|
Post by dazz on Sept 15, 2019 1:23:10 GMT
Based on...What exactly? Has no powers and no leadership skills. Shes the most intresting character out of the bunch She's an entirely one dimension comedy sidekick to the main heroes love interest, how is this interesting?
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Sept 15, 2019 1:34:28 GMT
Says you, which I disagree with, just because you think they did a great job doesn't make it so, nor does me thinking differently, I am merely giving my opinion and my thinking about things, but I highly doubt the MCU's first female led superhero was meant to be just ok, and that's what it was imo. Well hopefully you’ll learn to appreciate it I would hope you’re open to learning what they did so well If someone can show me another way to look at it then maybe I would, I hated MOS the first time I saw it and the second, it wasn't until I watched it with a watch along commentary that someone actually put scenes into a different perspective that I saw past my own hang ups and appreciated the film more for what it is, now it's a film I really like, I still have issues with several major parts, but they are based not on the ideas but the execution behind them.
But so far nothing you have said makes me re-evaluate my opinion on CM, as your responses have been more suited if I were arguing the movie sucks because of the directions it took, that's not really my issue my issue is on the execution of the direction it tries to take.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Sept 15, 2019 2:45:21 GMT
Well hopefully you’ll learn to appreciate it I would hope you’re open to learning what they did so well If someone can show me another way to look at it then maybe I would, I hated MOS the first time I saw it and the second, it wasn't until I watched it with a watch along commentary that someone actually put scenes into a different perspective that I saw past my own hang ups and appreciated the film more for what it is, now it's a film I really like, I still have issues with several major parts, but they are based not on the ideas but the execution behind them.
But so far nothing you have said makes me re-evaluate my opinion on CM, as your responses have been more suited if I were arguing the movie sucks because of the directions it took, that's not really my issue my issue is on the execution of the direction it tries to take.
Ill take some more time to help you understand what I mean later on. They’ve just done too good to treat these films like they’re just average.
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Sept 15, 2019 3:45:30 GMT
If someone can show me another way to look at it then maybe I would, I hated MOS the first time I saw it and the second, it wasn't until I watched it with a watch along commentary that someone actually put scenes into a different perspective that I saw past my own hang ups and appreciated the film more for what it is, now it's a film I really like, I still have issues with several major parts, but they are based not on the ideas but the execution behind them.
But so far nothing you have said makes me re-evaluate my opinion on CM, as your responses have been more suited if I were arguing the movie sucks because of the directions it took, that's not really my issue my issue is on the execution of the direction it tries to take.
Ill take some more time to help you understand what I mean later on. They’ve just done too good to treat these films like they’re just average. Not when the product they put out is just average or just above average like in the case of CM.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Sept 15, 2019 3:46:49 GMT
Ill take some more time to help you understand what I mean later on. They’ve just done too good to treat these films like they’re just average. Not when the product they put out is just average or just above average like in the case of CM. They're all above average. They’re all above close to average. That’s why everybody else struggles to come close.
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Sept 15, 2019 5:29:39 GMT
Not when the product they put out is just average or just above average like in the case of CM. They're all above average. They’re all above close to average. That’s why everybody else struggles to come close. Now you just sound ridiculous, Dark World is not above average not by a long shot neither is IM 2 or CM, they do mostly good or better films but Marvel has produced some iffy content over the years, and past success doesn't get a mediocre film treatment undeserving it's quality.
|
|
|
Post by thenewnexus on Sept 15, 2019 9:57:25 GMT
Shes the most intresting character out of the bunch She's an entirely one dimension comedy sidekick to the main heroes love interest, how is this interesting? Kat Dennings does a great job playing her
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Sept 15, 2019 12:16:45 GMT
They're all above average. They’re all above close to average. That’s why everybody else struggles to come close. Now you just sound ridiculous, Dark World is not above average not by a long shot neither is IM 2 or CM, they do mostly good or better films but Marvel has produced some iffy content over the years, and past success doesn't get a mediocre film treatment undeserving it's quality. Those are better than average actually. Just look at them compared to most of Fox and Sony’s output. Dark World and IM2 are good films. WB would have killed for the DCEU to have been that good. When reasonable people refer to them as below average, they mean by MCU standards, not overall. Every other studio would love to be that consistently good, that those are their “bad” films, because they’re easily better than a lot of what they do.
|
|
|
Post by Power Ranger on Sept 15, 2019 12:40:38 GMT
Now you just sound ridiculous, Dark World is not above average not by a long shot neither is IM 2 or CM, they do mostly good or better films but Marvel has produced some iffy content over the years, and past success doesn't get a mediocre film treatment undeserving it's quality. Those are better than average actually. Just look at them compared to most of Fox and Sony’s output. Dark World and IM2 are good films. WB would have killed for the DCEU to have been that good. When reasonable people refer to them as below average, they mean by MCU standards, not overall. Every other studio would love to be that consistently good, that those are their “bad” films, because they’re easily better than a lot of what they do. I like IM2. It’s Iron Man 3 that is below average and then some. Iron Man 2 has great villains, continues the first film’s story arc and introduces cool new characters. I don’t know why people don’t like it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2019 12:42:43 GMT
They're all above average. They’re all above close to average. That’s why everybody else struggles to come close. Now you just sound ridiculous, Dark World is not above average not by a long shot neither is IM 2 or CM, they do mostly good or better films but Marvel has produced some iffy content over the years, and past success doesn't get a mediocre film treatment undeserving it's quality. Remember who youre talking to dazz. Arch is like a Jehovah's witness when it comes to the mcu. That or that kind of parent where the child (mcu) can do no wrong. No offense Arch, you know I love you
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Sept 15, 2019 13:38:47 GMT
Those are better than average actually. Just look at them compared to most of Fox and Sony’s output. Dark World and IM2 are good films. WB would have killed for the DCEU to have been that good. When reasonable people refer to them as below average, they mean by MCU standards, not overall. Every other studio would love to be that consistently good, that those are their “bad” films, because they’re easily better than a lot of what they do. I like IM2. It’s Iron Man 3 that is below average and then some. Iron Man 2 has great villains, continues the first film’s story arc and introduces cool new characters. I don’t know why people don’t like it. Totally agree on IM2. Its just became the cool one that a few people flocked to band wagon hate even though it’s actually good. I know what you mean about IM3 but it’s actually got a lot of good work. It’s not in my personal favorite by any means but compare it to most anything Sony, WB, or Fox and yeah it’s still above average. Some find it highly underrated and I get it.
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Sept 15, 2019 17:28:48 GMT
She's an entirely one dimension comedy sidekick to the main heroes love interest, how is this interesting? Kat Dennings does a great job playing her Which has nothing to do with her being an interesting character you drooling fanatic.
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Sept 15, 2019 17:41:18 GMT
Now you just sound ridiculous, Dark World is not above average not by a long shot neither is IM 2 or CM, they do mostly good or better films but Marvel has produced some iffy content over the years, and past success doesn't get a mediocre film treatment undeserving it's quality. Those are better than average actually. Just look at them compared to most of Fox and Sony’s output. Dark World and IM2 are good films. WB would have killed for the DCEU to have been that good. When reasonable people refer to them as below average, they mean by MCU standards, not overall. Every other studio would love to be that consistently good, that those are their “bad” films, because they’re easily better than a lot of what they do. No they aren't they are average films, their not bad but their not good either, I don't think the MCU has produced a bad film yet, but not everyone they do is remarkable either, and you are showing again how you are ineffective at defending a pov, you are having to misconstrue what I say to try and make a point.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Sept 15, 2019 17:52:17 GMT
Those are better than average actually. Just look at them compared to most of Fox and Sony’s output. Dark World and IM2 are good films. WB would have killed for the DCEU to have been that good. When reasonable people refer to them as below average, they mean by MCU standards, not overall. Every other studio would love to be that consistently good, that those are their “bad” films, because they’re easily better than a lot of what they do. No they aren't they are average films, their not bad but their not good either, I don't think the MCU has produced a bad film yet, but not everyone they do is remarkable either, and you are showing again how you are ineffective at defending a pov, you are having to misconstrue what I say to try and make a point. I haven’t tried to make a larger point yet. I’ll sit down when I feel like taking the time to do it, but those are good films. Other studios produce actual average and bad films like MOS, SS, Apocalypse, Dark Phoenix, Amazing Spiderman, AS2, BVS, etc. You don’t see that kind of thing from Marvel because they’re always better than Average.
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Sept 15, 2019 18:00:22 GMT
Those are better than average actually. Just look at them compared to most of Fox and Sony’s output. Dark World and IM2 are good films. WB would have killed for the DCEU to have been that good. When reasonable people refer to them as below average, they mean by MCU standards, not overall. Every other studio would love to be that consistently good, that those are their “bad” films, because they’re easily better than a lot of what they do. I like IM2. It’s Iron Man 3 that is below average and then some. Iron Man 2 has great villains, continues the first film’s story arc and introduces cool new characters. I don’t know why people don’t like it. Such as who? Justin Hammer is a simpsons character made flesh, how is Tony's primary rival and the 2nd biggest weapons mogul in the world so inept and useless? I mean his fucking missile doesn't even work for Christ sake, his big this will end things easily ace in the hole weapon was as effective as throwing a rock at a T-Rex.
Vanko isnt that great either past a few scenes, his whole story with Hammer is idiotic as again Hammer is fucking worthless, Vanko is clearly doing his own thing, not following orders and untrustworthy yet Hammer just lets him keep doing his thing, which undermines Vanko as a smart and crafty villain because his one great success is that he outwits Hammer, but a toddler on crack could do that.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Sept 15, 2019 18:06:21 GMT
I like IM2. It’s Iron Man 3 that is below average and then some. Iron Man 2 has great villains, continues the first film’s story arc and introduces cool new characters. I don’t know why people don’t like it. Such as who? Justin Hammer is a simpsons character made flesh, how is Tony's primary rival and the 2nd biggest weapons mogul in the world so inept and useless? I mean his fucking missile doesn't even work for Christ sake, his big this will end things easily ace in the hole weapon was as effective as throwing a rock at a T-Rex.
Vanko isnt that great either past a few scenes, his whole story with Hammer is idiotic as again Hammer is fucking worthless, Vanko is clearly doing his own thing, not following orders and untrustworthy yet Hammer just lets him keep doing his thing, which undermines Vanko as a smart and crafty villain because his one great success is that he outwits Hammer, but a toddler on crack could do that.
You seriously have a massive stick up your ass.
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Sept 15, 2019 18:12:35 GMT
Such as who? Justin Hammer is a simpsons character made flesh, how is Tony's primary rival and the 2nd biggest weapons mogul in the world so inept and useless? I mean his fucking missile doesn't even work for Christ sake, his big this will end things easily ace in the hole weapon was as effective as throwing a rock at a T-Rex.
Vanko isnt that great either past a few scenes, his whole story with Hammer is idiotic as again Hammer is fucking worthless, Vanko is clearly doing his own thing, not following orders and untrustworthy yet Hammer just lets him keep doing his thing, which undermines Vanko as a smart and crafty villain because his one great success is that he outwits Hammer, but a toddler on crack could do that.
You seriously have a massive stick up your ass. Or you are a petty sycophant who cannot take any sort of criticism towards the MCU, I don't know which is worse the idiots who cannot accept the good the MCU offers or those who refuse to admit it's faults, both sides are made up of dozy twats either way.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2019 20:05:11 GMT
I am constantly a big fan of these Super Frauen. But Captain McMarvel cannot compare to mein Wunder Woman!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2019 20:06:12 GMT
She's an entirely one dimension comedy sidekick to the main heroes love interest, how is this interesting? Kat Dennings does a great job playing her Nein. You are only a fan because of the gigantic Brüste.
|
|
|
Post by thenewnexus on Sept 15, 2019 20:35:45 GMT
Kat Dennings does a great job playing her Which has nothing to do with her being an interesting character you drooling fanatic. It has everything to do with it
|
|