|
Post by King Conan on Oct 29, 2017 20:04:24 GMT
And now we have another proof, that fanboys can't accept other peoples opinion.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2017 20:05:48 GMT
And now we have another proof, that fanboys can't accept other peoples opinion. scabab , if you'd do the honors?
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Oct 30, 2017 13:06:01 GMT
I stopped watching anything with Campea. And that final word attitude is the reason why. Was so glad when AMC Movie Talk ended and he stopped being the main host of everything. Schnepp was the only person keeping me watching that. I like Stuckman's reviews. Only thing that got to me on him is that he had this soft authority on stuff because "he grew up with it." That kinda ended when people started pointing it out to him and he started using it as a joke. I used to like Campea, but as the years have gone on his true colors began to pop-up more. He'll change his tune whenever he feels that he's in the "minority"(i.e. the Star Wars prequels) and he'll exaggerate every piece of information he comes across with. I really liked Schnepp when he was an occasional guest on those talk shows, but I feel he's overstayed his welcome with the AMC/Collider crew and should concentrate more on what he's actually better suited for, directing and writing, specially for animation - His episodes of The Venture Bros. and Metalocolypse were pretty darn awesome. He can talk a good deal about the stuff he likes, but the stuff he doesn't like he doesn't exactly project the best personality. I think Campea was worse when he was with AMC. I those times when he changed his tune is more for when he had to sell a movie for them. He sounded like an advertisement a lot. Yeah, I haven't watch the Collider shows as much. So Schnepp hasn't gotten to that level yet. But the person that is starting to get to that level is Harloff... It's like he's the new Campea. More a fan of Ellis. Oh and about the subject of this thread. I've only seen Jahns on the AMC/Collider shows. Not a fan. Maybe it's the way he talks. Like he always has a cold, with something stuck in his throat and he's trying to talk around it.
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Oct 30, 2017 13:57:44 GMT
It surprises me. i remember in 2015 when he gave AOU and awestometacular rating. He gave Fury Road just a " buy it on bluray" and said it will not get near hist top 10. It ended up on nr 4, and AOU ended outside the top. I'm surpised because he usually loves MCU movies the first time he sees one
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Oct 30, 2017 14:01:51 GMT
It surprises me. i remember in 2015 when he gave AOU and awestometacular rating. He gave Fury Road just a " buy it on bluray" and said it will not get near hist top 10. It ended up on nr 4, and AOU ended outside the top. I'm surpised because he usually loves MCU movies the first time he sees one It doesn't surprise me at all. He's an idiot who doesn't know how to critique or analyze anything. I have no clue how his inane, stuttering, shtick and jump-cut editing became a thing. JJ is a complete tool.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2017 14:28:42 GMT
The snowflakes are melting.
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Oct 30, 2017 14:33:43 GMT
It surprises me. i remember in 2015 when he gave AOU and awestometacular rating. He gave Fury Road just a " buy it on bluray" and said it will not get near hist top 10. It ended up on nr 4, and AOU ended outside the top. I'm surpised because he usually loves MCU movies the first time he sees one It doesn't surprise me at all. He's an idiot who doesn't know how to critique or analyze anything. I have no clue how his innate, stuttering, shtick and jump-cut editing became a thing. JJ is a complete tool. I prefer Stuckman who knows other movies besides blockbusters and knows better how to express himself. I was just pointing that he always loved MCU movies and had little to complain about. but yeah, both JJ's are tools. Him and Abrams
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Oct 30, 2017 14:40:05 GMT
It surprises me. i remember in 2015 when he gave AOU and awestometacular rating. He gave Fury Road just a " buy it on bluray" and said it will not get near hist top 10. It ended up on nr 4, and AOU ended outside the top. I'm surpised because he usually loves MCU movies the first time he sees one Well...Fury Road was a good movie, but it was really just a big budget remake of Road Warrior with some feminist stuff thrown in.
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Oct 30, 2017 14:55:01 GMT
It surprises me. i remember in 2015 when he gave AOU and awestometacular rating. He gave Fury Road just a " buy it on bluray" and said it will not get near hist top 10. It ended up on nr 4, and AOU ended outside the top. I'm surpised because he usually loves MCU movies the first time he sees one Well...Fury Road was a good movie, but it was really just a big budget remake of Road Warrior with some feminist stuff thrown in. and a lot better than AOU for sure
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Oct 30, 2017 14:56:51 GMT
Well...Fury Road was a good movie, but it was really just a big budget remake of Road Warrior with some feminist stuff thrown in. and a lot better than AOU for sure Not really, AOU suffered from audiences once again wanting the villain to be the star of the movie instead of the heroes...and getting pissed that once again the movie was about the heroes. Fury Road had great visuals and lots of practical effects, but story wise it's just one giant chase scene.
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Oct 30, 2017 14:59:40 GMT
and a lot better than AOU for sure Not really, AOU suffered from audiences once again wanting the villain to be the star of the movie instead of the heroes...and getting pissed that once again the movie was about the heroes. yeah, no. but keep telling yourself what you want to hear
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Oct 30, 2017 15:01:03 GMT
and a lot better than AOU for sure Not really, AOU suffered from audiences once again wanting the villain to be the star of the movie instead of the heroes...and getting pissed that once again the movie was about the heroes. so it was the audiences' fault that AOU sucked so hard. Got it.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Oct 30, 2017 15:04:31 GMT
Not really, AOU suffered from audiences once again wanting the villain to be the star of the movie instead of the heroes...and getting pissed that once again the movie was about the heroes. yeah, no. but keep telling yourself what you want to hear It's true, before the MCU most CBMs were only really interested in making the villain stand out as opposed to the hero. Even after 17 movies people are still upset that MCU continues to make stories about their heroes and not their villains.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Oct 30, 2017 15:04:51 GMT
Not really, AOU suffered from audiences once again wanting the villain to be the star of the movie instead of the heroes...and getting pissed that once again the movie was about the heroes. so it was the audiences' fault that AOU sucked so hard. Got it. If you call being rated fresh "sucking"...
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Oct 30, 2017 15:06:07 GMT
yeah, no. but keep telling yourself what you want to hear It's true, before the MCU most CBMs were only really interested in making the villain stand out as opposed to the hero. Even after 17 movies people are still upset that MCU continues to make stories about their heroes and not their villains. so how come people(including me) loved the first Avengers but were dissapointed in AOU?
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Oct 30, 2017 15:07:28 GMT
It's true, before the MCU most CBMs were only really interested in making the villain stand out as opposed to the hero. Even after 17 movies people are still upset that MCU continues to make stories about their heroes and not their villains. so how come people(including me) loved the first Avengers but were dissapointed in AOU? I dunno, I'm not a mind reader. Maybe because Avengers had Loki as the villain instead of Ultron?
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Oct 30, 2017 15:10:06 GMT
so how come people(including me) loved the first Avengers but were dissapointed in AOU? I dunno, I'm not a mind reader. Maybe because Avengers had Loki as the villain instead of Ultron? No,i didn't care for Loki in the first one. i actually liked Loki more in Thor 1 and even Thor 2( he was about the only thing i liked besides Frigga's funeral)
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Oct 30, 2017 15:13:04 GMT
so it was the audiences' fault that AOU sucked so hard. Got it. If you call being rated fresh "sucking"... I call it what everybody calls it apart from some MCU fanatics: a massive disappointment and studio tempered abomination. Like a delicious fruit that turned into foul ashes within a blink of an eye.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Oct 30, 2017 15:13:31 GMT
I dunno, I'm not a mind reader. Maybe because Avengers had Loki as the villain instead of Ultron? No,i didn't care for Loki in the first one. i actually liked Loki more in Thor 1 and even Thor 2( he was about the only thing i liked besides Frigga's funeral) Ironic, seeing how Thor 2 was more or less humorless. You'd think that totally appeal to people who detract the MCU...
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Oct 30, 2017 15:19:06 GMT
No,i didn't care for Loki in the first one. i actually liked Loki more in Thor 1 and even Thor 2( he was about the only thing i liked besides Frigga's funeral) Ironic, seeing how Thor 2 was more or less humorless. You'd think that totally appeal to people who detract the MCU... Yeah, totally humorless, it almost felt like Schindler's List
|
|