Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2017 13:06:55 GMT
No i am going to play her son here. You should be banned. I am the Great Prog. I never get banned.
Except that time on imdb when I made crude sexual remarks about Sarah Palin.
And that time on imdb I told one poster to have sex with his mum.
It is about time you get banned. You have behaved like a total out of control mental patient here.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2017 13:13:16 GMT
It is about time you get banned. You have behaved like a total out of control mental patient here. Fucky McFucky Fuck Fuck Fucking Fucked Fucky Fuck I'll have you know that i have reported your posts. Goodbye.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2017 13:16:58 GMT
997
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2017 13:17:54 GMT
998
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2017 13:18:10 GMT
999
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2017 13:19:06 GMT
Nothing to add, just wanted to be 1,000th post on his thread 👍
|
|
j2
Sophomore
@j2
Posts: 628
Likes: 149
|
Post by j2 on Feb 27, 2017 14:30:53 GMT
Well, fuck you and the horse you rode in on.
She is no lady. She is a horrible, evil, malicious, spiteful nasty old bitch who just lies, lies, lies, lies, lies about the lies, and goes all,
"WAAAAH! THEY'RE ALL NASTY TO ME, BECAUSE DEY GAY AND I'M A POOR LITTLE FRAIL WOMAN!"
, when the truth is more obvious to those who aren't pricks.
You should be banned for treating an old woman like this. I assure you, if it had been the other way around action might have been taken already. This is psychological bullying/harassment plain and simple, against a person any age.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2017 14:32:47 GMT
You should be banned for treating an old woman like this. I assure you, if it had been the other way around action might have been taken already. This is psychological bullying/harassment plain and simple, against a person any age. I agree. No one deserves this.
|
|
londonbird
Sophomore
@londonbird
Posts: 250
Likes: 82
|
Post by londonbird on Feb 27, 2017 14:53:58 GMT
Oh for Gods sake you silly little woman, I was pointing out you were correct. Stop with this constant aggression and me, me, me victim hood it's getting very old and very boring the post I have is a conversation you had with someone else and you mention the gospels, I found what you said interesting so saved it for future research and discussion with my vicar. Howeve, here is a thought, stop lying or telling half truths and maybe people wouldn't save your posts to prove you wrong all. The. Time. As I asked why so obsessed? Why pretend that you were trying to help? So you have trouble reading as well as memory issues. As. I. Said. It was a post regarding the gospels. I found it interesting so kept it. It was not obsession. As to whether you think I am trying to help or not. Read the last few posts and tell me where I am being fake. Geode was correct in it being under a year but it's semantics as you were correct in it being around this time.
|
|
|
Post by rachelcarson1953 on Feb 27, 2017 15:17:10 GMT
I have answered it twice - can you not read or count?
Goodbye, have a nice day.
No, you haven't answered it because anyone can not have children. Just like anyone can bake a cake. You don't need to be a homosexual to bake a cake and you don't need to be homosexual to not have children.
You run away like I thought you would. :wave:
No, I realized that I answered a flawed question; no group of people defined by one thing, be it gender identity or race or any other distinction not made by choice, should have to answer how they contribute to society.
My experiences with the LGBT community has been with individuals, and I could tell many stories of how these individuals enriched my life and comforted me after the death of my husband, but those stories are too personal to tell here.
I wish that, as Martin Luther King did, someday we will all be judged by the content of our character and not by the color of our skin - or gender identity.
Having said that, it was the gay community that protested the Reagan administration's blocking of funding to solve the mystery of AIDS, a virus that does not discriminate, that can infect anyone regardless of their gender, gender identity, race, social status, age, et al. Just like the Bubonic Plague, just like Ebola, just like Legionnaire's Disease. It was a clear health threat to everyone, and Reagan's lack of action brought about the death of many human beings that could have been saved, had the research community been funded appropriately. To quote from the movie "And the Band Played On" based on the book by Randy Shilts, "If it was infecting grandmothers and virgins, there would be an army of researchers out there."
Legionnaire's Disease research was amply funded, and no one discriminated against Legionnaires, the small group that the disease happened to break out in. Since it was acquired in a public place where groups of people gathered, it could have broken out in a group of Avon representatives.
So, it could be said that the gay community showed the world that all humans had the right to equal health care, regardless of gender, race, social status, et al. And when Ebola hit, the research community was on it, and properly funded.
|
|
j2
Sophomore
@j2
Posts: 628
Likes: 149
|
Post by j2 on Feb 27, 2017 17:36:56 GMT
No, you haven't answered it because anyone can not have children. Just like anyone can bake a cake. You don't need to be a homosexual to bake a cake and you don't need to be homosexual to not have children.
You run away like I thought you would. :wave:
No, I realized that I answered a flawed question; no group of people defined by one thing, be it gender identity or race or any other distinction not made by choice, should have to answer how they contribute to society.
My experiences with the LGBT community has been with individuals, and I could tell many stories of how these individuals enriched my life and comforted me after the death of my husband, but those stories are too personal to tell here.
I wish that, as Martin Luther King did, someday we will all be judged by the content of our character and not by the color of our skin - or gender identity.
Having said that, it was the gay community that protested the Reagan administration's blocking of funding to solve the mystery of AIDS, a virus that does not discriminate, that can infect anyone regardless of their gender, gender identity, race, social status, age, et al. Just like the Bubonic Plague, just like Ebola, just like Legionnaire's Disease. It was a clear health threat to everyone, and Reagan's lack of action brought about the death of many human beings that could have been saved, had the research community been funded appropriately. To quote from the movie "And the Band Played On" based on the book by Randy Shilts, "If it was infecting grandmothers and virgins, there would be an army of researchers out there."
Legionnaire's Disease research was amply funded, and no one discriminated against Legionnaires, the small group that the disease happened to break out in. Since it was acquired in a public place where groups of people gathered, it could have broken out in a group of Avon representatives.
So, it could be said that the gay community showed the world that all humans had the right to equal health care, regardless of gender, race, social status, et al. And when Ebola hit, the research community was on it, and properly funded.
In other words 'homosexuals are saints'?
|
|
|
Post by rachelcarson1953 on Feb 27, 2017 17:53:04 GMT
No, I realized that I answered a flawed question; no group of people defined by one thing, be it gender identity or race or any other distinction not made by choice, should have to answer how they contribute to society.
My experiences with the LGBT community has been with individuals, and I could tell many stories of how these individuals enriched my life and comforted me after the death of my husband, but those stories are too personal to tell here.
I wish that, as Martin Luther King did, someday we will all be judged by the content of our character and not by the color of our skin - or gender identity.
Having said that, it was the gay community that protested the Reagan administration's blocking of funding to solve the mystery of AIDS, a virus that does not discriminate, that can infect anyone regardless of their gender, gender identity, race, social status, age, et al. Just like the Bubonic Plague, just like Ebola, just like Legionnaire's Disease. It was a clear health threat to everyone, and Reagan's lack of action brought about the death of many human beings that could have been saved, had the research community been funded appropriately. To quote from the movie "And the Band Played On" based on the book by Randy Shilts, "If it was infecting grandmothers and virgins, there would be an army of researchers out there."
Legionnaire's Disease research was amply funded, and no one discriminated against Legionnaires, the small group that the disease happened to break out in. Since it was acquired in a public place where groups of people gathered, it could have broken out in a group of Avon representatives.
So, it could be said that the gay community showed the world that all humans had the right to equal health care, regardless of gender, race, social status, et al. And when Ebola hit, the research community was on it, and properly funded.
In other words 'homosexuals are saints'? Since I am an Atheist, the word "saint" does not compute.
In the instance I detailed, their activism saved many lives; quite possibly yours.
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Feb 27, 2017 19:11:55 GMT
In other words 'homosexuals are saints'? Since I am an Atheist, the word "saint" does not compute.
In the instance I detailed, their activism saved many lives; quite possibly yours.
"In other words 'homosexuals are saints'?" is a pretty blatant "I can't acknowledge even a calm summation on the issue without inflating it into something not actually said" response, given that one hardly need be a "saint" in order to draw attention to a social issue, willingly or unwittingly, but let me just say, yours was an incredibly well-thought-out response (especially given who you were addressing initially - a party not known to honestly address such responses) - the activism behind acknowledging what was then "GRID" has underlined improvements in human rights palpably, regardless of the group. You're correct, though - as I mentioned in my other post, what could possibly be the motivation behind asking how a group of individuals, be it homosexuals are people with tattoos or redheads or whatever, "contributes to society" - the implications are more than a little dark and the bigotry sort of shines through. It's a questions based on a flawed premise, wherein the posing of it speaks volumes.
|
|
j2
Sophomore
@j2
Posts: 628
Likes: 149
|
Post by j2 on Feb 27, 2017 19:18:09 GMT
In other words 'homosexuals are saints'? Since I am an Atheist, the word "saint" does not compute.
In the instance I detailed, their activism saved many lives; quite possibly yours.
Like hell they have. A satanist might have saved lives as well. Surely your computer realizes the definition of the word 'saint' itself despite atheism, which is also a word. Fancy way to push around agendas.
|
|
j2
Sophomore
@j2
Posts: 628
Likes: 149
|
Post by j2 on Feb 27, 2017 19:22:26 GMT
Since I am an Atheist, the word "saint" does not compute.
In the instance I detailed, their activism saved many lives; quite possibly yours.
"In other words 'homosexuals are saints'?" is a pretty blatant "I can't acknowledge even a calm summation on the issue without inflating it into something not actually said" response, given that one hardly need be a "saint" in order to draw attention to a social issue, willingly or unwittingly, ... Just cutting through the 'political "correctness"' BS; seeing things for what they really are.
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Feb 27, 2017 19:26:09 GMT
"In other words 'homosexuals are saints'?" is a pretty blatant "I can't acknowledge even a calm summation on the issue without inflating it into something not actually said" response, given that one hardly need be a "saint" in order to draw attention to a social issue, willingly or unwittingly, ... Just cutting through the 'political "correctness"' BS; seeing things for what they really are. Tell me about it. First they pushed their evil agenda of inter-racial marriage, even though God told us in the Bible that mixing the races is bad. Now they want gay people to get married. Why can people not be more tolerant of our intolerance? Looks like it's time to end our own lives.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 27, 2017 19:28:38 GMT
Just cutting through the 'political "correctness"' BS; seeing things for what they really are. Tell me about it. First they pushed their evil agenda of inter-racial marriage, even though God told us in the Bible that mixing the races is bad. Now they want gay people to get married. Why can people not be more tolerant of our intolerance? Looks like it's time to end our own lives. Stop lying Sam. God and Jesus never taught that interracial marriage was forbidden or wrong.
But God did teach that homosexuality is forbidden.
[furious barrage of out of context bible quotes incoming by Sam]
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Feb 27, 2017 19:33:20 GMT
Tell me about it. First they pushed their evil agenda of inter-racial marriage, even though God told us in the Bible that mixing the races is bad. Now they want gay people to get married. Why can people not be more tolerant of our intolerance? Looks like it's time to end our own lives. Stop lying Sam. God and Jesus never taught that interracial marriage was forbidden or wrong. Of course 'He' didn't. Just like God never taught that gay marriage was forbidden or wrong. That didn't stop many bigoted religious folk from using the Bible to say that interracial marriage is wrong when it was the social issue of the day. Look it up. "But God did teach that homosexuality is forbidden." --- This is destined to be yet another day when you fail to prove that.
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Feb 27, 2017 19:35:34 GMT
This thread could have been more aptly titled 'Are you a loser?'
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 27, 2017 19:37:54 GMT
Stop lying Sam. God and Jesus never taught that interracial marriage was forbidden or wrong. Of course 'He' didn't. Just like God never taught that gay marriage was forbidden or wrong. That didn't stop many bigoted religious folk from using the Bible to say that interracial marriage is wrong when it was the social issue of the day. Look it up. "But God did teach that homosexuality is forbidden." --- This is destined to be yet another day when you fail to prove that. God says that homosexuality is evil and forbidden so that would make gay marriage evil and forbidden Einstein.
That didn't stop many bigoted religious folk from using the Bible to say that interracial marriage is wrong when it was the social issue of the day.
There go those moving goal posts that always exist when discussing anything with Sam.
|
|