|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Sept 29, 2021 19:05:13 GMT
Does naming the Captain Marvel sequel "The Marvels" instead of "Captain Marvel 2" or "Captain Marvel subtitle" insinuate a lack of confidence in Captain Marvel?
It does to me! If They had confidence in Captain Marvel as a brand they would just name it that, wouldn't they?!
After all, they named Shang Chi - SHANG CHI! Why wouldn't they name this "Captain Marvel 2" or "Captain Marvel subtitle"?
And before you say it... I realize that new characters are going to be included. Monica Rambeau and Kamala Khan; but those characters are introduced in Disney+ shows. IMO that only furthers suggests they don't have complete faith in "Captain Marvel" on her own.
Thoughts?
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Sept 29, 2021 19:40:07 GMT
I see what you're saying, but at the same time, I think they're just being cute with the title. It could be named anything, and people will still be pissed that Brie Larson is still playing the lead.
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Sept 29, 2021 19:48:39 GMT
Yes.
I've said something similar before as well. When Captain Marvel was first announced, she was supposed to be the next big thing. Feige made all these announcements about making Captain Marvel the next flagship MCU character, the next face of the MCU to replace Stark and Rogers. Also the most powerful character.
They rushed her movie in, pushed her last minute into Endgame, and from every source I can see, they (MCU) seemed intent to fast track her 2nd movie.
Then all of a sudden... it stopped. We saw her 2nd movie (which was originally scheduled to come out fairly early in Phase 4) get postponed, then postponed, then postponed, till it eventually got kicked out of the timeline. There was even rumors that she'd need to share her next movie with Spiderman but that seems to have gotten scrapped.
And now when they finally get her movie back on a schedule, they're making her share the spotlight with an ensemble... which I don't think the MCU has ever done for any of their main characters.
My theory is that the MCU originally planned to make Captain Marvel their flagship character but then they saw how divisive the character was and so took her back a step.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2021 0:00:14 GMT
A bit. But that’s not a bad thing. Feige has a good sense of when his franchises need a mix up or an extra boost. Thor 3 was a big shake up, even including Hulk as a supporting character, but now Thor is a beloved centerpiece of the MCU. Captain Marvel desperately needed a course correction and this is it. The character will benefit from it.
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Sept 30, 2021 13:04:50 GMT
Yes. I've said something similar before as well. When Captain Marvel was first announced, she was supposed to be the next big thing. Feige made all these announcements about making Captain Marvel the next flagship MCU character, the next face of the MCU to replace Stark and Rogers. Also the most powerful character. They rushed her movie in, pushed her last minute into Endgame, and from every source I can see, they (MCU) seemed intent to fast track her 2nd movie. Then all of a sudden... it stopped. We saw her 2nd movie (which was originally scheduled to come out fairly early in Phase 4) get postponed, then postponed, then postponed, till it eventually got kicked out of the timeline. There was even rumors that she'd need to share her next movie with Spiderman but that seems to have gotten scrapped. And now when they finally get her movie back on a schedule, they're making her share the spotlight with an ensemble... which I don't think the MCU has ever done for any of their main characters. My theory is that the MCU originally planned to make Captain Marvel their flagship character but then they saw how divisive the character was and so took her back a step. The movie made over a billion dollars, I hardly think they're hiding her. To your point in the What If thread, if anything they're force feeding her to the audience. The sequel is coming out three years after the original; same as Captain America, Ant-Man, and the gap between Iron Man 2 & 3. Black Panther was almost universally praised, and barring covid the sequel would've been three years later instead of four. Plenty of characters have had to share the spotlight with an ensemble at some point. The Dark World was rewritten to add more Loki, and Ragnarok heavily featured the Hulk, including in the marketing. The Winter Soldier has Black Widow and introduces Falcon, both IM sequels prominently feature War Machine; Hell, sometimes I forget Civil War is a Captain America film, not an Avengers film. It has nothing to do with the character being divisive. This is what Marvel does now, team ups. Ant-Man & The Wasp, The Falcon & The Winter Soldier, two versions of Hawkeye, two versions of Thor in the upcoming Thor film, etc. Loki was as much about Sophie as it was about Loki proper.
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Sept 30, 2021 17:13:10 GMT
Yes. I've said something similar before as well. When Captain Marvel was first announced, she was supposed to be the next big thing. Feige made all these announcements about making Captain Marvel the next flagship MCU character, the next face of the MCU to replace Stark and Rogers. Also the most powerful character. They rushed her movie in, pushed her last minute into Endgame, and from every source I can see, they (MCU) seemed intent to fast track her 2nd movie. Then all of a sudden... it stopped. We saw her 2nd movie (which was originally scheduled to come out fairly early in Phase 4) get postponed, then postponed, then postponed, till it eventually got kicked out of the timeline. There was even rumors that she'd need to share her next movie with Spiderman but that seems to have gotten scrapped. And now when they finally get her movie back on a schedule, they're making her share the spotlight with an ensemble... which I don't think the MCU has ever done for any of their main characters. My theory is that the MCU originally planned to make Captain Marvel their flagship character but then they saw how divisive the character was and so took her back a step. The movie made over a billion dollars, I hardly think they're hiding her. To your point in the What If thread, if anything they're force feeding her to the audience. The sequel is coming out three years after the original; same as Captain America, Ant-Man, and the gap between Iron Man 2 & 3. Black Panther was almost universally praised, and barring covid the sequel would've been three years later instead of four. Plenty of characters have had to share the spotlight with an ensemble at some point. The Dark World was rewritten to add more Loki, and Ragnarok heavily featured the Hulk, including in the marketing. The Winter Soldier has Black Widow and introduces Falcon, both IM sequels prominently feature War Machine; Hell, sometimes I forget Civil War is a Captain America film, not an Avengers film. It has nothing to do with the character being divisive. This is what Marvel does now, team ups. Ant-Man & The Wasp, The Falcon & The Winter Soldier, two versions of Hawkeye, two versions of Thor in the upcoming Thor film, etc. Loki was as much about Sophie as it was about Loki proper. What he said. ^^^
|
|
|
Post by Ass_E9 on Sept 30, 2021 18:23:05 GMT
Perhaps they'll stylize it as THE MARVELƧ.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Sept 30, 2021 22:18:53 GMT
I don't think Marvel Studios has a lack of confidence in Captain Marvel. I believe they are in for a surprise, though, in that I predict that The Marvels isn't going to do nearly the same business as the first film.
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Oct 1, 2021 16:28:11 GMT
Yes. I've said something similar before as well. When Captain Marvel was first announced, she was supposed to be the next big thing. Feige made all these announcements about making Captain Marvel the next flagship MCU character, the next face of the MCU to replace Stark and Rogers. Also the most powerful character. They rushed her movie in, pushed her last minute into Endgame, and from every source I can see, they (MCU) seemed intent to fast track her 2nd movie. Then all of a sudden... it stopped. We saw her 2nd movie (which was originally scheduled to come out fairly early in Phase 4) get postponed, then postponed, then postponed, till it eventually got kicked out of the timeline. There was even rumors that she'd need to share her next movie with Spiderman but that seems to have gotten scrapped. And now when they finally get her movie back on a schedule, they're making her share the spotlight with an ensemble... which I don't think the MCU has ever done for any of their main characters. My theory is that the MCU originally planned to make Captain Marvel their flagship character but then they saw how divisive the character was and so took her back a step. The movie made over a billion dollars, I hardly think they're hiding her. To your point in the What If thread, if anything they're force feeding her to the audience. The sequel is coming out three years after the original; same as Captain America, Ant-Man, and the gap between Iron Man 2 & 3. Black Panther was almost universally praised, and barring covid the sequel would've been three years later instead of four. Plenty of characters have had to share the spotlight with an ensemble at some point. The Dark World was rewritten to add more Loki, and Ragnarok heavily featured the Hulk, including in the marketing. The Winter Soldier has Black Widow and introduces Falcon, both IM sequels prominently feature War Machine; Hell, sometimes I forget Civil War is a Captain America film, not an Avengers film. It has nothing to do with the character being divisive. This is what Marvel does now, team ups. Ant-Man & The Wasp, The Falcon & The Winter Soldier, two versions of Hawkeye, two versions of Thor in the upcoming Thor film, etc. Loki was as much about Sophie as it was about Loki proper. Well let's be honest here, her movie made over a billion dollars because it was strategically placed just before Endgame. On its own, most experts agree it wouldn't have achieved anywhere near those numbers. As for other characters sharing the spotlight in movies, there's a pretty big difference between adding more side characters to a main character's movie, and outright making it an ensemble. Beefing up Loki's role or adding in Valkyrie and Hulk didn't change Thor: Ragnarok from being a Thor movie. Same thing for Thor: TDW or Ironman 2 and 3 or CATWS. We might be able to say that Civil War was almost an ensemble movie, but we're also talking about adding a lot of already well-developed characters (like Ironman) instead of utilizing newly introduced characters. Yes, Ant-Man had to split the spotlight with Wasp in the 2nd movie but Ant-Man is probably at the bottom rung of the popularity ladder as far MCU characters with solo films go. Besides, at least he still gets his name on the title. And Ironman, Thor, Captain America and Dr. Strange all still get their names on the title even when they need to share the spotlight, making it clear that it's still their movies. The Marvels is the first time I've seen the MCU give a solo character a 2nd movie where the title isn't making it clear that it's their movie. Yeah, it might mean nothing and it might simply be them trying new things, but it's certainly interesting that it just so happened to be for the most divisive major character in the MCU yet. Well, that and the fact that the plans for the 2nd Captain Marvel movie kept changing dates and priorities. Mostly though, the reason why I'm entertaining this specific theory is due to the fact that the MCU has dialed down promotion of Captain Marvel a LOT in the past year or so. You can usually get a feel which characters Marvel are pushing to the spotlight to be their main characters, and they used to push hard for Captain Marvel even after Endgame. Then it died down to almost nothing. They still OP the heck out of her whenever she appears (like the What If episodes) but they did stop trying to promote her as the new face of Phase 4. Though to be fair, they did something similar to Dr. Strange when he first came out.
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Oct 1, 2021 17:05:12 GMT
The movie made over a billion dollars, I hardly think they're hiding her. To your point in the What If thread, if anything they're force feeding her to the audience. The sequel is coming out three years after the original; same as Captain America, Ant-Man, and the gap between Iron Man 2 & 3. Black Panther was almost universally praised, and barring covid the sequel would've been three years later instead of four. Plenty of characters have had to share the spotlight with an ensemble at some point. The Dark World was rewritten to add more Loki, and Ragnarok heavily featured the Hulk, including in the marketing. The Winter Soldier has Black Widow and introduces Falcon, both IM sequels prominently feature War Machine; Hell, sometimes I forget Civil War is a Captain America film, not an Avengers film. It has nothing to do with the character being divisive. This is what Marvel does now, team ups. Ant-Man & The Wasp, The Falcon & The Winter Soldier, two versions of Hawkeye, two versions of Thor in the upcoming Thor film, etc. Loki was as much about Sophie as it was about Loki proper. Well let's be honest here, her movie made over a billion dollars because it was strategically placed just before Endgame. On its own, most experts agree it wouldn't have achieved anywhere near those numbers. As for other characters sharing the spotlight in movies, there's a pretty big difference between adding more side characters to a main character's movie, and outright making it an ensemble. Beefing up Loki's role or adding in Valkyrie and Hulk didn't change Thor: Ragnarok from being a Thor movie. Same thing for Thor: TDW or Ironman 2 and 3 or CATWS. We might be able to say that Civil War was almost an ensemble movie, but we're also talking about adding a lot of already well-developed characters (like Ironman) instead of utilizing newly introduced characters. Yes, Ant-Man had to split the spotlight with Wasp in the 2nd movie but Ant-Man is probably at the bottom rung of the popularity ladder as far MCU characters with solo films go. Besides, at least he still gets his name on the title. And Ironman, Thor, Captain America and Dr. Strange all still get their names on the title even when they need to share the spotlight, making it clear that it's still their movies. The Marvels is the first time I've seen the MCU give a solo character a 2nd movie where the title isn't making it clear that it's their movie. Yeah, it might mean nothing and it might simply be them trying new things, but it's certainly interesting that it just so happened to be for the most divisive major character in the MCU yet. Well, that and the fact that the plans for the 2nd Captain Marvel movie kept changing dates and priorities. Mostly though, the reason why I'm entertaining this specific theory is due to the fact that the MCU has dialed down promotion of Captain Marvel a LOT in the past year or so. You can usually get a feel which characters Marvel are pushing to the spotlight to be their main characters, and they used to push hard for Captain Marvel even after Endgame. Then it died down to almost nothing. They still OP the heck out of her whenever she appears (like the What If episodes) but they did stop trying to promote her as the new face of Phase 4. Though to be fair, they did something similar to Dr. Strange when he first came out. It's not like CM made a billion dollars on its opening weekend. CBM movies make a lot of their money off of repeat viewings. If people hated CM as much as you think they did, it never would've made a billion dollars, I don't care if it had come out a week before Endgame. (And by the way, as I've mentioned in the past, the timing of its release was actually detrimental to the film's reception and legacy. It feels like a phase one movie and it should've been one. Instead they crammed a solo film introducing a new character into the center of this enormously complex crossover event; I'm surprised it didn't flop. I understand why people think it's not great. How can a self-contained origin story compare to Infinity War?) You're really reaching with your argument here. Ant-Man literally shared the title of his film with another character, how is that not the same thing? Civil War was the ultimate ensemble movie, well at least until IW and Endgame. How are the plans changing for CM2 different from massive rewrites to include Loki in the plot of Thor 2? You were just complaining about Marvel force feeding CM to the audience in What If; now you're saying they aren't promoting her at all? Her movie cones out in just over a year, they're more focused on promoting everything that comes out before that. Eternals, Hawkeye, DS2, Black Panther 2, Ms. Marvel. They have more chapters to the MCU story than ever before now that they have Disney+ as a playground, as well as more films per year on a slate clogged by covid for over a year. I don't know why you think they should be talking about CM2 alone to try to prove they're still invested in the character. It's called the Marvels because it features several characters who have used the name in the comics. They're promoting all of those characters equally for the same reason they called it Falcon & The Winter Soldier-- they want to cast as large a marketing net as possible. The Ms. Marvel show will have debuted by then. "Are you a fan of the Ms. Marvel show? Are you a fan of Captain Marvel? They're both in this film. Buy your tickets now." It's all marketing. They hope to have several prominent female characters to promote going forward. It isn't that complicated, and it doesn't require some conspiracy theory to avoid backlash to a character who headlined a billion dollar grossing film. We've had the overpowered conversation before and I still think you're wrong (What If notwithstanding, as it's hard to gauge proper power levels in a cartoon where Nick Fury is launched 50 feet into the air and survives). She doesn't do anything in her own film until the very end, and even then she doesn't do anything more impressive than some of Thor or Hulk's feats, and nobody ever complained about them. The one mistake Feige made were his comments on Carol being, "The most powerful character by far," before her film debuted. If he hadn't said that, nobody would blink when she blew up a spaceship, as if that's some incredible feat. The bottom line is most people don't hate the character the way you do. I can find youtube videos of people bitching about any movie or movie character you can imagine, that doesn't mean they represent the majority. They sure as hell aren't trying to make people forget about the character by giving her a sequel.
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Oct 1, 2021 18:05:50 GMT
Well let's be honest here, her movie made over a billion dollars because it was strategically placed just before Endgame. On its own, most experts agree it wouldn't have achieved anywhere near those numbers. As for other characters sharing the spotlight in movies, there's a pretty big difference between adding more side characters to a main character's movie, and outright making it an ensemble. Beefing up Loki's role or adding in Valkyrie and Hulk didn't change Thor: Ragnarok from being a Thor movie. Same thing for Thor: TDW or Ironman 2 and 3 or CATWS. We might be able to say that Civil War was almost an ensemble movie, but we're also talking about adding a lot of already well-developed characters (like Ironman) instead of utilizing newly introduced characters. Yes, Ant-Man had to split the spotlight with Wasp in the 2nd movie but Ant-Man is probably at the bottom rung of the popularity ladder as far MCU characters with solo films go. Besides, at least he still gets his name on the title. And Ironman, Thor, Captain America and Dr. Strange all still get their names on the title even when they need to share the spotlight, making it clear that it's still their movies. The Marvels is the first time I've seen the MCU give a solo character a 2nd movie where the title isn't making it clear that it's their movie. Yeah, it might mean nothing and it might simply be them trying new things, but it's certainly interesting that it just so happened to be for the most divisive major character in the MCU yet. Well, that and the fact that the plans for the 2nd Captain Marvel movie kept changing dates and priorities. Mostly though, the reason why I'm entertaining this specific theory is due to the fact that the MCU has dialed down promotion of Captain Marvel a LOT in the past year or so. You can usually get a feel which characters Marvel are pushing to the spotlight to be their main characters, and they used to push hard for Captain Marvel even after Endgame. Then it died down to almost nothing. They still OP the heck out of her whenever she appears (like the What If episodes) but they did stop trying to promote her as the new face of Phase 4. Though to be fair, they did something similar to Dr. Strange when he first came out. It's not like CM made a billion dollars on its opening weekend. CBM movies make a lot of their money off of repeat viewings. If people hated CM as much as you think they did, it never would've made a billion dollars, I don't care if it had come out a week before Endgame. (And by the way, as I've mentioned in the past, the timing of its release was actually detrimental to the film's reception and legacy. It feels like a phase one movie and it should've been one. Instead they crammed a solo film introducing a new character into the center of this enormously complex crossover event; I'm surprised it didn't flop. I understand why people think it's not great. How can a self-contained origin story compare to Infinity War?) You're really reaching with your argument here. Ant-Man literally shared the title of his film with another character, how is that not the same thing? Civil War was the ultimate ensemble movie, well at least until IW and Endgame. How are the plans changing for CM2 different from massive rewrites to include Loki in the plot of Thor 2? You were just complaining about Marvel force feeding CM to the audience in What If; now you're saying they aren't promoting her at all? Her movie cones out in just over a year, they're more focused on promoting everything that comes out before that. Eternals, Hawkeye, DS2, Black Panther 2, Ms. Marvel. They have more chapters to the MCU story than ever before now that they have Disney+ as a playground, as well as more films per year on a slate clogged by covid for over a year. I don't know why you think they should be talking about CM2 alone to try to prove they're still invested in the character. It's called the Marvels because it features several characters who have used the name in the comics. They're promoting all of those characters equally for the same reason they called it Falcon & The Winter Soldier-- they want to cast as large a marketing net as possible. The Ms. Marvel show will have debuted by then. "Are you a fan of the Ms. Marvel show? Are you a fan of Captain Marvel? They're both in this film. Buy your tickets now." It's all marketing. They hope to have several prominent female characters to promote going forward. It isn't that complicated, and it doesn't require some conspiracy theory to avoid backlash to a character who headlined a billion dollar grossing film. We've had the overpowered conversation before and I still think you're wrong (What If notwithstanding, as it's hard to gauge proper power levels in a cartoon where Nick Fury is launched 50 feet into the air and survives). She doesn't do anything in her own film until the very end, and even then she doesn't do anything more impressive than some of Thor or Hulk's feats, and nobody ever complained about them. The one mistake Feige made were his comments on Carol being, "The most powerful character by far," before her film debuted. If he hadn't said that, nobody would blink when she blew up a spaceship, as if that's some incredible feat. The bottom line is most people don't hate the character the way you do. I can find youtube videos of people bitching about any movie or movie character you can imagine, that doesn't mean they represent the majority. They sure as hell aren't trying to make people forget about the character by giving her a sequel. Hulk can't accomplish the same feats that Carol does. Not even close. Thor can, but he took multiple movies to get to that power level and he had to make numerous sacrifices along the way to get there. Carol became that powerful by the end of her first movie, without needing to do anything more difficult than removing a chip from her neck. This is not me hating on her, this is me pointing out a writing flaw. It is very difficult to grow a character when you introduce them already near the top. You can do it to villains because villains need to be overcome, but a hero needs to be able to overcome challenges and that doesn't work when you're putting them at the top of the food chain. Right now Carol is suffering from the DBZ syndrome, and each time they showcase her they just reinforce that. But that's not the same thing as actively promoting her. And whether you agree with me or not, surely you can't deny that Carol has become the most divisive MCU character yet. When you say "most people don't hate the character the way you do", I think you'd be surprised to find out my opinions are actually shared by quite a number of fans, and my opinions are pretty mild compared to some others getting thrown out there. In any case, I can't prove to you my conspiracy theory because that's all it is: a conspiracy theory. I'm honest enough to admit that. But I also don't think I'm entirely wrong. I may not have all the details correct but there's enough clues out there that my theory isn't completely baseless, but I'm not going to waste energy convincing others about it. Because it's still just a theory. So we'll just have to agree to disagree on this.
|
|
|
Post by Lux on Oct 1, 2021 19:09:20 GMT
It's not like CM made a billion dollars on its opening weekend. CBM movies make a lot of their money off of repeat viewings. If people hated CM as much as you think they did, it never would've made a billion dollars, I don't care if it had come out a week before Endgame. (And by the way, as I've mentioned in the past, the timing of its release was actually detrimental to the film's reception and legacy. It feels like a phase one movie and it should've been one. Instead they crammed a solo film introducing a new character into the center of this enormously complex crossover event; I'm surprised it didn't flop. I understand why people think it's not great. How can a self-contained origin story compare to Infinity War?) You're really reaching with your argument here. Ant-Man literally shared the title of his film with another character, how is that not the same thing? Civil War was the ultimate ensemble movie, well at least until IW and Endgame. How are the plans changing for CM2 different from massive rewrites to include Loki in the plot of Thor 2? You were just complaining about Marvel force feeding CM to the audience in What If; now you're saying they aren't promoting her at all? Her movie cones out in just over a year, they're more focused on promoting everything that comes out before that. Eternals, Hawkeye, DS2, Black Panther 2, Ms. Marvel. They have more chapters to the MCU story than ever before now that they have Disney+ as a playground, as well as more films per year on a slate clogged by covid for over a year. I don't know why you think they should be talking about CM2 alone to try to prove they're still invested in the character. It's called the Marvels because it features several characters who have used the name in the comics. They're promoting all of those characters equally for the same reason they called it Falcon & The Winter Soldier-- they want to cast as large a marketing net as possible. The Ms. Marvel show will have debuted by then. "Are you a fan of the Ms. Marvel show? Are you a fan of Captain Marvel? They're both in this film. Buy your tickets now." It's all marketing. They hope to have several prominent female characters to promote going forward. It isn't that complicated, and it doesn't require some conspiracy theory to avoid backlash to a character who headlined a billion dollar grossing film. We've had the overpowered conversation before and I still think you're wrong (What If notwithstanding, as it's hard to gauge proper power levels in a cartoon where Nick Fury is launched 50 feet into the air and survives). She doesn't do anything in her own film until the very end, and even then she doesn't do anything more impressive than some of Thor or Hulk's feats, and nobody ever complained about them. The one mistake Feige made were his comments on Carol being, "The most powerful character by far," before her film debuted. If he hadn't said that, nobody would blink when she blew up a spaceship, as if that's some incredible feat. The bottom line is most people don't hate the character the way you do. I can find youtube videos of people bitching about any movie or movie character you can imagine, that doesn't mean they represent the majority. They sure as hell aren't trying to make people forget about the character by giving her a sequel. Hulk can't accomplish the same feats that Carol does. Not even close. Thor can, but he took multiple movies to get to that power level and he had to make numerous sacrifices along the way to get there. Carol became that powerful by the end of her first movie, without needing to do anything more difficult than removing a chip from her neck. This is not me hating on her, this is me pointing out a writing flaw. It is very difficult to grow a character when you introduce them already near the top. You can do it to villains because villains need to be overcome, but a hero needs to be able to overcome challenges and that doesn't work when you're putting them at the top of the food chain. Right now Carol is suffering from the DBZ syndrome, and each time they showcase her they just reinforce that. But that's not the same thing as actively promoting her. And whether you agree with me or not, surely you can't deny that Carol has become the most divisive MCU character yet. When you say "most people don't hate the character the way you do", I think you'd be surprised to find out my opinions are actually shared by quite a number of fans, and my opinions are pretty mild compared to some others getting thrown out there. In any case, I can't prove to you my conspiracy theory because that's all it is: a conspiracy theory. I'm honest enough to admit that. But I also don't think I'm entirely wrong. I may not have all the details correct but there's enough clues out there that my theory isn't completely baseless, but I'm not going to waste energy convincing others about it. Because it's still just a theory. So we'll just have to agree to disagree on this. Carol isn't divisive you're confusing Brie with her character.
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Oct 2, 2021 3:40:21 GMT
Hulk can't accomplish the same feats that Carol does. Not even close. Thor can, but he took multiple movies to get to that power level and he had to make numerous sacrifices along the way to get there. Carol became that powerful by the end of her first movie, without needing to do anything more difficult than removing a chip from her neck. This is not me hating on her, this is me pointing out a writing flaw. It is very difficult to grow a character when you introduce them already near the top. You can do it to villains because villains need to be overcome, but a hero needs to be able to overcome challenges and that doesn't work when you're putting them at the top of the food chain. Right now Carol is suffering from the DBZ syndrome, and each time they showcase her they just reinforce that. But that's not the same thing as actively promoting her. And whether you agree with me or not, surely you can't deny that Carol has become the most divisive MCU character yet. When you say "most people don't hate the character the way you do", I think you'd be surprised to find out my opinions are actually shared by quite a number of fans, and my opinions are pretty mild compared to some others getting thrown out there. In any case, I can't prove to you my conspiracy theory because that's all it is: a conspiracy theory. I'm honest enough to admit that. But I also don't think I'm entirely wrong. I may not have all the details correct but there's enough clues out there that my theory isn't completely baseless, but I'm not going to waste energy convincing others about it. Because it's still just a theory. So we'll just have to agree to disagree on this. Dude, when was the last time you watched Thor? The movie starts off with him laying waste to all of Jotunheim. He's absolutely destroying the place and everyone in it. He didn't have to earn anything before he did that, he was just that powerful and we all accepted it. If that's not being introduced as the alpha, I don't know what is. Hulk one-shots a leviathan in Avengers, we eat it up. Thor also one shots a leviathan with lightning as it comes through the portal (which begs the question, why didn't he just keep doing that?), it's just an awesome action sequence. CM demolishes a Kree ship (and has to work harder than Thor or Hulk to do it), she's just too damn powerful. Thor earned his powers back by the end of his movie, and Carol earned hers. "All she did was remove a chip from her neck," is like saying all Thor did was say sorry to Jane or whatever. There was an entire film's worth of character development that you're glossing over. At least she doesn't start her movie off literally in god mode like Thor. And I can't stress this enough, all she did was blow up a spaceship. You understand she's essentially a walking infinity stone? This seems well within her range. Hell, Wanda is more overpowered than CM in Endgame. Carol shrugging off the headbutt was a step too far, I'll give you that one. But Thanos still ends up overpowering her; meanwhile Wanda was absolutely going to kill Thanos if his ship didn't lay waste to the battlefield. But again, this is excusable because Feige never came out and said, "Wanda is the most powerful hero by far." That's what pissed people off. Her feats are standard situational superhero stuff (how's that for alliteration?), but the audience doesn't want to be told who the most powerful superhero is-- they want to decide that for themselves. I can't change your opinion on your theory about the title, I can only ask you this: What would be the point? Who do you think they're trying to fool? Which casual fan that wasn't going to see CM 2 because they thought she was OP and didn't earn it or whatever, is now going to see The Marvels? Do you think they won't realize she's in it until they're sitting in the theater? Do you think they're saying to themselves, "Hey, they took her full name out of the title and she's part of an ensemble, I guess she won't be overpowered and she'll have to earn it this time." What do you think the Venn diagram for CM fans and Ms. Marvel fans looks like, because I'm sensing a whole lot of commonality. It's a little silly when you think it through.
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Oct 2, 2021 4:43:36 GMT
Hulk can't accomplish the same feats that Carol does. Not even close. Thor can, but he took multiple movies to get to that power level and he had to make numerous sacrifices along the way to get there. Carol became that powerful by the end of her first movie, without needing to do anything more difficult than removing a chip from her neck. This is not me hating on her, this is me pointing out a writing flaw. It is very difficult to grow a character when you introduce them already near the top. You can do it to villains because villains need to be overcome, but a hero needs to be able to overcome challenges and that doesn't work when you're putting them at the top of the food chain. Right now Carol is suffering from the DBZ syndrome, and each time they showcase her they just reinforce that. But that's not the same thing as actively promoting her. And whether you agree with me or not, surely you can't deny that Carol has become the most divisive MCU character yet. When you say "most people don't hate the character the way you do", I think you'd be surprised to find out my opinions are actually shared by quite a number of fans, and my opinions are pretty mild compared to some others getting thrown out there. In any case, I can't prove to you my conspiracy theory because that's all it is: a conspiracy theory. I'm honest enough to admit that. But I also don't think I'm entirely wrong. I may not have all the details correct but there's enough clues out there that my theory isn't completely baseless, but I'm not going to waste energy convincing others about it. Because it's still just a theory. So we'll just have to agree to disagree on this. Dude, when was the last time you watched Thor? The movie starts off with him laying waste to all of Jotunheim. He's absolutely destroying the place and everyone in it. He didn't have to earn anything before he did that, he was just that powerful and we all accepted it. If that's not being introduced as the alpha, I don't know what is. Hulk one-shots a leviathan in Avengers, we eat it up. Thor also one shots a leviathan with lightning as it comes through the portal (which begs the question, why didn't he just keep doing that?), it's just an awesome action sequence. CM demolishes a Kree ship (and has to work harder than Thor or Hulk to do it), she's just too damn powerful. Thor earned his powers back by the end of his movie, and Carol earned hers. "All she did was remove a chip from her neck," is like saying all Thor did was say sorry to Jane or whatever. There was an entire film's worth of character development that you're glossing over. At least she doesn't start her movie off literally in god mode like Thor. And I can't stress this enough, all she did was blow up a spaceship. You understand she's essentially a walking infinity stone? This seems well within her range. Hell, Wanda is more overpowered than CM in Endgame. Carol shrugging off the headbutt was a step too far, I'll give you that one. But Thanos still ends up overpowering her; meanwhile Wanda was absolutely going to kill Thanos if his ship didn't lay waste to the battlefield. But again, this is excusable because Feige never came out and said, "Wanda is the most powerful hero by far." That's what pissed people off. Her feats are standard situational superhero stuff (how's that for alliteration?), but the audience doesn't want to be told who the most powerful superhero is-- they want to decide that for themselves. I can't change your opinion on your theory about the title, I can only ask you this: What would be the point? Who do you think they're trying to fool? Which casual fan that wasn't going to see CM 2 because they thought she was OP and didn't earn it or whatever, is now going to see The Marvels? Do you think they won't realize she's in it until they're sitting in the theater? Do you think they're saying to themselves, "Hey, they took her full name out of the title and she's part of an ensemble, I guess she won't be overpowered and she'll have to earn it this time." What do you think the Venn diagram for CM fans and Ms. Marvel fans looks like, because I'm sensing a whole lot of commonality. It's a little silly when you think it through. Ok, forget about the title and let's focus on power levels. We can discuss the title more once we reach some kind of agreement on power levels. Thor takes out a bunch of frost giants and lays waste to their iceland. Does he win that match? No, he actually needs to get saved by Odin. What happens after that? He gets stripped of his powers and gets treated like a loon by the people of earth. Gets electrocuted multiple times and knocked out on Earth. He's led to believe he caused his father's death and he's forced to apologize to his brother. He needs to completely change his attitude in order to get his powers back, even sacrifices himself. And even once he gets his powers back and faces off against Loki, he needs to make a sacrifice: Save the frost giants or go back to the woman he loves? In the end, he sacrifices love for his duty. Does Captain Marvel go through any of that? Did she ever need any sort of saving in her movie? Did she ever apologize for anything she did? Did she ever need to be humbled or face a challenge that she didn't just blast her way through? Did she ever even lose a fight? And in the end, did she need to make any personal sacrifice in order to gain her full powers? Nope. None at all. And no, blowing up a spaceship is not the most impressive thing she did. She caught a rocket ship about the size of a small skyscraper and threw it back at the Kree. She made Ronan retreat. Later on in Endgame she's beating up Thanos in hand to hand combat and Thanos needed to use the power stone just to get her off him. This is the same Thanos that casually demolished Hulk in hand to hand combat. So no, Hulk is obviously nowhere near Carol's league. Yeah he punched a leviathan (with added assistance from Ironman) but that was one leviathan. Carol took down the entire mothership of Thanos, a ship that could house hundreds of leviathans. Thor is obviously stronger and more potent than Hulk, and at his strongest I actually think he's more powerful than Captain Marvel. But he struggles to get to that point. He's lost his mother, father, brother and people. He lost an eye and his favored weapon and gets stabbed and bruised multiple times. He's lost multiple fights along the way and had to resort to either trickery or flat out depending on other people to save the day. Heck he even struggles in a fight against Ironman or Hulk. Lost to Hela and Kurse. Got beat up by Thanos and his goons. Took around 5 movies to unlock his full powers. He suffered PTSD and became a shell of his former self. In fact, we only ever see Thor at full power for a very brief period, at the end of Infinity War. After that he becomes a joke of himself. Carol went through none of that to get to her current power levels. She's lost no fair fights, doesn't get injured, doesn't overcome any challenges, doesn't go through any character changes, is never humiliated in any way, etc. Now granted she's only had 1 movie and a brief outing in Endgame, but that just proves my point. If she's already this powerful at such an early stage of her MCU appearance without really needing to do much, there's not a lot of room for her to grow.
|
|
|
Post by twothousandonemark on Oct 2, 2021 16:17:13 GMT
Yes. I've said something similar before as well. When Captain Marvel was first announced, she was supposed to be the next big thing. Feige made all these announcements about making Captain Marvel the next flagship MCU character, the next face of the MCU to replace Stark and Rogers. Also the most powerful character. They rushed her movie in, pushed her last minute into Endgame, and from every source I can see, they (MCU) seemed intent to fast track her 2nd movie. Then all of a sudden... it stopped. We saw her 2nd movie (which was originally scheduled to come out fairly early in Phase 4) get postponed, then postponed, then postponed, till it eventually got kicked out of the timeline. There was even rumors that she'd need to share her next movie with Spiderman but that seems to have gotten scrapped. And now when they finally get her movie back on a schedule, they're making her share the spotlight with an ensemble... which I don't think the MCU has ever done for any of their main characters. My theory is that the MCU originally planned to make Captain Marvel their flagship character but then they saw how divisive the character was and so took her back a step. I've no feeling towards the character at all good or bad alike. Even in Endgame, I'm both surprised I forget she's in that movie when I think about it, & even still react a bit surprised when she makes her grand finale entrance. I think with all the MCU misfit toy characters, leads & supporting alike, Captain Marvel just feels too flawless. She screams DC comics at me & that didn't meld for me in the Infinity Saga. I think she'll need to sacrifice & memorably perish for her to have much of a lasting mark now.
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Oct 3, 2021 13:36:43 GMT
Dude, when was the last time you watched Thor? The movie starts off with him laying waste to all of Jotunheim. He's absolutely destroying the place and everyone in it. He didn't have to earn anything before he did that, he was just that powerful and we all accepted it. If that's not being introduced as the alpha, I don't know what is. Hulk one-shots a leviathan in Avengers, we eat it up. Thor also one shots a leviathan with lightning as it comes through the portal (which begs the question, why didn't he just keep doing that?), it's just an awesome action sequence. CM demolishes a Kree ship (and has to work harder than Thor or Hulk to do it), she's just too damn powerful. Thor earned his powers back by the end of his movie, and Carol earned hers. "All she did was remove a chip from her neck," is like saying all Thor did was say sorry to Jane or whatever. There was an entire film's worth of character development that you're glossing over. At least she doesn't start her movie off literally in god mode like Thor. And I can't stress this enough, all she did was blow up a spaceship. You understand she's essentially a walking infinity stone? This seems well within her range. Hell, Wanda is more overpowered than CM in Endgame. Carol shrugging off the headbutt was a step too far, I'll give you that one. But Thanos still ends up overpowering her; meanwhile Wanda was absolutely going to kill Thanos if his ship didn't lay waste to the battlefield. But again, this is excusable because Feige never came out and said, "Wanda is the most powerful hero by far." That's what pissed people off. Her feats are standard situational superhero stuff (how's that for alliteration?), but the audience doesn't want to be told who the most powerful superhero is-- they want to decide that for themselves. I can't change your opinion on your theory about the title, I can only ask you this: What would be the point? Who do you think they're trying to fool? Which casual fan that wasn't going to see CM 2 because they thought she was OP and didn't earn it or whatever, is now going to see The Marvels? Do you think they won't realize she's in it until they're sitting in the theater? Do you think they're saying to themselves, "Hey, they took her full name out of the title and she's part of an ensemble, I guess she won't be overpowered and she'll have to earn it this time." What do you think the Venn diagram for CM fans and Ms. Marvel fans looks like, because I'm sensing a whole lot of commonality. It's a little silly when you think it through. Ok, forget about the title and let's focus on power levels. We can discuss the title more once we reach some kind of agreement on power levels. Thor takes out a bunch of frost giants and lays waste to their iceland. Does he win that match? No, he actually needs to get saved by Odin. What happens after that? He gets stripped of his powers and gets treated like a loon by the people of earth. Gets electrocuted multiple times and knocked out on Earth. He's led to believe he caused his father's death and he's forced to apologize to his brother. He needs to completely change his attitude in order to get his powers back, even sacrifices himself. And even once he gets his powers back and faces off against Loki, he needs to make a sacrifice: Save the frost giants or go back to the woman he loves? In the end, he sacrifices love for his duty. Does Captain Marvel go through any of that? Did she ever need any sort of saving in her movie? Did she ever apologize for anything she did? Did she ever need to be humbled or face a challenge that she didn't just blast her way through? Did she ever even lose a fight? And in the end, did she need to make any personal sacrifice in order to gain her full powers? Nope. None at all. And no, blowing up a spaceship is not the most impressive thing she did. She caught a rocket ship about the size of a small skyscraper and threw it back at the Kree. She made Ronan retreat. Later on in Endgame she's beating up Thanos in hand to hand combat and Thanos needed to use the power stone just to get her off him. This is the same Thanos that casually demolished Hulk in hand to hand combat. So no, Hulk is obviously nowhere near Carol's league. Yeah he punched a leviathan (with added assistance from Ironman) but that was one leviathan. Carol took down the entire mothership of Thanos, a ship that could house hundreds of leviathans. Thor is obviously stronger and more potent than Hulk, and at his strongest I actually think he's more powerful than Captain Marvel. But he struggles to get to that point. He's lost his mother, father, brother and people. He lost an eye and his favored weapon and gets stabbed and bruised multiple times. He's lost multiple fights along the way and had to resort to either trickery or flat out depending on other people to save the day. Heck he even struggles in a fight against Ironman or Hulk. Lost to Hela and Kurse. Got beat up by Thanos and his goons. Took around 5 movies to unlock his full powers. He suffered PTSD and became a shell of his former self. In fact, we only ever see Thor at full power for a very brief period, at the end of Infinity War. After that he becomes a joke of himself. Carol went through none of that to get to her current power levels. She's lost no fair fights, doesn't get injured, doesn't overcome any challenges, doesn't go through any character changes, is never humiliated in any way, etc. Now granted she's only had 1 movie and a brief outing in Endgame, but that just proves my point. If she's already this powerful at such an early stage of her MCU appearance without really needing to do much, there's not a lot of room for her to grow. I don't know that Thor needed saving. Odin shows up to put an end to the fight. He was pissed at Thor for starting it. Thor was wiping the floor with the frost giants, literally demolishing their entire realm with hammer blows. That big bad creature looked like a game changer, and Thor just blew a hole in its head. And yes, CM went through that. She sacrificed herself before her movie even started, we just didn't find out it happened until the end (which is when her full power is unlocked, just like Thor). She got her ass handed to her in training by Yon-Rogg. Hell, she even got duped and sucker punched by Talos. She's captured and helpless as she's being interrogated by the skrulls. Her flashbacks show how she was underestimated and told she couldn't do it time and time again, but she kept getting up. From what I understand, this stuff resonates much more with women than it does with us, so I get why this type of hero's journey isn't as compelling to you. But it's a struggle nonetheless. I personally don't like the way this story was put together, but I still recognize the story arc here, and I don't see her falling into her powers the way you do. The stuff from the end of her movie. She's a walking infinity stone, she should be able to overpower a kree rocket ship. I think Thor or even Iron Man would've done the same thing, had it been their film. This is younger, less powerful Ronan. He even looks different. he's clearly not at the same level he's at in GOTG. For that matter, he doesn't seem particularly afraid of her. He says they'll come back to get her when they're more prepared. I'm not going to argue anything from Endgame, we both agree that movie is all over the place with powersets and disappointing character arcs (or lack thereof). At the end of the day, Carol doesn't take on a formidable opponent until the end of her film. She gets taken down several times at the beginning and spends the rest of the time doing pretty much nothing (that's the real problem with this film). At the end she unlocks her potential, just like Thor, and Hulk, and the entire Avengers team before her. And even then she only fights her opponent to a standstill before he decides discretion is the better part of valor. Hulk, Thor and Iron Man beat their opponents into submission; hell Tony killed his. We've had this discussion multiple times, neither of us are going to budge and I'm just glad we can still do this without getting annoyed with each other.
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Oct 26, 2021 20:04:05 GMT
The movie made over a billion dollars, I hardly think they're hiding her... Well let's be honest here, her movie made over a billion dollars because it was strategically placed just before Endgame. On its own, most experts agree it wouldn't have achieved anywhere near those numbers. As for other characters sharing the spotlight in movies, there's a pretty big difference between adding more side characters to a main character's movie, and outright making it an ensemble. Beefing up Loki's role or adding in Valkyrie and Hulk didn't change Thor: Ragnarok from being a Thor movie. Same thing for Thor: TDW or Ironman 2 and 3 or CATWS. We might be able to say that Civil War was almost an ensemble movie, but we're also talking about adding a lot of already well-developed characters (like Ironman) instead of utilizing newly introduced characters. Yes, Ant-Man had to split the spotlight with Wasp in the 2nd movie but Ant-Man is probably at the bottom rung of the popularity ladder as far MCU characters with solo films go. Besides, at least he still gets his name on the title. And Ironman, Thor, Captain America and Dr. Strange all still get their names on the title even when they need to share the spotlight, making it clear that it's still their movies. The Marvels is the first time I've seen the MCU give a solo character a 2nd movie where the title isn't making it clear that it's their movie. Yeah, it might mean nothing and it might simply be them trying new things, but it's certainly interesting that it just so happened to be for the most divisive major character in the MCU yet. Well, that and the fact that the plans for the 2nd Captain Marvel movie kept changing dates and priorities. Mostly though, the reason why I'm entertaining this specific theory is due to the fact that the MCU has dialed down promotion of Captain Marvel a LOT in the past year or so. You can usually get a feel which characters Marvel are pushing to the spotlight to be their main characters, and they used to push hard for Captain Marvel even after Endgame. Then it died down to almost nothing. They still OP the heck out of her whenever she appears (like the What If episodes) but they did stop trying to promote her as the new face of Phase 4. Though to be fair, they did something similar to Dr. Strange when he first came out. THIS^^^
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Oct 27, 2021 16:10:07 GMT
Ok, forget about the title and let's focus on power levels. We can discuss the title more once we reach some kind of agreement on power levels. Thor takes out a bunch of frost giants and lays waste to their iceland. Does he win that match? No, he actually needs to get saved by Odin. What happens after that? He gets stripped of his powers and gets treated like a loon by the people of earth. Gets electrocuted multiple times and knocked out on Earth. He's led to believe he caused his father's death and he's forced to apologize to his brother. He needs to completely change his attitude in order to get his powers back, even sacrifices himself. And even once he gets his powers back and faces off against Loki, he needs to make a sacrifice: Save the frost giants or go back to the woman he loves? In the end, he sacrifices love for his duty. Does Captain Marvel go through any of that? Did she ever need any sort of saving in her movie? Did she ever apologize for anything she did? Did she ever need to be humbled or face a challenge that she didn't just blast her way through? Did she ever even lose a fight? And in the end, did she need to make any personal sacrifice in order to gain her full powers? Nope. None at all. And no, blowing up a spaceship is not the most impressive thing she did. She caught a rocket ship about the size of a small skyscraper and threw it back at the Kree. She made Ronan retreat. Later on in Endgame she's beating up Thanos in hand to hand combat and Thanos needed to use the power stone just to get her off him. This is the same Thanos that casually demolished Hulk in hand to hand combat. So no, Hulk is obviously nowhere near Carol's league. Yeah he punched a leviathan (with added assistance from Ironman) but that was one leviathan. Carol took down the entire mothership of Thanos, a ship that could house hundreds of leviathans. Thor is obviously stronger and more potent than Hulk, and at his strongest I actually think he's more powerful than Captain Marvel. But he struggles to get to that point. He's lost his mother, father, brother and people. He lost an eye and his favored weapon and gets stabbed and bruised multiple times. He's lost multiple fights along the way and had to resort to either trickery or flat out depending on other people to save the day. Heck he even struggles in a fight against Ironman or Hulk. Lost to Hela and Kurse. Got beat up by Thanos and his goons. Took around 5 movies to unlock his full powers. He suffered PTSD and became a shell of his former self. In fact, we only ever see Thor at full power for a very brief period, at the end of Infinity War. After that he becomes a joke of himself. Carol went through none of that to get to her current power levels. She's lost no fair fights, doesn't get injured, doesn't overcome any challenges, doesn't go through any character changes, is never humiliated in any way, etc. Now granted she's only had 1 movie and a brief outing in Endgame, but that just proves my point. If she's already this powerful at such an early stage of her MCU appearance without really needing to do much, there's not a lot of room for her to grow. I don't know that Thor needed saving. Odin shows up to put an end to the fight. He was pissed at Thor for starting it. Thor was wiping the floor with the frost giants, literally demolishing their entire realm with hammer blows. That big bad creature looked like a game changer, and Thor just blew a hole in its head. And yes, CM went through that. She sacrificed herself before her movie even started, we just didn't find out it happened until the end (which is when her full power is unlocked, just like Thor). She got her ass handed to her in training by Yon-Rogg. Hell, she even got duped and sucker punched by Talos. She's captured and helpless as she's being interrogated by the skrulls. Her flashbacks show how she was underestimated and told she couldn't do it time and time again, but she kept getting up. From what I understand, this stuff resonates much more with women than it does with us, so I get why this type of hero's journey isn't as compelling to you. But it's a struggle nonetheless. I personally don't like the way this story was put together, but I still recognize the story arc here, and I don't see her falling into her powers the way you do. The stuff from the end of her movie. She's a walking infinity stone, she should be able to overpower a kree rocket ship. I think Thor or even Iron Man would've done the same thing, had it been their film. This is younger, less powerful Ronan. He even looks different. he's clearly not at the same level he's at in GOTG. For that matter, he doesn't seem particularly afraid of her. He says they'll come back to get her when they're more prepared. I'm not going to argue anything from Endgame, we both agree that movie is all over the place with powersets and disappointing character arcs (or lack thereof). At the end of the day, Carol doesn't take on a formidable opponent until the end of her film. She gets taken down several times at the beginning and spends the rest of the time doing pretty much nothing (that's the real problem with this film). At the end she unlocks her potential, just like Thor, and Hulk, and the entire Avengers team before her. And even then she only fights her opponent to a standstill before he decides discretion is the better part of valor. Hulk, Thor and Iron Man beat their opponents into submission; hell Tony killed his. We've had this discussion multiple times, neither of us are going to budge and I'm just glad we can still do this without getting annoyed with each other. Yes, Thor needed saving. His team was in full retreat. Yes, he was making a fight of it but they were still trying to run away. They were cornered, heavily outnumbered and even Thor had a heavy look of worry on his face before Odin came down and broke up the fight. Carol never needed saving like that before. That's not even bringing into account scenes like Loki saving Thor from his horrible beat down from Kurse, Thor needing Surtur's help to beat Hela, Thor needing Vision's help against Ultron, Thor getting absolutely stomped by Thanos, etc. Carol didn't exactly make a sacrifice prior to her movie. She tried to destroy her ship's power core so that Yon Rogg couldn't take it, but there's no indication that she actually knew it was going to explode the way it did. She was initially losing her training session against Yon Rogg but that fight still ended up with Yon Rogg being the one knocked down and hurt. Yes, she got sucker punched by Talos... again supporting my point that she has never lost a fair fight. She gets captured (again due to said sucker punch) but was easily able to free herself without much issues. If the most challenging things she faces are shown in flashbacks, then this is horrible writing. Flashbacks are used to flesh out the background of a character, not as the main obstacle they need to overcome to develop their arc. To use it as such is just plain horrible (and lazy) writing. It's pretty much the opposite of show don't tell. At the end of her movie, she's not a walking infinity stone. At least she should be. If it was Vision or Dr. Strange, two characters who actually have infinity stones, then that would be understandable. She got her powers from an infinity stone but then so did Wanda and Pietro. They weren't anywhere near her power levels in their first movie. Wanda took far, far longer to get to that power level... which is probably why most people don't complain about Wanda being OP the same way they complain about Carol being OP. Thor or Ironman would have destroyed that Kree rocket ship but I don't believe either of them have ever shown any feat where they outright just throw a rocket ship back, or anything approaching the size of that rocket ship. At the end of the day, it's not Carol's power levels that are problematic, it's the way it's shown and developed on screen. Wanda, Thor and Dr. Strange are all just as powerful if not moreso, but their power levels were carefully paced and developed throughout multiple shows. They were given challenges that they actually struggled with instead of only seeming to struggle with. Carol gets none of that. I do hope they fix it in the next movie. You might be surprised to know that Carol Danvers is in my top 5 favorite comicbook characters (Miss Marvel version, not Captain Marvel version). So it pains me to see her treated like this and hope they do better with the next movie. But so far with the way they're handling her and if the Black Widow movie was any indication, I'm not hopeful. For her character to get proper development the MCU must be willing to break her character and drag her through the mud if necessary (the way they do to all their other solo-movie characters other than Black Widow). I just can't see them doing that with her.
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Oct 27, 2021 17:06:45 GMT
I don't know that Thor needed saving. Odin shows up to put an end to the fight. He was pissed at Thor for starting it. Thor was wiping the floor with the frost giants, literally demolishing their entire realm with hammer blows. That big bad creature looked like a game changer, and Thor just blew a hole in its head. And yes, CM went through that. She sacrificed herself before her movie even started, we just didn't find out it happened until the end (which is when her full power is unlocked, just like Thor). She got her ass handed to her in training by Yon-Rogg. Hell, she even got duped and sucker punched by Talos. She's captured and helpless as she's being interrogated by the skrulls. Her flashbacks show how she was underestimated and told she couldn't do it time and time again, but she kept getting up. From what I understand, this stuff resonates much more with women than it does with us, so I get why this type of hero's journey isn't as compelling to you. But it's a struggle nonetheless. I personally don't like the way this story was put together, but I still recognize the story arc here, and I don't see her falling into her powers the way you do. The stuff from the end of her movie. She's a walking infinity stone, she should be able to overpower a kree rocket ship. I think Thor or even Iron Man would've done the same thing, had it been their film. This is younger, less powerful Ronan. He even looks different. he's clearly not at the same level he's at in GOTG. For that matter, he doesn't seem particularly afraid of her. He says they'll come back to get her when they're more prepared. I'm not going to argue anything from Endgame, we both agree that movie is all over the place with powersets and disappointing character arcs (or lack thereof). At the end of the day, Carol doesn't take on a formidable opponent until the end of her film. She gets taken down several times at the beginning and spends the rest of the time doing pretty much nothing (that's the real problem with this film). At the end she unlocks her potential, just like Thor, and Hulk, and the entire Avengers team before her. And even then she only fights her opponent to a standstill before he decides discretion is the better part of valor. Hulk, Thor and Iron Man beat their opponents into submission; hell Tony killed his. We've had this discussion multiple times, neither of us are going to budge and I'm just glad we can still do this without getting annoyed with each other. Yes, Thor needed saving. His team was in full retreat. Yes, he was making a fight of it but they were still trying to run away. They were cornered, heavily outnumbered and even Thor had a heavy look of worry on his face before Odin came down and broke up the fight. Carol never needed saving like that before. That's not even bringing into account scenes like Loki saving Thor from his horrible beat down from Kurse, Thor needing Surtur's help to beat Hela, Thor needing Vision's help against Ultron, Thor getting absolutely stomped by Thanos, etc. Carol didn't exactly make a sacrifice prior to her movie. She tried to destroy her ship's power core so that Yon Rogg couldn't take it, but there's no indication that she actually knew it was going to explode the way it did. She was initially losing her training session against Yon Rogg but that fight still ended up with Yon Rogg being the one knocked down and hurt. Yes, she got sucker punched by Talos... again supporting my point that she has never lost a fair fight. She gets captured (again due to said sucker punch) but was easily able to free herself without much issues. If the most challenging things she faces are shown in flashbacks, then this is horrible writing. Flashbacks are used to flesh out the background of a character, not as the main obstacle they need to overcome to develop their arc. To use it as such is just plain horrible (and lazy) writing. It's pretty much the opposite of show don't tell. At the end of her movie, she's not a walking infinity stone. At least she should be. If it was Vision or Dr. Strange, two characters who actually have infinity stones, then that would be understandable. She got her powers from an infinity stone but then so did Wanda and Pietro. They weren't anywhere near her power levels in their first movie. Wanda took far, far longer to get to that power level... which is probably why most people don't complain about Wanda being OP the same way they complain about Carol being OP. Thor or Ironman would have destroyed that Kree rocket ship but I don't believe either of them have ever shown any feat where they outright just throw a rocket ship back, or anything approaching the size of that rocket ship. At the end of the day, it's not Carol's power levels that are problematic, it's the way it's shown and developed on screen. Wanda, Thor and Dr. Strange are all just as powerful if not moreso, but their power levels were carefully paced and developed throughout multiple shows. They were given challenges that they actually struggled with instead of only seeming to struggle with. Carol gets none of that. I do hope they fix it in the next movie. You might be surprised to know that Carol Danvers is in my top 5 favorite comicbook characters (Miss Marvel version, not Captain Marvel version). So it pains me to see her treated like this and hope they do better with the next movie. But so far with the way they're handling her and if the Black Widow movie was any indication, I'm not hopeful. For her character to get proper development the MCU must be willing to break her character and drag her through the mud if necessary (the way they do to all their other solo-movie characters other than Black Widow). I just can't see them doing that with her. Thor's team was in full retreat, but he didn't seem that worried to me. Worried for his friends, they were in real trouble. "Father, let's fight them together," or something to that effect when Odin shows up. Not hoping for a way out. Anyway it's a poor comparison to bring up multiple situations of Thor needing help when CM has been in like three scenes outside of her own movie. I'm pretty sure they'd write it a similar way for her if she was a major part of multiple ensemble movies. I've already agreed it's a poorly written movie. Just not because of her power levels compared to other heroes. You're trying way too hard here. It wasn't a fair fight when she was knocked out and captured by Talos? Ok then, she's depicted as a chump, doesn't that make it even? If they did that to Thor, you'd complain they were turning him into a moron again. How has she never lost a fair fight? Thanos punched her into next Tuesday. At the end of the day, all she's done is blow up some ships and beat a laughably overwhelmed Yon-Rogg. Come on, man. She attempted to blow up a ship with an incredible power core of unknown energy levels that she was standing right next to, and you don't think she expected to die?! This is like an old DC Fan argument that Steve Rodgers knew he'd survive in the ice. Really? Wanda's powers have certainly evolved over time, she takes out the Avengers pretty much by herself in AoU. And when she single-handedly overpowered Thanos in the same poorly written movie where Carol takes a headbutt from him like it was nothing, you didn't complain half as much about that. Why? I know why, and I'll get back to it. How big are the leviathans? Doesn't IM launch a bunch mini-rockets or something to take one down? Thor one-shots a leviathan. Thor is destroying the very fabric of Jotenheim at the beginning of his own movie. Thor overwhelms the IG in IW. Captain Marvel blew up some ships. If Kevin Feige had said, "Wanda will be the most powerful hero by far," you and everyone else would be complaining about her instead. It's that simple. Somebody said Carol was more powerful than the other heroes, and that pissed you off before you ever saw the movie. She was overpowered by default before the opening credits. Your mind was made up, and you continue to do mental gymnastics to try to explain your perspective. "She's never lost a fair fight." "She couldn't have known a highly volatile energy source would explode in her face if she shot it." "Thor singlehandedly turning the tide of the battle in IW and overpowering the gauntlet on his own is not as impressive as blowing up some starships." We had agreed to disagree on this topic, I'm not sure why you brought it up again. But I really don't want to keep going if you're going to continue down the path of delusion. You think she's overpowered, fine. But dude, she knew shooting that core put her life in jeopardy. She lost engagements against the enemy. Other heroes have kicked just as much ass, if not far more than Captain Marvel.
|
|
havenless
Sophomore
@havenless
Posts: 717
Likes: 312
|
Post by havenless on Oct 27, 2021 19:34:18 GMT
Does naming the Captain Marvel sequel "The Marvels" instead of "Captain Marvel 2" or "Captain Marvel subtitle" insinuate a lack of confidence in Captain Marvel? It does to me! If They had confidence in Captain Marvel as a brand they would just name it that, wouldn't they?! After all, they named Shang Chi - SHANG CHI! Why wouldn't they name this "Captain Marvel 2" or "Captain Marvel subtitle"? And before you say it... I realize that new characters are going to be included. Monica Rambeau and Kamala Khan; but those characters are introduced in Disney+ shows. IMO that only furthers suggests they don't have complete faith in "Captain Marvel" on her own. Thoughts? I look at it slightly differently. No, not naming it CM 2 doesn’t show a lack of confidence… because what I think is happening has happened before. Man of Steel! I believe this is not CM 2 but instead kind of a mini-Avengers movie, not unlike BvS (but they probably won’t fight each other). So in essence, they’re making a team up movie as the follow up to Captain Marvel, which isn’t a discredit to the name CM2. The discredit to CM2 is that they decided against making it at all. They believe this is the preferred path for the character’s franchise, and I don’t disagree with that.
|
|