blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Apr 4, 2017 16:46:06 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Edward-Elizabeth-Hitler on Apr 4, 2017 16:48:12 GMT
Lol, nope. Wing Nut Daily is an appropriate source for an idiot of your calibre.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Apr 4, 2017 16:58:13 GMT
They absolutely without doubt spied on him, but here's the thing. For all of us who hold a US citizenship, they spied on us too, using 911 as an excuse. The NSA has every phone call, every text, and every email recorded. They are probably not looking at it, but it's there for them to look at if they want to.
I find it ironic that Nixon who won both of his elections by landslides got burned out of office for this, while Obama gets a pass.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Apr 4, 2017 17:05:07 GMT
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Apr 4, 2017 17:16:11 GMT
They probably should have been spying on that idiot, but unfortunately there's no evidence that the Obama administration had the foresight to do that. Now we will be a suburb of Russia within a few years.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Apr 4, 2017 18:47:37 GMT
"So the Obama administration was spying on Trump and his team" There was no evidence of that provided at all, the closest was claims to the contents of documents that will be completely different according to the claims once they get released. Is there a reason you jump on these stories and information that have such little grounding in reality?
|
|
|
Post by general313 on Apr 4, 2017 18:53:18 GMT
"So the Obama administration was spying on Trump and his team" There was no evidence of that provided at all, the closest was claims to the contents of documents that will be completely different according to the claims once they get released. Is there a reason you jump on these stories and information that have such little grounding in reality? He needs to spin quickly before the fake news is unmasked.
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Apr 4, 2017 18:53:19 GMT
Damn... you have to hit some HINKY sites to spread stuff like this. Fair warning to all - that site is malware central.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2017 19:00:01 GMT
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Apr 4, 2017 19:05:58 GMT
I love how when someone disputes a story they can't google it themselves. Take your pick.
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Apr 4, 2017 19:49:10 GMT
I love how when someone disputes a story they can't google it themselves. Take your pick. I'm assuming, prior to your edit, you were going to link something like "LMGTFY", but then you saw the results: voat.co onepoliticalplaza.com counterjihadreport phibetaiota.net therussophile.org (<--- that's gold) conspiracy.trendolizer.com ... and realized it only made things worse. This has certainly offered an interesting glimpse into where you get your "news", though.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Apr 4, 2017 19:56:28 GMT
I love how when someone disputes a story they can't google it themselves. Take your pick. I'm assuming, prior to your edit, you were going to link something like "LMGTFY", but then you saw the results: voat.co onepoliticalplaza.com counterjihadreport phibetaiota.net therussophile.org (<--- that's gold) conspiracy.trendolizer.com ... and realized it only made things worse. This has certainly offered an interesting glimpse into where you get your "news", though. No I linked to google's results but when I clicked the link it took me back to this thread. Sometimes when I "create link" it changes the link? I'm sure PD would know why. But you can choose from many sites to read this story. CNN is even reporting on this story telling people to ignore it i.e dont pay attention to it.
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Apr 4, 2017 19:59:37 GMT
I know - I just listed the first page of hits on it above. Legit!
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Apr 4, 2017 20:04:05 GMT
I know - I just listed the first page of hits on it above. Legit! No just ignore the main point I was making and post the laughy face. Ok then.
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Apr 4, 2017 20:06:02 GMT
Your point was that it's on multiple sites. I listed the top results of said sites.
My favorite was "therussophile.org". Good stuff.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Apr 4, 2017 20:38:03 GMT
My favorites are NBC, CNN and MSNBC. Because they are also talking about this story.
What fucking point you think you're making doesnt matter to me. Thanks though.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Apr 4, 2017 20:46:14 GMT
In before Eva or Cash come in saying "you missed the point Cinemachinery was making "therussophile.org" is not a reputable site you dumb shit"
|
|
|
Post by geode on Apr 4, 2017 21:03:20 GMT
Damn... you have to hit some HINKY sites to spread stuff like this. Fair warning to all - that site is malware central. They are a well-known fake news site as well. Fake News
|
|
|
Post by Edward-Elizabeth-Hitler on Apr 4, 2017 21:03:24 GMT
In before Eva or Cash come in saying "you missed the point Cinemachinery was making "therussophile.org" is not a reputable site you dumb shit" Wnd is not a reputable site either you stupid twat.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2017 21:13:43 GMT
I love how when someone disputes a story they can't google it themselves. Take your pick. I'm assuming, prior to your edit, you were going to link something like "LMGTFY", but then you saw the results: voat.co onepoliticalplaza.com counterjihadreport phibetaiota.net therussophile.org (<--- that's gold) conspiracy.trendolizer.com ... and realized it only made things worse. This has certainly offered an interesting glimpse into where you get your "news", though. Here's what I don't understand,Why are so many Americans unable to distinguish between properly sourced,impartial stories reported by reputable news organizations and politically slanted hack jobs light on facts cobbled together by individuals who hold repellent racist and bigoted views. Am I going to put the same stock in a story reported on the BBC about immigration or the BNP(British National Party) website? This complete inability to differentiate between the legitimacy and reliability of sources is a serious problem.
|
|