|
Post by Cinemachinery on Feb 16, 2018 17:25:40 GMT
If these points have nothing to do with each other, then you are basically saying that the following post of yours was completely pointless. Are you seriously insinuating that only a society that has chip implementation can be considered dystopian?!? There are dozens of different ways a society can dystopian. That's my point. That point came after the point I made when I pointed out your false comparison between dystopia and "the end of the world." I think he's just saying that there are many ways a society can be dystopian, and "not being able to remove a chip" isn't necessarily a defining factor.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2018 17:31:06 GMT
Are you seriously insinuating that only a society that has chip implementation can be considered dystopian?!? There are dozens of different ways a society can dystopian. That's my point. That point came after the point I made when I pointed out your false comparison between dystopia and "the end of the world." I think he's just saying that there are many ways a society can be dystopian, and "not being able to remove a chip" isn't necessarily a defining factor. No, that's what I'm saying. He said that I mentioned the "end of the world." His evidence was that I mentioned "dystopia." I think you and I would be in agreement by saying that talking about a dystopia does not necessarily correlate to a discussion on Armageddon. It can suggest that, but it doesn't have to, and, in most cases, doesn't. And for the record, per Erjen's original point, nobody was talking about the end of the world on this thread and phludowin is just flat-out wrong in attributing it to me. Phludowin obviously has an incorrect and narrow perception of what a dystopia is.
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Feb 16, 2018 17:53:10 GMT
|
|
|
Post by goz on Feb 16, 2018 20:48:24 GMT
I think he's just saying that there are many ways a society can be dystopian, and "not being able to remove a chip" isn't necessarily a defining factor. No, that's what I'm saying. He said that I mentioned the "end of the world." His evidence was that I mentioned "dystopia." I think you and I would be in agreement by saying that talking about a dystopia does not necessarily correlate to a discussion on Armageddon. It can suggest that, but it doesn't have to, and, in most cases, doesn't. And for the record, per Erjen's original point, nobody was talking about the end of the world on this thread and phludowin is just flat-out wrong in attributing it to me. Phludowin obviously has an incorrect and narrow perception of what a dystopia is. If I may interrupt here, I think that there is a subtext here of which you, being a newish poster are unaware. In the past Erjenious has been notorious for posting end of the world 'Armageddon' type posts and stupid YouTube videos on this and related topics, so there is a kind of assumption about what he thinks and feels on the subject which is, in this case unwritten butt 'understood' by the older posters.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2018 21:10:01 GMT
No, that's what I'm saying. He said that I mentioned the "end of the world." His evidence was that I mentioned "dystopia." I think you and I would be in agreement by saying that talking about a dystopia does not necessarily correlate to a discussion on Armageddon. It can suggest that, but it doesn't have to, and, in most cases, doesn't. And for the record, per Erjen's original point, nobody was talking about the end of the world on this thread and phludowin is just flat-out wrong in attributing it to me. Phludowin obviously has an incorrect and narrow perception of what a dystopia is. If I may interrupt here, I think that there is a subtext here of which you, being a newish poster are unaware. In the past Erjenious has been notorious for posting end of the world 'Armageddon' type posts and stupid YouTube videos on this and related topics, so there is a kind of assumption about what he thinks and feels on the subject which is, in this case unwritten butt 'understood' by the older posters. I appreciate it, but I kind of assumed as such, based on his other posts and comments from folks who don't seem to like him too much. I'm just a stickler for words and their meanings. Heck, it wasn't even my argument to take up until my name was dropped. If Phludowin had stuck to quoting Erjen, I wouldn't have responded. But instead he attributed something to me and it wasn't true, so I posted on it. I'm sure Erjen has posted a lot of stuff most of you find particularly cartoonish. It's not cool to talk about Leviathan or Behemoth or nephilim or how Amelkites weren't really humans or a literal 144-hour creation period among even Christian circles these days, let alone the shark tank that is this board. I'm sure there is subtext there. Admin told me how far back y'all go.
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Feb 16, 2018 21:53:01 GMT
I think he's just saying that there are many ways a society can be dystopian, and "not being able to remove a chip" isn't necessarily a defining factor. No, that's what I'm saying. He said that I mentioned the "end of the world." His evidence was that I mentioned "dystopia." I think you and I would be in agreement by saying that talking about a dystopia does not necessarily correlate to a discussion on Armageddon. It can suggest that, but it doesn't have to, and, in most cases, doesn't. And for the record, per Erjen's original point, nobody was talking about the end of the world on this thread and phludowin is just flat-out wrong in attributing it to me. Phludowin obviously has an incorrect and narrow perception of what a dystopia is. I wasn't talking about Armageddon. That's a fairy tale published in the Bible, better known as the Apocalypse/Revelations. I agree that you had not talked about that before. However, what people understand by "End of the world" is apparently unclear. I was talking about the "End of the world" in a more general sense. Here's what I perceive regarding this thread. @graham asked The Herald Erjen a question. This one. So is the basis of the fear that the Big Book O Magic says that you have to have "a mark" and that "a mark" has been translated into "a microchip" and this therefore means the end of the world is coming? Because the end of the world isn't likely to come anytime soon. Then The Herald Erjen replied with a non sequitur: No one here is talking about "the end of the world" except you. It is of course possible to assume, that The Herald Erjen believes that asking questions about xxx means talking about xxx. But then, The Herald Erjen posted this: No, nobody is talking about it [the end of the world, n.b.]. Some people just like to drop hints whilst jerking themselves off to the prospect. Baloney. Baloney means disagreement. But in this case, the disagreement is misplaced, because, as goz mentioned, The Herald Erjen has a history of posting videos as supposed evidence that the stuff from Revelations, or other tales from the Bible, is coming true. So, I may have made a non intuitive choice when I mentioned you (@winterssuicide) as someone talking about the end of the world. There's a much more obvious choice: The Herald Erjen. Conclusion: The Herald Erjen has been talking about the "End of the world", and has proven @graham right.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2018 21:58:57 GMT
No, that's what I'm saying. He said that I mentioned the "end of the world." His evidence was that I mentioned "dystopia." I think you and I would be in agreement by saying that talking about a dystopia does not necessarily correlate to a discussion on Armageddon. It can suggest that, but it doesn't have to, and, in most cases, doesn't. And for the record, per Erjen's original point, nobody was talking about the end of the world on this thread and phludowin is just flat-out wrong in attributing it to me. Phludowin obviously has an incorrect and narrow perception of what a dystopia is. I wasn't talking about Armageddon. That's a fairy tale published in the Bible, better known as the Apocalypse/Revelations. I agree that you had not talked about that before. However, what people understand by "End of the world" is apparently unclear. I was talking about the "End of the world" in a more general sense. Here's what I perceive regarding this thread. @graham asked The Herald Erjen a question. This one. So is the basis of the fear that the Big Book O Magic says that you have to have "a mark" and that "a mark" has been translated into "a microchip" and this therefore means the end of the world is coming? Because the end of the world isn't likely to come anytime soon. Then The Herald Erjen replied with a non sequitur: No one here is talking about "the end of the world" except you. It is of course possible to assume, that The Herald Erjen believes that asking questions about xxx means talking about xxx. But then, The Herald Erjen posted this: Baloney means disagreement. But in this case, the disagreement is misplaced, because, as goz mentioned, The Herald Erjen has a history of posting videos as supposed evidence that the stuff from Revelations, or other tales from the Bible, is coming true. So, I may have made a non intuitive choice when I mentioned you (@winterssuicide ) as someone talking about the end of the world. There's a much more obvious choice: The Herald Erjen . Conclusion: The Herald Erjen has been talking about the "End of the world", and has proven @graham right. Hey, as long as I'm out of it, then I have no dog in the fight. You guys can carry on now with your semantic argument without my interference.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Feb 16, 2018 22:06:47 GMT
I wasn't talking about Armageddon. That's a fairy tale published in the Bible, better known as the Apocalypse/Revelations. I agree that you had not talked about that before. However, what people understand by "End of the world" is apparently unclear. I was talking about the "End of the world" in a more general sense. Here's what I perceive regarding this thread. @graham asked The Herald Erjen a question. This one.Then The Herald Erjen replied with a non sequitur:It is of course possible to assume, that The Herald Erjen believes that asking questions about xxx means talking about xxx. But then, The Herald Erjen posted this:Baloney means disagreement. But in this case, the disagreement is misplaced, because, as goz mentioned, The Herald Erjen has a history of posting videos as supposed evidence that the stuff from Revelations, or other tales from the Bible, is coming true. So, I may have made a non intuitive choice when I mentioned you (@winterssuicide ) as someone talking about the end of the world. There's a much more obvious choice: The Herald Erjen . Conclusion: The Herald Erjen has been talking about the "End of the world", and has proven @graham right. Hey, as long as I'm out of it, then I have no dog in the fight. You guys can carry on now with your semantic argument without my interference. Sheesh! What a wimp! Not even a chiahuahua?(sp lol)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2018 22:15:00 GMT
Hey, as long as I'm out of it, then I have no dog in the fight. You guys can carry on now with your semantic argument without my interference. Sheesh! What a wimp! Not even a chiahuahua?(sp lol) I don't think people should make dogs fight, even if they're only Chihuahuas.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Feb 16, 2018 22:19:43 GMT
Sheesh! What a wimp! Not even a chiahuahua?(sp lol) I don't think people should make dogs fight, even if they're only Chihuahuas. What if David was a Chihuahua with a slingshot and Goliath was a Doberman?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2018 22:20:47 GMT
I don't think people should make dogs fight, even if they're only Chihuahuas. What if David was a Chihuahua with a slingshot and Goliath was a Doberman? Is it Miller Time, Goz?
|
|
|
Post by goz on Feb 16, 2018 22:30:25 GMT
What if David was a Chihuahua with a slingshot and Goliath was a Doberman? Is it Miller Time, Goz? Well, it is 9.29 am here in Gozland.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2018 22:35:53 GMT
Well, it is 9.29 am here in Gozland. Yeah? My wife gets home from work around 8:30am and the first thing she does is crack a beer. Don't let the time of day stop you.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Feb 16, 2018 23:22:59 GMT
Well, it is 9.29 am here in Gozland. Yeah? My wife gets home from work around 8:30am and the first thing she does is crack a beer. Don't let the time of day stop you. Shift workers are a gift from your God, so I don't let people 'cast nasturtians' on them! I am on here evading 'work' so the least I can do is stay sober unless and until the 'work thing' happens. Fuck it! It is Saturday...my book can wait! ( puts on swimsuit and goes down to the beach )
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Feb 17, 2018 6:07:11 GMT
No, that's what I'm saying. He said that I mentioned the "end of the world." His evidence was that I mentioned "dystopia." I think you and I would be in agreement by saying that talking about a dystopia does not necessarily correlate to a discussion on Armageddon. It can suggest that, but it doesn't have to, and, in most cases, doesn't. And for the record, per Erjen's original point, nobody was talking about the end of the world on this thread and phludowin is just flat-out wrong in attributing it to me. Phludowin obviously has an incorrect and narrow perception of what a dystopia is. I wasn't talking about Armageddon. That's a fairy tale published in the Bible, better known as the Apocalypse/Revelations. I agree that you had not talked about that before. However, what people understand by "End of the world" is apparently unclear. I was talking about the "End of the world" in a more general sense. Here's what I perceive regarding this thread. @graham asked The Herald Erjen a question. This one. So is the basis of the fear that the Big Book O Magic says that you have to have "a mark" and that "a mark" has been translated into "a microchip" and this therefore means the end of the world is coming? Because the end of the world isn't likely to come anytime soon. Then The Herald Erjen replied with a non sequitur: No one here is talking about "the end of the world" except you. It is of course possible to assume, that The Herald Erjen believes that asking questions about xxx means talking about xxx. But then, The Herald Erjen posted this: Baloney means disagreement. But in this case, the disagreement is misplaced, because, as goz mentioned, The Herald Erjen has a history of posting videos as supposed evidence that the stuff from Revelations, or other tales from the Bible, is coming true. So, I may have made a non intuitive choice when I mentioned you (@winterssuicide ) as someone talking about the end of the world. There's a much more obvious choice: The Herald Erjen . Conclusion: The Herald Erjen has been talking about the "End of the world", and has proven @graham right. Well, you're wrong, and winterssuicide was right. Dystopian society =/= "the end of the world." You may not like it, but there's nothing you can do about it.
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Feb 17, 2018 9:29:29 GMT
Dystopian society =/= "the end of the world." You may not like it, but there's nothing you can do about it. Not true. There is something I can do about it: Repost the relevant part of @graham 's post regarding the "end of the world". No, nobody is talking about it. Some people just like to drop hints. Quoted for truth.
|
|
|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on Feb 17, 2018 9:36:16 GMT
Was listening to this today and thought of this thread:
|
|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Feb 17, 2018 13:32:49 GMT
Who if anyone is talking about the end of the world in this thread?
There does appear much dispute on the matter. I attempt to solve the issue here.
I found the first occurrence at the 11th message. It is from @graham
Earlier in the thread, the 6th message, @winterssuicide had mentioned the conditions on Earth about the time of the Tower of Babel. That is shortly after the flood.
It appears then that graham and associates mistook comments on Earth shortly after the flood for comments about the end of the world, which it is about as far from as it can get.
The confusion then is entirely the fault of atheists with a superficial understanding of the Bible.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2018 15:27:09 GMT
Either that or people are too cowardly to address it directly and so just drop oh-so-subtle hints. You know, like I suggested and other people have pointed out more explicitly.
Keep up, Arlon. I know it's a strain, but do try, there's a good chap.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2018 16:28:46 GMT
Who if anyone is talking about the end of the world in this thread? There does appear much dispute on the matter. I attempt to solve the issue here. I found the first occurrence at the 11th message. It is from @graham Earlier in the thread, the 6th message, @winterssuicide had mentioned the conditions on Earth about the time of the Tower of Babel. That is shortly after the flood. It appears then that graham and associates mistook comments on Earth shortly after the flood for comments about the end of the world, which it is about as far from as it can get. The confusion then is entirely the fault of atheists with a superficial understanding of the Bible. Ha, to be fair, the conditions just before the Flood are the same conditions before the end of the world (per the scriptures). Unification of humanity is always a harbinger of doom. So maybe the atheists on the board are just really witty.
|
|