Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 22, 2017 17:14:52 GMT
Proof?
|
|
|
Post by King Conan on Mar 22, 2017 17:25:46 GMT
I could laugh all my days about the comic nerds here. Their posts are too funny.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 22, 2017 17:26:49 GMT
Bet you'd back down real fast face-to-face.
|
|
|
Post by King Conan on Mar 22, 2017 17:40:45 GMT
Did you talk to me, or the Jesse guy?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 22, 2017 17:42:09 GMT
I''m talking to the man with such inadequacy he has to use Canon as his avatar.
|
|
|
Post by King Conan on Mar 22, 2017 17:57:28 GMT
I dont know what do you want from me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 22, 2017 18:01:42 GMT
You talk like big, claiming to laugh at us "nerds" for "being funny." Bet you'd be a lot less brave if I was standing right in front of you.
|
|
|
Post by King Conan on Mar 22, 2017 18:04:25 GMT
Sorry but you acted strange and weird, its not good.
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on Mar 22, 2017 18:23:51 GMT
This is one very IMDb-esque thread, captures the essence very nicely... Sooner or later these superhero films are going to hit a dead end. Even the R-rated ones which have been good so far will exhaust all originality over time. I really don't think so. Originality comes in how the story is told, not necessarily the story itself. Just look at Tim Burton's Batman and the Dark Knight. Both revolve around Batman's first encounters with the Joker, yet are radically different from each other.
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Mar 22, 2017 21:12:59 GMT
I think it's fair to say that it's impossible to transition comic/book characters perfectly to movies. There will always be changes made here and there. That said, the MCU has been the most successful in adhering to its comic origins. Followed by Sony. DC is fairly far away but at least they're still ahead of Fox. DC just tries to make their characters dark and grounded (for better or worse) but Fox basically just takes the names of the characters and throws out their source material.
Also, I find it pathetic that adults feel like the superhero genre is a defining metric to whether you're an adult or not.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 22, 2017 21:53:11 GMT
I think it's fair to say that it's impossible to transition comic/book characters perfectly to movies. There will always be changes made here and there. That said, the MCU has been the most successful in adhering to its comic origins. Followed by Sony. DC is fairly far away but at least they're still ahead of Fox. DC just tries to make their characters dark and grounded (for better or worse) but Fox basically just takes the names of the characters and throws out their source material. Also, I find it pathetic that adults feel like the superhero genre is a defining metric to whether you're an adult or not. Having the Juggeraut not be Xavier's jealous step-brother comes to mind.
|
|
|
Post by Agent of Chaos on Mar 23, 2017 1:31:07 GMT
Ah, you are the idiotic and braindead troll, who only can say "ashamed". Thank you for being a reason, imdb shuts down their boards. And if FOX is ashamed of the comics, then the MCU too. Oh? Fox divorces their films from the source material as much as they possibly while the MCU embraces what makes their characters great. If Fox had any balls, Kitty Pryde would have been the time traveler in the Days of Future Past film. I remember the 90s animated series and Wolverine & The X-Men(which involved Kevin Fiege) did the same thing with their version of Days of a Future Past. Kitty Pryde wasn't the time traveler in either of those. While the movie version actually had Kitty be involved with the time travel. Do you know why Kitty was always replaced? Because she got no development in the original story. Any of the other surviving X-Men could have played her role and the story would have been the same. I think it's fair to say that it's impossible to transition comic/book characters perfectly to movies. There will always be changes made here and there. That said, the MCU has been the most successful in adhering to its comic origins. Followed by Sony. DC is fairly far away but at least they're still ahead of Fox. DC just tries to make their characters dark and grounded (for better or worse) but Fox basically just takes the names of the characters and throws out their source material. Also, I find it pathetic that adults feel like the superhero genre is a defining metric to whether you're an adult or not. Having the Juggeraut not be Xavier's jealous step-brother comes to mind. X3 Juggy was based on the one from the Ultimate Universe who was a mutant and had no relation to Xavier. The X-films since X2 have adapted things from the Ultimate comics and merged it with the 616. Something that the MCU would later emulate. The X-films and MCU films adaptation methods are very similar, probably because Kevin Fiege was involved with the creation of both.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2017 1:48:29 GMT
Incorrect. The X-films take the names of characters and then completely divorce them from their comic book counterparts. The MCU makes an honest effort to transplant both the names and personalities of the characters onto the screen. Oh, and the characters in the MCU actually allowed to look like their comic book counterparts with only a couple of rare exceptions.
|
|
|
Post by Agent of Chaos on Mar 23, 2017 2:06:32 GMT
Incorrect. The X-films take the names of characters and then completely divorce them from their comic book counterparts. The MCU makes an honest effort to transplant both the names and personalities of the characters onto the screen. Oh, and the characters in the MCU actually allowed to look like their comic book counterparts with only a couple of rare exceptions. Not really. I remember Marvel writer Mark Millar talking about how Tony's personality is nothing like in the 616. And he is the face of the MCU. I don't know much about GoTG but I heard that they are really difficult from their comic counterparts.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2017 2:11:15 GMT
Mark Millar is a dumbass and the same man who couldn't write Captain America well to save his life. His word is worth about as much as a politician's.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Mar 23, 2017 2:11:59 GMT
Incorrect. The X-films take the names of characters and then completely divorce them from their comic book counterparts. The MCU makes an honest effort to transplant both the names and personalities of the characters onto the screen. Oh, and the characters in the MCU actually allowed to look like their comic book counterparts with only a couple of rare exceptions. Not really. I remember Marvel writer Mark Millar talking about how Tony's personality is nothing like in the 616. And he is the face of the MCU. I don't know much about GoTG but I heard that they are really difficult from their comic counterparts. Mark Millar has no right to complain, seeing how OOC he made everyone to get his stories to work. As for GOTG, the original version of Star-Lord was a pretty unlikable character. It's for the best they changed him.
|
|
|
Post by Agent of Chaos on Mar 23, 2017 2:24:37 GMT
Not really. I remember Marvel writer Mark Millar talking about how Tony's personality is nothing like in the 616. And he is the face of the MCU. I don't know much about GoTG but I heard that they are really difficult from their comic counterparts. Mark Millar has no right to complain, seeing how OOC he made everyone to get his stories to work. As for GOTG, the original version of Star-Lord was a pretty unlikable character. It's for the best they changed him. He wasn't complaining at all. He said that he found it flattering that his personality was like Ultimate Iron Man, since he created him. And apparently the film makers said that's what they were aiming for.
|
|
Stuart "2-D" Pot
Sophomore
Guess who's back?
@startrekkie1202
Posts: 315
Likes: 71
|
Post by Stuart "2-D" Pot on Mar 23, 2017 11:17:58 GMT
With Disney running out of money to pay the critics for Iron Fist and Logan being a smash hit, the adults are finally taking back the superhero films from the kiddies giving us real mature films. Farewell kiddie marvel. Hello mature movies. Shut up kiddie.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Mar 23, 2017 16:04:36 GMT
Mark Millar has no right to complain, seeing how OOC he made everyone to get his stories to work. As for GOTG, the original version of Star-Lord was a pretty unlikable character. It's for the best they changed him. He wasn't complaining at all. He said that he found it flattering that his personality was like Ultimate Iron Man, since he created him. And apparently the film makers said that's what they were aiming for. Well, 616 Tony has had plenty of varied characterizations so I can get why they thought it would be better to go with the Ultimate Version since his character had been more consistent and didn't have 616's baggage. Worked out pretty well all things considered.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2017 16:53:02 GMT
With Disney running out of money to pay the critics for Iron Fist and Logan being a smash hit, the adults are finally taking back the superhero films from the kiddies giving us real mature films. Farewell kiddie marvel. Hello mature movies. Shut up kiddie. Welcome aboard the wormhole rebellion.
|
|