|
Post by formersamhmd on Apr 10, 2018 16:54:50 GMT
I doubt that when she spoke of the Entire fandom, entire age range. Deranged the artsy-fartsy types get. Which is fine by me, cinema is better off without them.
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Apr 10, 2018 18:03:16 GMT
its sad mcu fans are attacking me and calling for the moderator to ban to me. mcu fans also try to drag other superhero movies to the mcu problem but its not just possible. noone has really talked badly with other movies. the industry started having a huge problem with superhero movies once the mcu movies stated flooding the gates. this is reality. marvel movies specifically did severe damaged to the genre. that is the truth. How exactly is the MCU damaging the superhero genre? It's the highest rated superhero franchises of all time, and so far, with the exception of The Incredible Hulk, all of their films make serious bank. The real reality is that the MCU is saving the superhero genre. While films like Fant4stic, X-Men: Apocalypse, and the DCEU (minus Wonder Woman) are damaging the superhero genre. And before you answer my question, don't say it's kiddie and filled with kiddie humor. But... but... they’re all from Disney, so of course, they’re filled with KIDDIE humor, which is exactly why we know that ‘Incredibles 2’ will be THE worst film of 2018!
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Apr 10, 2018 18:21:27 GMT
its sad mcu fans are attacking me and calling for the moderator to ban to me. mcu fans also try to drag other superhero movies to the mcu problem but its not just possible. noone has really talked badly with other movies. the industry started having a huge problem with superhero movies once the mcu movies stated flooding the gates. this is reality. marvel movies specifically did severe damaged to the genre. that is the truth. Attacking you? No one here is attacking you. We're just trying to get some pest control in here.
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Apr 10, 2018 18:56:20 GMT
How exactly is the MCU damaging the superhero genre? It's the highest rated superhero franchises of all time, and so far, with the exception of The Incredible Hulk, all of their films make serious bank. The real reality is that the MCU is saving the superhero genre. While films like Fant4stic, X-Men: Apocalypse, and the DCEU (minus Wonder Woman) are damaging the superhero genre. And before you answer my question, don't say it's kiddie and filled with kiddie humor. But... but... they’re all from Disney, so of course, they’re filled with KIDDIE humor, which is exactly why we know that ‘Incredibles 2’ will be THE worst film of 2018! I'm surprised the Disney hate group isn't targeting The Incredibles 2.
|
|
|
Post by thenewnexus on Apr 10, 2018 19:31:33 GMT
The best at being boring, maybe. Nah, they go for that "grounded" approach. The approach that nearly destroyed the genre. I'm starting to think thenewnexus might have ADD or ADHD, they can only respond to short responses but anything too lengthy they outright ignore it, like my response where I explained the purpose of the Netflix shows, why you will never see an R-Rated Spider-Man picture, and why The Punisher is for more of a niche market and is NOT a superhero. Not too mention that they also keep ignoring almost every reply talking about how much of an impact RDJ's portrayal of Iron Man has had on the character and helped launch the MCU as we know it now. First two Spiderman movies and ASM movies say hi,pg13,serious and great. RDJ just got lucky thats it,imagine if they went with Tom Cruise or other actor the mcu would be still be around
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Apr 10, 2018 19:43:09 GMT
I'm starting to think thenewnexus might have ADD or ADHD, they can only respond to short responses but anything too lengthy they outright ignore it, like my response where I explained the purpose of the Netflix shows, why you will never see an R-Rated Spider-Man picture, and why The Punisher is for more of a niche market and is NOT a superhero. Not too mention that they also keep ignoring almost every reply talking about how much of an impact RDJ's portrayal of Iron Man has had on the character and helped launch the MCU as we know it now. First two Spiderman movies and ASM movies say hi,pg13,serious and great. RDJ just got lucky thats it,imagine if they went with Tom Cruise or other actor the mcu would be still be around 1. All 'Spider-Man' films are rated PG-13, including 'Spider-Man: Homecoming'.
2. MCU is still around. Try harder.
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Apr 10, 2018 19:45:08 GMT
But... but... they’re all from Disney, so of course, they’re filled with KIDDIE humor, which is exactly why we know that ‘Incredibles 2’ will be THE worst film of 2018! I'm surprised the Disney hate group isn't targeting The Incredibles 2. Yeah, if anything, 'Incredibles 2' will be THE most kiddie superhero film of the year - even more so than any MCU films.
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Apr 10, 2018 19:46:36 GMT
I'm surprised the Disney hate group isn't targeting The Incredibles 2. Yeah, if anything, 'Incredibles 2' will be THE most kiddie superhero film of the year - even more so than any MCU films. More kiddie than Teen Titans Go to the Movies?
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Apr 10, 2018 19:52:15 GMT
Yeah, if anything, 'Incredibles 2' will be THE most kiddie superhero film of the year - even more so than any MCU films. More kiddie than Teen Titans Go to the Movies? Of course! 'Teen Titans Go! To the Movies' is from Warner Brothers, so it will be mature and adult!
|
|
|
Post by thenewnexus on Apr 10, 2018 19:58:16 GMT
First two Spiderman movies and ASM movies say hi,pg13,serious and great. RDJ just got lucky thats it,imagine if they went with Tom Cruise or other actor the mcu would be still be around 1. All 'Spider-Man' films are rated PG-13, including 'Spider-Man: Homecoming'.
2. MCU is still around. Try harder.
1. I was responding to dredd who said I wanted an R Rated spidey,i brought those 3 movies. Homecoming was a comedy and bad. 2. His mcu role was a fluke thats it and. Mcu would still be around without him
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Apr 10, 2018 19:58:43 GMT
I'm starting to think thenewnexus might have ADD or ADHD, they can only respond to short responses but anything too lengthy they outright ignore it, like my response where I explained the purpose of the Netflix shows, why you will never see an R-Rated Spider-Man picture, and why The Punisher is for more of a niche market and is NOT a superhero. Not too mention that they also keep ignoring almost every reply talking about how much of an impact RDJ's portrayal of Iron Man has had on the character and helped launch the MCU as we know it now. First two Spiderman movies and ASM movies say hi,pg13,serious and great. RDJ just got lucky thats it,imagine if they went with Tom Cruise or other actor the mcu would be still be around What are you talking about? Sam Raimi's first two Spider-Man movies were not all that serious, they had plenty of humor and silly, campy moments and the kids who saw them in theatres ate em' up big time - more than adults actually. The first Amazing Spider-Man was a little bit serious but its use of humor felt fairly awkward and out of place in the environment they were trying to create, the sequel cranked the cheese factor to the ninth with more humor, more camp, and villains so ridiculous it was like they stepped right out of The Tick. Green Goblin looked like Beavis from Beavis and Butt-Head and I swear if he had cackled I would've been trying to locate Butt-Head in the film. Electro started off as a psychotic dork a la Jim Carrey's Edward Nygma and then transitioned to a hybrid between Watchmen's Dr. Manhattan with Arnold's Mr. Freeze. Then there's The Rhino, I love me some Paul Giamatti and all but good lord that maybe the goofiest thing he's ever done in his acting career, and he's done lots of outrageous roles. Given how Tom Cruise pretty much seized control over production of The Mummy( Which was supposed to launch a shared universe itself) and turned that into the mess that it was I think we should be thankful that Marvel decided to go with talent over star power with Iron Man. Luck has nothing to do with it, that's why RDJ has enjoyed repeated success after another since the first Iron Man movie.
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Apr 10, 2018 20:04:50 GMT
1. All 'Spider-Man' films are rated PG-13, including 'Spider-Man: Homecoming'.
2. MCU is still around. Try harder.
1. I was responding to dredd who said I wanted an R Rated spidey,i brought those 3 movies. Homecoming was a comedy and bad. 2. His mcu role was a fluke thats it and. Mcu would still be around without him 1. Homecoming was no more a comedy than all prior Spider-Man movies and it was good. 2. No, it wasn't a fluke. The movie became the hit that it did because people fell in love with RDJ's portrayal of the Iron Man character, if it were Tom Cruise or Nicolas Cage audiences would not have reacted as positively as they had. Actors can make or break material, RDJ made it work and his performance has influenced all contemporary media with the character. He is to Iron Man as what Christopher Reeve was to Superman, its impossible to separate the two that's how well-liked RDJ is as the character and how much impact he has had with the material.
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Apr 10, 2018 20:09:35 GMT
First two Spiderman movies and ASM movies say hi,pg13,serious and great. RDJ just got lucky thats it,imagine if they went with Tom Cruise or other actor the mcu would be still be around What are you talking about? Sam Raimi's first two Spider-Man movies were not all that serious, they had plenty of humor and silly, campy moments and the kids who saw them in theatres ate em' up big time - more than adults actually. The first Amazing Spider-Man was a little bit serious but its use of humor felt fairly awkward and out of place in the environment they were trying to create, the sequel cranked the cheese factor to the ninth with more humor, more camp, and villains so ridiculous it was like they stepped right out of The Tick. Green Goblin looked like Beavis from Beavis and Butt-Head and I swear if he had cackled I would've been trying to locate Butt-Head in the film. Electro started off as a psychotic dork a la Jim Carrey's Edward Nygma and then transitioned to a hybrid between Watchmen's Dr. Manhattan with Arnold's Mr. Freeze. Then there's The Rhino, I love me some Paul Giamatti and all but good lord that maybe the goofiest thing he's ever done in his acting career, and he's done lots of outrageous roles. Given how Tom Cruise pretty much seized control over production of The Mummy( Which was supposed to launch a shared universe itself) and turned that into the mess that it was I think we should be thankful that Marvel decided to go with talent over star power with Iron Man. Luck has nothing to do with it, that's why RDJ has enjoyed repeated success after another since the first Iron Man movie. But... but... 'The Mummy' is a dark and serious horror film, so it's obviously better than any MCU films!
ekoj taht uoy fi etovpu etaidemmi
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Apr 10, 2018 20:17:39 GMT
What are you talking about? Sam Raimi's first two Spider-Man movies were not all that serious, they had plenty of humor and silly, campy moments and the kids who saw them in theatres ate em' up big time - more than adults actually. The first Amazing Spider-Man was a little bit serious but its use of humor felt fairly awkward and out of place in the environment they were trying to create, the sequel cranked the cheese factor to the ninth with more humor, more camp, and villains so ridiculous it was like they stepped right out of The Tick. Green Goblin looked like Beavis from Beavis and Butt-Head and I swear if he had cackled I would've been trying to locate Butt-Head in the film. Electro started off as a psychotic dork a la Jim Carrey's Edward Nygma and then transitioned to a hybrid between Watchmen's Dr. Manhattan with Arnold's Mr. Freeze. Then there's The Rhino, I love me some Paul Giamatti and all but good lord that maybe the goofiest thing he's ever done in his acting career, and he's done lots of outrageous roles. Given how Tom Cruise pretty much seized control over production of The Mummy( Which was supposed to launch a shared universe itself) and turned that into the mess that it was I think we should be thankful that Marvel decided to go with talent over star power with Iron Man. Luck has nothing to do with it, that's why RDJ has enjoyed repeated success after another since the first Iron Man movie. But... but... 'The Mummy' is a dark and serious horror film, so it's obviously better than any MCU films!
ekoj taht uoy fi etovpu etaidemmi
Yeah, I'm sure that will be his response. I'm sure he thinks the 2017 movie is better than the 1999 one with Brendan Fraser, spoiler alert - It isn't. In fact it makes the Fraser version look like Lawrence of Arabia.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Apr 10, 2018 20:18:05 GMT
I'm starting to think thenewnexus might have ADD or ADHD, they can only respond to short responses but anything too lengthy they outright ignore it, like my response where I explained the purpose of the Netflix shows, why you will never see an R-Rated Spider-Man picture, and why The Punisher is for more of a niche market and is NOT a superhero. Not too mention that they also keep ignoring almost every reply talking about how much of an impact RDJ's portrayal of Iron Man has had on the character and helped launch the MCU as we know it now. First two Spiderman movies and ASM movies say hi,pg13,serious and great. RDJ just got lucky thats it,imagine if they went with Tom Cruise or other actor the mcu would be still be around The MCU wouldn't exist if they'd gone with Cruise. His ego would never allow him to have co-stars that have equal parts to him. We'd be lucky to have ONE Iron Man movie. As for the Raimi films, they're campier than anything in the MCU. Not much serious there.
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on Apr 10, 2018 20:20:14 GMT
1. All 'Spider-Man' films are rated PG-13, including 'Spider-Man: Homecoming'.
2. MCU is still around. Try harder.
1. I was responding to dredd who said I wanted an R Rated spidey,i brought those 3 movies. Homecoming was a comedy and bad. 2. His mcu role was a fluke thats it and. Mcu would still be around without him Four hit movies in a row is not a fluke. That's not what that word means.
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Apr 10, 2018 20:23:38 GMT
But... but... 'The Mummy' is a dark and serious horror film, so it's obviously better than any MCU films!
ekoj taht uoy fi etovpu etaidemmi
Yeah, I'm sure that will be his response. I'm sure he thinks the 2017 movie is better than the 1999 one with Brendan Fraser, spoiler alert - It isn't. In fact it makes the Fraser version look like Lawrence of Arabia. Both versions. Even its infamously campy sequel is better.
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Apr 10, 2018 20:27:34 GMT
Yeah, I'm sure that will be his response. I'm sure he thinks the 2017 movie is better than the 1999 one with Brendan Fraser, spoiler alert - It isn't. In fact it makes the Fraser version look like Lawrence of Arabia. Both versions. Even its infamously campy sequel is better. Yes. I think I would even watch Tomb of the Dragon Emperor over the new one, it at least has Fraser and John Hannah and not too mention Michelle Yeoh who is able to make even the most boring product watchable( I know I only got thru Star Trek Discovery because of Yeoh and her performance, her and Doug Jones' characters).
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Apr 10, 2018 20:29:55 GMT
Both versions. Even its infamously campy sequel is better. Yes. I think I would even watch Tomb of the Dragon Emperor over the new one, it at least has John Hannah and Michelle Yeoh who always make even the weakest film watchable( I know I only got thru Star Trek Discovery because of Yeoh). Ouch. I thought 'Tomb of the Dragon Emperor' was quite bad even by a brainless entertainment film standard (better than Rob Cohen's previous effort 'Stealth', though, I'll give it that). Was Dark Universe's 'The Mummy' really THAT bad? I mean, I'm aware of its infamy, but still...
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Apr 10, 2018 20:38:04 GMT
Yes. I think I would even watch Tomb of the Dragon Emperor over the new one, it at least has John Hannah and Michelle Yeoh who always make even the weakest film watchable( I know I only got thru Star Trek Discovery because of Yeoh). Ouch. I thought 'Tomb of the Dragon Emperor' was quite bad even by a brainless entertainment film standard (better than Rob Cohen's previous effort 'Stealth', though, I'll give it that). Was Dark Universe's 'The Mummy' really THAT bad? I mean, I'm aware of its infamy, but still... It's very bland, visually dry, and has one too many things going on. Russell Crowe and Sofia Boutella are the only thins going for it.
|
|