puvo
Sophomore
@puvo
Posts: 575
Likes: 78
|
Post by puvo on May 10, 2017 23:22:31 GMT
Do you think that people who don't want to be signed up for socialized health care should be allowed to opt out?
Your question to me. I gave you my answer based on my experience in my country. Well now, based on the experience in my country, I don't want to be signed up for government health care, and I'm not the only one. It has been mentioned repeatedly, in places with socialised medicine, you get to chose to go private. Nobody forces you to go public.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on May 11, 2017 6:55:21 GMT
You figure it out, dickhead. Oh my god, you are so bad at this, it's cringeworthy. So I had a "Three Men and a Baby" moment. It was provoked. Cringe away, you delicate little wimp.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on May 11, 2017 6:57:28 GMT
Well now, based on the experience in my country, I don't want to be signed up for government health care, and I'm not the only one. It has been mentioned repeatedly, in places with socialised medicine, you get to chose to go private. Nobody forces you to go public. Good. As long as it stays that way there won't be any trouble.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on May 11, 2017 7:04:59 GMT
As far as I know, yes, except for the moron part. And you pay for that right? If Medicaid is funded by taxes, then yes.. Why?
|
|
chasallnut
Sophomore
@chasallnut
Posts: 506
Likes: 158
|
Post by chasallnut on May 11, 2017 7:49:55 GMT
Do you think that people who don't want to be signed up for socialized health care should be allowed to opt out?
Your question to me. I gave you my answer based on my experience in my country. Snapshot of a low-info rural US voter: more than willing to pay through the roof for the simplest procedures via a propped-up mutual-profit game being played by pharmaceutical companies and insurance providers, shies away in horror at the notion of taking a pittance from our infrastructure budget and ensuring everyone's health because it would be dimes off his paycheck. This type of shit has pharma CEOs cackling. Bonus: in our system (an insurance system geared towards corporate wealth) guess who bears the burnt when an uninsured individual hits the emergency room? I work in pharma so I know exactly who bears the brunt. All new drugs have their budgets based around sales in the USA because that is where the highest margins are. That's the golden goose. And alomg the way the insurance companies make vast amounts which is why they can afford to contest claims, employ agencies to dig for minutiae in a claimant's history in order to refuse a claim. And the likes of erjen are happy with this system. I can't fathom it at all.
|
|
chasallnut
Sophomore
@chasallnut
Posts: 506
Likes: 158
|
Post by chasallnut on May 11, 2017 7:55:01 GMT
It has been mentioned repeatedly, in places with socialised medicine, you get to chose to go private. Nobody forces you to go public. Good. As long as it stays that way there won't be any trouble. You get to choose to go private providing you take out a private insurance. However part of the taxation still goes to the NHS (UK) and is still available if you require it or there are exclusions to the insurance policy.
|
|
puvo
Sophomore
@puvo
Posts: 575
Likes: 78
|
Post by puvo on May 11, 2017 11:34:48 GMT
It has been mentioned repeatedly, in places with socialised medicine, you get to chose to go private. Nobody forces you to go public. Good. As long as it stays that way there won't be any trouble. So, like I said, "Kinda takes away your entire stated issue with it, now doesn't it?" And the correct answer to that is yes, not "No".
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Nov 15, 2017 18:35:34 GMT
Some on the board seem to have conveniently forgotten Mr. Kimmel's blubbering and plea for socialized healthcare on TV, so I thought I'd be a nice guy and bump it. Maybe it will jog a few memories.
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Nov 15, 2017 18:55:31 GMT
Some on the board seem to have conveniently forgotten Mr. Kimmel's blubbering and plea for socialized healthcare on TV, so I thought I'd be a nice guy and bump it. Maybe it will jog a few memories. Thanks for confirming you didn't actually listen to the monologue. Pre-existing conditions and caps are literally the only insurance aspects he discusses. Grahan-Cassidy has a reform bill to replace the ACA, which is the bill that required people buy health insurance. As stated, Kimmel was in favor of the G-C bill until they added caps and removed pre-existing coverage. Mandated purchase was nowhere in the bill. You've been talking about this for days and haven't had the slightest inkling of what's actually been said. Amazing.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Nov 15, 2017 19:01:40 GMT
Some on the board seem to have conveniently forgotten Mr. Kimmel's blubbering and plea for socialized healthcare on TV, so I thought I'd be a nice guy and bump it. Maybe it will jog a few memories. Thanks for confirming you didn't actually listen to the monologue. Pre-existing conditions and caps are literally the only insurance aspects he discusses. Grahan-Cassidy has a reform bill to replace the ACA, which is the bill that required people buy health insurance. You've been talking about this for days and haven't had the slightest inkling of what's actually been said. Amazing. that guy is such a train wreck.
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Nov 15, 2017 19:04:43 GMT
Thanks for confirming you didn't actually listen to the monologue. Pre-existing conditions and caps are literally the only insurance aspects he discusses. Grahan-Cassidy has a reform bill to replace the ACA, which is the bill that required people buy health insurance. You've been talking about this for days and haven't had the slightest inkling of what's actually been said. Amazing. that guy is such a train wreck. Maybe he'll answer your earlier question once he's done collating whether dihydrogen monoxide is bad for you. That's been in the queue for quite some time.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Nov 15, 2017 19:06:47 GMT
Having fun, boys? That's nice.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Nov 15, 2017 19:10:06 GMT
that guy is such a train wreck. Maybe he'll answer your earlier question once he's done collating whether dihydrogen monoxide is bad for you. That's been in the queue for quite some time. I have decided not to hold my breath, every time I get sucked in I ask him an actual question and it looks like I am going to get a good answer, but then he just pulls out the waaaaaabbrrllgltlllgltltgll . Whats odd is I actually think he may have some opinions that are founded on real things and I would really be interested in hearing them, after all that is why I am here, but I can only guess that he is so lacking in self esteem that he thinks his real opinions are rubbish and will only respond with that garbage he posts.
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Nov 15, 2017 19:18:23 GMT
Maybe he'll answer your earlier question once he's done collating whether dihydrogen monoxide is bad for you. That's been in the queue for quite some time. I have decided not to hold my breath, every time I get sucked in I ask him an actual question and it looks like I am going to get a good answer, but then he just pulls out the waaaaaabbrrllgltlllgltltgll . Dude you're never going to get an answer when providing one undercuts something he's already said. He has no reverse setting. "Kimmel wants socialized medicine!" "Where does Kimmel say anything about that?" "If the monologue where he cries for socialized medicine!" "Where in the monologue does he even discuss socialized medicine?" "Right there in that monologue where he cries for socialized medicine!" "There's nothing in there about socialized medicine." "Here's a new definition I just made up for socialized medicine!" "Whut?" "BEEEEER!"
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Nov 15, 2017 19:26:44 GMT
I have decided not to hold my breath, every time I get sucked in I ask him an actual question and it looks like I am going to get a good answer, but then he just pulls out the waaaaaabbrrllgltlllgltltgll . Dude you're never going to get an answer when providing one undercuts something he's already said. He has no reverse setting. "Kimmel wants socialized medicine!" "Where does Kimmel say anything about that?" "If the monologue where he cries for socialized medicine!" "Where in the monologue does he even discuss socialized medicine?" "Right there in that monologue where he cries for socialized medicine!" "There's nothing in there about socialized medicine." "Here's a new definition I just made up for socialized medicine!" "Whut?" "BEEEEER!" I did like the way he had to invent a new definition for what he was talking about so he could avoid his stance, of course that backfired when he had to defend that new definition. But really, I can't believe he is really this stupid, it has to be an act.
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Nov 15, 2017 19:27:44 GMT
Some on the board seem to have conveniently forgotten Mr. Kimmel's blubbering and plea for socialized healthcare on TV, so I thought I'd be a nice guy and bump it. Maybe it will jog a few memories.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Nov 15, 2017 19:32:52 GMT
Some on the board seem to have conveniently forgotten Mr. Kimmel's blubbering and plea for socialized healthcare on TV, so I thought I'd be a nice guy and bump it. Maybe it will jog a few memories. At least that shows some imagination, but.........gadreel and Cine are the ones who won't let it go.
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Nov 15, 2017 20:21:30 GMT
Create a new thread on it, go back and bump two old ones... then say others won't let it go.
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Nov 16, 2017 5:19:29 GMT
Thsee kinds of things are easily fixed by just having compete free of charge health care that is owned by the people (socialism) Wow! You found a way to get medical professionals and support staff to work for free? For medical supplies, bedding, food etc to be supplied at no charge? Quality.
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Nov 16, 2017 8:08:48 GMT
I think Jimmy Kimmel is a baby.
Sad angry clowns are not funny. Make me laugh, funny man.. if I want to see someone cry I go to work.
|
|