Eλευθερί
Junior Member
@eleutheri
Posts: 3,710
Likes: 1,670
|
Post by Eλευθερί on Nov 22, 2020 11:41:06 GMT
I am almost finished watching HBO's Band of Brothers, which follows an American military unit during the European conflict in World War II, from Normandy through the Battle of the Bulge. Several people here said they thought Band of Brothers was better than The Pacific, which was the HBO show made several years later focusing on WWII engagements between Americans and Japanese in the Pacific. imdb2.freeforums.net/thread/241729/pacificI don't think Band of Brother was as good as The Pacific. After the first episode, Band of Brothers is just hour after hour of machine-gun fire and mortar explosions. With a few exceptions, many of the men all kind of just blend into one another. In The Pacific, on the other hand, they followed individual soldiers from their home lives before the war, through training, into the battles, and then back home again. For me, the effect was much more powerful because you felt like you got to know each of them as individual people, rather than as just another soldier in a foxhole or on a stretcher.
|
|
|
Post by Marv on Nov 22, 2020 18:25:54 GMT
Ive not seen the Pacific...but I don't know how you didn't get to know the characters in Band of Brothers. Several of them have episodes focused on them directly. Many others are colorful enough that i found myself caring about them. I loved Band of Brothers.
|
|
|
Post by Winter_King on Nov 23, 2020 10:11:13 GMT
The reason why Band of Brothers works better for me is that we follow the same unit since D-Day until the defeat of Germany. We accompany this unit in Normandy, Belgium, Netherlands and finally Germany. When they lose a man, we as an audience feel it.
The Pacific is good but the following three different soldiers in separate situations didn't made me feel much for the characters. Joseph Mazello's character end up being the one I was mostly invested in him precisely because we follow him and his unit in Peleliu and Okinawa over three episodes if I'm not mistaken.
I also disagree that after the first episode it's just machine gun fire and mortar explosion but you haven't finished the series so I won't say much.
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on Nov 24, 2020 1:19:25 GMT
I am almost finished watching HBO's Band of Brothers, which follows an American military unit during the European conflict in World War II, from Normandy through the Battle of the Bulge. Several people here said they thought Band of Brothers was better than The Pacific, which was the HBO show made several years later focusing on WWII engagements between Americans and Japanese in the Pacific. IMDB2.freeforums.net/thread/241729/pacificI don't think Band of Brother was as good as The Pacific. After the first episode, Band of Brothers is just hour after hour of machine-gun fire and mortar explosions. With a few exceptions, many of the men all kind of just blend into one another. In The Pacific, on the other hand, they followed individual soldiers from their home lives before the war, through training, into the battles, and then back home again. For me, the effect was much more powerful because you felt like you got to know each of them as individual people, rather than as just another soldier in a foxhole or on a stretcher. semantics but that was 2001.
|
|
|
Post by Sarge on Nov 25, 2020 3:22:52 GMT
I watched BoB twice and feel like I got everything it had to give the first time, if you know what I mean. Haven't seen The Pacific but added it to my list and will check it out.
|
|