|
Post by summers8 on Oct 31, 2017 21:03:46 GMT
Apparently with thor 3, I will skip it because from all the feedbacks. we are told to leave our brains at the door and enjoy the comedy and just have fun with the movie. Nah, give me Logan, TDK, DOFP, Sin City, X2,BB. Some good MCU fans are been more honest though, they did not like how everything is a joke in thor 3 and wish MCU will do another winter solider. guyson is funnier than mcu jokes...I swear...lol. Ive seen Ragnarok, its basically a clone of GotG 1.0. There is a joke literally every 10 minutes. Yes I have heard, this is better than Logan? not really. it is factually impossible. have yet to see anyone say so or even call it the best MCU movie. the honour still goes to winter solider. I am just bracing myself to when Americans see Thor. this weekend is not gonna to be kind to marvel because people were already getting sick of one dimensional comedy MCU movies. This is sadly spiderman homecoming 2.0. as a typical MCU movie...it will be hyped 1-2 weeks. by the 3rd week people will turn on it as they did with Homecoming and GOTG. Logan even after 8 months. there is still Oscar talk and what the film did for the genre in 2017 and beyond.
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Oct 31, 2017 21:49:49 GMT
And who is still talking about Logan? No one. People have moved on to Wonder Woman and Thor 3 being the best of the year. I was talking about X-men movies because Char mentioned retreads. X-men Apocalypse man! Do you know what a God complex is? Look it up. I'll wait... I guarantee you 90% of the youtube film critic community will have Logan in their top 5 movies of 2017 ahead of Gotg 2 or Ragnarok. And I wouldn't be surprised to see it nominated in a respectable oscar categories as well. You belittle Logan by saying people are already saying Thor and Homecoming are better? Which people, the MCU fanatics who hate anything anti-MCU like formersamhmd. A lot of the reaction to Logan was how unique and diffrent it was from run of the mill comic films that are being pumped out on the assembly line by Disney. Out of all the CBMs this year including Justice League which looks like a MCU copycat ripoff, Logan is the one that stands out the most and is what people will remember. All the others follow the same cliche 3 act structure that weve come to expect and end up with a generic big CGI fight. And yes Apocalypse fell into this trap as well because Fox wanted to cash in on by coping other studios. No other X-film has ended in such a way so I can forgive them for 1 film and I feel singer was compromised. I said Wonder Woman and Thor 3. Get it right. Wonder Woman is pretty much the same movie as Captain America: First Avenger. Logan is not a rip-off of an MCU movie. Never said it was. I said it's the same movie as The Wolverine. Mangold did the same thing with Logan and The Wolverine that Singer does in all his X-men movies.
|
|
|
Post by summers8 on Oct 31, 2017 21:55:30 GMT
I guarantee you 90% of the youtube film critic community will have Logan in their top 5 movies of 2017 ahead of Gotg 2 or Ragnarok. And I wouldn't be surprised to see it nominated in a respectable oscar categories as well. You belittle Logan by saying people are already saying Thor and Homecoming are better? Which people, the MCU fanatics who hate anything anti-MCU like formersamhmd. A lot of the reaction to Logan was how unique and diffrent it was from run of the mill comic films that are being pumped out on the assembly line by Disney. Out of all the CBMs this year including Justice League which looks like a MCU copycat ripoff, Logan is the one that stands out the most and is what people will remember. All the others follow the same cliche 3 act structure that weve come to expect and end up with a generic big CGI fight. And yes Apocalypse fell into this trap as well because Fox wanted to cash in on by coping other studios. No other X-film has ended in such a way so I can forgive them for 1 film and I feel singer was compromised. I said Wonder Woman and Thor 3. Get it right. Wonder Woman is pretty much the same movie as Captain America: First Avenger. Logan is not a rip-off of an MCU movie. Never said it was. I said it's the same movie as The Wolverine. Mangold did the same thing with Logan and The Wolverine that Singer does in all his X-men movies. WW predates CA Logan is Old Man Logan Wolverine is the Claremont Japanese stories. did the term rip off get a new meaning in 2017? Isn't Thor 3 a copy of GOTG by all. charzhino you might need some help here, I think what some MCU fans might be doing is only taking on people who are not so well informed or know much about comics.
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Oct 31, 2017 21:57:00 GMT
Ive seen Ragnarok, its basically a clone of GotG 1.0. There is a joke literally every 10 minutes. Yes I have heard, this is better than Logan? not really. it is factually impossible. have yet to see anyone say so or even call it the best MCU movie. the honour still goes to winter solider. I am just bracing myself to when Americans see Thor. this weekend is not gonna to be kind to marvel because people were already getting sick of one dimensional comedy MCU movies. This is sadly spiderman homecoming 2.0. as a typical MCU movie...it will be hyped 1-2 weeks. by the 3rd week people will turn to on it as they did with Homecoming and GOTG. Logan even after 8 months. there is still Oscar talk and what the film did for the genre in 2017 and beyond. Yet, more people see these movies over and over than they do the X-men movies. Hell, even with bad reviews people flock to go see DC movies. What is the X-men's problem? More people went to see the Raimi Spider-man movies, more people went to see Deadpool. What is the commonality of this? Oh people enjoyed themselves when they saw these movies. But the thing I want to know is why do you have to turn every thread into a "vs the MCU" discussion? This was about The Dark Phoenix. Yep going back through this thread you are the first person to mention the MCU. Congratulations.
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on Oct 31, 2017 22:08:16 GMT
Yes I have heard, this is better than Logan? not really. it is factually impossible. have yet to see anyone say so or even call it the best MCU movie. the honour still goes to winter solider. I am just bracing myself to when Americans see Thor. this weekend is not gonna to be kind to marvel because people were already getting sick of one dimensional comedy MCU movies. This is sadly spiderman homecoming 2.0. as a typical MCU movie...it will be hyped 1-2 weeks. by the 3rd week people will turn to on it as they did with Homecoming and GOTG. Logan even after 8 months. there is still Oscar talk and what the film did for the genre in 2017 and beyond. Yet, more people see these movies over and over than they do the X-men movies. Hell, even with bad reviews people flock to go see DC movies. What is the X-men's problem? More people went to see the Raimi Spider-man movies, more people went to see Deadpool. What is the commonality of this? Oh people enjoyed themselves when they saw these movies. But the thing I want to know is why do you have to turn every thread into a "vs the MCU" discussion? This was about The Dark Phoenix. Argument ad populum. If Fox dumbed down X-men with camp and jokes then people would go see it. Suicide Squad was absolute trash and an abomination to cinema yet made $100m more than Days of Future Past domestically. The general audience dont know what good cinema is, they are attracted to bright lights, (un)funny characters and CGI bonanzas, something that MCU are proponents in. People keep saying Deadpool was a box office hit because it was faithful to source material. Rubbish. General audience dont know who deadpool is. They loved it because it was edgy, R-rated and different. Im happy that Fox arent bending over to try and copy other studios formula and make a dumbed down product for pure financial gain. And if that means sacrificing on stuff like comic accurate character portrayal and costumes then so be it.
|
|
|
Post by summers8 on Oct 31, 2017 22:15:55 GMT
Yes I have heard, this is better than Logan? not really. it is factually impossible. have yet to see anyone say so or even call it the best MCU movie. the honour still goes to winter solider. I am just bracing myself to when Americans see Thor. this weekend is not gonna to be kind to marvel because people were already getting sick of one dimensional comedy MCU movies. This is sadly spiderman homecoming 2.0. as a typical MCU movie...it will be hyped 1-2 weeks. by the 3rd week people will turn to on it as they did with Homecoming and GOTG. Logan even after 8 months. there is still Oscar talk and what the film did for the genre in 2017 and beyond. Yet, more people see these movies over and over than they do the X-men movies. Hell, even with bad reviews people flock to go see DC movies. What is the X-men's problem? More people went to see the Raimi Spider-man movies, more people went to see Deadpool. What is the commonality of this? Oh people enjoyed themselves when they saw these movies. But the thing I want to know is why do you have to turn every thread into a "vs the MCU" discussion? This was about The Dark Phoenix. I hate to point out the obvious here.MCU movies are made by disney with the best marketing and cinematic appeal. x-men with disney will make far more money but it is not worth it. Recent X-Men movies, the last awful ones still made 500 million dollars (with no disney power to back it up). Logan and Deadpool are r rated are bringing in 600-700 million, but I don't consider them part of the old xmen movies but logan and deadpool are what happens when you bring in fresh blood and secretly reboot. Now imagine how much a pg 13 can make. do you see me loving The dark phoenix saga movie?no. I kind of even want it to fail so fox can have a real full reboot. sadly if money is your only defence you need to stay more on target aka spiderman homecoming and iron man 3 beating iron man 1 when iron man 1 was superior. X-Men's box office will grow after logan and deadpool (If the movies have the same quality) but it will not come from anything tied to the old movies or singer/kinberg. as I said, as a fan of xmen , I am also the biggest critic and biggest truth sayer for all comic book properties because I do really care. do I defend the messed up timelines? No. do I defend too much magneto? No do I also hate what mystique has become? Yes do I hate what they did to Cyclops? Yes. the difference between me and you is I don't pretend xmen is perfect.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 1, 2017 0:15:23 GMT
A lot of the reaction to Logan was how unique and diffrent it was from run of the mill comic films that are being pumped out on the assembly line by Disney. The only new thing it did was kill Logan and Xavier. Virtually ALL films follow. Logan as well, only difference was that they killed him in the end.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 1, 2017 0:15:47 GMT
Apparently with thor 3, I will skip it because from all the feedbacks. we are told to leave our brains at the door and enjoy the comedy and just have fun with the movie. Nah, give me Logan, TDK, DOFP, Sin City, X2,BB. Some good MCU fans are been more honest though, they did not like how everything is a joke in thor 3 and wish MCU will do another winter solider. guyson is funnier than mcu jokes...I swear...lol. You must seriously hate Ghostbusters. Ive seen Ragnarok, its basically a clone of GotG 1.0. There is a joke literally every 10 minutes.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 1, 2017 0:16:48 GMT
This is the same argument people used when they said Ant-Man would bomb. And Guardians of the Galaxy. And Iron Man. People will go to these banal movies because they Are unpretentious and unashamed. Their heads aren't up their asses in trying to be all artsy fartsy instead of working hard on making a good film.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 1, 2017 0:17:13 GMT
Ive seen Ragnarok, its basically a clone of GotG 1.0. There is a joke literally every 10 minutes. Yes I have heard, this is better than Logan? not really. it is factually impossible. Says you.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 1, 2017 0:17:58 GMT
I said Wonder Woman and Thor 3. Get it right. Wonder Woman is pretty much the same movie as Captain America: First Avenger. Logan is not a rip-off of an MCU movie. Never said it was. I said it's the same movie as The Wolverine. Mangold did the same thing with Logan and The Wolverine that Singer does in all his X-men movies. WW predates CA Logan is Old Man Logan Wolverine is the Claremont Japanese stories. did the term rip off get a new meaning in 2017? Isn't Thor 3 a copy of GOTG by all. charzhino you might need some help here, I think what some MCU fans might be doing is only taking on people who are not so well informed or know much about comics. No, Cap came before WW. Do your research. This is getting embarrassing.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 1, 2017 0:19:28 GMT
I hate to point out the obvious here.MCU movies are made by disney with the best marketing and cinematic appeal. x-men with disney will make far more money but it is not worth it. It is if we get actual X-Men movies and not FoX-Men one. The FoX-Men, not the X-Men.
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on Nov 1, 2017 11:35:39 GMT
People will go to these banal movies because they Are unpretentious and unashamed. Their heads aren't up their asses in trying to be all artsy fartsy instead of working hard on making a good film. Nah, they go to MCU movies because they want cheap thrills whilst turning off their brain. Intelligent comic book films get left behind because audiences dont want to engage in authentic issues, instead they use that pathetic "escapism from reality" card as a driving force.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 1, 2017 13:50:27 GMT
Nah, they go to MCU movies because they want Something true to the comics without its head being up its ass. Fixed. The FoX-Men movies have never dealt with authentic issues, it's views on prejudice are hilariously one-sided.
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Nov 1, 2017 17:03:31 GMT
Yet, more people see these movies over and over than they do the X-men movies. Hell, even with bad reviews people flock to go see DC movies. What is the X-men's problem? More people went to see the Raimi Spider-man movies, more people went to see Deadpool. What is the commonality of this? Oh people enjoyed themselves when they saw these movies. But the thing I want to know is why do you have to turn every thread into a "vs the MCU" discussion? This was about The Dark Phoenix. I hate to point out the obvious here.MCU movies are made by disney with the best marketing and cinematic appeal. x-men with disney will make far more money but it is not worth it. Recent X-Men movies, the last awful ones still made 500 million dollars (with no disney power to back it up). Logan and Deadpool are r rated are bringing in 600-700 million, but I don't consider them part of the old xmen movies but logan and deadpool are what happens when you bring in fresh blood and secretly reboot. Now imagine how much a pg 13 can make. do you see me loving The dark phoenix saga movie?no. I kind of even want it to fail so fox can have a real full reboot. sadly if money is your only defence you need to stay more on target aka spiderman homecoming and iron man 3 beating iron man 1 when iron man 1 was superior. X-Men's box office will grow after logan and deadpool (If the movies have the same quality) but it will not come from anything tied to the old movies or singer/kinberg. as I said, as a fan of xmen , I am also the biggest critic and biggest truth sayer for all comic book properties because I do really care. do I defend the messed up timelines? No. do I defend too much magneto? No do I also hate what mystique has become? Yes do I hate what they did to Cyclops? Yes. the difference between me and you is I don't pretend xmen is perfect. Do you have that huge space after your posts to annoy me? Wait, so am I an X-men super fan or am I an X-men hater? Pick a side. I've never said that X-men was perfect. So how can I pretend it is? Also, don't you think that is the reason why I am so critical towards X-men? It's my favorite comic book corner. Just above Spider-man. I'm not that sort of fan that would love the movies just because they are making X-men movies. And money is not the defense. I'm talking about the amount of people that went to see the movie. If more people went to see Spider-man back in 2002 than X-men in both 2000 and 2003 then it's not the climate of comic book movies. It's the movie itself. X2 should have done way more than it did after Spider-man. More people should have been on board to see that movie. With their popularity, X-men should have done Avengers level money on X2. Especially after The Matrix. I guess everyone was saving their money to go see The Matrix Reloaded and Finding Nemo (since X2 came out 2 and 4 weeks before them). They don't need a full reboot. Just get good. Get rid of Singer and Kinberg. Singer is holding on to the X-men franchise with an iron grip because he knows he has nothing else. Everything else he tries falls flat. What ever happened to the Logan's Run remake? Or 20000 Leagues Under the Sea? I guess Bohemian Rhapsody is a passion project he had to make.
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Nov 1, 2017 17:14:43 GMT
I said Wonder Woman and Thor 3. Get it right. Wonder Woman is pretty much the same movie as Captain America: First Avenger. Logan is not a rip-off of an MCU movie. Never said it was. I said it's the same movie as The Wolverine. Mangold did the same thing with Logan and The Wolverine that Singer does in all his X-men movies. WW predates CA Logan is Old Man Logan Wolverine is the Claremont Japanese stories. did the term rip off get a new meaning in 2017? Isn't Thor 3 a copy of GOTG by all. charzhino you might need some help here, I think what some MCU fans might be doing is only taking on people who are not so well informed or know much about comics. The movie. The movie!!! When making the Wonder Woman movie they remade Captain America: First Avenger. The Wonder Woman movie came out this year. How did it come out before Captain America First Avenger? When making Logan they just remade The Wolverine. It's the same movie in a different setting. Wolverine living in the middle of nowhere is brought back into the fold and goes on the run with a young female. His healing factor is stripped away from him and he has to go through the movie with it on low setting or ignoring the pain entirely. Both movies has a young woman skilled in blades, a scientist, and a villain made from him. The only thing Logan took from Old Man Logan was the old man part.
|
|
|
Post by Agent of Chaos on Nov 1, 2017 18:36:53 GMT
WW predates CA Logan is Old Man Logan Wolverine is the Claremont Japanese stories. did the term rip off get a new meaning in 2017? Isn't Thor 3 a copy of GOTG by all. charzhino you might need some help here, I think what some MCU fans might be doing is only taking on people who are not so well informed or know much about comics. The movie. The movie!!! When making the Wonder Woman movie they remade Captain America: First Avenger. The Wonder Woman movie came out this year. How did it come out before Captain America First Avenger? When making Logan they just remade The Wolverine. It's the same movie in a different setting. Wolverine living in the middle of nowhere is brought back into the fold and goes on the run with a young female. His healing factor is stripped away from him and he has to go through the movie with it on low setting or ignoring the pain entirely. Both movies has a young woman skilled in blades, a scientist, and a villain made from him. The only thing Logan took from Old Man Logan was the old man part. Actually, that is from Old Man Logan and/or Death of Wolverine.
|
|
|
Post by summers8 on Nov 1, 2017 18:51:14 GMT
I hate to point out the obvious here.MCU movies are made by disney with the best marketing and cinematic appeal. x-men with disney will make far more money but it is not worth it. Recent X-Men movies, the last awful ones still made 500 million dollars (with no disney power to back it up). Logan and Deadpool are r rated are bringing in 600-700 million, but I don't consider them part of the old xmen movies but logan and deadpool are what happens when you bring in fresh blood and secretly reboot. Now imagine how much a pg 13 can make. do you see me loving The dark phoenix saga movie?no. I kind of even want it to fail so fox can have a real full reboot. sadly if money is your only defence you need to stay more on target aka spiderman homecoming and iron man 3 beating iron man 1 when iron man 1 was superior. X-Men's box office will grow after logan and deadpool (If the movies have the same quality) but it will not come from anything tied to the old movies or singer/kinberg. as I said, as a fan of xmen , I am also the biggest critic and biggest truth sayer for all comic book properties because I do really care. do I defend the messed up timelines? No. do I defend too much magneto? No do I also hate what mystique has become? Yes do I hate what they did to Cyclops? Yes. the difference between me and you is I don't pretend xmen is perfect. Wait, so am I an X-men super fan or am I an X-men hater? Pick a side. I've never said that X-men was perfect. So how can I pretend it is? Also, don't you think that is the reason why I am so critical towards X-men? It's my favorite comic book corner. Just above Spider-man. I'm not that sort of fan that would love the movies just because they are making X-men movies. And money is not the defense. I'm talking about the amount of people that went to see the movie. If more people went to see Spider-man back in 2002 than X-men in both 2000 and 2003 then it's not the climate of comic book movies. It's the movie itself. X2 should have done way more than it did after Spider-man. More people should have been on board to see that movie. With their popularity, X-men should have done Avengers level money on X2. Especially after The Matrix. I guess everyone was saving their money to go see The Matrix Reloaded and Finding Nemo (since X2 came out 2 and 4 weeks before them). They don't need a full reboot. Just get good. Get rid of Singer and Kinberg. Singer is holding on to the X-men franchise with an iron grip because he knows he has nothing else. Everything else he tries falls flat. What ever happened to the Logan's Run remake? Or 20000 Leagues Under the Sea? I guess Bohemian Rhapsody is a passion project he had to make. Wait x-men is your favourite comic book series but you think Magneto is a dr doom knock off and you complain about how you hate xmen on top ? okay. I think those are just frustrated Dismarvel fans who lash out at xmen because they can't understand why everyone says X-Men is too good to be in the MCU. Don’t confuse Disney marketing to quality. X2 made 400 million right? In 2003, still a lot of money and slightly better than Spiderman 2 as a movie but spiderman 2 had better promotion and yes toys. Sony is good at that. So this is all about money you can add twilight , transformers and the iron man sequels.. But let’s talk money for most comic films. Fox has a better chance to grow, others? Not so much. What happened to spiderman homecoming becoming more profitable than the earlier films? That fell flat. Logan with an r rating will end up becoming more profitable than most of the comic films this year and will leave with the best in quality and the most respected. In the comic book landscape, sadly the recent xmen movies are the best we got, the facts don’t lie and collective thinking of the people don't lie. Deadpool , DOFP and Logan. WB DCEU and MCU have not even come close to these films because WB sadly was trying to be Nolan without the real Nolan, while MCU movies are generic comedies. I agree that X-Men needs to get better and better even after DOFP, Logan and Deadpool and push the genre forward aka New Mutants been a horror psychological thriller and Gambit been a crime heist film. .. while others are still trying to place catch up or even think outside box like the xmen movies. We have to ask ourselves, how good does xmen have to get when their counterparts say, we can’t make the xmen movies because they are too heavy, too serious and compelling (compelling is quite easy) and fox and x-men fans say, sure we can make them and fox ends making these movies with great financial rewards that they are more than satisfied with. As I said, the next few weeks and years are going to be interesting for everyone, exciting for X-Men fans. My guess is more movies like Logan, Deadpool and DOFP and less off Apocalypse, and if this remains the case,Other comic movies will become classified as full parodies.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 1, 2017 18:56:05 GMT
but you think Magneto is a dr doom knock off Originally he was. He didn't get a decent backstory for like 20 years. Plenty would be happy with the X-Men in the MCU. Just not the FoX-Men fans who hate all the other Marvel heroes. X2 wouldn't do well in today's environment. The only reason the first Fox films did well was because they had no competition. It was. Shows that they knew there wasn't much of a plot so they substituted blood and gore instead. Yeah, fact is that the MCU just keeps winning. Even Thor beat Logan. Backwards and ashamed. They think it's still the year 2000.
|
|
|
Post by summers8 on Nov 1, 2017 19:13:59 GMT
WW predates CA Logan is Old Man Logan Wolverine is the Claremont Japanese stories. did the term rip off get a new meaning in 2017? Isn't Thor 3 a copy of GOTG by all. charzhino you might need some help here, I think what some MCU fans might be doing is only taking on people who are not so well informed or know much about comics. The movie. The movie!!! When making the Wonder Woman movie they remade Captain America: First Avenger. The Wonder Woman movie came out this year. How did it come out before Captain America First Avenger? When making Logan they just remade The Wolverine. It's the same movie in a different setting. Wolverine living in the middle of nowhere is brought back into the fold and goes on the run with a young female. His healing factor is stripped away from him and he has to go through the movie with it on low setting or ignoring the pain entirely. Both movies has a young woman skilled in blades, a scientist, and a villain made from him. The only thing Logan took from Old Man Logan was the old man part.
|
|