|
Post by captainbryce on Aug 23, 2018 13:19:28 GMT
So no real counterargument Yup. That’s pretty much what he does when he runs out of argument. “LOL”
|
|
|
Post by captainbryce on Aug 23, 2018 13:24:21 GMT
1. Captain Bryce: Yes I agree that evolution occurred but I won't say whether I agree with the idea of Common Descent. For the record, I do believe in common descent.
|
|
|
Post by captainbryce on Aug 23, 2018 13:27:45 GMT
so evolution is the start of life rather than the development of it. There no logical reason to buy into that but that appears to be the only option. Of course there is. All evidence points exactly to that, making it the ONLY logical thing to buy into with respect to how modern species came into existence. What’s illogical is that two lions were able to survive on an Ark for a year eating plants. That is an unscientific and implausible assumption based on zero evidence. But that’s what you choose to believe regardless. And your telling other people that a belief in evolution is “illogical”?
|
|
|
Post by Vegas on Aug 23, 2018 13:35:01 GMT
So....what did the lions eat for a year on Noah’s Ark? Doesn't The Bible answer that question? I think it says that God worked his voodoo and the meat-eaters were turned into eaters of straw. Now... I don't know how much nutritional value straw has... … Maybe it was magic straw?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2018 13:43:15 GMT
So....what did the lions eat for a year on Noah’s Ark? Doesn't The Bible answer that question? I think it says that God worked his voodoo and the meat-eaters were turned into eaters of straw. Now... I don't know how much nutritional value straw has... ::question::… Maybe it was magic straw? The ark was approximately the size of two football pitches... If noah can fit two of 8.7 million animal species in that small space, I'm sure finding space for magic straw for everyone for a year and ten days would be easy. There's two of every kind of whale 🐳 on board for starters.
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Aug 23, 2018 13:47:31 GMT
so evolution is the start of life rather than the development of it. There no logical reason to buy into that but that appears to be the only option. Of course there is. All evidence points exactly to that, making it the ONLY logical thing to buy into with respect to how modern species came into existence. What’s illogical is that two lions were able to survive on an Ark for a year eating plants. That is an unscientific and implausible assumption based on zero evidence. But that’s what you choose to believe regardless. And your telling other people that a belief in evolution is “illogical”? there is nonevekdence pointing to how life began. If there was you would have already shown it instead of typing it. As Life of Pi states, people just choose the better story.
|
|
|
Post by captainbryce on Aug 23, 2018 16:04:35 GMT
Of course there is. All evidence points exactly to that, making it the ONLY logical thing to buy into with respect to how modern species came into existence. What’s illogical is that two lions were able to survive on an Ark for a year eating plants. That is an unscientific and implausible assumption based on zero evidence. But that’s what you choose to believe regardless. And your telling other people that a belief in evolution is “illogical”? there is nonevekdence pointing to how life began. If there was you would have already shown it instead of typing it. As Life of Pi states, people just choose the better story. I didn’t ask how life began. I asked what did the lions on Noah’s ark eat. Your answer was “food”, meaning you can’t explain the logic of a story that you believe in. How life “began” is a red herring topic that you started, that has nothing to do with my question.
|
|
|
Post by captainbryce on Aug 23, 2018 16:16:17 GMT
So....what did the lions eat for a year on Noah’s Ark? Doesn't The Bible answer that question? If it did, would I have asked? Do you have a biblical reference for that? Book, chapter, verse? Well first thing is first, where does it say they are straw at all? Moreover, where does it say that any straw was available on the ark for them to eat? There is no indication that Noah brought any plants or grass on the ark with him, nor was he ever commanded to. Genesis 7:2-3 Take with you seven pairs of every kind of clean animal, a male and its mate, and one pair of every kind of unclean animal, a male and its mate, and also seven pairs of every kind of bird, male and female, to keep their various kinds alive throughout the earth. Genesis 7:11,8:13 In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, on the seventeenth day of the second month —on that day all the springs of the great deep burst forth, and the floodgates of the heavens were opened. By the first day of the first month of Noah’s six hundred and first year, the water had dried up from the earth. Noah then removed the covering from the ark and saw that the surface of the ground was dry. It says he took male and female animals into the ark, and waited there for a year for the floodwaters to recede. No mention of him bringing grain or straw on the ark, no mention of the carnivores being able to survive on it, in fact there is no mention of food at all! Hence the question. How can anyone believe this really happened?
|
|
|
Post by Vegas on Aug 23, 2018 16:29:27 GMT
Do you have a biblical reference for that? Book, chapter, verse?
Not bothering to look for it.... I might have just mixed some other verses in my drug-laden brain. Who knows?... If God didn't... Ya figure they'd have a few days of collecting a few thousand floating carcasses for the meat-eaters.... and lions eat fish, don't they?
|
|
|
Post by captainbryce on Aug 23, 2018 16:44:33 GMT
Do you have a biblical reference for that? Book, chapter, verse?
Not bothering to look for it.... I might have just mixed some other verses in my drug-laden brain. Who knows?... If God didn't... Ya figure they'd have a few days of collecting a few thousand floating carcasses for the meat-eaters.... and lions eat fish, don't they? Well, firstly I would say that it’s incumbent on the people who teach this to explain the logic of it to those they are trying to indoctrinate. It would also be the responsibility of those evangelizing to explain the logic of this story to a skeptic. It shouldn’t be required for you or myself to investigate possible ways that the story could work. Secondly, there are verses in the bible that refute your hypothesis. Noah and family were sealed in the Ark. They never left during the flood to collect food, and the first time they exit the ark is when it runs aground on Mt. Ararat. Genesis 7:16,8:3-4,6-9 The animals going in were male and female of every living thing, as God had commanded Noah. Then the Lord shut him in. The water receded steadily from the earth. At the end of the hundred and fifty days the water had gone down, and on the seventeenth day of the seventh month the ark came to rest on the mountains of Ararat. After forty days Noah opened a window he had made in the ark and sent out a raven, and it kept flying back and forth until the water had dried up from the earth. Then he sent out a dove to see if the water had receded from the surface of the ground. But the dove could find nowhere to perch because there was water over all the surface of the earth; so it returned to Noah in the ark. He reached out his hand and took the dove and brought it back to himself in the ark.
|
|
|
Post by rizdek on Aug 23, 2018 16:46:05 GMT
I think you'll find many many people who would claim that evolution does not disprove the Bible...so they would contend the decision had nothing to do with disproving the Bible. I would agree with them. Evolution isn't a reason to reject the Bible or even parts of it.
I do seriously see Christianity as a religion. Not sure why I wouldn't.
Referring to science...can it or can it not show people that they are mistaken? Your last sentence seems to be saying both which seem contradictory. I'm not sure what you mean. Science can show people where they are mistaken in their assumptions that underlie various aspects of human behavior and technology that society depends on and the affects is success/failure.
Science cannot solve issues in society, there are however many things it can show like the boiling point of water, the acceleration due to gravity, and things science cannot solve. I have not contradicted myself. Your statement: "Science can show people who think science can solve problems in society that they are mistaken, it can't."
Can science show they are mistaken or not? Can science show people who think science can solve problems in society that they are mistaken?
|
|
|
Post by Vegas on Aug 23, 2018 16:50:05 GMT
Not bothering to look for it.... I might have just mixed some other verses in my drug-laden brain. Who knows?... If God didn't... Ya figure they'd have a few days of collecting a few thousand floating carcasses for the meat-eaters.... and lions eat fish, don't they? Secondly, there are verses in the bible that refute your hypothesis. Noah and family were sealed in the Ark. They never left during the flood to collect food, and the first time they exit the ark is when it runs aground on Mt. Ararat. Genesis 7:16,8:3-4,6-9 After forty days Noah opened a window Well... The verses that you quote seem to not refute my hypothesis.... If the ark had windows.... then they could fish out of them...
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Aug 23, 2018 16:50:38 GMT
Not bothering to look for it.... I might have just mixed some other verses in my drug-laden brain. Who knows?... If God didn't... Ya figure they'd have a few days of collecting a few thousand floating carcasses for the meat-eaters.... and lions eat fish, don't they? Well, firstly I would say that it’s incumbent on the people who teach this to explain the logic of it to those they are trying to indoctrinate. It would also be the responsibility of those evangelizing to explain the logic of this story to a skeptic. It shouldn’t be required for you or myself to investigate possible ways that the story could work. Secondly, there are verses in the bible that refute your hypothesis. Noah and family were sealed in the Ark. They never left during the flood to collect food, and the first time they exit the ark is when it runs aground on Mt. Ararat. Genesis 7:16,8:3-4,6-9 The animals going in were male and female of every living thing, as God had commanded Noah. Then the Lord shut him in. The water receded steadily from the earth. At the end of the hundred and fifty days the water had gone down, and on the seventeenth day of the seventh month the ark came to rest on the mountains of Ararat. After forty days Noah opened a window he had made in the ark and sent out a raven, and it kept flying back and forth until the water had dried up from the earth. Then he sent out a dove to see if the water had receded from the surface of the ground. But the dove could find nowhere to perch because there was water over all the surface of the earth; so it returned to Noah in the ark. He reached out his hand and took the dove and brought it back to himself in the ark. It is in no way the responsibility of the believer to explain things just because you are curious. You might as well ask why Moses didn’t eat burritos. If there isn’t an explicit answer beyond clear instruction for him to have enough food then why would you demand an explicit answer beyond that? The answer I and perhaps others already gave is good enough for you so now you can ask a 3rd question and be sufficiently dissatified with that too.
|
|
|
Post by captainbryce on Aug 23, 2018 17:03:26 GMT
It is in no way the responsibility of the believer to explain things just because you are curious. You might as well ask why Moses didn’t eat burritos. I’m not asking because I’m curious about what Noah did, or how his lions are food. There was no Noah and there was no Noah’s Ark. The entire story is fictional, so my curiosity on these points is settled. What I’m curious about is how YOU as a believer rationalize this nonsense to yourself logically, and whether or not you can produce a compelling argument to make this belief conform to what is logical. And as I predicted, you seem incapable of doing that. Well you don’t even have that to work with. There is no “clear instruction” for him to have food on the Ark. But that aside, I am not demanding any answer from you at all. This is a purely voluntary opportunity for believers. I’m not expecting you to be able to answer because there is no answer. Well you don’t get to decide what’s enough for me. You can choose to participate, or you can withdraw yourself from the tread after your mental gymnastics and evasions are exposed. But before you go, I recommend you spend some more time reading the Bible you so cherish because clearly you don’t realize that your duty as a Christian is to evangelize. From a scriptural standpoint, IT IS your responsibility to explain things to non-believers! 1 Peter 3:15 But in your hearts revere Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect READ THE BIBLE!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2018 17:48:23 GMT
Secondly, there are verses in the bible that refute your hypothesis. Noah and family were sealed in the Ark. They never left during the flood to collect food, and the first time they exit the ark is when it runs aground on Mt. Ararat. Genesis 7:16,8:3-4,6-9 After forty days Noah opened a window Well... The verses that you quote seem to not refute my hypothesis.... If the ark had windows.... then they could fish out of them... They wouldn't catch anything... God was pissed, undoing creation, and starting again. It's explicit, everything not on the ark died... The only fish left alive were on the ark.
|
|
|
Post by Vegas on Aug 23, 2018 17:53:45 GMT
Well... The verses that you quote seem to not refute my hypothesis.... If the ark had windows.... then they could fish out of them... They wouldn't catch anything... God was pissed, undoing creation, and starting again. It's explicit, everything not on the ark died... The only fish left alive were on the ark. Meh..... Not so much: Genesis 7:22
“All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died.”
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2018 17:59:44 GMT
They wouldn't catch anything... God was pissed, undoing creation, and starting again. It's explicit, everything not on the ark died... The only fish left alive were on the ark. Meh..... Not so much: Genesis 7:22
“All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died.” All in who's nostrils was the breath of life, includes marine life.
|
|
|
Post by Vegas on Aug 23, 2018 18:04:07 GMT
Meh..... Not so much: Genesis 7:22
“All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died.” All in who's nostrils was the breath of life, includes marine life. Dude... You're a moron... or just illiterate.... probably a smidgeon of both.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2018 18:07:27 GMT
All in who's nostrils was the breath of life, includes marine life. Dude... You're a moron... or just illiterate.... probably a smidgeon of both. Not me pal... The breath of life, oxygen if you like, is in all marine life. God would know that, he created everything. No, I'm sorry, if he is killing all in who's nostrils is the breath of life, it is all encompassing... He didn't include an opt out clause.
|
|
|
Post by Vegas on Aug 23, 2018 18:13:27 GMT
Dude... You're a moron... or just illiterate.... probably a smidgeon of both. Not me pal... The breath of life, oxygen if you like, is in all marine life. God would know that, he created everything. No, I'm sorry, if he is killing all in who's nostrils is the breath of life, it is all encompassing... He didn't include an opt out clause. Here I'll read you the verse one more time slooooowly.... “All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, ooooof... all.. that.. was... …in .. the... dryyyyyyyy... land......, died.” But, hey... Feel free to continue to be a moron.
|
|