|
Post by amyghost on Feb 13, 2024 0:07:14 GMT
Once you take to repeating posts verbatim, I know you've run out of counter arguments. You don't give a rat's ass about equality, justice, civil liberties, or rights, except as they can be used to prop up and maintain the privileges of White men now and forever. Thanks for making your position on this abundantly clear. I'll keep asking why you support racial segregation, racial discrimination, civil rights violations and violations of racial inclusion policy at Waterloo university. I'll also keep asking why black students need their own racially segregated swim class. All you give is the usual race card playing gibberish. Keep repeating yourself. I'm betting your MRA buds over at Stormfront are marveling at your rhetorical skills right about now.
|
|
transfuged
Sophomore
@transfuged
Posts: 956
Likes: 308
|
Post by transfuged on Feb 13, 2024 0:42:16 GMT
It is a fact. In 1954 if there was pool that didn't allow black people then that is racial discrimination and segregation. In 2024 if you're white and go for a swim and told it's for blacks only then that is also racial discrimination and segregation. In 2024 it's actually worse because we're supposed to know better and should have learned from past wrongs and also now it's against the law and in the case of Waterloo university it goes against their own policy of inclusion. How can a segregated class at a university be ok in 2024? We know that a chess club that doesn't have enough diversity and despite having no rules banning anyone based on race it still considered problematic and steps need to be taken. But blacks only? No problem. Nothing to see. Total racist hypocrisy. And what's your feeling about centuries of brutal oppression of Blacks by Whites? I'm getting the distinct feeling you're none too bothered by that (after all, you weren't around, right?), and sure as hell it's just nothing at all compared to the outrage barbecue you're having to endure at the realization that maybe Black folks don't want you around sometimes. Give it a rest. Your lame excuse for how one is not only equivalent to but actually worse than the other just gets lamer with every repeat performance of it. Problems? Off the boats psycho post is right until : ”total racist hypocrisy”. It could be something else at work. Not only ”racism”. ”what’s your feelings” about... Violent oppression ? It was slavery. Slavery is a crime. There is nothing to feel about it. It’s as evil as segregation, moreover both are against the law, which has no feelings, but will. And as long as any folks do not want otbp around in their private sphere, OK. But not in a public place, and neither on the ground of otbp’s skin color and in the name of free thinking.
|
|
|
Post by clusium on Feb 13, 2024 1:04:50 GMT
Touching how your only interest in transpeople/immigrants/women is when you get that bonanza opportunity to demonize all three groups in one person. How many All-American White males have committed mass shootings recently? And where were your tears when Black churches were being burned in common occurences in the South?
You're so full of shit you'd burst if stuck with a pin. Take your crocodile tears and weep them at someone who's taken in by your hypocrisy and phony outrage. I'm pretty sure OffTheBoatPsycho would have cried for them too (any Christian would; the truth is, it doesn't matter the race it matters that it is a House Of God & we are all brothers & sisters in the faith).
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Feb 13, 2024 1:54:35 GMT
Touching how your only interest in transpeople/immigrants/women is when you get that bonanza opportunity to demonize all three groups in one person. How many All-American White males have committed mass shootings recently? And where were your tears when Black churches were being burned in common occurences in the South?
You're so full of shit you'd burst if stuck with a pin. Take your crocodile tears and weep them at someone who's taken in by your hypocrisy and phony outrage. I'm pretty sure OffTheBoatPsycho would have cried for them too (any Christian would; the truth is, it doesn't matter the race it matters that it is a House Of God & we are all brothers & sisters in the faith). He's been conspicuous by his absence in showing any of those tears. However, the tears he sheds for any perceived threat to White male supremacy and privilege are loud, long, and highly visible here. Until he shows anything to indicate otherwise, I rank him as the worst sort of MAGA phony, hiding behind false 'sympathy' as a painfully transparent mask for his bigotry towards all non-Whites and his extreme hatred that they dare have the temerity to seek equality now, as well as to have their own narratives of their pasts recognized. He can crawl back to Naziland AFAIC, and good riddance.
|
|
|
Post by clusium on Feb 13, 2024 3:59:59 GMT
I'm pretty sure OffTheBoatPsycho would have cried for them too (any Christian would; the truth is, it doesn't matter the race it matters that it is a House Of God & we are all brothers & sisters in the faith). He's been conspicuous by his absence in showing any of those tears. However, the tears he sheds for any perceived threat to White male supremacy and privilege are loud, long, and highly visible here. Until he shows anything to indicate otherwise, I rank him as the worst sort of MAGA phony, hiding behind false 'sympathy' as a painfully transparent mask for his bigotry towards all non-Whites and his extreme hatred that they dare have the temerity to seek equality now, as well as to have their own narratives of their pasts recognized. He can crawl back to Naziland AFAIC, and good riddance. Even though I have not posted in well over a week (my laptop was in the shop), I managed to follow the discussion between you & OffTheBoatPsycho, as well as transfuged. Pretty interesting discussion the 3 of you got going on here. In regards to this all Black fitness centre: Well, there are all women's fitness centres, & there all men's fitness centres. However, physical anatomy of both men & women are different. By contrast, the only real difference in regards to anatomy between the races are pigments of skin, & little else. Therefore, in what purpose, would an all Black fitness centre or an all White fitness centre, or even an all Oriental fitness centre serve? And yes, historically White people have been completely horrible to Black people (see the topic thread I just made today, for one such example), however, have Oriental people mistreated Black people? If not, in what way would be okay to not allow them from using the same fitness centres as Black people?
|
|
transfuged
Sophomore
@transfuged
Posts: 956
Likes: 308
|
Post by transfuged on Feb 13, 2024 9:00:16 GMT
Clusium All women fitness centre are illegal here. It’s against the law, public order as defined by the civil code. I can take à picture of the last one that was closed on prefect orders.
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Feb 13, 2024 12:02:31 GMT
He's been conspicuous by his absence in showing any of those tears. However, the tears he sheds for any perceived threat to White male supremacy and privilege are loud, long, and highly visible here. Until he shows anything to indicate otherwise, I rank him as the worst sort of MAGA phony, hiding behind false 'sympathy' as a painfully transparent mask for his bigotry towards all non-Whites and his extreme hatred that they dare have the temerity to seek equality now, as well as to have their own narratives of their pasts recognized. He can crawl back to Naziland AFAIC, and good riddance. Even though I have not posted in well over a week (my laptop was in the shop), I managed to follow the discussion between you & OffTheBoatPsycho , as well as transfuged . Pretty interesting discussion the 3 of you got going on here. In regards to this all Black fitness centre: Well, there are all women's fitness centres, & there all men's fitness centres. However, physical anatomy of both men & women are different. By contrast, the only real difference in regards to anatomy between the races are pigments of skin, & little else. Therefore, in what purpose, would an all Black fitness centre or an all White fitness centre, or even an all Oriental fitness centre serve? And yes, historically White people have been completely horrible to Black people (see the topic thread I just made today, for one such example), however, have Oriental people mistreated Black people? If not, in what way would be okay to not allow them from using the same fitness centres as Black people? The problem with OTBP's narrative is that it's not impelled by any real issues with exclusivity in group settings, per se. It's grounded in the fact that any minority group dares to deny Whites, and particularly White males, access to them at any time. There is a vastly different narrative pertaining between such as scenarios as involves White/Black in the US and Blacks/Other ethnic and racial groups. The history is not there with those groups as it is with Whites. While I don't give a blanket endorsement to exclusionary practices, I can see how, in this specific case, they've come to be accepted by some in the face of a completely intransigent refusal, on the part of many of the same type of White male that OTBP's opinions represent, to even acknowledge that grave historical injustice has been done to Blacks by White America (and continues in the present); or that harm to any minority group has been inflicted on them by that same White America. These people are the power base that Trump is cynically exploiting to regain the presidency; and the thinking that impels these people is deep-rooted in our society, and went virtually unchallenged for many years. The emotional meltdown that many of these people experience in the face of pushback by Blacks and other marginalized groups is fearful to witness, and terrible evidence that calls for 'justice and equality' by these same people is a hypocritical sham intended only to reaffirm the social power and primacy that these Whites believe is their God-ordained birthright. They consider themselves the only, and true, victims of injustice in America, and the attempt by them to make this the prevailing and only acceptable narrative is sickening and despicable.
|
|
|
Post by clusium on Feb 13, 2024 12:48:22 GMT
Even though I have not posted in well over a week (my laptop was in the shop), I managed to follow the discussion between you & OffTheBoatPsycho , as well as transfuged . Pretty interesting discussion the 3 of you got going on here. In regards to this all Black fitness centre: Well, there are all women's fitness centres, & there all men's fitness centres. However, physical anatomy of both men & women are different. By contrast, the only real difference in regards to anatomy between the races are pigments of skin, & little else. Therefore, in what purpose, would an all Black fitness centre or an all White fitness centre, or even an all Oriental fitness centre serve? And yes, historically White people have been completely horrible to Black people (see the topic thread I just made today, for one such example), however, have Oriental people mistreated Black people? If not, in what way would be okay to not allow them from using the same fitness centres as Black people? The problem with OTBP's narrative is that it's not impelled by any real issues with exclusivity in group settings, per se. It's grounded in the fact that any minority group dares to deny Whites, and particularly White males, access to them at any time. There is a vastly different narrative pertaining between such as scenarios as involves White/Black in the US and Blacks/Other ethnic and racial groups. The history is not there with those groups as it is with Whites. While I don't give a blanket endorsement to exclusionary practices, I can see how, in this specific case, they've come to be accepted by some in the face of a completely intransigent refusal, on the part of many of the same type of White male that OTBP's opinions represent, to even acknowledge that grave historical injustice has been done to Blacks by White America (and continues in the present); or that harm to any minority group has been inflicted on them by that same White America. These people are the power base that Trump is cynically exploiting to regain the presidency; and the thinking that impels these people is deep-rooted in our society, and went virtually unchallenged for many years. The emotional meltdown that many of these people experience in the face of pushback by Blacks and other marginalized groups is fearful to witness, and terrible evidence that calls for 'justice and equality' by these same people is a hypocritical sham intended only to reaffirm the social power and primacy that these Whites believe is their God-ordained birthright. They consider themselves the only, and true, victims of injustice in America, and the attempt by them to make this the prevailing and only acceptable narrative is sickening and despicable. Yes, but, as you noted, this was the situation for Black people in THE UNITED STATES. OffTheBoatPsycho was citing a club which takes place in a CANADIAN university. Afro-Canadians did not have it in the same way as Afro-Americans did, in the deep American South. I was just browsing online newspaper, & they just shared an article which said that anti-racism training only makes racism worse. Anti-Racism Training Increases Racism
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 13, 2024 20:32:13 GMT
Touching how your only interest in transpeople/immigrants/women is when you get that bonanza opportunity to demonize all three groups in one person. How many All-American White males have committed mass shootings recently? And where were your tears when Black churches were being burned in common occurences in the South? You're so full of shit you'd burst if stuck with a pin. Take your crocodile tears and weep them at someone who's taken in by your hypocrisy and phony outrage. White male shooters? Check out the stat when you don't conveniently leave out drive by shootings. Then check out the murder rates committed by black male's vs every other demographic. I condemn the burning of black churches. We're talking about the massive number of attacks on churches in present day Canada.
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 13, 2024 20:32:43 GMT
I'll keep asking why you support racial segregation, racial discrimination, civil rights violations and violations of racial inclusion policy at Waterloo university. I'll also keep asking why black students need their own racially segregated swim class. All you give is the usual race card playing gibberish. Keep repeating yourself. I'm betting your MRA buds over at Stormfront are marveling at your rhetorical skills right about now. I'll keep asking why you support racial segregation, racial discrimination, civil rights violations and violations of racial inclusion policy at Waterloo university. I'll also keep asking why black students need their own racially segregated swim class. All you give is the usual race card playing gibberish.
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 13, 2024 20:33:42 GMT
I'm pretty sure OffTheBoatPsycho would have cried for them too (any Christian would; the truth is, it doesn't matter the race it matters that it is a House Of God & we are all brothers & sisters in the faith). He's been conspicuous by his absence in showing any of those tears. However, the tears he sheds for any perceived threat to White male supremacy and privilege are loud, long, and highly visible here. Until he shows anything to indicate otherwise, I rank him as the worst sort of MAGA phony, hiding behind false 'sympathy' as a painfully transparent mask for his bigotry towards all non-Whites and his extreme hatred that they dare have the temerity to seek equality now, as well as to have their own narratives of their pasts recognized. He can crawl back to Naziland AFAIC, and good riddance. Race baiting meaningless drivel.
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 13, 2024 20:39:17 GMT
Even though I have not posted in well over a week (my laptop was in the shop), I managed to follow the discussion between you & OffTheBoatPsycho, as well as transfuged. Pretty interesting discussion the 3 of you got going on here. In regards to this all Black fitness centre: Well, there are all women's fitness centres, & there all men's fitness centres. However, physical anatomy of both men & women are different. By contrast, the only real difference in regards to anatomy between the races are pigments of skin, & little else. Therefore, in what purpose, would an all Black fitness centre or an all White fitness centre, or even an all Oriental fitness centre serve? And yes, historically White people have been completely horrible to Black people (see the topic thread I just made today, for one such example), however, have Oriental people mistreated Black people? If not, in what way would be okay to not allow them from using the same fitness centres as Black people? The problem with OTBP's narrative is that it's not impelled by any real issues with exclusivity in group settings, per se. It's grounded in the fact that any minority group dares to deny Whites, and particularly White males, access to them at any time. There is a vastly different narrative pertaining between such as scenarios as involves White/Black in the US and Blacks/Other ethnic and racial groups. The history is not there with those groups as it is with Whites. You mean breaking law by denying a person their civil rights due to skin color, racial segregation, discrimination based on skin color, violating school policy on inclusion etc? Yeah, that's a problem. Are you in favor of all those things?
|
|
|
Post by clusium on Feb 13, 2024 23:05:01 GMT
Clusium All women fitness centre are illegal here. It’s against the law, public order as defined by the civil code. I can take à picture of the last one that was closed on prefect orders. Where is it illegal to have an all women's fitness centre???
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Feb 14, 2024 2:16:11 GMT
I have no doubt OTBP wouldn't particularly like you to be aware of any of that. He's still blathering away, but at this point his Nazi/MRA dribble bores me, and he's not getting any further responses. As for Lorrie Goldstein, he's a climate-change denier and biased hack. Anything with his byline on it is going to be greeted with a high level of skepticism by me.
|
|
|
Post by clusium on Feb 14, 2024 2:27:17 GMT
Don't be so sure about that: www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/anti-black-racism-in-canadaI have no doubt OTBP wouldn't particularly like you to be aware of any of that. He's still blathering away, but at this point his Nazi/MRA dribble bores me, and he's not getting any further responses. As for Lorrie Goldstein, he's a climate-change denier and biased hack. Anything with his byline on it is going to be greeted with a high level of skepticism by me. I didn't say that they didn't have it bad at all. Just that they did not have it as badly. During the era of slavery in the South, they used to escape to Canada. By contrast, Jewish people from Europe that tried to come to Canada in order to escape being killed in the Holocaust were rejected & sent back to Europe & subsequently to their horrible fates in the concentration camps. Canada & The Holocaust
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 14, 2024 2:49:34 GMT
Don't be so sure about that: www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/anti-black-racism-in-canadaI have no doubt OTBP wouldn't particularly like you to be aware of any of that. He's still blathering away, but at this point his Nazi/MRA dribble bores me, and he's not getting any further responses. As for Lorrie Goldstein, he's a climate-change denier and biased hack. Anything with his byline on it is going to be greeted with a high level of skepticism by me. Hmm, I noticed they have a large part on segregation. Doesn't appear to be supportive of it like you.
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Feb 14, 2024 2:54:29 GMT
Hmm, I noticed they have a large part on segregation. Doesn't appear to be supportive of it like you. You're too stupid to figure out that recognition of the right of an oppressed group to have its narratives and realities respected in the present doesn't equate to 'support of segregation', as you're cynically attempting to use the phrase. Jesus. Go back to Stormfront already. You really are a sterling example of the cretinous 'thinking' that place harbors among its room-temperature IQ user base.
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Feb 14, 2024 3:02:14 GMT
I didn't say that they didn't have it bad at all. Just that they did not have it as badly. During the era of slavery in the South, they used to escape to Canada. By contrast, Jewish people from Europe that tried to come to Canada in order to escape being killed in the Holocaust were rejected & sent back to Europe & subsequently to their horrible fates in the concentration camps. Canada & The HolocaustAs I'm well aware. But saying that 'Blacks didn't have it as badly in Canada' isn't saying much in the light of historical fact. A bit like saying you jumped off a burning boat to escape the flames, and found yourself drowning in frigid waters; they may indeed have, in some cases, escaped to Canada, but apart from no longer being enslaved, the society they escaped into was not really much more benevolent for them in many respects.
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 14, 2024 3:03:58 GMT
Hmm, I noticed they have a large part on segregation. Doesn't appear to be supportive of it like you. You're too stupid to figure out that recognition of the right of an oppressed group to have its narratives and realities respected in the present doesn't equate to 'support of segregation', as you're cynically attempting to use the phrase. Jesus. Go back to Stormfront already. You really are a sterling example of the cretinous 'thinking' that place harbors among its room-temperature IQ user base. Black students at a university in Canada are an oppressed group in 2024? How so?
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Feb 14, 2024 12:26:29 GMT
You're too stupid to figure out that recognition of the right of an oppressed group to have its narratives and realities respected in the present doesn't equate to 'support of segregation', as you're cynically attempting to use the phrase. Jesus. Go back to Stormfront already. You really are a sterling example of the cretinous 'thinking' that place harbors among its room-temperature IQ user base. Black students at a university in Canada are an oppressed group in 2024? How so? You need to go put something on those pavement-burn marks on your knuckles, Adolph.
|
|