|
|
Post by merh on Dec 16, 2018 20:51:45 GMT
How? I thought you were being sarcastic. I'm not seeing anything special or notable about that Thor poster. It's not brightly colored. A fraction likes to bitch about marvel being for kids. The only people I've ever seen doing that have been teens trying to sneak into R or unrated films. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 17, 2018 0:06:14 GMT
How? I thought you were being sarcastic. I'm not seeing anything special or notable about that Thor poster. It's not brightly colored. A fraction likes to bitch about marvel being for kids. The only people I've ever seen doing that have been teens trying to sneak into R or unrated films. This is why we can't have nice things on a good day. |
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Dec 17, 2018 12:51:38 GMT
Well it was significantly better. It's no surprise that the consensus is that Ragnarok was easily the best of three and vastly more successful because of it. in the real world of comic movies and norse mythology ragnarok is the worse.
did the first two films have issues. yes but at least they had the real content of thor and his fantasy mythos.
thor 3 was just gotg part 3 in a bad way. the movie should not have been a comedy.
also this is when the critics bias became more obvious, how critics can give a pass to making a joke out of the name ragnarok is just a lie.
And exactly how much of a toss did you give about Norse Mythology before you found out it was another criticism you could throw at the MCU? But if really bothers you so much consider this. In the first series of Agents Of SHIELD the following conversation takes place - Skye: You guys may think it's old news, but it's new... news to everybody else. So, Asgardians are aliens from another planet that visited us thousands years ago?
Phil Coulson: Or more.
Skye: And because we couldn't understand aliens, we thought they were gods?
Phil Coulson: That's where our Norse mythology comes from.Ragnarok as a myth was created on Earth by humans. But it never happened. On Asgard it is a prophecy. When it does eventually happen, NOW, it resembles the prophecy rather than the Earth created myth. |
|
|
|
Post by DSDSquared on Dec 17, 2018 13:08:28 GMT
So in highlight of my criticism about MCU and their colors only there to attract children, anyone remember the first thor poster or were some of you not born yet?
it is really so bad to see mcu has derailed like this. look at this beautiful epic poster. this was a marvel film with potential.
I have to ask how do we go from this to this
so mcu fans u see how much your movies declined as an art form. also remember the tone? thor 1 was pretty serious. jokenock...well.
This would make sense if it weren't for the fact that Ragnarok was the much better film. |
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Dec 17, 2018 18:55:30 GMT
So in highlight of my criticism about MCU and their colors only there to attract children, anyone remember the first thor poster or were some of you not born yet?
it is really so bad to see mcu has derailed like this. look at this beautiful epic poster. this was a marvel film with potential.
I have to ask how do we go from this to this
so mcu fans u see how much your movies declined as an art form. also remember the tone? thor 1 was pretty serious. jokenock...well.
You missed a step. Insert this poster into the middle of your presentation and it will all makes sense. I promise.  |
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Dec 17, 2018 18:59:45 GMT
And, a few more for your consideration.   |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 17, 2018 19:59:21 GMT
This all begs the question:
Has anyone done any serious Slurpee souvenir cup design analysis yet?
|
|
|
|
Post by No Morpho, Only Bánh mì on Dec 17, 2018 20:43:19 GMT
So in highlight of my criticism about MCU and their colors only there to attract children, anyone remember the first thor poster or were some of you not born yet?
it is really so bad to see mcu has derailed like this. look at this beautiful epic poster. this was a marvel film with potential.
I have to ask how do we go from this to this
so mcu fans u see how much your movies declined as an art form. also remember the tone? thor 1 was pretty serious. jokenock...well.
You missed a step. Insert this poster into the middle of your presentation and it will all makes sense. I promise. The image doesn’t show, LDM. Was it this one?  |
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Dec 17, 2018 22:59:58 GMT
None of you is asking the most important question. What the hell is eclipsy?
|
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Dec 18, 2018 2:22:58 GMT
You missed a step. Insert this poster into the middle of your presentation and it will all makes sense. I promise. The image doesn’t show, LDM. Was it this one? I was thinking about this solo poster from The Dark World  We got more lightning as the series went on... ;-) |
|
|
|
Post by summers8 on Dec 18, 2018 6:51:54 GMT
hmm...thor 2 another movie with potential. I also see some Gladiator from the posters. still one of the most serious mcu movie apart from that jane's friend and her awful boyfriend and the villain. the movie had issues but again could be corrected.
Its beyond disgraceful mcu felt the only way to save thor was to make him a parody even in the posters.
and look at hulk, lol. I understand why ed norton will never have sunk that low to be in thor 3.
|
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on Dec 18, 2018 9:37:35 GMT
hmm...thor 2 another movie with potential. I also see some Gladiator from the posters. still one of the most serious mcu movie apart from that jane's friend and her awful boyfriend and the villain. the movie had issues but again could be corrected. Its beyond disgraceful mcu felt the only way to save thor was to make him a parody even in the posters. and look at hulk, lol. I understand why ed norton will never have sunk that low to be in thor 3. They were gonna make Thor 3 a serious movie following on from Thor 2 but apparently the test screening was recieved poorly so they ended up making it a goofy comedy. Shame because Thor 2 had great potential for a threequel |
|
|
|
Post by summers8 on Dec 18, 2018 12:56:47 GMT
hmm...thor 2 another movie with potential. I also see some Gladiator from the posters. still one of the most serious mcu movie apart from that jane's friend and her awful boyfriend and the villain. the movie had issues but again could be corrected. Its beyond disgraceful mcu felt the only way to save thor was to make him a parody even in the posters. and look at hulk, lol. I understand why ed norton will never have sunk that low to be in thor 3. They were gonna make Thor 3 a serious movie following on from Thor 2 but apparently the test screening was recieved poorly so they ended up making it a goofy comedy. Shame because Thor 2 had great potential for a threequel I never heard the story. this is why criticism is not credible anymore. who did they screen it to? 5 years olds? the mindless masses as mickey rouke once described who mcu movies appeals too.
what a shame
|
|
|
|
Post by DSDSquared on Dec 18, 2018 13:19:48 GMT
They were gonna make Thor 3 a serious movie following on from Thor 2 but apparently the test screening was recieved poorly so they ended up making it a goofy comedy. Shame because Thor 2 had great potential for a threequel I never heard the story. this is why criticism is not credible anymore. who did they screen it to? 5 years olds? the mindless masses as mickey rouke once described who mcu movies appeals too.
what a shame
Once again, this would make more sense if it were not for the fact that Ragnarok was BY FAR the best film of the three. |
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on Dec 18, 2018 13:56:05 GMT
I never heard the story. this is why criticism is not credible anymore. who did they screen it to? 5 years olds? the mindless masses as mickey rouke once described who mcu movies appeals too.
what a shame
Once again, this would make more sense if it were not for the fact that Ragnarok was BY FAR the best film of the three. Again, its by far the best if you hate actual Thor and his mythology. |
|
|
|
Post by DSDSquared on Dec 18, 2018 14:40:18 GMT
Once again, this would make more sense if it were not for the fact that Ragnarok was BY FAR the best film of the three. Again, its by far the best if you hate actual Thor and his mythology. It is by far the best if you like actual good movies that are well written and entertaining. Thor 3 is a far better movie than Thor 2. That is pretty much a no brainer. |
|
|
|
Post by bud47 on Dec 18, 2018 15:12:23 GMT
Once again, this would make more sense if it were not for the fact that Ragnarok was BY FAR the best film of the three. Again, its by far the best if you hate actual Thor and his mythology. Thor has had many different iterations in the comic books, not just dark and serious. It's not the movie I would have preferred or wanted, but I can at least respect that the movie takes it's inspiration and influence from the comics, specifically Jack Kirby's contributions. And it's still an entertaining flick. |
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on Dec 18, 2018 15:24:18 GMT
Again, its by far the best if you hate actual Thor and his mythology. Thor has had many different iterations in the comic books, not just dark and serious. It's not the movie I would have preferred or wanted, but I can at least respect that the movie takes it's inspiration and influence from the comics, specifically Jack Kirby's contributions. And it's still an entertaining flick. Taiki Waititi never cared for the comics and hated them Thors main personality which every one knows about is perfectly represented in the first 2 Thor films whilst getting the tone and mythological aspects accurate too. Ragnarok dumbed him down and betrayed his demeanour, personality and bravado of what Thor is about. Please show me where hes crying like a girl in the comics of getting his hair cut. Youl probably say that im being hypocritical because Xmen are not comic accurate but youd be mistaken. They get the mythology, tone and character traits/personality correct and have never butchered a character like Thor was in Ragnarok. |
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on Dec 18, 2018 15:25:55 GMT
Again, its by far the best if you hate actual Thor and his mythology. It is by far the best if you like actual good movies that are well written and entertaining. Thor 3 is a far better movie than Thor 2. That is pretty much a no brainer. Disagree, Thor 2 is the better movie. Only thing Ragnarok improves is the villain. |
|
|
|
Post by bud47 on Dec 18, 2018 15:35:18 GMT
Thor has had many different iterations in the comic books, not just dark and serious. It's not the movie I would have preferred or wanted, but I can at least respect that the movie takes it's inspiration and influence from the comics, specifically Jack Kirby's contributions. And it's still an entertaining flick. Taiki Waititi never cared for the comics and hated them Thors main personality which every one knows about is perfectly represented in the first 2 Thor films whilst getting the tone and mythological aspects accurate too. Ragnarok dumbed him down and betrayed his demeanour, personality and bravado of what Thor is about. Please show me where hes crying like a girl in the comics of getting his hair cut. Youl probably say that im being hypocritical because Xmen are not comic accurate but youd be mistaken. They get the mythology, tone and character traits/personality correct and have never butchered a character like Thor was in Ragnarok. I agree. There's a lot I didn't like about Thor Rangarok. It was way too goofy and the humor was taken too far. I would have preferred something closer to the first two films as far as how the character and mythology was portrayed. But overall, it was still an entertaining movie. I guess I'm just a little more forgiving when it comes to these films, because I was never that much of a fan of Thor growing up. |
|
