|
Post by amyghost on Feb 8, 2024 2:33:28 GMT
As I said before, you're not going to let go of the false equivalency narrative, because it's the only one you've got. The problem is, that at base, it's not a legitimate narrative and no amount of "you're turning a blind eye to racism" or "you support racism" does anything toward legitimizing it. It is a fact. In 1954 if there was pool that didn't allow black people then that is racial discrimination and segregation. In 2024 if you're white and go for a swim and told it's for blacks only then that is also racial discrimination and segregation. In 2024 it's actually worse because we're supposed to know better and should have learned from past wrongs and also now it's against the law and in the case of Waterloo university it goes against their own policy of inclusion. How can a segregated class at a university be ok in 2024? We know that a chess club that doesn't have enough diversity and despite having no rules banning anyone based on race it still considered problematic and steps need to be taken. But blacks only? No problem. Nothing to see. Total racist hypocrisy. And what's your feeling about centuries of brutal oppression of Blacks by Whites? I'm getting the distinct feeling you're none too bothered by that (after all, you weren't around, right?), and sure as hell it's just nothing at all compared to the outrage barbecue you're having to endure at the realization that maybe Black folks don't want you around sometimes. Give it a rest. Your lame excuse for how one is not only equivalent to but actually worse than the other just gets lamer with every repeat performance of it.
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 9, 2024 20:40:30 GMT
It is a fact. In 1954 if there was pool that didn't allow black people then that is racial discrimination and segregation. In 2024 if you're white and go for a swim and told it's for blacks only then that is also racial discrimination and segregation. In 2024 it's actually worse because we're supposed to know better and should have learned from past wrongs and also now it's against the law and in the case of Waterloo university it goes against their own policy of inclusion. How can a segregated class at a university be ok in 2024? We know that a chess club that doesn't have enough diversity and despite having no rules banning anyone based on race it still considered problematic and steps need to be taken. But blacks only? No problem. Nothing to see. Total racist hypocrisy. And what's your feeling about centuries of brutal oppression of Blacks by Whites? I'm getting the distinct feeling you're none too bothered by that (after all, you weren't around, right?), and sure as hell it's just nothing at all compared to the outrage barbecue you're having to endure at the realization that maybe Black folks don't want you around sometimes. Give it a rest. Your lame excuse for how one is not only equivalent to but actually worse than the other just gets lamer with every repeat performance of it. I might as well ask what your feelings are about the amount of black on white crime compared to white on black. the discussion is about the policy of segregation. We all know it's wrong and against the law. It's against school policy. Yet there it is. You really think it should be allowable because brutality against blacks at some point in history? Every group has faced brutality. You would see outrage barbeque if there was a white only swim class, or someone expressed that they don't want to be around blacks.
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Feb 10, 2024 1:46:36 GMT
And what's your feeling about centuries of brutal oppression of Blacks by Whites? I'm getting the distinct feeling you're none too bothered by that (after all, you weren't around, right?), and sure as hell it's just nothing at all compared to the outrage barbecue you're having to endure at the realization that maybe Black folks don't want you around sometimes. Give it a rest. Your lame excuse for how one is not only equivalent to but actually worse than the other just gets lamer with every repeat performance of it. I might as well ask what your feelings are about the amount of black on white crime compared to white on black. the discussion is about the policy of segregation. We all know it's wrong and against the law. It's against school policy. Yet there it is. You really think it should be allowable because brutality against blacks at some point in history? Every group has faced brutality. You would see outrage barbeque if there was a white only swim class, or someone expressed that they don't want to be around blacks. Answer a question with a question. Anything to get around the (pardon the pun) black and white fact that you think it's far worse for you, as a white male, to feel even slightly put upon by the existence of an all-black enclave than the historical reality of centuries of oppression. Go back to Stormfront. There's no hope for you anywhere else.
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 10, 2024 3:11:45 GMT
I might as well ask what your feelings are about the amount of black on white crime compared to white on black. the discussion is about the policy of segregation. We all know it's wrong and against the law. It's against school policy. Yet there it is. You really think it should be allowable because brutality against blacks at some point in history? Every group has faced brutality. You would see outrage barbeque if there was a white only swim class, or someone expressed that they don't want to be around blacks. Answer a question with a question. Anything to get around the (pardon the pun) black and white fact that you think it's far worse for you, as a white male, to feel even slightly put upon by the existence of an all-black enclave than the historical reality of centuries of oppression. Go back to Stormfront. There's no hope for you anywhere else. The irony goes right over your head. You'd fit right in at stormfront as they also support racial segregation. Denying people their civil rights and racist policies you have that in common with them. Like them you crap all over all those who fought against segregation. Deplorable.
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Feb 10, 2024 11:59:01 GMT
Answer a question with a question. Anything to get around the (pardon the pun) black and white fact that you think it's far worse for you, as a white male, to feel even slightly put upon by the existence of an all-black enclave than the historical reality of centuries of oppression. Go back to Stormfront. There's no hope for you anywhere else. The irony goes right over your head. You'd fit right in at stormfront as they also support racial segregation. Denying people their civil rights and racist policies you have that in common with them. Like them you crap all over all those who fought against segregation. Deplorable. Back comes the jack-in-the-box. The great White Male Supremacy Narrative is challenged, so any laughably transparent hypocrisy can be touted out in defense of it. You crap all over those who endured--and fought--decades of brutal oppression by those same White males, and think the 'turnabout is fair play' line puts you in the righteous seat. That same shit thinking appears all over Stormfront and related White Is Right sites all over the net 24/7, so it's not hard to see where you've picked up your script from. You're not deplorable. Just indoctrinated, dumb, and pitiful. The day you can see beyond the end of your own White nose will be a terrible one for you.
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 10, 2024 19:55:41 GMT
The irony goes right over your head. You'd fit right in at stormfront as they also support racial segregation. Denying people their civil rights and racist policies you have that in common with them. Like them you crap all over all those who fought against segregation. Deplorable. Back comes the jack-in-the-box. The great White Male Supremacy Narrative is challenged, so any laughably transparent hypocrisy can be touted out in defense of it. You crap all over those who endured--and fought--decades of brutal oppression by those same White males, and think the 'turnabout is fair play' line puts you in the righteous seat. That same shit thinking appears all over Stormfront and related White Is Right sites all over the net 24/7, so it's not hard to see where you've picked up your script from. You're not deplorable. Just indoctrinated, dumb, and pitiful. The day you can see beyond the end of your own White nose will be a terrible one for you. Just keep in mind that it is you that support segregation and racist policies that discriminate against people based on skin color. It is you that support the denial of a person's basic civil rights due to skin color. It is you that support two tier school policies based on skin color. You.
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Feb 11, 2024 12:29:16 GMT
Just keep in mind that it is you that support segregation and racist policies that discriminate against people based on skin color. It is you that support the denial of a person's basic civil rights due to skin color. It is you that support two tier school policies based on skin color. You. And you're cool with ignoring decades, centuries, of the oppression of a people who had their civil rights, basic human liberties, freedom, and lives denied and stripped away from them. It's easier to sit on that righteous throne whining about how those same people are now wrecking your life (LOL) because of a scenario that's not remotely equivalent in moral scope. Funny how I don't notice anything in your post history that indicates you were worrying too much about those same civil liberties being denied systematically to non-whites over the years; nor anything that's expressing any moral indignation when those same civil liberties and equality under the law are being denied to those of different hue, religion, orientation or gender in the present day. It's only because you think White males are somehow getting the shaft (as if ) that's got your tear ducts and outrage glands working overtime now. Give it a rest. Your sort would be almost funny if it weren't for the fact that you're so embarrassingly ubiquitous in current American idiot-society.
|
|
transfuged
Sophomore
@transfuged
Posts: 956
Likes: 308
|
Post by transfuged on Feb 11, 2024 14:55:54 GMT
Amyghost You become the x in the equation, you know, when you refuse to acknowlege the lack of intellection in the ’concept of race'. Can’t you see that, dear ? The bump 😀🥰💋
|
|
transfuged
Sophomore
@transfuged
Posts: 956
Likes: 308
|
Post by transfuged on Feb 11, 2024 15:02:52 GMT
Amyghost When and where has Off the boat psycho expressed denial of segregation ? Denial of historical facts ? Appart from in your humble opinion, and you have the right to opinion. Please, dear tell us. Mistakes happen.
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 11, 2024 21:08:52 GMT
Just keep in mind that it is you that support segregation and racist policies that discriminate against people based on skin color. It is you that support the denial of a person's basic civil rights due to skin color. It is you that support two tier school policies based on skin color. You. And you're cool with ignoring decades, centuries, of the oppression of a people who had their civil rights, basic human liberties, freedom, and lives denied and stripped away from them. It's easier to sit on that righteous throne whining about how those same people are now wrecking your life (LOL) because of a scenario that's not remotely equivalent in moral scope. Funny how I don't notice anything in your post history that indicates you were worrying too much about those same civil liberties being denied systematically to non-whites over the years; nor anything that's expressing any moral indignation when those same civil liberties and equality under the law are being denied to those of different hue, religion, orientation or gender in the present day. It's only because you think White males are somehow getting the shaft (as if ) that's got your tear ducts and outrage glands working overtime now. Give it a rest. Your sort would be almost funny if it weren't for the fact that you're so embarrassingly ubiquitous in current American idiot-society. I've acknowledged and condemned bad things that happened in the past. I'll do it again; I condemn bad things that happened in the past. Now let's get back to the present. Racial segregation is bad, against the law, violates civil rights and goes against school policy. Given all that is it not wrong to have racial segregation in a university that otherwise condemns racism of any kind? If not, please explain why.
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 11, 2024 21:13:21 GMT
Amyghost When and where has Off the boat psycho expressed denial of segregation ? Denial of historical facts ? Appart from in your humble opinion, and you have the right to opinion. Please, dear tell us. Mistakes happen. Amy reminds me of those heads of university who just could not condemn calls for the genocide of Jews by their own students. They'd twist, squirm and jump through hoops to do anything but condemn calls for genocide. For most people it's easy but they just could not do it. For some reason Amy can't acknowledge and condemn racial segregation at Waterloo because the victims are not black, and the people who benefit from this discrimination are not white. For Amy there is only one group who can be racist.
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Feb 11, 2024 21:52:51 GMT
Amyghost When and where has Off the boat psycho expressed denial of segregation ? Denial of historical facts ? Appart from in your humble opinion, and you have the right to opinion. Please, dear tell us. Mistakes happen. Amy reminds me of those heads of university who just could not condemn calls for the genocide of Jews by their own students. They'd twist, squirm and jump through hoops to do anything but condemn calls for genocide. For most people it's easy but they just could not do it. For some reason Amy can't acknowledge and condemn racial segregation at Waterloo because the victims are not black, and the people who benefit from this discrimination are not white. For Amy there is only one group who can be racist. The only failure to acknowledge around here is your ongoing failure to acknowledge both historical and present-day facts about the treatment of minority groups in the US, using your ongoing rubric of de jure segregation as being the greatest of all evils because White men are experiencing something--in a small way--of the inequality non-Whites (and non-males) have experienced throughout the history of the nation. You really think the argument you keep putting up more than answers that fact. I've acknowledged and condemned bad things that happened in the past. I'll do it again; I condemn bad things that happened in the past. Now let's get back to the present. Racial segregation is bad, against the law, violates civil rights and goes against school policy. Given all that is it not wrong to have racial segregation in a university that otherwise condemns racism of any kind? If not, please explain why.
And when have you condemned any of those same 'bad things' that are happening to non-White, non-males in the ongoing present? Oh, that's right...you haven't. And if you've taken to quoting transfuged to back your position, I don't give much for your chances at persuading anyone of your credibility.
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 11, 2024 22:16:58 GMT
Amy reminds me of those heads of university who just could not condemn calls for the genocide of Jews by their own students. They'd twist, squirm and jump through hoops to do anything but condemn calls for genocide. For most people it's easy but they just could not do it. For some reason Amy can't acknowledge and condemn racial segregation at Waterloo because the victims are not black, and the people who benefit from this discrimination are not white. For Amy there is only one group who can be racist. The only failure to acknowledge around here is your ongoing failure to acknowledge both historical and present-day facts about the treatment of minority groups in the US, using your ongoing rubric of de jure segregation as being the greatest of all evils because White men are experiencing something--in a small way--of the inequality non-Whites (and non-males) have experienced throughout the history of the nation. You really think the argument you keep putting up more than answers that fact. I've acknowledged and condemned bad things that happened in the past. I'll do it again; I condemn bad things that happened in the past. Now let's get back to the present. Racial segregation is bad, against the law, violates civil rights and goes against school policy. Given all that is it not wrong to have racial segregation in a university that otherwise condemns racism of any kind? If not, please explain why.
And when have you condemned any of those same 'bad things' that are happening to non-White, non-males in the ongoing present? Oh, that's right...you haven't. And if you've taken to quoting transfuged to back your position, I don't give much for your chances at persuading anyone of your credibility. I've acknowledged bad things that happened to people in the past. I've acknowledged bad things that happen in the present. I've acknowledged that racism is bad no matter the victim or the aggressor. Do you support racial segregation, racial discrimination, civil rights violations and violations of racial inclusion policy at Waterloo university. If not, why not?
|
|
transfuged
Sophomore
@transfuged
Posts: 956
Likes: 308
|
Post by transfuged on Feb 12, 2024 0:59:04 GMT
Amyghost You have nothing à tad more precise ? Like on page x of y thread Otf the boat psycho wrote à horrible thing like gaz chambers never were true or segregation never was practised on earth ?
|
|
transfuged
Sophomore
@transfuged
Posts: 956
Likes: 308
|
Post by transfuged on Feb 12, 2024 1:05:14 GMT
Amyghost, I am still waiting for you to prove the existence of ”races” among human individuals. Usually I do not wait, but I have all the time. No one can do it. There is only us and we are the same.
|
|
transfuged
Sophomore
@transfuged
Posts: 956
Likes: 308
|
Post by transfuged on Feb 12, 2024 1:27:13 GMT
Off the boatpsycho Mrs Gay resigned. Actually I heard what she said about context and I felt sorry for her. The point was not the mass murders of jewish, communists, sganis and political opponents of the reich. Denying the criminality of these past facts is an offence. It’s about the présent, it is about people who have à right to hate the idea of war. She had been put between the devil and the deep blue sea. Whatever she’d say, it was à mess. War is hell. I hate to write that for it rings contrived and I know I am advocating something that I do not like, but revenge is fruitless. And war is public revenge. She also knew that freedom of speech was in the balance.
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Feb 12, 2024 12:45:02 GMT
The only failure to acknowledge around here is your ongoing failure to acknowledge both historical and present-day facts about the treatment of minority groups in the US, using your ongoing rubric of de jure segregation as being the greatest of all evils because White men are experiencing something--in a small way--of the inequality non-Whites (and non-males) have experienced throughout the history of the nation. You really think the argument you keep putting up more than answers that fact. I've acknowledged and condemned bad things that happened in the past. I'll do it again; I condemn bad things that happened in the past. Now let's get back to the present. Racial segregation is bad, against the law, violates civil rights and goes against school policy. Given all that is it not wrong to have racial segregation in a university that otherwise condemns racism of any kind? If not, please explain why.
And when have you condemned any of those same 'bad things' that are happening to non-White, non-males in the ongoing present? Oh, that's right...you haven't. And if you've taken to quoting transfuged to back your position, I don't give much for your chances at persuading anyone of your credibility. I've acknowledged bad things that happened to people in the past. I've acknowledged bad things that happen in the present. I've acknowledged that racism is bad no matter the victim or the aggressor. Do you support racial segregation, racial discrimination, civil rights violations and violations of racial inclusion policy at Waterloo university. If not, why not? Once you take to repeating posts verbatim, I know you've run out of counter arguments. You don't give a rat's ass about equality, justice, civil liberties, or rights, except as they can be used to prop up and maintain the privileges of White men now and forever. Thanks for making your position on this abundantly clear.
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 12, 2024 18:40:18 GMT
I've acknowledged bad things that happened to people in the past. I've acknowledged bad things that happen in the present. I've acknowledged that racism is bad no matter the victim or the aggressor. Do you support racial segregation, racial discrimination, civil rights violations and violations of racial inclusion policy at Waterloo university. If not, why not? Once you take to repeating posts verbatim, I know you've run out of counter arguments. You don't give a rat's ass about equality, justice, civil liberties, or rights, except as they can be used to prop up and maintain the privileges of White men now and forever. Thanks for making your position on this abundantly clear. I'll keep asking why you support racial segregation, racial discrimination, civil rights violations and violations of racial inclusion policy at Waterloo university. I'll also keep asking why black students need their own racially segregated swim class. All you give is the usual race card playing gibberish.
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 12, 2024 18:43:48 GMT
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Feb 13, 2024 0:05:55 GMT
Touching how your only interest in transpeople/immigrants/women is when you get that bonanza opportunity to demonize all three groups in one person. How many All-American White males have committed mass shootings recently? And where were your tears when Black churches were being burned in common occurences in the South? You're so full of shit you'd burst if stuck with a pin. Take your crocodile tears and weep them at someone who's taken in by your hypocrisy and phony outrage.
|
|