the screen are secondary to the script's exploration of racial issues in Chicago (which is even more relevant today than it was in 1992), especially during the ending. In fact, an entire scene is dedicated to a group of high school students trying to summon the evil spirit... and they're never referenced again! Usually, when a horror movie shows a death at that point in the story, it then shows the heroes reacting to the news, so they can reflect on the situation as a whole. Also, one of those girls might've survived, so I was interested to see how she was going to explain what happened. Because the movie chose this approach, the characters aren't very compelling... whether they were meant to be or not. 6/10 ------------------------------------- You can read comments of other movies in my blog.
|
|