|
|
Post by damngumby on Nov 3, 2017 16:21:15 GMT
You first need two sets of data to compare before analyzing it. Didn't they teach you that in Lawyer School?
There is zero indication that you possess the aptitude to attend law school. Hence the use of the mocking term - Lawyer School.
This is what ... the 3rd time that this has flown completely over your head?
Shall we go for 4?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jedan Archer on Nov 3, 2017 18:15:59 GMT
You first need two sets of data to compare before analyzing it. Lol figures! You are so impressively smart, I am sure you will get a Darwin Award when you grow up. If you do not find out how it goes with the data thing send a letter to RT or your local congress man. It's "law school", champ. Essentially, they teach law in law school. Mathematics and statistics you should already have learned in regular school. But you need those to run a law firm, uh sorry, lawyer firm for you... Lol, there is zero indication that you possess the aptitude to attend regular school. So that's how you deal with your intellectual deficits by desperately blabbering them away like a child. Like with the comparative data thing before. Has this ever worked out in real life? Hardly, as we see. No offence. |
|
|
|
Post by Hitman's Bodyguard on Nov 3, 2017 18:18:35 GMT
Spider-Man 2
Spider-Man
The Amazing Spider-Man
The Amazing Spider-Man 2
Spider-Man: Homecoming
Spider-Man 3
|
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Nov 3, 2017 18:30:03 GMT
There is no opinion here, only fact. I didn't say that it wasn't a bad movie, which would have been an opinion. I simply stated that just because it doesn't do anything new doesn't mean it's automatically bad. That's a fact. in your opinion You need to work on your reading comprehension. |
|
|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Nov 3, 2017 18:48:55 GMT
You need to work on your reading comprehension.  |
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Nov 3, 2017 18:52:04 GMT
For the record - your evasiveness indicates that you have absolutely no idea what you were talking about with the "data thing" ... or anything else, for that matter.  That's still funny! You barged into this conversation with nothing to contribute, and it looks like that is how you will exit. |
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Nov 4, 2017 0:02:58 GMT
Everything I've said is true and accurate and fair. No, you haven't. "Marvel Studios makes crappy movies." The actual truth is Marvel Studios has continuously made hit after hit, and their movies generally receive positive reviews, some even get great reviews. "Dictator Kevin Feige never gives his directors full control." Also false. We've told you time and time again that James Gunn has full control on the Guardians of the Galaxy franchise. Taika Waititi also said he got a lot of control on Thor: Ragnarok and Kevin Feige. Sure, he doesn't get along with all of his directors (Edgar Wright and Joss Whedon), but a prestige director Ryan Coogler is in the same spot as Edgar Wright, and I don't hear any problems behind the scenes of Black Panther. I could go on and on. Also, a lot of director woes with Marvel Studios disappeared ever since Ike Perlmutter lost control of the studio. |
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Nov 4, 2017 1:18:01 GMT
No, you haven't. "Marvel Studios makes crappy movies." The actual truth is Marvel Studios has continuously made hit after hit, and their movies generally receive positive reviews, some even get great reviews. "Dictator Kevin Feige never gives his directors full control." Also false. We've told you time and time again that James Gunn has full control on the Guardians of the Galaxy franchise. Taika Waititi also said he got a lot of control on Thor: Ragnarok and Kevin Feige. Sure, he doesn't get along with all of his directors (Edgar Wright and Joss Whedon), but a prestige director Ryan Coogler is in the same spot as Edgar Wright, and I don't hear any problems behind the scenes of Black Panther. I could go on and on. Also, a lot of director woes with Marvel Studios disappeared ever since Ike Perlmutter lost control of the studio. That is true. |
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 4, 2017 2:38:44 GMT
MCU has been promoting the Netflix shows as part of MCU for years. "It's all connected" is their tagline. So Iron Fist is as much Marvel as Iron Man. Everything I've said is true and accurate and fair. Except it isn't. The movie and TV divisions are different, the only thing that they have in common is that they are designed to take place within the same universe, but they are not made by the same team of creatives. That's irrelevant. MCU claims the TV shows as part of their shared universe so Iron Fist is as much an MCU product as Iron Man. Moreover, MCU has promoted their shared universe with the tagline "It's all connected" so MCU can't disavow Iron Fist or Inhumans from their shared universe now just because those shows got bad reviews. MCU promoted those shows as part of their shared universe so they live by their tagline, they die by their tagline. Switch "true", "accurate", and "fair" with "false", "inaccurate", and "unfair" and you are correct. No, everything I've posted has always been true, accurate, and fair. |
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 4, 2017 2:47:20 GMT
Just because you don't understand Bayes' Theorem and Bayesian Statistics doesn't change the fact that the Bayesian adjusted score is not only a valid measurement but also a more accurate measurement than using raw averages. So Tristan is 100% correct and you're 100% wrong. It's a fact that Wonder Woman has better reviews than SMH. Congratulations, Ace. You just confused the reviews with the "adjusted score". We already know how many positive and negative reviews there are for each movie. You can not alter a known fact with a statistical probability. SMH got better reviews. That is a fact that you can not dispute. The "adjusted score" is something entirely different. It is an attempt to rank the movies by deriving a number based on an algorithm that you don't understand, using input data that you don't know.  How on earth do you manage to get every single thing wrong? Eh, chum? No, the adjusted score is a normalization of scores using Bayesian Statistics (which is a field of Statistics taught at most major universities that have a Statistics Department) to account for the different number of reviews for each movie. It's more accurate than raw averages because raw averages don't account for the different number of reviews. Using raw averages would be like comparing a batter in baseball who had only 30 at-bats during the season to another batter in baseball who had 300 at-bats during the season.
Bottom line: Wonder Woman is a better-reviewed movie than SMH and that is a fact that you can't dispute: 50 Best Superhero Movies of All Time
|
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Nov 4, 2017 2:58:55 GMT
Except it isn't. The movie and TV divisions are different, the only thing that they have in common is that they are designed to take place within the same universe, but they are not made by the same team of creatives. That's irrelevant. MCU claims the TV shows as part of their shared universe so Iron Fist is as much an MCU product as Iron Man. Moreover, MCU has promoted their shared universe with the tagline "It's all connected" so MCU can't disavow Iron Fist or Inhumans from their shared universe now just because those shows got bad reviews. MCU promoted those shows as part of their shared universe so they live by their tagline, they die by their tagline. Switch "true", "accurate", and "fair" with "false", "inaccurate", and "unfair" and you are correct. No, everything I've posted has always been true, accurate, and fair. I never said Marvel has "disavowed" Iron Fist or Inhumans from the MCU, I'm saying that Marvel Studios and Marvel Television are two different factions of the company, in other words - Thor: Ragnarok is not produced by Marvel Television, Iron Fist is not produced by Marvel Studios. At the end of the day, yes, they're made by the same company but the creative teams involved are not the very same. You claim the footage captured by Peter Parker's phone runs to about or over 10 whole minutes, which is not true OR accurate as the video previously shared shows that is much less than that. You claim Ronan was defeated by a dance-off in the first Guardians of the Galaxy - this never happened as Ronan did not agree to Quill's challenge, the infinity stone was what defeated him, Quill's dancing just distracted him. The list goes on, and many times people have disproven you and you've either changed your tune or ran away to only reinstate these comments again on other topics. |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 4, 2017 3:02:33 GMT
MCU promoted those shows as part of their shared universe so they live by their tagline, they die by their tagline. One bad miniseries and one show that was always going to be disliked for political reasons...compared to the massive runaway success of everything else at the MCU. They can eat one tiny little fail here and there. Untrue, Ken. |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 4, 2017 3:03:58 GMT
Congratulations, Ace. You just confused the reviews with the "adjusted score". We already know how many positive and negative reviews there are for each movie. You can not alter a known fact with a statistical probability. SMH got better reviews. That is a fact that you can not dispute. The "adjusted score" is something entirely different. It is an attempt to rank the movies by deriving a number based on an algorithm that you don't understand, using input data that you don't know. How on earth do you manage to get every single thing wrong? Eh, chum? No, the adjusted score is a normalization of scores using Bayesian Statistics (which is a field of Statistics taught at most major universities that have a Statistics Department) to account for the different number of reviews for each movie. It's more accurate than raw averages because raw averages don't account for the different number of reviews. Using raw averages would be like comparing a batter in baseball who had only 30 at-bats during the season to another batter in baseball who had 300 at-bats during the season.
Bottom line: Wonder Woman is a better-reviewed movie than SMH and that is a fact that you can't dispute: 50 Best Superhero Movies of All Time
Thor Ragnarok will soon be on that update list...higher than WW. And it didn't need any of WW's artificial boosters to get there. |
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 4, 2017 3:08:19 GMT
No, the adjusted score is a normalization of scores using Bayesian Statistics (which is a field of Statistics taught at most major universities that have a Statistics Department) to account for the different number of reviews for each movie. It's more accurate than raw averages because raw averages don't account for the different number of reviews. Using raw averages would be like comparing a batter in baseball who had only 30 at-bats during the season to another batter in baseball who had 300 at-bats during the season.
Bottom line: Wonder Woman is a better-reviewed movie than SMH and that is a fact that you can't dispute: 50 Best Superhero Movies of All Time
Thor Ragnarok will soon be on that update list...higher than WW. Nope, Ragnarok has been dropping fast. At the end of Wednesday, Ragnarok had 6 rotten reviews since the reviews started coming in. By the end of Thursday, that doubled to 12 rotten reviews. Now it's up to 18 rotten reviews. So the rotten reviews tripled in just 2 days. A few days ago, Raganarok was at 99%. Now it's already dropped to 93%, which puts it below The Dark Knight. Ragnarok is dropping fast. |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 4, 2017 3:46:07 GMT
Thor Ragnarok will soon be on that update list...higher than WW. Nope, Ragnarok has been dropping fast. At the end of Wednesday, Ragnarok had 6 rotten reviews since the reviews started coming in. By the end of Thursday, that doubled to 12 rotten reviews. Now it's up to 18 rotten reviews. So the rotten reviews tripled in just 2 days. A few days ago, Raganarok was at 99%. Now it's already dropped to 93%, which puts it below The Dark Knight. Ragnarok is dropping fast. Nope, it'll power through when more positives come in. Dark Knight only got its' rating from Ledger dying making it immune to real criticism anyways, not because of the films' content. |
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Nov 4, 2017 3:51:11 GMT
Nope, Ragnarok has been dropping fast. At the end of Wednesday, Ragnarok had 6 rotten reviews since the reviews started coming in. By the end of Thursday, that doubled to 12 rotten reviews. Now it's up to 18 rotten reviews. So the rotten reviews tripled in just 2 days. A few days ago, Raganarok was at 99%. Now it's already dropped to 93%, which puts it below The Dark Knight. Ragnarok is dropping fast. Nope, it'll power through when more positives come in. Dark Knight only got its' rating from Ledger dying making it immune to real criticism anyways, not because of the films' content. Are you just saying this to provoke him? Because there's no way that's in the slightest bit of true. Heath Ledger could still be alive today, he could have turned into some Harvey Weinstein type pervert and it wouldn't stop The Dark Knight from running circles around most these other superhero movies. I like these MCU movies, I really do but even the best ones don't begin to compare. The direction, the cinematography, the score, the acting, the tone, the story, the use of practical effects over being a CGI fest and the way everything comes together etc, none of that changed from him being dead. |
|
|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Nov 4, 2017 3:53:03 GMT
Nope, Ragnarok has been dropping fast. At the end of Wednesday, Ragnarok had 6 rotten reviews since the reviews started coming in. By the end of Thursday, that doubled to 12 rotten reviews. Now it's up to 18 rotten reviews. So the rotten reviews tripled in just 2 days. A few days ago, Raganarok was at 99%. Now it's already dropped to 93%, which puts it below The Dark Knight. Ragnarok is dropping fast. Nope, it'll power through when more positives come in. Dark Knight only got its' rating from Ledger dying making it immune to real criticism anyways, not because of the films' content. But THOR 3 has multiple artificial boosters, such as a Thor / Hulk team up, Odin's death, and a female villain. |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 4, 2017 3:59:01 GMT
Nope, it'll power through when more positives come in. Dark Knight only got its' rating from Ledger dying making it immune to real criticism anyways, not because of the films' content. Are you just saying this to provoke him? Because there's no way that's in the slightest bit of true. Part of it is, you can't deny that Ledger's death made it be considered "bad taste" to not treat the film with kid's gloves. Especially with all the hype behind it. If he hadn't died, the plot failures I pointed out would've been exposed by critics in the initial reviews. It needed an omnipotent villain to work, the philosophies it preaches are full of holes, the third act was a rush-job, Two Face was a waste, the ending was silly....I can go on. It really benefited from having not much in the way of competition at the time, since the MCU hadn't started really yet. Just Iron Man 1. Then again, I've never been impressed by Nolan and thought he was more style over actual substance. All he's good at is writing one-note fanatics and archetypes instead of actual characters. Inception in particular gave me a headache when I realized it was a fairly generic movie about brainwashing. |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 4, 2017 3:59:46 GMT
Nope, it'll power through when more positives come in. Dark Knight only got its' rating from Ledger dying making it immune to real criticism anyways, not because of the films' content. But THOR 3 has multiple artificial boosters, such as a Thor / Hulk team up, Odin's death, and a female villain. MCU's done team ups before, Odin dying is a logical part of the Thor story and a female villain isn't something new. |
|
|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Nov 4, 2017 4:03:59 GMT
But THOR 3 has multiple artificial boosters, such as a Thor / Hulk team up, Odin's death, and a female villain. MCU's done team ups before, Odin dying is a logical part of the Thor story and a female villain isn't something new. 1 ) and they were ABs then, too 2 ) still an AB 3 ) it is for MCU films |
|
