|
Post by awhina on Feb 22, 2017 8:03:29 GMT
How many times have I got to say that news translations don't mean changes of fact? You need to believe what you say is true. You know I don't speak Swedish but I assure you that in English the New Testament definitely condemns adult men having sex with each other. The Latin Bible was not the original and more up to date versions use more reliable texts than the Latin. So over all what you clsim is inaccurate. You don't read what I write do you? I just proved that the bible has been altered. The latin on at the time, was closer to the original than our bibles of today. Have you ever played that game when you sit in a circle and send whispers on by one, you know, I whisper "A black cat" and after i has been passed over several people, you get the whisper "Back at you"? It's actually the exact same things with the bible, the more people that have translated and edited it, the more it moves from the original, colouring the text with the ethics of the time. " The Latin Bible was not the original and more up to date versions use more reliable texts than the Latin. So over all what you clsim is inaccurate. " And suddenly, you admit to the bible being edited. No clown. A new translation is not an edit. Why do you refuse to accept that?
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Feb 22, 2017 8:07:14 GMT
How many times have I got to say that news translations don't mean changes of fact? You need to believe what you say is true. You know I don't speak Swedish but I assure you that in English the New Testament definitely condemns adult men having sex with each other. The Latin Bible was not the original and more up to date versions use more reliable texts than the Latin. So over all what you clsim is inaccurate. Do tell Ada... What are these more reliable texts that you speak of? Who is this Ada you addressed your question to?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2017 8:13:58 GMT
Do tell Ada... What are these more reliable texts that you speak of? Who is this Ada you addressed your question to? That would be you, as you said in t'other thread "I was never without the red warning as Ada from 2 weeks after getting on PD'S hate list so 5 years and as Melanie from a few days!"
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Feb 22, 2017 8:16:54 GMT
Who is this Ada you addressed your question to? That would be you, as you said in t'other thread "I was never without the red warning as Ada from 2 weeks after getting on PD'S hate list so 5 years and as Melanie from a few days!" Nevertheless I am not Ada here and will not answer to that name.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2017 8:19:53 GMT
That would be you, as you said in t'other thread "I was never without the red warning as Ada from 2 weeks after getting on PD'S hate list so 5 years and as Melanie from a few days!" Nevertheless I am not Ada here and will not answer to that name. OK then awhina... what are these more reliable texts that you speak of? What are they, and why are they more reliable than the earlier Latin (and Greek) texts?
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Feb 22, 2017 8:27:19 GMT
Nevertheless I am not Ada here and will not answer to that name. OK then awhina... what are these more reliable texts that you speak of? What are they, and why are they more reliable than the earlier Latin (and Greek) texts? You answered your own question. I meant the Greek texts, which he didn't mention. You're trying to smuggle in the pretence that he mentioned the Greek texts.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2017 8:36:29 GMT
Who is this Ada you addressed your question to? You are Ada. Why do you insist on playing these childish games.? You are the poster known as Ada Lovelace,the most homophobic bigot on the original RFS board. The hypocrite who talks about a mother never giving up her child and yet gave up one of her children for adoption at birth because she was unable to look after him,and her family were unwilling to help her do so. The same women who had a second child removed from her custody by a judge because she was deemed an unfit mother. The same women who talks about the sanctity of marriage when her own was a complete and utter disaster which led to infidelity and divorce. The same women who likes to lecture others about these things while doing everything she can to deny her own failings in these matters. The same women who thought it appropirate to say most gay men are pedophiles.. The same women who had her posting history wiped and a huge posting quota put in place for saying these things and worse on the original RFS board. The same women who accussed several posters of being pedophiles and distributing child pornography. That's who this women is. You've had many names Awhina/Melanie000/Adelina/Hellada/Helena-Justina/Tullia/Vicky32 but you will always been known as Ada and no matter what you call yourself you'll always be pond scum.
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Feb 22, 2017 8:43:27 GMT
Who is this Ada you addressed your question to? You are Ada. Why do you insist on playing these childish games.? You are the poster known as Ada Lovelace,the most homophobic bigot on the original RFS board. The hypocrite who talks about a mother never giving up her child and yet gave up one of her children for adoption at birth because she was unable to look after him,and her family were unwilling to help her do so. The same women who had a second child removed from her custody by a judge because she was deemed an unfit mother. The same women who talks about the sanctity of marriage when her own was a complete and utter disaster which led to infidelity and divorce. The same women who likes to lecture others about these things while doing everything she can to deny her own failings in these matters. The same women who thought it appropirate to say most gay men are pedophiles.. The same women who had her posting history wiped and a huge posting quota put in place for saying these things and worse on the original RFS board. The same women who accussed several posters of being pedophiles and distributing child pornography. That's who this women is. You've had many names Awhina/Melanie000/Adelina/Hellada/Helena-Justina/Tullia/Vicky32 but you will always been known as Ada and no matter what you call yourself you'll always be pond scum. You are a lying psychopath supes. My son was not removed from my custody because I was unfit. You know that. The rest of your lies are not worthy of any answer.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2017 8:47:48 GMT
You are Ada. Why do you insist on playing these childish games.? You are the poster known as Ada Lovelace,the most homophobic bigot on the original RFS board. The hypocrite who talks about a mother never giving up her child and yet gave up one of her children for adoption at birth because she was unable to look after him,and her family were unwilling to help her do so. The same women who had a second child removed from her custody by a judge because she was deemed an unfit mother. The same women who talks about the sanctity of marriage when her own was a complete and utter disaster which led to infidelity and divorce. The same women who likes to lecture others about these things while doing everything she can to deny her own failings in these matters. The same women who thought it appropirate to say most gay men are pedophiles.. The same women who had her posting history wiped and a huge posting quota put in place for saying these things and worse on the original RFS board. The same women who accussed several posters of being pedophiles and distributing child pornography. That's who this women is. You've had many names Awhina/Melanie000/Adelina/Hellada/Helena-Justina/Tullia/Vicky32 but you will always been known as Ada and no matter what you call yourself you'll always be pond scum. You are a lying psychopath supes. My son was not removed from my custody because I was unfit. You know that. The rest of your lies are not worthy of any answer. Then why did you have a child removed from your custody? I think this is relevant, given that you have been casting aspersions and moral judgements on others over similar issues in this thread.
|
|
j2
Sophomore
@j2
Posts: 628
Likes: 149
|
Post by j2 on Feb 22, 2017 8:49:09 GMT
Women "deacons" nowadays are FAR from 'servants', except if it means to say they serve themselves. Carry on. N'aww, you felt stupid I see. And yet again you are wrong (you must be used to it by now). Prove otherwise. Or are you just going to say "Google" as you allways do when you painted yourself into a corner? I don't amuse people like you; I expose you. Take it up with the Catholics, for example. It's for very strong reasons they've opposed women in appointed ministry positions for two thousand years, except in the case of nuns controlling 'themselves' to a degree.
|
|
|
Post by progressiveelement on Feb 22, 2017 8:50:40 GMT
You are Ada. Why do you insist on playing these childish games.? You are the poster known as Ada Lovelace,the most homophobic bigot on the original RFS board. The hypocrite who talks about a mother never giving up her child and yet gave up one of her children for adoption at birth because she was unable to look after him,and her family were unwilling to help her do so. The same women who had a second child removed from her custody by a judge because she was deemed an unfit mother. The same women who talks about the sanctity of marriage when her own was a complete and utter disaster which led to infidelity and divorce. The same women who likes to lecture others about these things while doing everything she can to deny her own failings in these matters. The same women who thought it appropirate to say most gay men are pedophiles.. The same women who had her posting history wiped and a huge posting quota put in place for saying these things and worse on the original RFS board. The same women who accussed several posters of being pedophiles and distributing child pornography. That's who this women is. You've had many names Awhina/Melanie000/Adelina/Hellada/Helena-Justina/Tullia/Vicky32 but you will always been known as Ada and no matter what you call yourself you'll always be pond scum. You are a lying psychopath supes. My son was not removed from my custody because I was unfit. You know that. The rest of your lies are not worthy of any answer. Would this not be the one Dustin Hoffman helped influence the taking of? 😜
|
|
j2
Sophomore
@j2
Posts: 628
Likes: 149
|
Post by j2 on Feb 22, 2017 8:54:36 GMT
Favor me? Are you under the impression of that I am a christian? Sorry to disappoint you, i'm not. But on the question of how that don't favor you, the answer is that according to the bible (a book i've read several times, have you?) Jesus would never have talked down to homosexuals like you and others do. You are not a christian in the spirit of Jesus teachings, so that would make you a "christian". My best friend is a deacon and she is totally for gay marriage, female bishops, helping refugees etc, but according to you, she is not a christian. What a joke. I find it almost amusing that atheist people consider themselves experts on how Christians should be! Jesus never said "party on dudes" to homosexuals. Well that's what they would have everyone believe. It goes in line with their interests, after all.
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Feb 22, 2017 8:56:46 GMT
You are a lying psychopath supes. My son was not removed from my custody because I was unfit. You know that. The rest of your lies are not worthy of any answer. Then why did you have a child removed from your custody? I think this is relevant, given that you have been casting aspersions and moral judgements on others over similar issues in this thread. Because my husband won custody. It happens all the time. It's not relevant to the thread at all, you are simply being prurient. If you want to know the details tough, but I will just say that the husband had parents living to support him whereas mine were dead and my siblings were children. This happened 36 years ago and the child is now a grown man with his own family and he lives nearby. We are in contact all the time.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2017 9:04:28 GMT
Then why did you have a child removed from your custody? I think this is relevant, given that you have been casting aspersions and moral judgements on others over similar issues in this thread. Because my husband won custody. It happens all the time. It's not relevant to the thread at all, you are simply being prurient. If you want to know the details tough, but I will just say that the husband had parents living to support him whereas mine were dead and my siblings were children. This happened 36 years ago and the child is now a grown man with his own family and he lives nearby. We are in contact all the time. No, details are not needed, you could just say lost custody battle with father. I am good friends with my daughter's mother, her partner and their child, even though we separated 17 years ago, I don't understand these acrimonious custody battles/separations.
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Feb 22, 2017 9:09:27 GMT
Because my husband won custody. It happens all the time. It's not relevant to the thread at all, you are simply being prurient. If you want to know the details tough, but I will just say that the husband had parents living to support him whereas mine were dead and my siblings were children. This happened 36 years ago and the child is now a grown man with his own family and he lives nearby. We are in contact all the time. No, details are not needed, you could just say lost custody battle with father. I am good friends with my daughter's mother, her partner and their child, even though we separated 17 years ago, I don't understand these acrimonious custody battles. That is very nice for you but don't judge my experience by your own. If I had not given any details certain men would have hurried to supply their own lies.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2017 9:13:52 GMT
No, details are not needed, you could just say lost custody battle with father. I am good friends with my daughter's mother, her partner and their child, even though we separated 17 years ago, I don't understand these acrimonious custody battles. That is very nice for you but don't judge my experience by your own. If I had not given any details certain men would have hurried to supply their own lies. I haven't judged your experience, just said it sounds like something mutually damaging, that I don't understand why people would put themselves and their children through. Do you think perhaps you imagined I judged you when I didn't, because you have a habit of judging other people?
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Feb 22, 2017 9:16:01 GMT
I find it almost amusing that atheist people consider themselves experts on how Christians should be! Jesus never said "party on dudes" to homosexuals. Well that's what they would have everyone believe. It goes in line with their interests, after all. Exactly. They want to believe that silence means consent.
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Feb 22, 2017 9:18:40 GMT
That is very nice for you but don't judge my experience by your own. If I had not given any details certain men would have hurried to supply their own lies. I haven't judged your experience, just said it sounds like something mutually damaging, that I don't understand why people would put themselves and their children through. Do you really think that any of that was my choice? Could you kindly stop minding my business now?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2017 9:27:12 GMT
I haven't judged your experience, just said it sounds like something mutually damaging, that I don't understand why people would put themselves and their children through. Do you really think that any of that was my choice? Could you kindly stop minding my business now? You're so spiky aren't you? You can't pick up when somebody is trying to give you a bit of a break, and engage you in a conversation about a similar situation, in this instance, separation and children. If you cast moral judgements on other people, as you do, then you have to expect your own morals to come under scrutiny in return. You need to understand that... if you don't like it, stop judging others... it's that simple.
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Feb 22, 2017 9:35:09 GMT
Do you really think that any of that was my choice? Could you kindly stop minding my business now? You're so spiky aren't you? You can't pick up when somebody is trying to give you a bit of a break, and engage you in a conversation about a similar situation, in this instance, separation and children. If you cast moral judgements on other people, as you do, then you have to expect your own morals to come under scrutiny in return. You need to understand that... if you don't like it, stop judging others... it's that simple. That is a great excuse but it won't work. I have not been "judging" anyone. Even if I had been, that would not justify all the talk about my private life abd an event that caused great psin to me and my sons (all of them were affected by what happened to their brother.) Which is why I am not a fan of seeing the lives of children being f***ed up.
|
|