|
Post by Sulla on Apr 10, 2017 18:21:36 GMT
What are you babbling about?? So the Japanese never bombed Pear Harbour? Germany never declared war on America? And I am focusing solely on the American involvement. Millions have given their lives in order to maintain freedoms, just like your freedom to talk the garbage you are spouting on here. Hawaii, which we invaded and just stole from the native people there, was not a state at the time. So the attack on Pearl Harbor was as close to bombing the mainland as any of the WW2 enemies was going to get. We were always safe from any harm from Germany and Japan. Show me any examples as to where any soldiers in any modern wars sacrificed themselves for my freedom here. Since when was there any threat at all to any of our freedoms from a foreign enemy? It doesn't matter how the US acquired Hawaii and Alaska nor does it matter that they weren't yet states. They were US territories with American military and civilians there who were attacked. Two Alaskan islands were invaded and occupied. The villagers were rounded up and shipped to Japan. Should we not have viewed that as a danger to our freedom? We only know in hindsight that the Japanese didn't have the resources to invade the mainland with significant forces.
There was no danger of mainland harm if you don't count the bombardment of Ellwood in California or the woman and five children killed by a Japanese balloon bomb in Oregon. It was just lucky that the other 300 balloon bombs known to reach America out of the 9,000 launched didn't kill anyone else. You might have a case for later, smaller wars not being about our freedom, but not WWII. If the US did nothing until the Western Hemisphere became isolated and unable to obtain certain raw materials needed for making war, how long do you think we would have kept our freedom against the Axis and the combined industrial might of the rest of the world? Anyone who fought against the Axis was fighting for everyone's freedom.
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Apr 10, 2017 18:35:08 GMT
"Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you; Jesus Christ and the American G. I. One died for your soul; the other for your freedom."
I've never asked either one to die for me. Me neither. Before you die for someone, it might be a good idea to ask first to see if you really need to die.
|
|
|
Post by WarrenPeace on Apr 10, 2017 18:35:23 GMT
If it wasn't for corporate interests, we would keep to our own and stay out of it and let them resolve their own problems, which is how it should be. Why didn't we step in and try and stop the slaughter of Rwanda? What resources do they have that we want? If that had been an oil rich country with the reserves under threat of not being shipped to America anymore, you bet your butt we would have been there in a NY minute. So, you're against intervening, but when the US stays out of it, they should draw fire for not intervening? They were involved on a humanitarian level, as were other UN nations. Such was Rwanda's opinion of French involvement, they changed their national language from French to English. As it happens, the country they export the most products to outside Africa is the US. Mainly coffee, tea, hides and tin ore. I'm questioning the motives behind whenever America invades a foreign country. Like Iraq. We didn't invade until two oil men became president. Dumbya and Prick Cheney. And then when we packed up and left and when ISIS came in and was gaining control of Iraq, we didn't get re-involved, this time with bombings, until ISIS was threatening a town which was a major oil supplier or the HQ for oil companies. Before all that, we knew how Hussein mis-treated, tortured and killed the citizens and we just didn't give a shit at all. If we did, then we would have either gone in there earlier or finished the job of the first war. We support brutal dictators. Manipulate elections and do other things to put them in charge. But once they thumb their nose at America or we want more, then we invade. Never has anything to do with our freedoms and never did.
|
|
|
Post by progressiveelement on Apr 10, 2017 18:52:35 GMT
So, you're against intervening, but when the US stays out of it, they should draw fire for not intervening? They were involved on a humanitarian level, as were other UN nations. Such was Rwanda's opinion of French involvement, they changed their national language from French to English. As it happens, the country they export the most products to outside Africa is the US. Mainly coffee, tea, hides and tin ore. I'm questioning the motives behind whenever America invades a foreign country. Like Iraq. We didn't invade until two oil men became president. Dumbya and Prick Cheney. And then when we packed up and left and when ISIS came in and was gaining control of Iraq, we didn't get re-involved, this time with bombings, until ISIS was threatening a town which was a major oil supplier or the HQ for oil companies. Before all that, we knew how Hussein mis-treated, tortured and killed the citizens and we just didn't give a shit at all. If we did, then we would have either gone in there earlier or finished the job of the first war. We support brutal dictators. Manipulate elections and do other things to put them in charge. But once they thumb their nose at America or we want more, then we invade. Never has anything to do with our freedoms and never did. Getting in bed with the devil is a story older than the US. Britain, France, Germany, Russia, Spain, Portugal, there can't be many a power/empire who've made war for profit, power, and using allies of an unsavoury nature to achieve goals, sphere of influence,etc
|
|
|
Post by WarrenPeace on Apr 10, 2017 19:02:36 GMT
Hawaii, which we invaded and just stole from the native people there, was not a state at the time. So the attack on Pearl Harbor was as close to bombing the mainland as any of the WW2 enemies was going to get. We were always safe from any harm from Germany and Japan. Show me any examples as to where any soldiers in any modern wars sacrificed themselves for my freedom here. Since when was there any threat at all to any of our freedoms from a foreign enemy?
Fixed your quote for you. Your welcome. OK I was not aware of that. However, the only ones whose freedoms were affected were those villagers that were allegedly round up. (And I do mean "allegedly" while keeping in mind that the Gulf of Tonkin affair that put is into Viet Nam was a total and complete lie and fabrication.) Sure since Alaska is way the fuck up there and there is a whole 'nuther country they would have to fight through to get to ours. And only in hindsight? Somehow I doubt that. I mean, hey, if our very own government will lie to us that every Japanese/American civilian is somehow a threat to create this atmosphere of hatred and paranoia, why trust them with any "truth" they tell us? Rounding them up, stealing their homes, businesses, possessions and then throwing them into prison when they didn't commit any crimes was the wrong thing to do. Well, there ya go. Our freedoms were never at stake.
That is going down the road of speculation which is paved with bullshit which I don't care to step in. I just deal with what we have and what we know.
Unless of course there is indisputable proof that Germany and the axis did come up with plans for an American invasion.
If we don't have that, then we got nothing.
|
|
|
Post by WarrenPeace on Apr 10, 2017 19:06:01 GMT
I'm questioning the motives behind whenever America invades a foreign country. Like Iraq. We didn't invade until two oil men became president. Dumbya and Prick Cheney. And then when we packed up and left and when ISIS came in and was gaining control of Iraq, we didn't get re-involved, this time with bombings, until ISIS was threatening a town which was a major oil supplier or the HQ for oil companies. Before all that, we knew how Hussein mis-treated, tortured and killed the citizens and we just didn't give a shit at all. If we did, then we would have either gone in there earlier or finished the job of the first war. We support brutal dictators. Manipulate elections and do other things to put them in charge. But once they thumb their nose at America or we want more, then we invade. Never has anything to do with our freedoms and never did. Getting in bed with the devil is a story older than the US. Britain, France, Germany, Russia, Spain, Portugal, there can't be many a power/empire who've made war for profit, power, and using allies of an unsavoury nature to achieve goals, sphere of influence,etc in other words: War is cool. It is super awesome and it is one of the best things America is good at. Creating destruction, suffering and death around the world and we should keep doing it. Right?
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Apr 10, 2017 19:08:31 GMT
"Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you; Jesus Christ and the American G. I. One died for your soul; the other for your freedom."
Let me know when your 'freedom' extends to what you put into your own body, or the freedom to end your own life if you want to. Right now you're not 'free', you're just regurgitating propaganda. Your government tells you you're 'free' so you blindly believe it, because you're stupid and easily manipulated. Ironic that someone living in the country that imprisons more of it's own population for non-violent crimes than any other country on Earth is bragging about 'freedom'.
|
|
|
Post by progressiveelement on Apr 10, 2017 19:13:50 GMT
Fixed your quote for you. Your welcome. OK I was not aware of that. However, the only ones whose freedoms were affected were those villagers that were allegedly round up. (And I do mean "allegedly" while keeping in mind that the Gulf of Tonkin affair that put is into Viet Nam was a total and complete lie and fabrication.) Sure since Alaska is way the fuck up there and there is a whole 'nuther country they would have to fight through to get to ours. And only in hindsight? Somehow I doubt that. I mean, hey, if our very own government will lie to us that every Japanese/American civilian is somehow a threat to create this atmosphere of hatred and paranoia, why trust them with any "truth" they tell us? Rounding them up, stealing their homes, businesses, possessions and then throwing them into prison when they didn't commit any crimes was the wrong thing to do. Well, there ya go. Our freedoms were never at stake.
That is going down the road of speculation which is paved with bullshit which I don't care to step in. I just deal with what we have and what we know.
Unless of course there is indisputable proof that Germany and the axis did come up with plans for an American invasion.
If we don't have that, then we got nothing. Germany definitely had plans to attack the US. They had the Amerika Bomber project to develop bombers that could travel long distances to attack US targets. Even nuking them. The project was scrapped as they did not have the resources at the time. They even had future plans to develop a space weapon capable of focusing the sun's rays to wreak destruction on any nation that opposed them. Those Nazis had some fancy ideas going on. Much of the development of ballistic missile submarines was derived from German concepts.
|
|
|
Post by progressiveelement on Apr 10, 2017 19:19:40 GMT
Getting in bed with the devil is a story older than the US. Britain, France, Germany, Russia, Spain, Portugal, there can't be many a power/empire who've made war for profit, power, and using allies of an unsavoury nature to achieve goals, sphere of influence,etc in other words: War is cool. It is super awesome and it is one of the best things America is good at. Creating destruction, suffering and death around the world and we should keep doing it. Right? It is evidently better to let evil triumph. 😜 What about rescuing people? Hostages, people stuck up a mountain? How about assisting in huminatarian missions? Flying a Herc and dropping off food? And why do you keep focusing on the States? Are they the sole warmonger on the planet?
|
|
|
Post by WarrenPeace on Apr 10, 2017 19:28:35 GMT
I didn't know that quote was being attributed to soldiers of WW2. Just tired of the propaganda crap that soldiers are fighting and dying for American freedoms which is never, ever true. Other than that, I hate the fucking military and have no respect for it. If they want my respect than they need to stop with the killing of civilians which is the norm. Have you ever heard of the My Lai massacre in Nam? That is just the tip of the iceberg and one of the few and only times they ever got caught at it and went to trial. I'm only looking at America. No doubt other countries that take part in wars also have their hands as bloody as the American soldiers and military when it comes to civilian deaths. I am a conscientious objector, never even registered for the draft, fuck it, and a pacifist. So I am against all wars all the time. Not really. Does this look like it is "better disciplined" to you? On Monday, April 5, Wikileaks.org posted video footage from Iraq, taken from a US military Apache helicopter in July 2007 as soldiers aboard it killed 12 people and wounded two children. The dead included two employees of the Reuters news agency: photographer Namir Noor-Eldeen and driver Saeed Chmagh. The US military confirmed the authenticity of the video. The footage clearly shows an unprovoked slaughter, and is shocking to watch whilst listening to the casual conversation of the soldiers in the background. As disturbing as the video is, this type of behavior by US soldiers in Iraq is not uncommon. Truthout has spoken with several soldiers who shared equally horrific stories of the slaughtering of innocent Iraqis by US occupation forces. "I remember one woman walking by," said Jason Washburn, a corporal in the US Marines who served three tours in Iraq. He told the audience at the Winter Soldier hearings that took place March 13-16, 2008, in Silver Spring, Maryland, "She was carrying a huge bag, and she looked like she was heading toward us, so we lit her up with the Mark 19, which is an automatic grenade launcher, and when the dust settled, we realized that the bag was full of groceries. She had been trying to bring us food and we blew her to pieces." Washburn testified on a panel that discussed the rules of engagement (ROE) in Iraq, and how lax they were, to the point of being virtually nonexistent. "During the course of my three tours, the rules of engagement changed a lot," Washburn's testimony continued, "The higher the threat the more viciously we were permitted and expected to respond. Something else we were encouraged to do, almost with a wink and nudge, was to carry 'drop weapons', or by my third tour, 'drop shovels'. We would carry these weapons or shovels with us because if we accidentally shot a civilian, we could just toss the weapon on the body, and make them look like an insurgent." Hart Viges, a member of the 82nd Airborne Division of the Army who served one year in Iraq, told of taking orders over the radio. "One time they said to ï¬re on all taxicabs because the enemy was using them for transportation.... One of the snipers replied back, 'Excuse me? Did I hear that right? Fire on all taxicabs?' The lieutenant colonel responded, 'You heard me, trooper, ï¬re on all taxicabs.' After that, the town lit up, with all the units ï¬ring on cars. This was my ï¬rst experience with war, and that kind of set the tone for the rest of the deployment." Vincent Emanuele, a Marine rifleman who spent a year in the al-Qaim area of Iraq near the Syrian border, told of emptying magazines of bullets into the city without identifying targets, running over corpses with Humvees and stopping to take "trophy" photos of bodies. "An act that took place quite often in Iraq was taking pot shots at cars that drove by," he said, "This was not an isolated incident, and it took place for most of our eight-month deployment." truth-out.org/archive/component/k2/item/88912:iraq-war-vet-we-were-told-to-just-shoot-people-and-the-officers-would-take-care-of-usUS Army 'Kill Team' in Afghanistan Posed for Photos of Murdered Civilians March 21, 2011 "The Guardian" -- Commanders in Afghanistan are bracing themselves for possible riots and public fury triggered by the publication of "trophy" photographs of US soldiers posing with the dead bodies of defenceless Afghan civilians they killed. Senior officials at Nato's International Security Assistance Force in Kabul have compared the pictures published by the German news weekly Der Spiegel to the images of US soldiers abusing prisoners in Abu Ghraib in Iraq which sparked waves of anti-US protests around the world. They fear that the pictures could be even more damaging as they show the aftermath of the deliberate murders of Afghan civilians by a rogue US Stryker tank unit that operated in the southern province of Kandahar last year. If you dare, go here to see the photos: www.informationclearinghouse.info/article27738.htmU.S. military announces that civilian casualties in Iraq and Syria are more than double previous estimate The number of civilians killed by U.S. airstrikes in Iraq and Syria is more than double the previous estimate, U.S. Central Command said on Wednesday, after reexamining its air campaign based on allegations from activist groups. The announcement of 64 additional deaths brings the total civilian death toll in U.S. air attacks to 119 since the campaign against the Islamic State began in 2014, Centcom said. The command, responsible for U.S. military operations in the Middle East, is investigating other allegations. www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2016/11/09/u-s-military-announces-that-civilian-casualties-in-iraq-and-syria-are-more-than-double-previous-estimate/?utm_term=.36240c496aa7Got the idea of how wrong you are yet or shall I dig up some more examples But they still managed to kick out our invading asses with little more than sticks and stones. Good on them for getting us the fuck out where we didn't belong. See? It was all bullshit with that communism crap and domino theory which just turned out to be propaganda and a lie to go to war. Doesn't matter that it happened over there after all.
|
|
|
Post by progressiveelement on Apr 10, 2017 20:07:07 GMT
Got the idea of how wrong you are yet or shall I dig up some more examples
Yup, every single one a psycho murderer.... See how calm you are in an environment where you can't tell the wolves from the sheep. Training is one thing, reality is another, people react differently to the stress of combat. Crack up, go psycho, matters aren't helped when the REMFs are being a little inconsistent. Disciplined troops can make mistakes in the heat of combat, where hesitation can get you and others killed. Those who willingly fire on unarmed civilians should face severe penalties as mandated. When you hear of coverups, it is often those in seniority trying to cover their own asses, their "service" usually spent sitting at desks, being waited on by 10 servants, totally dislocated from reality. Typical bureaucrats.
😐
Anyway....
But they still managed to kick out our invading asses with little more than sticks and stones. Good on them for getting us the fuck out where we didn't belong.
Not really. The VC were effective, but the NVA had the big toys. Like the French before them, the US saw North Vietnamese as peasants, so when they actually prove to be a tad more formidable, it was a bit of a shock. US troops at this time had no real experience in guerilla warfare, they were up against an enemy that knew better how to make the terrain a weapon for them.
The US were getting a bit too confident in technology. Early F-4 Phantom II fighter jets did not have cannons, they were deemed obsolete in manage of missiles. They found out the hard way that x amount of missiles does not guarantee x amount of kills, and when things got close, an older, but more agile MiG-17 in the hands of a well-trained pilot is going to ruin your day, as well as the newer MiG-21s, technically inferior to the F-4 but much more agile. The Soviets actually trained these pilots, and also flew a few themselves. And again, cultural superiority lead to a serious underestimation of the NVA.
The US were also supporting a corrupt regime that was unpopular with their own people, and the Communist North was gaining many sympathizers.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2017 20:49:32 GMT
I've never asked either one to die for me. Me neither. Before you die for someone, it might be a good idea to ask first to see if you really need to die. One might even say that going out and dying for people who haven't asked you to and don't want you to is rather presumptuous. Especially if you do so with the expectation of gratitude from them.
|
|
|
Post by Sulla on Apr 10, 2017 21:03:11 GMT
WarrenPeace
I didn't address the manner in which those territories were acquired because that's irrelevant to the fact that US military and civilians were later attacked there. That is unless you're saying they got what they deserved for the way we acquired Hawaii.
44 villagers were taken to Hokkaido and after the war the survivors were returned and resettled in Atka. The event is well-documented unless you think it's another phony government story. As owners of the territory in which they lived, we had an obligation to protect their freedom from enslavement by foreign powers the same as if they were official citizens.
You've gone off about a subject which I didn't address. Of course internment was wrong.
At the time of the panic, the US Army had not yet built up and Japan was known to be the only country which had a significant number of amphibious landing craft. It's pretty easy to understand why there was a fear at the time. A mainland invasion would require 'stepping stones' across the Pacific. Possession of Attu, Kiska, Guam, Midway and Hawaii could've served that purpose. The Japanese captured the first three listed. Just because they failed at Midway doesn't mean they wouldn't try again. No government fearmongering was needed to connect those dots.
Our freedom to work and move around within our own country without being killed by a foreign power was certainly at stake. Now I'm convinced you're just trolling.
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Apr 10, 2017 21:30:52 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2017 23:28:11 GMT
Superman died for us too. But I think he'll come back, which just cheapens the sacrifice really.
|
|
|
Post by thefleetsin on Apr 10, 2017 23:30:25 GMT
there's nothing quite like divinely inspired self interest.
people will do all manner of things at your command.
|
|
|
Post by progressiveelement on Apr 10, 2017 23:32:00 GMT
Superman died for us too. But I think he'll come back, which just cheapens the sacrifice really. Did you even doubt it after seeing his casket, and particularly the final moments?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2017 23:32:36 GMT
That dirt might have just gotten bored being on that coffin and decided to go elsewhere!
|
|
|
Post by SuperDevilDoctor on Apr 11, 2017 9:35:39 GMT
I never felt this good when I was out of the Church and it was impossible to resist sin. Although being "in" the Church apparently did little to stop that alarmingly high number of Catholic priests from molesting all those children... Nor did it dissuade some Catholic priests in Croatia from personally leading anti-Jewish death squads during World War II. Just sayin'.
|
|
|
Post by Edward-Elizabeth-Hitler on Apr 11, 2017 9:44:56 GMT
As I get closer to God by praying and adhering to his laws and teachings,[attending mass, going to confession and receiving holy communion] it becomes easier to resist sin and temptation. It also reduces stress and depression for me and greatly improves my mood and well being. I never felt this good when I was out of the Church and it was impossible to resist sin. What "sins" did you find it impossible to resist, blade?
|
|