|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Jul 15, 2017 2:09:28 GMT
My thoughts on the dance off. It's pointless and self defeating to spend endless hours analyzing one tiny fragment of a movie. If I wanted to I could frame every scene of every movie in a negative light if I looked hard enough. A movie is like an impressionist painting. If you stand 6 inches away from it, you'll say "it's just a bunch of smudges!". You have to stand back and take it in as a whole to actually enjoy it.
Of course you have to actually want to enjoy it which seems to be more rare then you might think.
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Jul 15, 2017 2:38:34 GMT
Oh come on, the dance off scene perfectly fits the character and actually makes sense in that context. It's nothing like Martha which didn't make sense from a character point of view. And really it's pretty fun right before the movie gets dramatic as hell. They didn't need to ruin the climax with a joke. They should've given it a rest for one scene. If there's one thing that The Winter Soldier proves, it's that humor is best left to the side when the dramatic moments play out. That's not to say that the humor should be abandoned all together (TWS is quite funny). They just need to control it. But it wasn't a joke, it was a distraction like he said. They've quite frequently established that Quill is a dancer in both movies. He knew that the moment was silly and that Ronan's ego would have him confused by the moment. Hell, everyone was confused by the moment. Even his teammate Gamora. But then, the humor was left behind for the next part when he sees his mother. Her name was Martha, right?
|
|
|
Post by merh on Jul 15, 2017 2:52:43 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sdrew13163 on Jul 15, 2017 4:53:49 GMT
They didn't need to ruin the climax with a joke. They should've given it a rest for one scene. If there's one thing that The Winter Soldier proves, it's that humor is best left to the side when the dramatic moments play out. That's not to say that the humor should be abandoned all together (TWS is quite funny). They just need to control it. But it wasn't a joke, it was a distraction like he said. They've quite frequently established that Quill is a dancer in both movies. He knew that the moment was silly and that Ronan's ego would have him confused by the moment. Hell, everyone was confused by the moment. Even his teammate Gamora. But then, the humor was left behind for the next part when he sees his mother. Her name was Martha, right? I just don't like it. Simple as that. I don't like the Martha scene either, so I don't know why you used that against me. Both of the scenes could have been handled better and made a better impact overall.
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Jul 15, 2017 5:22:34 GMT
But it wasn't a joke, it was a distraction like he said. They've quite frequently established that Quill is a dancer in both movies. He knew that the moment was silly and that Ronan's ego would have him confused by the moment. Hell, everyone was confused by the moment. Even his teammate Gamora. But then, the humor was left behind for the next part when he sees his mother. Her name was Martha, right? I just don't like it. Simple as that. I don't like the Martha scene either, so I don't know why you used that against me. Both of the scenes could have been handled better and made a better impact overall. That sounds like a personal problem and not a problem with the movie. But the one scene does make an impact. The problem is that people fixate on the "dance off" and not what it was meant to be (and is said to be by the character in the movie), a distraction. The main point of the scene is for them to come together and Quill seeing his mother. I think people forget about that. Or even switch off before that because they can't handle the distraction.
|
|
|
Post by sdrew13163 on Jul 15, 2017 5:46:40 GMT
I just don't like it. Simple as that. I don't like the Martha scene either, so I don't know why you used that against me. Both of the scenes could have been handled better and made a better impact overall. That sounds like a personal problem and not a problem with the movie. But the one scene does make an impact. The problem is that people fixate on the "dance off" and not what it was meant to be (and is said to be by the character in the movie), a distraction. The main point of the scene is for them to come together and Quill seeing his mother. I think people forget about that. Or even switch off before that because they can't handle the distraction. I wasn't clear on this, but the dance off is just part of the problem for me. If it was left at that, then fine. It's a silly movie and it more or less fits the tone. The corker for me is the "turd blossom" comment. That was wholly unnecessary. And a personal problem with a movie is all there is. No matter how bad a scene in any movie, someone likes it. No matter how great a scene in any movie, someone hates it. What you might consider a problem could actually be a big positive for me (and vice versa). It ruined the climax for me. That's all I'm saying. Maybe it made the entire climax work so much better for you. Any problem that anyone sees in an any movie is a "personal problem". That's what opinions are.
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Jul 15, 2017 13:02:36 GMT
That sounds like a personal problem and not a problem with the movie. But the one scene does make an impact. The problem is that people fixate on the "dance off" and not what it was meant to be (and is said to be by the character in the movie), a distraction. The main point of the scene is for them to come together and Quill seeing his mother. I think people forget about that. Or even switch off before that because they can't handle the distraction. I wasn't clear on this, but the dance off is just part of the problem for me. If it was left at that, then fine. It's a silly movie and it more or less fits the tone. The corker for me is the "turd blossom" comment. That was wholly unnecessary. And a personal problem with a movie is all there is. No matter how bad a scene in any movie, someone likes it. No matter how great a scene in any movie, someone hates it. What you might consider a problem could actually be a big positive for me (and vice versa). It ruined the climax for me. That's all I'm saying. Maybe it made the entire climax work so much better for you. Any problem that anyone sees in an any movie is a "personal problem". That's what opinions are. Not really. The scene works because that is the character that is established. If he didn't do that, or something similar, then there would have been something wrong. That's why people instantly know when there are multiple writers that worked on or changed small parts of a movie. Because the tone or the characters change too much from what they are established as being (with no explanation). That was Quill through out the movie. If he stopped being that Quill then the scene doesn't work. You see how I did not make it personal? You don't want to like the scene and it sounds like you are trying to find reasons why you don't like it. First it was the "dance off" now it's him saying turd blossom. Next it will be because there were aliens around.
|
|
|
Post by summers8 on Jul 15, 2017 13:55:27 GMT
I wasn't clear on this, but the dance off is just part of the problem for me. If it was left at that, then fine. It's a silly movie and it more or less fits the tone. The corker for me is the "turd blossom" comment. That was wholly unnecessary. And a personal problem with a movie is all there is. No matter how bad a scene in any movie, someone likes it. No matter how great a scene in any movie, someone hates it. What you might consider a problem could actually be a big positive for me (and vice versa). It ruined the climax for me. That's all I'm saying. Maybe it made the entire climax work so much better for you. Any problem that anyone sees in an any movie is a "personal problem". That's what opinions are. Not really. The scene works because that is the character that is established. If he didn't do that, or something similar, then there would have been something wrong. That's why people instantly know when there are multiple writers that worked on or changed small parts of a movie. Because the tone or the characters change too much from what they are established as being (with no explanation). That was Quill through out the movie. If he stopped being that Quill then the scene doesn't work. You see how I did not make it personal? You don't want to like the scene and it sounds like you are trying to find reasons why you don't like it. First it was the "dance off" now it's him saying turd blossom. Next it will be because there were aliens around. the scene didn't work. it is becoming bad how all of you mcu fans defend all the crap mcu puts out. it didn't work because it ruined the moment. we already had a villain that was not even scary or threatening , adding the dance off made the villain look worse than he already did. You don't break off into a dance at a moment of life and death situation regardless of the character. this is why people say mcu is for kids. the scene may not have been a joke for the characters but it was a joke for the movie goers. Us. some of us laughed, most of us cringed. The scene did not work at all. in fact is is far worse than martha when you break it down and do something called film analysis. with martha, batman only stopped himself from killing superman because it reminded him of his own mother and he realized that this ''god'' (superman) he was trying to kill could be also human (the same human he was trying to protect from superman) and had a mother he cared about. the concept behind martha was good but the execution was poor. with the dance off, the concept and execution are both poor and don't work at all not to mention the cheese and childishness of the scene and the movie. Deadpool could really be pushing it. I have a bad feeling that deadpool 2 will suffer the same fate as GOTG even with the renowned Cable coming in. neither deadpool and gotg are among the best comic films ever made but they were successful because they did something different and new though with little depth to them especially with GOTG 1. but as seen with gotg 2 or even the avengers 2. it is hard to repeat the new again formula and succeed.
|
|
|
Post by summers8 on Jul 15, 2017 13:59:15 GMT
That sounds like a personal problem and not a problem with the movie. But the one scene does make an impact. The problem is that people fixate on the "dance off" and not what it was meant to be (and is said to be by the character in the movie), a distraction. The main point of the scene is for them to come together and Quill seeing his mother. I think people forget about that. Or even switch off before that because they can't handle the distraction. I wasn't clear on this, but the dance off is just part of the problem for me. If it was left at that, then fine. It's a silly movie and it more or less fits the tone. The corker for me is the "turd blossom" comment. That was wholly unnecessary. And a personal problem with a movie is all there is. No matter how bad a scene in any movie, someone likes it. No matter how great a scene in any movie, someone hates it. What you might consider a problem could actually be a big positive for me (and vice versa). It ruined the climax for me. That's all I'm saying. Maybe it made the entire climax work so much better for you. Any problem that anyone sees in an any movie is a "personal problem". That's what opinions are. well from the opening scene, the movie was meant to be silly but it took the silliness too far with the dance off. deadpool's antics works better because deadpool is suppose to be satire. GOTG was actually compared to freaking star wars. are you freaking kidding moi? did we see anyone try to play with lord vader?
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Jul 15, 2017 14:05:15 GMT
Not really. The scene works because that is the character that is established. If he didn't do that, or something similar, then there would have been something wrong. That's why people instantly know when there are multiple writers that worked on or changed small parts of a movie. Because the tone or the characters change too much from what they are established as being (with no explanation). That was Quill through out the movie. If he stopped being that Quill then the scene doesn't work. You see how I did not make it personal? You don't want to like the scene and it sounds like you are trying to find reasons why you don't like it. First it was the "dance off" now it's him saying turd blossom. Next it will be because there were aliens around. the scene didn't work. it is becoming bad how all of you mcu fans defend all the crap mcu puts out. it didn't work because it ruined the moment. we already had a villain that was not even scary or threatening , adding the dance off made the villain look worse than he already did. You don't break off into a dance at a moment of life and death situation regardless of the character. this is why people say mcu is for kids. It "ruins the moment" if you were expecting Ronan to win and destroy Xandar. You want to distract someone, you do something really bizarre and unexpected. MCU is "for kids" the same way LOTR is for kids, or Dr Who, or Star Trek, or Star Wars.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 15, 2017 15:30:54 GMT
the scene didn't work. it is becoming bad how all of you mcu fans defend all the crap mcu puts out. it didn't work because it ruined the moment. we already had a villain that was not even scary or threatening , adding the dance off made the villain look worse than he already did. You don't break off into a dance at a moment of life and death situation regardless of the character. this is why people say mcu is for kids. It "ruins the moment" if you were expecting Ronan to win and destroy Xandar. You want to distract someone, you do something really bizarre and unexpected. MCU is "for kids" the same way LOTR is for kids, or Dr Who, or Star Trek, or Star Wars. You're trying logic on people that dont want that. Good luck with that. To me its fine if people hate a scene, movie or even the whole MCU. What I dont get is that the people who do like it get attacked. Like they are superior or something. Its bullshit. I love the MCU, really liked Wonder Woman and lots of other DC outings. Same goes for some of the FoX-men movies. For me its strange that some just seem to hate everything about the MCU without any nuance. And also the hate towards its fans. I really dont understand it.
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Jul 15, 2017 17:51:15 GMT
Not really. The scene works because that is the character that is established. If he didn't do that, or something similar, then there would have been something wrong. That's why people instantly know when there are multiple writers that worked on or changed small parts of a movie. Because the tone or the characters change too much from what they are established as being (with no explanation). That was Quill through out the movie. If he stopped being that Quill then the scene doesn't work. You see how I did not make it personal? You don't want to like the scene and it sounds like you are trying to find reasons why you don't like it. First it was the "dance off" now it's him saying turd blossom. Next it will be because there were aliens around. the scene didn't work. it is becoming bad how all of you mcu fans defend all the crap mcu puts out. it didn't work because it ruined the moment. we already had a villain that was not even scary or threatening , adding the dance off made the villain look worse than he already did. You don't break off into a dance at a moment of life and death situation regardless of the character. this is why people say mcu is for kids. the scene may not have been a joke for the characters but it was a joke for the movie goers. Us. some of us laughed, most of us cringed. The scene did not work at all. in fact is is far worse than martha when you break it down and do something called film analysis. with martha, batman only stopped himself from killing superman because it reminded him of his own mother and he realized that this ''god'' (superman) he was trying to kill could be also human (the same human he was trying to protect from superman) and had a mother he cared about. the concept behind martha was good but the execution was poor. with the dance off, the concept and execution are both poor and don't work at all not to mention the cheese and childishness of the scene and the movie. Deadpool could really be pushing it. I have a bad feeling that deadpool 2 will suffer the same fate as GOTG even with the renowned Cable coming in. neither deadpool and gotg are among the best comic films ever made but they were successful because they did something different and new though with little depth to them especially with GOTG 1. but as seen with gotg 2 or even the avengers 2. it is hard to repeat the new again formula and succeed. Well, the problem isn't the movie, but you. The movies set a tone and you want it to go away from that tone for some false serious crap. You forget that we are watching adventure movies akin to Star Wars and Indiana Jones. Not a false deconstruction of characters in a false serious world. It was indeed cringe worthy. That is another point of it. This guy starts dancing and mumbling a song to dance to and the villain is standing there asking him what the hell he is doing. Why is he dancing in the middle of a battle for this planet? What is going on here? His teammate is standing there wondering the same thing. He tries to get her to dance with him and she stands there shaking her head perplexed. The laughs you hear is the same laughs you'd hear when a comedian says the most out there raunchiest joke that you aren't sure you are suppose to laugh at, but you are so uncomfortable that you laugh at it. That's why the scene works as a distraction and it jumps right back into what was happening before and they steal the Infinity stone back from him. We could have had something different and in character (which we got) or we could have had the same old villain monologue while the hero stands and keep him talking as a boring distraction that is out of character. Cable will take the place of Colossus and be the straight man to Deadpool's shenanigans. I can see it coming across like MIB3 with Brolin playing K again. And there you go with those personal issues. You're coming off like a hipster with your "I hate what is popular" shtick. Deadpool is an awesome movie and one of the best X-men movies. They finally got a character right. These movies have never came off as trying to be deep and serious. They know they are comic book adventure movies, but at the same time don't talk down to use for being based on comic books like, say, Transformers. That's something the MCU has learned from the 1st Reeve movies (mostly the 1st one). What makes the MCU work is like this: They are the sports team that gets the pep talk before the game that tells them to have fun and beers are on me after the game. The DCEU is the team that get the "pep talk" to go and crush the other team and there are no smiles in the locker room and the team colors are all black and if they lose everyone will have to run laps after the game (assist coach was there for Wonder Woman). I think Batman and Robin hurt Fox and DC. They don't want to make a movie that would even look close to that. Snyder is good for the more adult stuff like 300 and Watchmen, but that's not what the Justice League characters need.
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Jul 15, 2017 17:54:51 GMT
It "ruins the moment" if you were expecting Ronan to win and destroy Xandar. You want to distract someone, you do something really bizarre and unexpected. MCU is "for kids" the same way LOTR is for kids, or Dr Who, or Star Trek, or Star Wars. You're trying logic on people that dont want that. Good luck with that. To me its fine if people hate a scene, movie or even the whole MCU. What I dont get is that the people who do like it get attacked. Like they are superior or something. Its bullshit. I love the MCU, really liked Wonder Woman and lots of other DC outings. Same goes for some of the FoX-men movies. For me its strange that some just seem to hate everything about the MCU without any nuance. And also the hate towards its fans. I really dont understand it. Also, they don't acknowledge that you continually say you like movies from other studios. Or say that they didn't like the movies you liked from that other studio to keep that distance.
|
|
|
Post by sdrew13163 on Jul 15, 2017 18:46:21 GMT
I wasn't clear on this, but the dance off is just part of the problem for me. If it was left at that, then fine. It's a silly movie and it more or less fits the tone. The corker for me is the "turd blossom" comment. That was wholly unnecessary. And a personal problem with a movie is all there is. No matter how bad a scene in any movie, someone likes it. No matter how great a scene in any movie, someone hates it. What you might consider a problem could actually be a big positive for me (and vice versa). It ruined the climax for me. That's all I'm saying. Maybe it made the entire climax work so much better for you. Any problem that anyone sees in an any movie is a "personal problem". That's what opinions are. Not really. The scene works because that is the character that is established. If he didn't do that, or something similar, then there would have been something wrong. That's why people instantly know when there are multiple writers that worked on or changed small parts of a movie. Because the tone or the characters change too much from what they are established as being (with no explanation). That was Quill through out the movie. If he stopped being that Quill then the scene doesn't work. You see how I did not make it personal? You don't want to like the scene and it sounds like you are trying to find reasons why you don't like it. First it was the "dance off" now it's him saying turd blossom. Next it will be because there were aliens around. So you're saying that if the scene was taken out and you never knew it was supposed to be in it then you'd notice it? You'd just be like "Man, I was really hoping they'd have a dance-off scene at the end. That's what Quill was meant to do"? I didn't like it, and yes it is a personal problem. Everything is. That's the point. What I hate, you like. Again, for example, I don't know your thoughts on the Nightmare scene in BvS, but it's one of the scenes in the movie that I really liked. The setting, choreography, special effects, and cinematography are all great. Now let's say (for the sake of my point) that you hated the scene. I'm not going to say, "There's no way that you can't like it! It's a dark, twisted, well-crafted fight sequence that is one of the few scenes in the movie that feels like a cohesive whole. It fits the movie, so it's good". I won't say that because I know that there are some scenes that people just don't like. No matter how much it fits the movie. Also, I didn't change my answer as to why I don't like the scene. I just added that on top of the dance, I don't like the "turd blossom" comment. It's called an opinion. I don't know how anyone could hate The Dark Knight or Raiders of the Lost Ark, but there are people who do. I understand that that's their opinion.
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Jul 15, 2017 20:11:26 GMT
Not really. The scene works because that is the character that is established. If he didn't do that, or something similar, then there would have been something wrong. That's why people instantly know when there are multiple writers that worked on or changed small parts of a movie. Because the tone or the characters change too much from what they are established as being (with no explanation). That was Quill through out the movie. If he stopped being that Quill then the scene doesn't work. You see how I did not make it personal? You don't want to like the scene and it sounds like you are trying to find reasons why you don't like it. First it was the "dance off" now it's him saying turd blossom. Next it will be because there were aliens around. So you're saying that if the scene was taken out and you never knew it was supposed to be in it then you'd notice it? You'd just be like "Man, I was really hoping they'd have a dance-off scene at the end. That's what Quill was meant to do"? I didn't like it, and yes it is a personal problem. Everything is. That's the point. What I hate, you like. Again, for example, I don't know your thoughts on the Nightmare scene in BvS, but it's one of the scenes in the movie that I really liked. The setting, choreography, special effects, and cinematography are all great. Now let's say (for the sake of my point) that you hated the scene. I'm not going to say, "There's no way that you can't like it! It's a dark, twisted, well-crafted fight sequence that is one of the few scenes in the movie that feels like a cohesive whole. It fits the movie, so it's good". I won't say that because I know that there are some scenes that people just don't like. No matter how much it fits the movie. Also, I didn't change my answer as to why I don't like the scene. I just added that on top of the dance, I don't like the "turd blossom" comment. It's called an opinion. I don't know how anyone could hate The Dark Knight or Raiders of the Lost Ark, but there are people who do. I understand that that's their opinion. No, but what I am saying is that the distraction fits the character as is. The Knightmare scene fits the character's paranoia. So yes it fits the movie. It's the sequel bait Flash scene that comes next that is head scratching and doesn't fit. The thing about BvS is that they made the movie to fit the director's cut. So when they had to edit it down it made even less sense. When they edited the movie down they should have gone back in and reshot some scenes to fit the new cut. And reading why you liked the scene, I see we are on different pages on this. You see that scene from a technical standpoint (something LukeLoves and I go at it about all the time). I think I'm more of a storyteller so I see it from the point of the characters and the story of the movie instead of what the writers was thinking or what the director was panning the camera at. Not saying you changed your reason, but that you are adding more in a nit-picky way. I can understand why people can hate any movie. I'm not here to tell you that you shouldn't not like a movie.
|
|
|
Post by merh on Jul 15, 2017 20:52:06 GMT
Not really. The scene works because that is the character that is established. If he didn't do that, or something similar, then there would have been something wrong. That's why people instantly know when there are multiple writers that worked on or changed small parts of a movie. Because the tone or the characters change too much from what they are established as being (with no explanation). That was Quill through out the movie. If he stopped being that Quill then the scene doesn't work. You see how I did not make it personal? You don't want to like the scene and it sounds like you are trying to find reasons why you don't like it. First it was the "dance off" now it's him saying turd blossom. Next it will be because there were aliens around. So you're saying that if the scene was taken out and you never knew it was supposed to be in it then you'd notice it? You'd just be like "Man, I was really hoping they'd have a dance-off scene at the end. That's what Quill was meant to do"? I didn't like it, and yes it is a personal problem. Everything is. That's the point. What I hate, you like. Again, for example, I don't know your thoughts on the Nightmare scene in BvS, but it's one of the scenes in the movie that I really liked. The setting, choreography, special effects, and cinematography are all great. Now let's say (for the sake of my point) that you hated the scene. I'm not going to say, "There's no way that you can't like it! It's a dark, twisted, well-crafted fight sequence that is one of the few scenes in the movie that feels like a cohesive whole. It fits the movie, so it's good". I won't say that because I know that there are some scenes that people just don't like. No matter how much it fits the movie. Also, I didn't change my answer as to why I don't like the scene. I just added that on top of the dance, I don't like the "turd blossom" comment. It's called an opinion. I don't know how anyone could hate The Dark Knight or Raiders of the Lost Ark, but there are people who do. I understand that that's their opinion. My problem with Nolan is he falls short. Every movie I've seen of his could be better, but he settles for less. He manipulates characters with no care to have them act out of character to get where he wants them to be for the plot point he is making.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 16, 2017 0:39:22 GMT
They have nothing to retaliate with. Nothing in the MCU has come anywhere close to Martha, or Tornadocide, or Destruction Porn, or Cave Troll Doomsday, or Riddler Lex, or Plot Device Lois ah, I forgot you are a pathologically ignorant too. Just from the top of my head: 1. CW:
"I don't care he killed my MOM!!!" Clobber Cobber (beats the "You must save Martha" crap) 2. AoU:
I can't have me no little babies, I feel like a monster. Please hide your zucchini in me, Hulk ( ) 3. GotG 1 Peter Quill: Dance-off, bro. Me and you. [as Peter dances he holds his hand out to Gamora] Gamora. [Gamora shakes her head] Subtle. Take it back. [Peter continues to dance] Ronan: What are you doing? Peter Quill: I'm distracting you, you big turd blossom. 4. GotG 2
Peter Quill: You put your turd in my bed, I shave you! Rocket: It won't be my turd it'll be one of Drax's Drax: Haha! Yes I have famously huge turds
5. Peter Quill: You shouldn't have killed my mom and squished my Walkman! 6. Laser Battle in WORD WAR II...pang, pang (no joke) The list of juvenile, mommy fixated, idiotic MCU dialogue is endless, this is likely why the films even in their heyday are not in the Top 250 charts, don't you think? You honestly have no appreciation for comedy. You always fixate on the "infamously huge turds" joke, but that's downright tame compared to what you'll find in your standard Mel Brooks, John Hughes, John Landis, Zucker brothers and Abrahams, or Harold Ramis film. If "huge turds" scandalized you so, "Stripes" would traumatize you. Also, your continued assertion about Tony's anger at the climax of Civil War being dumb is incorrect, and we've explained why multiple times.
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Oct 31, 2018 4:58:20 GMT
ah, I forgot you are a pathologically ignorant too. Just from the top of my head: 1. CW:
"I don't care he killed my MOM!!!" Clobber Cobber (beats the "You must save Martha" crap) 2. AoU:
I can't have me no little babies, I feel like a monster. Please hide your zucchini in me, Hulk ( ) 3. GotG 1 Peter Quill: Dance-off, bro. Me and you. [as Peter dances he holds his hand out to Gamora] Gamora. [Gamora shakes her head] Subtle. Take it back. [Peter continues to dance] Ronan: What are you doing? Peter Quill: I'm distracting you, you big turd blossom. 4. GotG 2
Peter Quill: You put your turd in my bed, I shave you! Rocket: It won't be my turd it'll be one of Drax's Drax: Haha! Yes I have famously huge turds
5. Peter Quill: You shouldn't have killed my mom and squished my Walkman! 6. Laser Battle in WORD WAR II...pang, pang (no joke) The list of juvenile, mommy fixated, idiotic MCU dialogue is endless, this is likely why the films even in their heyday are not in the Top 250 charts, don't you think? You honestly have no appreciation for comedy. You always fixate on the "infamously huge turds" joke, but that's downright tame compared to what you'll find in your standard Mel Brooks, John Hughes, John Landis, Zucker brothers and Abrahams, or Harold Ramis film. If "huge turds" scandalized you so, "Stripes" would traumatize you. Also, your continued assertion about Tony's anger at the climax of Civil War being dumb is incorrect, and we've explained why multiple times. Nah, he's correct.
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Oct 31, 2018 16:51:13 GMT
You honestly have no appreciation for comedy. You always fixate on the "infamously huge turds" joke, but that's downright tame compared to what you'll find in your standard Mel Brooks, John Hughes, John Landis, Zucker brothers and Abrahams, or Harold Ramis film. If "huge turds" scandalized you so, "Stripes" would traumatize you. Also, your continued assertion about Tony's anger at the climax of Civil War being dumb is incorrect, and we've explained why multiple times. Nah, he's correct. I still am, innit?
Ironic how their appreciation of Gunn's hack comedy lead directly to their tolerance of Gunn's child abuse comedy in picture and poetry.
It's acquired taste, but "it's like poetry, it rhymes":
sorry, I stay with Lucas...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2018 16:58:30 GMT
5 out of the first 6 posters on this thread are either banned or deleted.
|
|