|
Post by OldSamVimes on Jun 17, 2017 11:22:11 GMT
There are something like 3 billion Muslims in the world. Are you asking me to generalize like an intellectually castrated buffoon? A little less than 2 billion, A-hole. It's so cute that with Ada gone you need to find someone to white knight for. You need to protect Cody, he is one dumb sack of shit.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 17, 2017 11:22:48 GMT
It's astonishing to me that anybody would think that what that judge did would be considered justice. Are we seriously to believe that the family of the victim will be satisfied that justice has been served so long as somebody dies for the crime? But that it doesn't matter at all to them who it is that dies? Are we really to believe that this family will say "Well it is a tragedy that our family member died, of course. But at least we have the consolation that an innocent man was punished for the crime, whilst the guilty man walked free." There is a reason that no judge would ever be allowed to do such a thing in reality - and that any judge who tried would be regarded as horribly corrupt and unfair. This video sets out to justify a central aspect of christianity, but in reality all it does is highlight just how downright evil that aspect is. You're taking the analogy a little too literally and missing the big picture. Blinky is missing the big picture because he wants to miss it. And he wants others to miss it too.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 17, 2017 11:24:27 GMT
A little less than 2 billion, A-hole. It's so cute that with Ada gone you need to find someone to white knight for. You need to protect Cody, he is one dumb sack of shit. He's probably better with numbers that you are, but then again you're a failure at everything, so it's okay.
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Jun 17, 2017 11:26:00 GMT
It's so cute that with Ada gone you need to find someone to white knight for. You need to protect Cody, he is one dumb sack of shit. He's probably better with numbers that you are, but then again you're a failure at everything, so it's okay. Your sentence structure is getting poor, time to put the bottles away and sleep for the night?
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 17, 2017 11:26:57 GMT
He's probably better with numbers that you are, but then again you're a failure at everything, so it's okay. Your sentence structure is getting poor, time to put the bottles away and sleep for the night? More like Slimy Sam's posting career to end.
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Jun 17, 2017 11:27:07 GMT
tpfkar When did you decide it was all crap and fall apart? It took six cold beers to inspire this thread.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 17, 2017 11:28:04 GMT
tpfkar When did you decide it was all crap and fall apart? It took six cold beers to inspire this thread.What religion do you follow?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2017 11:35:09 GMT
You're taking the analogy a little too literally and missing the big picture. If the analogy doesn't work in relation to the alleged reality, then that just means it is a poor analogy. Accurately mapping to the nuances of a real situation is what analogies are for. So let's set aside the bad analogy and consider the big picture. You believe that god's law is that "the wages of sin is death", meaning that those who sin - and everybody sins - deserve to die and be punished by god. Is that the case? And you believe that god manifested himself as a human, a person who was not guilty of my sins or yours or anybody elses. Is that the case? And you believe that this innocent person then took the punishment for your and my and everyone else's sins upon himself, so that we would not have to bear them. Is that the case? So. In this big picture, we the guilty are not punished for our sins. But an innocent person is punished in our place, for things he did not do. Do I have your big picture right? Do you think of what I've described as a just and fair outcome?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
The cross
Jun 17, 2017 11:42:23 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2017 11:42:23 GMT
Your sentence structure is getting poor, time to put the bottles away and sleep for the night? More like Slimy Sam's posting career to end. Dude, one thing I've realised about this board is that non-believers like Sam and Rabbit are not worth arguing with. Mocking and scoffing is all they're here to do. At least the likes of Graham, Supes, Captainbryce can sometimes raise valid objections or make coherent points. Sam and Rabbit offer nothing. One tries too hard to be funny and witty the other too hard to be annoying and both their MOs fail miserably. Let's not feed them.
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Jun 17, 2017 11:48:06 GMT
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 17, 2017 11:51:14 GMT
More like Slimy Sam's posting career to end. Dude, one thing I've realised about this board is that non-believers like Sam and Rabbit are not worth arguing with. Mocking and scoffing is all they're here to do. At least the likes of Graham, Supes, Captainbryce can sometimes raise valid objections or make coherent points. Sam and Rabbit offer nothing. One tries too hard to be funny and witty the other too hard to be annoying and both their MOs fail miserably. Let's not feed them. And the one thing I've realized is that if they are not opposed they will win by default. Too many people today are neither hot nor cold, like the ones that Christ mentioned; neither hot nor cold. Say what you will about the Muslims, but they are hot. Say what you will about the atheists, but they are cold. They are not lukewarm. Ask rabbit what religion he follows. He doesn't want to talk about it for some reason. Maybe it's a secret.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 17, 2017 11:51:43 GMT
What religion do you follow?
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Jun 17, 2017 11:52:02 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2017 12:07:16 GMT
You're taking the analogy a little too literally and missing the big picture. If the analogy doesn't work in relation to the alleged reality, then that just means it is a poor analogy. Accurately mapping to the nuances of a real situation is what analogies are for. So let's set aside the bad analogy and consider the big picture. You believe that god's law is that "the wages of sin is death", meaning that those who sin - and everybody sins - deserve to die and be punished by god. Is that the case? And you believe that god manifested himself as a human, a person who was not guilty of my sins or yours or anybody elses. Is that the case? And you believe that this innocent person then took the punishment for your and my and everyone else's sins upon himself, so that we would not have to bear them. Is that the case? So. In this big picture, we the guilty are not punished for our sins. But an innocent person is punished in our place, for things he did not do. Do I have your big picture right? Do you think of what I've described as a just and fair outcome? Cody? Is the above an accurate summation of your views, and do you regard them as just and fair?
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 17, 2017 12:07:47 GMT
What religion do you follow?
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Jun 17, 2017 12:09:45 GMT
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 17, 2017 12:11:11 GMT
What religion do you follow?
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Jun 17, 2017 12:13:01 GMT
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 17, 2017 12:15:19 GMT
What religion do you follow?
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Jun 17, 2017 12:17:36 GMT
|
|