|
Post by DC-Fan on Oct 12, 2017 4:36:12 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Oct 12, 2017 9:34:22 GMT
By the sounds of it, it's not really set in stone. But I'm sure something will happen, especially since the actresses have made it clear that they want it to happen. Not sure if they'll call it A force or something else, but a all female team should be fun.
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Oct 12, 2017 11:41:34 GMT
I am looking forward to Justice League featuring those Namor and Deathlok rip-offs Aquaman and Cyborg. How about you? Remind me, who did a movie first with these characteristics...A comic book hero created just before the US entry into World War 2, with superhuman abilities, carrying a shield, leads a multi-cultural team of soldiers (who at one point are all in London where they go to a local pub) in an attempt to defeat the Germans during a World War. The main villain and their scientist are developing a super weapon. The superhuman falls in love with an Allied agent in the process, but one of the happy couple dies when they sacrifice themselves whilst destroying an aeroplane that is carrying said weapon. And which criminal team-up movie came first...Guardians or Suicide Squad? Which film had two of the studios major heroes squaring up to each other for a big destructive battle...Age Of Ultron or BvS? And who was it that built a special suit first to beat that foe...Iron Man or Batman? Which film first had someone with "god" ancestry finding themselves adapting to life in a human civilization? Thor or Wonder Woman? Which film first had an attractive woman who was not all what she seemed until the last act of the film when she was revealed to be hero who helped save the day? Later to join a Superhero team which features the Billionaire hero she initially aided? Was that Iron Man 2 or BvS? We can sit here all day and break down plots, ideas, synopsis and similarities between films made by either studio, and come up with so called examples of "copying". Put your little stick away and stop trying to stir up the pot.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Oct 12, 2017 14:04:46 GMT
So long as they keep making movies, I'm good.
|
|
|
Post by seahawksraawk00 on Oct 12, 2017 14:08:03 GMT
Boohoo, go cry us a river you whiny bitch. DC is clearly copying Marvel. Marvel came out with Guardians and DC came out with Suicide Squad. Justice League is clearly a copy of the Avengers because it's the same set up. Steppenwolf attacking Earth before Darkseid. How's that any different than Loki attacking Earth before Thanos. Like I said, go cry us a river, bitch, and see where it gets you
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Oct 12, 2017 15:53:19 GMT
Gotham City Sirens has been cancelled and replaced by another proposed movie in DC's movie slate. There is also nothing to suggest that Marvel is planning an all-female team-up film as a reaction to this, as Tessa Thompson's comments suggest its just wishful thinking, nothing concrete.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Oct 12, 2017 16:45:38 GMT
If MCU was copying DCEU, they'd also be making crappy movies.
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Oct 12, 2017 17:07:22 GMT
If MCU was copying DCEU, they'd also be making crappy movies. so basically you admit that Marvel are copying DCEU! Kudos, I would never have deemed it possible that you are finally man enough to admit it, or was it just a Freudian slip, cupcake?
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Oct 12, 2017 17:17:56 GMT
But isn't the DCEU just a copy of the MCU?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 12, 2017 17:20:35 GMT
Boohoo, go cry us a river you whiny bitch. DC is clearly copying Marvel. Marvel came out with Guardians and DC came out with Suicide Squad. Justice League is clearly a copy of the Avengers because it's the same set up. Steppenwolf attacking Earth before Darkseid. How's that any different than Loki attacking Earth before Thanos. Like I said, go cry us a river, bitch, and see where it gets you The Justice League is 100% an Avengers rip-off. If the DCU had any shame left they'd be embarrassed. They even got in the Avengers director just to make sure. Coming off the back of WW, a direct copy of the MCU formula and their admission that they're going to use end-credit scenes and more humor in their movies, WB are essentially raising the white flag and agreeing that if you can't beat 'em, join 'em. This must be a really bitter pill to swallow for all of those staunch DCU fanatics who championed Hack Snyder's miserable doom and gloom approach and mocked the style of movie making their own team is now on the cusp of fully embracing.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Oct 12, 2017 19:22:01 GMT
If MCU was copying DCEU, they'd also be making crappy movies. so basically you admit that Marvel are copying DCEU! Kudos, I would never have deemed it possible that you are finally man enough to admit it, or was it just a Freudian slip, cupcake?
Since I don't think MCU is making crappy movies (quite the opposite), that would be a big ol' negatory, Sparky. ... However, you just admitted that DCEU is making crappy movies. Thanks for playing!
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Oct 12, 2017 19:36:52 GMT
so basically you admit that Marvel are copying DCEU! Kudos, I would never have deemed it possible that you are finally man enough to admit it, or was it just a Freudian slip, cupcake?
Since I don't think MCU is making crappy movies (quite the opposite), that would be a big ol' negatory, Sparky. ... However, you just admitted that DCEU is making crappy movies. Thanks for playing! Since I know DCEU isn't making crappy movies (quite the opposite: Oscar blessings, best reviewed CBM ever, already iconic music, media sensations after only 4 movies!!!), that would be a big ol' negatory, sweetcheeks .... And with this confession of yours you finally learned to properly quote too. It may be a small step for humanity, but it's a giant intellectual leap for you, cupcake.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Oct 12, 2017 20:35:21 GMT
Throwing your initial reply under the bus already, champ? That was a quick retreat!
I prefer to keep quotes short and to the point. Particularly when quoting an individual who babbles.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Oct 12, 2017 20:52:22 GMT
Since I don't think MCU is making crappy movies (quite the opposite), that would be a big ol' negatory, Sparky. ... However, you just admitted that DCEU is making crappy movies. Thanks for playing! Since I know DCEU isn't making crappy movies (quite the opposite: Oscar blessings, best reviewed CBM ever, already iconic music, media sensations after only 4 movies!!!), that would be a big ol' negatory, sweetcheeks .... And with this confession of yours you finally learned to properly quote too. It may be a small step for humanity, but it's a giant intellectual leap for you, cupcake. The only Oscar they has is for makeup. You clinging to that for dear life is rather embarrassing. It's like when Halle Berry accepted her Razzie for Catwoman while clinging to her Oscar for dear life. Wonder Woman was reviewed the way it was due to the artificial boosters. A decent movie that comes after trash will always look better than it really is. Music? What Iconic Music? There's Zimmer and his blaring wall of noise but that's not Iconic. And being infamous is way different from being famous. The DCEU movies are infamous, not media sensations. Still doesn't change that the movies have been garbage except for WW.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Oct 13, 2017 0:06:43 GMT
who did a movie first with these characteristics...A comic book hero created just before the US entry into World War 2, with superhuman abilities, carrying a shield, leads a multi-cultural team of soldiers (who at one point are all in London where they go to a local pub) in an attempt to defeat the Germans during a World War. The main villain and their scientist are developing a super weapon. The superhuman falls in love with an Allied agent in the process, but one of the happy couple dies when they sacrifice themselves whilst destroying an aeroplane that is carrying said weapon. That movie hasn't been made yet. The Wonder Woman movie takes place at the end of World War I, not the beginning of World War II. So you're off by 2 decades. And neither 1 of the happy couple I The First Avenger died or sacrificed themselves. So that movie hasn't been made yet.
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Oct 13, 2017 0:10:27 GMT
who did a movie first with these characteristics...A comic book hero created just before the US entry into World War 2, with superhuman abilities, carrying a shield, leads a multi-cultural team of soldiers (who at one point are all in London where they go to a local pub) in an attempt to defeat the Germans during a World War. The main villain and their scientist are developing a super weapon. The superhuman falls in love with an Allied agent in the process, but one of the happy couple dies when they sacrifice themselves whilst destroying an aeroplane that is carrying said weapon. That movie hasn't been made yet. The Wonder Woman movie takes place at the end of World War I, not the beginning of World War II. So you're off by 2 decades. We've been through this before. Go back....read carefully..see what was written Again, you have been told this before..."sacrifice" does NOT only mean an act resulting death
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Oct 13, 2017 4:03:39 GMT
who did a movie first with these characteristics...A comic book hero created just before the US entry into World War 2, with superhuman abilities, carrying a shield, leads a multi-cultural team of soldiers (who at one point are all in London where they go to a local pub) in an attempt to defeat the Germans during a World War. The main villain and their scientist are developing a super weapon. The superhuman falls in love with an Allied agent in the process, but one of the happy couple dies when they sacrifice themselves whilst destroying an aeroplane that is carrying said weapon. That movie hasn't been made yet. The Wonder Woman movie takes place at the end of World War I, not the beginning of World War II. So you're off by 2 decades. And neither 1 of the happy couple I The First Avenger died or sacrificed themselves. So that movie hasn't been made yet. No, but Peggy Carter died in Civil War. Steve sacrificed a life with her to save the world at the end of The First Avenger.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Oct 13, 2017 4:20:10 GMT
That movie hasn't been made yet. The Wonder Woman movie takes place at the end of World War I, not the beginning of World War II. So you're off by 2 decades. And neither 1 of the happy couple I The First Avenger died or sacrificed themselves. So that movie hasn't been made yet. No, but Peggy Carter died in Civil War. After living into her 90s. How is being healthy enough to live 90+ years a sacrifice? Steve sacrificed a life with her That's a weak argument. 1st, Steve Rogers woke up in 2011 a healthy, young man. He still had plenty of opportunity to have relationships with women. Heck, he was banging Peggy Carter's niece Sharon Carter before Peggy Carter's corpse even got cold. So it's not like Rogers didn't have any more opportunities to have relationships with women. 2nd, "but Peggy Carter was the love of his life". So what? They weren't even married so there was no guarantee that they would even have a life together. Sure, Peggy Carter may have been Steve's 1st love, but how many people marry the 1st person they ever fell in love with? What if they would've broken up? Then they wouldn't have had a life together and there wouldn't be any "sacrifice". So this is a weak argument since there's no guarantee that would get married and have a life together. Heck, he could've survived the war and then a week after the war got killed in a car accident. But he didn't get killed. He survived the war and woke up in 2011 a healthy, young man with plenty of opportunity to have relationships with women. So NO, Steve Rogers made NO SACRIFICE at all.
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Oct 13, 2017 4:34:09 GMT
No, but Peggy Carter died in Civil War. After living into her 90s. How is being healthy enough to live 90+ years a sacrifice? Steve sacrificed a life with her That's a weak argument. 1st, Steve Rogers woke up in 2011 a healthy, young man. He still had plenty of opportunity to have relationships with women. Heck, he was banging Peggy Carter's niece Sharon Carter before Peggy Carter's corpse even got cold. So it's not like Rogers didn't have any more opportunities to have relationships with women. 2nd, "but Peggy Carter was the love of his life". So what? They weren't even married so there was no guarantee that they would even have a life together. Sure, Peggy Carter may have been Steve's 1st love, but how many people marry the 1st person they ever fell in love with? What if they would've broken up? Then they wouldn't have had a life together and there wouldn't be any "sacrifice". So this is a weak argument since there's no guarantee that would get married and have a life together. Heck, he could've survived the war and then a week after the war got killed in a car accident. But he didn't get killed. He survived the war and woke up in 2011 a healthy, young man with plenty of opportunity to have relationships with women. So NO, Steve Rogers made NO SACRIFICE at all.I didn't say living in your 90s was a sacrifice, you said neither couple died. Peggy Carter died in Civil War. 1. Now that's a weak argument. He promised Peggy a dance, a date. Yeah, he could've start a new relationship with another woman, but he didn't. It took the death of the love of his life to move on and start seeing other women. 2. Just because they weren't married, it didn't mean he loved her. He wanted to spend the rest of his life with her, and eventually get married and have a family. Also it's hard to find true love again. Believe, I've tried, and still searching after my first love broke my heart. Now you're truly grasping for straws.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Oct 13, 2017 5:26:42 GMT
Just because they weren't married, it didn't mean he loved her. He wanted to spend the rest of his life with her And what guarantee was there that she wanted to spend the rest of her life with him? Did he propose? Did she accept his proposal? No? So there was no guarantee that she wanted to spend the rest of her life with him. She might've dumped him after the war. So NO, Steve Rogers didn't sacrifice a life with Peggy Carter because 1) they weren't married and 2) they weren't even engaged. Steve Rogers woke up in 2011 as a healthy, young man with plenty of opportunity to have relationships with women. So NO, Steve Rogers made NO SACRFICE at all.
|
|