Of These Four Men, The One Most Likely To Be Innocent......

I can't answer that because I don't have any kids so I don't know what I'd do with them, but if I'd had the chance to as a kid, I would've in a heartbeat.

Here are all the biggies that present a massive problem with this case. Not a single accuser was ever found to be credible. Not a single witness for the prosecution was found to be credible. Nobody who said they actually SAW boys being abused ever thought to call the cops and didn't say anything until they were paid for their stories, which an article published in 1994 found 'witnesses' would be paid $10,000 MORE if they said a boy was touched inside his pants vs. outside, only everybody who wants money would have an incentive to lie and up the ante on the details. There's no physical evidence, no child porn either in photos or digital or homemade, no flash drives full of homemade kiddie porn, and no accusers before he was 35 years old, even now, even with him dead when victims would feel safe about coming forward, there has been nobody. So if we literally can't believe a word ANYBODY says who says he did it, there's no case. All there is is a guy who didn't conform, and that was just unacceptable for society. Society decided as a rich successful black man he wasn't allowed to spend his money the way he wanted to, he should've spent it on things THEY thought he should, and they wouldn't think there was anything wrong with him. Drugs, hookers, guns, all fine, that's a rock star, a movie theater, an amusement park, and let people come there for free, nobody in the world is that pure of heart, he MUST be doing something felonious.

Now are most men in the world that purehearted? No, but what're really the odds in 8 billion people there couldn't be a single one?

I'm not overlooking it, everybody who says 'accurately' overlooks the problem he said MJ was circumcised and he wasn't. Even among people who say it  matched, can't agree on what matched, some say he described vitiligo spots, some say it was a birthmark, some even said it was a tattoo, so which of these is the accurate one? Chandler filled in a picture, cops took pictures, but the two of these have not been shown to the public to prove to us that they matched. They were never even presented in court to prove they matched. All we have is the word of cops and a DA who SAID they matched, some of whom were proven to falsify evidence in their cases. So again, we can't believe anybody involved, if they want to actually SHOW us those pictures AND the drawing to compare, then that'll be another thing. What's very telling though is none of the other accusers were ever asked to also make a drawing to compare to the original drawing. And the only explanation for that one is the end result would be like the 'which tire?' joke.

None of which makes him a pedophile. It's indisputable Gary Glitter, another famous rock star, was a pedophile, because the first time he was arrested for it, cops found 800+ images of child porn on his computer, the 2nd time he got arrested was for having sex with 10 year old girls in Vietnam, then a 3rd time in connection to Saville. And Saville we can believe was a pedophile because as soon as he was dead, boom, 1400 posthumous allegations. In the 10+ years MJ's been dead, there's been a grand total of 3 accusers, 2 of which wanted to get his estate's billion dollars, and the third one was a woman, who since she didn't fit the 'little boys' narrative, was promptly buried in the press because nobody wanted to read her story.

Ian Watkins, lead singer of the group Lost Prophets, he was a pedophile, of this there was no doubt, but the judge didn't just throw the book at him, but at the parents who LET him abuse their kids. Nobody there got a free pass unlike 'oh I saw MJ molesting boys and I saw it happen for months/years but I never did anything about it', 'Okay, you can go now, all we needed was your testimony, you won't be charged for aiding and abetting, a co-conspirator, contributing to the delinquency of a child, etc'.

Interestingly enough on that note in the MJ case, the accusers never demanded an apology from the ex-staff who got up in court and swore they WATCHED him abusing those boys, but put their paycheck first. And the fired maids and drivers, etc, never felt a need to apologize to the kids they supposedly watched being raped for months or years on end either. If any of this was real, somebody somewhere would demand those maids be held accountable for their own role, but nobody, the supposed victims, their mothers, anybody in their families, thought that was necessary. Now I don't have any kids, and I don't know if you do, but let's be real, you find out somebody watched your kid being raped for weeks/months on end, and didn't say anything to anybody because it was more important to them they keep their job, how willing would you be to let that slide, and say that person had no responsibility to report it or do anything to stop it?

Will Vahey, not a famous person, but a pedophile, who made the news because he was a teacher who'd take his boy students on overnight trips, where he would drug them, and molest them while they were unconscious, and take pictures of it, which filled up 10 gigabytes on a flash drive he had, which was stolen from his house by his housekeeper, who took it to the police station, and when they came to arrest him, he killed himself.

In all these cases of real pedophiles, there's proof, there are willing accomplices, there's also hired help who put the victims first instead of their job, there is photographic evidence, there is homemade child porn, there's opting for suicide instead of arrest/prison (like a district attorney of all people who got busted in a To Catch a Predator sting and blew his brains out when the cops came to arrest him), there is all this stuff that never existed in the MJ case. Again, if we can't believe ANY of the people who said 'he did it/I saw him', and there's no physical evidence, not a shred of child porn anywhere, no video or photographic evidence, no co-pedophiles to share victims with, it doesn't matter how weird he acted, there is no case. If being/acting weird was a sign someone was a pedophile, there wouldn't be millions of victims of it, most parents would NEVER leave their kids alone with a noted weirdo, but they think nothing of leaving them with trusted teachers, scout leaders, coaches, youth pastors, pediatricians, talent scouts, child photographers, camp counselors, babysitters, daycare providers, music teachers, swim instructors, priests, family friends, relatives, etc.

And if he wasn't doing anything wrong, what makes it inappropriate?

For now we'll go with the one where entire families were invited to stay in a 25 room mansion and with permission they all stayed the night in a 2 story bedroom.

Do you ever wonder why the kids wanted to stay in his room with him? Why no matter where he went, what country in the world, kids flocked around him? What did he have the weirdo down the street wouldn't?

Apparently all the kids who stayed there knew not to open things they weren't allowed to, the only possible exception would be the Arvizo brothers but given the DA had to plant Gavin's prints on the magazines, that in itself is highly doubtful.