blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 26, 2017 20:27:17 GMT
Where does homosexuality figure into that? Oh, that's right, it doesn't, but you knew that.
|
|
islandmur
Sophomore
All religions have messages of peace and love yet all religions are used for wars and hatred...
@islandmur
Posts: 320
Likes: 180
|
Post by islandmur on Feb 26, 2017 20:33:39 GMT
Homosexual marriages = 2 consenting adults Pedophilia = 1 adult and 1 non consenting child incest = usually same as pedophilia / but marriages between siblings /cousins who haven't grown up togheter? I couldn't care less also because consenting adults. ? Your problem? You know of consenting children to sex with adult... and I mean consenting - awareness - legal - etc...
|
|
j2
Sophomore
@j2
Posts: 628
Likes: 149
|
Post by j2 on Feb 26, 2017 21:57:21 GMT
Your problem? You know of consenting children to sex with adult... and I mean consenting - awareness - legal - etc... I don't know what the hell you're talking about. Care to TRY to make some sense?
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Feb 26, 2017 22:54:57 GMT
Unrepentant criminals is the important thing. WE know this. Yes we know that, but they need to not know it!
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Feb 26, 2017 23:00:08 GMT
True.
And your statement that there is no scientific support for homosexuality being innate is false.
Just a suggestion, Ada/HelenBlack...awhina, afeena, whatever, pick a name and an avatar and frigging stick with it. The name 'Sybil' comes to mind. Or find a therapist who can integrate all your multiple personalities.
Er who are you? I have a name, Awhina pronounced Afeena. The other names are names I used up to 7 years ago but the hysterical doxing boys insist on them - therefore your attack is unwarranted.
|
|
|
Post by geode on Feb 26, 2017 23:05:28 GMT
True.
And your statement that there is no scientific support for homosexuality being innate is false.
Just a suggestion, Ada/HelenBlack...awhina, afeena, whatever, pick a name and an avatar and frigging stick with it. The name 'Sybil' comes to mind. Or find a therapist who can integrate all your multiple personalities.
Er who are you? I have a name, Awhina pronounced Afeena. The other names are names I used up to 7 years ago but the hysterical doxing boys insist on them - therefore your attack is unwarranted. To be fair, in just the last few months you have used at least half a dozen names and multiple avatars, and when first encountering a different one everyone has to wonder who they are encountering.
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Feb 26, 2017 23:20:47 GMT
Er who are you? I have a name, Awhina pronounced Afeena. The other names are names I used up to 7 years ago but the hysterical doxing boys insist on them - therefore your attack is unwarranted. To be fair, in just the last few months you have used at least half a dozen names and multiple avatars, and when first encountering a different one everyone has to wonder who they are encountering. You are lying but even if you were telling the truth there's a reason - it's been an attempt to get away from harassment and the doxing boys. My avatar on the old board was always the same.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 26, 2017 23:29:29 GMT
][/quote]You are lying but even if you were telling the truth there's a reason - it's been an attempt to get away from harassment and the doxing boys.
Proof if anymore was needed that there's something wrong with your brain.
You called Geode a liar then you went on to explain why you did exactly what he said you did in the same paragraph.
Get some self awareness seriously you're an embarrassment.
|
|
|
Post by ProjectError on Feb 26, 2017 23:51:14 GMT
Not really. However it's not a real marriage any more than when a couple of 4 year old children at a kindergarten or play centre pretend to get married because they attended aunt and uncle's wedding on the weekend. Technically, that's not true. I'm not sure how you're defining "real" marriage. Marriages are defined/recognized by the state. They're not defined by the church. The church wedding/ceremony is just for show. It means nothing to the state. You're not officially married when the priest/preacher says "I now pronounce you man and wife" - you're officially married when you return the signed forms to a courthouse/City Hall after the ceremony. Gay couples are technically in a more real marriage than a Christian couple who gets married in a church without a marriage license, relying solely on a marriage not legal according to the state.
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Feb 27, 2017 0:18:21 GMT
Not really. However it's not a real marriage any more than when a couple of 4 year old children at a kindergarten or play centre pretend to get married because they attended aunt and uncle's wedding on the weekend. Technically, that's not true. I'm not sure how you're defining "real" marriage. Marriages are defined/recognized by the state. They're not defined by the church. The church wedding/ceremony is just for show. It means nothing to the state. You're not officially married when the priest/preacher says "I now pronounce you man and wife" - you're officially married when you return the signed forms to a courthouse/City Hall after the ceremony. Gay couples are technically in a more real marriage than a Christian couple who gets married in a church without a marriage license, relying solely on a marriage not legal according to the state. Maybe that is true in American law but not everyone is American. Marriage is much more than just s legal /financial arrangement, it's spiritual, emotional, social and cultural. The Christian couple married in church are just as married as the atheist one at "city hall".
|
|
althea
Sophomore
@althea
Posts: 105
Likes: 10
|
Post by althea on Feb 27, 2017 0:29:08 GMT
I apologize in advance if I've already responded in this thread. I do care if gays are given the right to marry and am against it only because it would change the definition of "marriage". "Between one man and one woman" is appropriately restrictive and prevents legal challenges defending all kinds of "marriages" which would be detrimental to society. To change the definition of marriage is to invite legal arguments that anyone should be able to marry anyone or anything, it would give pedophilia and incestuousness and all imaginable arguments legal grounds. I favor and support legal bonds between gays. What gay people do together is not an issue for me. First, the definition of marriage "between one man and one woman" is only one definition. Another is "the state of being united as spouses in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law". Second, there's no evidence that changing the definition of marriage would be detrimental to society. Actually, since the definition obviously has changed and society still exists, there's evidence that changing the definition of marriage is not detrimental to society. And third, slippery slope arguments have been around at least since allowing interracial marriages. This does not make slippery slope arguments right. The "one man and one woman" bit is the definition inserted into the marriage act that prevents same sex marriage. It's the part that will need to be rewritten to allow same sex marriage...IMHO, it should be removed completely, because it was only inserted to specifically discriminate against some relationships deemed marriages outside of the marriage act definition. In Australia, anyways. When people get married, if the celebrant doesn't say it, then it doesn't count. It's one of the mandatory parts of the wedding service if you don't have a traditional religious ceremony. If we used your second definition rather than the first definition, we already have gay marriage, so its not really helpful in the sense of changing the law to allow gay couples to marry. If you want evidence of changing the definition of marriage being detrimental, look at how they introduced the "one man and one woman to the exclusion of all others" into the marriage act in order to prevent marriages that were recognised in other countries from being recognised as marriages here.
|
|
|
Post by geode on Feb 27, 2017 2:02:55 GMT
To be fair, in just the last few months you have used at least half a dozen names and multiple avatars, and when first encountering a different one everyone has to wonder who they are encountering. You are lying but even if you were telling the truth there's a reason - it's been an attempt to get away from harassment and the doxing boys. My avatar on the old board was always the same. You had a different avatar for each ID at IMDb in just the past few months. Therefore it was not always the same. I am not lying. There was Ada, Helen, Melanie, and the two you have had here in the time period I have mentioned, and I think there was another one between Helen and Melanie. I could be wrong about that but it is what I think I saw. Of course with you changing so often it is easy to lose count. Maybe there were even more. It is a very poor attempt to hide from harassment since your persona is almost identical whatever name you use.
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Feb 27, 2017 6:35:54 GMT
You are lying but even if you were telling the truth there's a reason - it's been an attempt to get away from harassment and the doxing boys. My avatar on the old board was always the same. You had a different avatar for each ID at IMDb in just the past few months. Therefore it was not always the same. I am not lying. There was Ada, Helen, Melanie, and the two you have had here in the time period I have mentioned, and I think there was another one between Helen and Melanie. I could be wrong about that but it is what I think I saw. Of course with you changing so often it is easy to lose count. Maybe there were even more. It is a very poor attempt to hide from harassment since your persona is almost identical whatever name you use. You are lying. I had (by accident ) the same avatar for Ada and Helen which all the boys made much of but I didn't know because of my visual issues. When you boys started bitching I changed Helen to the giraffe and that is all I had for a year. But as I asked on the other board and never got an answer why so obsessed?
|
|
|
Post by geode on Feb 27, 2017 6:50:16 GMT
You had a different avatar for each ID at IMDb in just the past few months. Therefore it was not always the same. I am not lying. There was Ada, Helen, Melanie, and the two you have had here in the time period I have mentioned, and I think there was another one between Helen and Melanie. I could be wrong about that but it is what I think I saw. Of course with you changing so often it is easy to lose count. Maybe there were even more. It is a very poor attempt to hide from harassment since your persona is almost identical whatever name you use. You are lying. I had (by a accident ) the same avatar for Ada and Helen which all the boys made much of but I didn't know because of my visual issues. When you boys started bitching I changed Helen to the giraffe and that is all I had for a year. But as I asked on the other board and never got an answer why so obsessed? Why is your favorite comeback to being revealed as wrong to claim those pointing this out to be lying? You just look worse when this happens. Helen wasn't even created a year ago. Is this a memory lapse or your lying? I am not obsessed. I was simply defending another poster against your false accusations.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2017 6:57:24 GMT
You had a different avatar for each ID at IMDb in just the past few months. Therefore it was not always the same. I am not lying. There was Ada, Helen, Melanie, and the two you have had here in the time period I have mentioned, and I think there was another one between Helen and Melanie. I could be wrong about that but it is what I think I saw. Of course with you changing so often it is easy to lose count. Maybe there were even more. It is a very poor attempt to hide from harassment since your persona is almost identical whatever name you use. You are lying. I had (by a accident ) the same avatar for Ada and Helen which all the boys made much of but I didn't know because of my visual issues. When you boys started bitching I changed Helen to the giraffe and that is all I had for a year. But as I asked on the other board and never got an answer why so obsessed? So the lies start yet again. You forget the part where you tried to pretend that Ada and Helen Black were different people. You had your Ada Lovelace posting history wiped and a posting quota put in place for the disgusting things you said. You created the Helen Black sock immediately afterwards,you then hilariously used it to defend your Ada account,. The third post to you was by Chime commenting on the fact that yours and Ada's avatars were the same.,you changed it to the giraffe soon afterwards. You forget the part where you lied about claiming Helen and Ada had different real names and were therefor different people. This went on for months despite the fact people had rumbled who you were right from the start,instead of admitting that you'd lied you made a thread claiming it was all just a "social experiment". You even had in your bio for the Helen Black account that you wouldn't answer for what your Ada Lovelace account had said despite you both being the same person. You change your name as a defensive mechanism in a futile attempt to escape the hateful shit you post. It's something you've done on other boards to,on the H2 you regularly changed your name and created a sock account pretending to be your own sister. Geode's right you can call yourself whatever you like but your hateful and toxic persona will always give you away.
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Feb 27, 2017 7:08:05 GMT
You are lying. I had (by a accident ) the same avatar for Ada and Helen which all the boys made much of but I didn't know because of my visual issues. When you boys started bitching I changed Helen to the giraffe and that is all I had for a year. But as I asked on the other board and never got an answer why so obsessed? Why is your favorite comeback to being revealed as wrong to claim those pointing this out to be lying? You just look worse when this happens. Helen wasn't even created a year ago. Is this a memory lapse or your lying? I am not obsessed. I was simply defending another poster against your false accusations. Another lie.Helen was created in February 2016, March 1 at the latest and it's late on the 27th February right now. But why so obsessed?
|
|
|
Post by cybajedi on Feb 27, 2017 7:09:24 GMT
Ada and Helen were the same poster? Mind blown
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Feb 27, 2017 7:10:05 GMT
Oh, just one question supes - why so obsessed rage boy?
|
|
|
Post by geode on Feb 27, 2017 7:12:49 GMT
Why is your favorite comeback to being revealed as wrong to claim those pointing this out to be lying? You just look worse when this happens. Helen wasn't even created a year ago. Is this a memory lapse or your lying? I am not obsessed. I was simply defending another poster against your false accusations. Another lie.Helen was created in February 2016, March 1 at the latest and it's late on the 27th February right now. But why so obsessed? Perhaps, but I doubt it. It was months ago for sure.
|
|
|
Post by progressiveelement on Feb 27, 2017 7:28:39 GMT
True.
And your statement that there is no scientific support for homosexuality being innate is false.
Just a suggestion, Ada/HelenBlack...awhina, afeena, whatever, pick a name and an avatar and frigging stick with it. The name 'Sybil' comes to mind. Or find a therapist who can integrate all your multiple personalities.
Er who are you? I have a name, Awhina pronounced Afeena. The other names are names I used up to 7 years ago but the hysterical doxing boys insist on them - therefore your attack is unwarranted. It matters little when it's really fucking obvious they're all the same person, you stupid bitch.
|
|