|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 10, 2017 18:05:56 GMT
So just to keep everything in perspective, like I've been saying WW is a good film, and right in line with most of the MCU films although quite a few are still above it. The fresh meter is a littler higher for two reasons, one of those is people being happy for a female film that isn't garbage, and also some people being pretty desperate for a good DC film and eager to say there finally is one.
So all in all I think that's a realistic perspective and take on it. I think time will wear it down a bit honestly, especially if the rest of the DCU continues to be well below average, and I would make the case that all of the MCU films on level with it are better, but still this seems fair. |
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Jun 10, 2017 18:08:41 GMT
I actually enjoyed it more than a decent chunk of the mcu films.
|
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 10, 2017 18:11:05 GMT
I actually enjoyed it more than a decent chunk of the mcu films. Oh I didn't.
The only MCU films I'd say I enjoyed WW more might be Hulk and IM3, and sometimes that might be debatable. I'd watch any of the others way before WW, and honestly, I'll probably never see WW ever again. I have no plans to any way.
|
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Jun 10, 2017 18:11:11 GMT
I should just point out that the average rating should still technically be a 7.6. The only reason the average rating, as well as the percentage went down is because a review for 'The Mummy' was mistakenly counted against WW. That mistake has been fixed, but for some reason, the average rating and the percentage still haven't adjusted back to a 7.6 and 93% respectively. Just for the record, this isn't me making an excuse. This is the review I'm referring to: www.hypable.com/mummy-movie-review-atrocious/. The one that was mistakenly listed as a WW review. |
|
barkingbaphomet
Junior Member
all backlit and creepysmoking
@barkingbaphomet
Posts: 2,252
Likes: 1,006
|
Post by barkingbaphomet on Jun 10, 2017 18:21:41 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 10, 2017 18:30:34 GMT
Which character would win in a fight completely out of any context isn't all that interesting to me honestly. |
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Jun 10, 2017 18:42:49 GMT
Wrong Stanton, WW IS the third-best reviewed super hero movie ever, based on an adjusted, weighted (Bayesian) formula: editorial.rottentomatoes.com/guide/50-best-superhero-movies-of-all-time/5/ We will not explain weighted formula to you, it's not as sweet and simple asthat MCU formula you like to suck so much. But you still got to eat it: Wonder Woman is better reviewed than any MCU movie on the world's biggest review aggregate pool. It's only second to the wonderful TDK and the even more equally wonderful Logan. MCU legs behind. Isn't that literally marvelous? With an impressive opening weekend at +$100M in the US this is is by far the most successful female Superhero movie ever - and has even beating her male companions. Super hero origin story films usually do not reach this height at the box office. Last November’s Doctor Strange bowed to $85.1M while the first Captain America and Thor movies debuted to just over $65M each in 2011. Not to speak that it's of course artistically far more satisfying than all these lesser movies put together, there is simply nothing wrong with WW, and if you name something, I would find flaw in your trivial taste rather than the film.  |
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 10, 2017 18:46:08 GMT
Wrong Stanton, WW IS the third-best reviewed super hero movie ever, based on an adjusted, weighted (Bayesian) formula: editorial.rottentomatoes.com/guide/50-best-superhero-movies-of-all-time/5/ We will not explain weighted formula to you, it's not as sweet and simple asthat MCU formula you like to suck so much. But you still got to eat it: Wonder Woman is better reviewed than any MCU movie on the world's biggest review aggregate pool. It's only second to the wonderful TDK and the even more equally wonderful Logan. MCU legs behind. Isn't that literally marvelous? With an impressive opening weekend at +$100M in the US this is is by far the most successful female Superhero movie ever - and has even beating her male companions. Super hero origin story films usually do not reach this height at the box office. Last November’s Doctor Strange bowed to $85.1M while the first Captain America and Thor movies debuted to just over $65M each in 2011. Not to speak that it's of course artistically far more satisfying than all these lesser movies put together, there is simply nothing wrong with WW, and if you name something, I would find flaw in your trivial taste rather than the film. It gets a 7.5 which is hardly 3rd best.
And is top 50 really something to brag about?
Also we aren't discussing financials here, so I don't know why you're bringing it up.
|
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 10, 2017 19:02:08 GMT
I should just point out that the average rating should still technically be a 7.6. The only reason the average rating, as well as the percentage went down is because a review for 'The Mummy' was mistakenly counted against WW. That mistake has been fixed, but for some reason, the average rating and the percentage still haven't adjusted back to a 7.6 and 93% respectively. Just for the record, this isn't me making an excuse. This is the review I'm referring to: www.hypable.com/mummy-movie-review-atrocious/. The one that was mistakenly listed as a WW review. You do realize a single vote doesn't change an entire percentage point. What you are talking about is rounding up. |
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Jun 10, 2017 19:02:50 GMT
Wrong Stanton, WW IS the third-best reviewed super hero movie ever, based on an adjusted, weighted (Bayesian) formula: editorial.rottentomatoes.com/guide/50-best-superhero-movies-of-all-time/5/ It gets a 7.5 which is hardly 3rd best.
Check the fact, they will enlighten you. editorial.rottentomatoes.com/guide/50-best-superhero-movies-of-all-time/5/Yes, as long as you are top three and get a medal. The other places not so much...  Just so that you get the full perspective, and I want you to feel that noose that you are looking through slowly tightening. I always enjoyed to see you suffer. |
|
barkingbaphomet
Junior Member
all backlit and creepysmoking
@barkingbaphomet
Posts: 2,252
Likes: 1,006
|
Post by barkingbaphomet on Jun 10, 2017 19:05:18 GMT
Which character would win in a fight completely out of any context isn't all that interesting to me honestly. i suppose it would behoove us all to rise above such petty binary antagonism. |
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 10, 2017 19:07:28 GMT
I want you to feel that noose that you are looking through slowly tightening. I always enjoyed to see you suffer. I'm not here for childishness. 7.5. Enjoy your trolling. |
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Jun 10, 2017 19:13:12 GMT
I should just point out that the average rating should still technically be a 7.6. The only reason the average rating, as well as the percentage went down is because a review for 'The Mummy' was mistakenly counted against WW. That mistake has been fixed, but for some reason, the average rating and the percentage still haven't adjusted back to a 7.6 and 93% respectively. Just for the record, this isn't me making an excuse. This is the review I'm referring to: www.hypable.com/mummy-movie-review-atrocious/. The one that was mistakenly listed as a WW review. You do realize a single vote doesn't change an entire percentage point. What you are talking about is rounding up. I am talking about rounding up. As it stands, the percentage score for WW should be a 92.6, which rounds up to a 93%. It's currently listed as a 92% though, because they haven't readjusted the score after removing that review for 'The Mummy'. |
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Jun 10, 2017 19:18:17 GMT
I want you to feel that noose that you are looking through slowly tightening. I always enjoyed to see you suffer. I'm not here for childishness. 7.5. Enjoy your trolling. I always enjoy myself with you, Stanton. And don't be ashamed of your fanboy tears, they are well justified. Your surrender is hereby accepted. |
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Jun 10, 2017 19:20:34 GMT
You do realize a single vote doesn't change an entire percentage point. What you are talking about is rounding up. I am talking about rounding up. As it stands, the percentage score for WW should be a 92.6, which rounds up to a 93%. It's currently listed as a 92% though, because they haven't readjusted the score after removing that review for 'The Mummy'. that is very true, but I think in the statistic of the 50 best reviewed SH movies this glitch was corrected, not so on the site itself yet, alas... |
|
|
|
Post by sdrew13163 on Jun 10, 2017 20:09:05 GMT
How many of these threads are you going to make? We get it: you liked it okay, but you still like the MCU better.
|
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 10, 2017 20:13:10 GMT
You do realize a single vote doesn't change an entire percentage point. What you are talking about is rounding up. I am talking about rounding up. As it stands, the percentage score for WW should be a 92.6, which rounds up to a 93%. It's currently listed as a 92% though, because they haven't readjusted the score after removing that review for 'The Mummy'. I'm talking about the actual ratings the reviews gave it, not the up or down 92 score. That's a 7.5 and very much like most quality comic films. The point being that WW does not stand out as this best of the best, Oscar worthy, top 3 ever type of film. It's pretty good, but let's be realistic. |
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 10, 2017 20:16:03 GMT
How many of these threads are you going to make? We get it: you liked it okay, but you still like the MCU better. The RT rating score hadn't been discussed as far as I could tell. And I'm just keeping it real and in perspective that's all. |
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Jun 10, 2017 20:17:22 GMT
I am talking about rounding up. As it stands, the percentage score for WW should be a 92.6, which rounds up to a 93%. It's currently listed as a 92% though, because they haven't readjusted the score after removing that review for 'The Mummy'. I'm talking about the actual ratings the reviews gave it, not the up or down 92 score. That's a 7.5 and very much like most quality comic films. The point being that WW does not stand out as this best of the best, Oscar worthy, top 3 ever type of film. It's pretty good, but let's be realistic. It looks to me like the average rating is back to being listed as a 7.6. |
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 10, 2017 20:35:10 GMT
It looks to me like the average rating is back to being listed as a 7.6. Which doesn't change the point. It's quite in line with a lot of other films. |
|
