Morgan Freeman's career is over

Assuming it's true (which it is looking by number of claimants and because it all happened in public) it is a very sad thing. One would expect higher standards from people who are in position of power and are considered heroes by many.

Link to the article, no?

edition.cnn.com/2018/05/24/entertainment/morgan-freeman-accusations/index.html

Beyond, this particular case, I want to highlight one comment from CNN that is incredibly ignorant yet has been adapted as "the reason for all this" by the mainstream : "another example of the systematic problems that exist in the entertainment industry" - "Before #MeToo, many men in the industry could behave without fear of consequences, because many times when a powerful man did so, it was the victim who suffered repercussions."

While in a sense that is not false, the much bigger problem that everyone is failing to acknowledge is the whole "sexual revolution" thing still rolling on, that treats human beings like animals who just can't keep their hands off each other. Sex is idolized as the ultimate "win," the ultimate "prize" to gain. The supporters of this ideology might claim they needed to push back against repressive conservatives, but they have gone well beyond that and turned it into a game that must be played and must be won. Now they all scream how "it's only OK if there's consent," but generations have been raised with polluted thoughts in their brains. This ideology has turned women into pieces of meat in the minds of so many, and now you are trying to tell the lions out on the field to ask consent before touching. Guess how well that's working out? Not well at all.

All these men carry full responsibility, but at the same time it is absolutely stupid to ignore the environment that the "sexual revolution" has generated. When you burn decency at the stake, you attract vultures. Many, many vultures.

They could have, but then they're career would be over because the media would not take their side.
If the media didnt take the side of Lysette Anthony, Ashley Judd or Mira Sorvino in the Weinstein situation, why would they take the side of complete nobodies?

 Weinstein hired assistants to line up his victims too-so it was in the open. Could one of his victims had said to the assistants--hey-why are you helping him?

Just another reason why film media ownership should be diversified so no single group can control it and use mafia-like  behavior to cover up their misconduct.

I don't know the details but Anthony claimed he raped her in the late 80s in England and she filed a police report.
Seems pretty serious if she did and nothing came of it. Where was the media then?

He has something like 80 named accusers.
Should be in the Guinness book of World Records!

This one is really disappointing, never expected him to do things like this. I don't think you should trust allegations before proof or sentencing, but such a large amount of people speaking up makes it difficult to believe that nothing happened.