|
Post by DC-Fan on Sept 13, 2017 22:00:33 GMT
Spiderman Homecoming not only beat out Wonder Women on the Tomato-meter False. SM:H92% Average Rating: 7.6/10 90% liked it Average Rating: 4.3/5WW92% Average Rating: 7.6/10 90% liked it Average Rating: 4.3/5
LOL!!! A dumb MCU fan trying to use RT as proof that SMH is better than Wonder Woman. RT has Wonder Woman as the best superhero movie of all time: 50 Best Superhero Movies of All Time. Wonder Woman is the only superhero movie with an RT adjusted score over 108.
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Sept 13, 2017 22:15:04 GMT
False. SM:H92% Average Rating: 7.6/10 90% liked it Average Rating: 4.3/5WW92% Average Rating: 7.6/10 90% liked it Average Rating: 4.3/5
LOL!!! A dumb MCU fan trying to use RT as proof that SMH is better than Wonder Woman. RT has Wonder Woman as the best superhero movie of all time: 50 Best Superhero Movies of All Time. Wonder Woman is the only superhero movie with an RT adjusted score over 108.
According to RT, Homecoming is #4 with an adjusted score of 105. Not too shabby for a film you claim is awful.
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Sept 13, 2017 22:37:51 GMT
LOL!!! A dumb MCU fan trying to use RT as proof that SMH is better than Wonder Woman. RT has Wonder Woman as the best superhero movie of all time: 50 Best Superhero Movies of All Time. Wonder Woman is the only superhero movie with an RT adjusted score over 108.
According to RT, Homecoming is #4 with an adjusted score of 105. Not too shabby for a film you claim is awful. Seriously, why can't we just enjoy 4 great comic book films we've got this year? After all, 2017 gave us: 1. An extremely dark and gritty neo-western film. 2. A highly comedic space opera. 3. The first superheroine film that is actually good. 4. A very good high school comedy that focuses more on character growth than on action. And this November, we're getting an 80s-style fantasy action film in a similar vein with 'Heavy Metal'.
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Sept 13, 2017 22:42:47 GMT
According to RT, Homecoming is #4 with an adjusted score of 105. Not too shabby for a film you claim is awful. Seriously, why can't we just enjoy 4 great comic book films we've got this year? After all, 2017 gave us: 1. An extremely dark and gritty neo-western film. 2. A highly comedic space opera. 3. The first superheroine film that is actually good. 4. A very good high school comedy that focuses more on character growth than on action. And this November, we're getting an 80s-style fantasy action film in a similar vein with 'Heavy Metal'. Exactly, this has definitely been a great year for comic book movies from each studios (Fox, Warner Bros, and Marvel). So far, I've enjoyed all 4 comic book movies.
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Sept 13, 2017 22:54:21 GMT
Seriously, why can't we just enjoy 4 great comic book films we've got this year? After all, 2017 gave us: 1. An extremely dark and gritty neo-western film. 2. A highly comedic space opera. 3. The first superheroine film that is actually good. 4. A very good high school comedy that focuses more on character growth than on action. And this November, we're getting an 80s-style fantasy action film in a similar vein with 'Heavy Metal'. Exactly, this has definitely been a great year for comic book movies from each studios (Fox, Warner Bros, and Marvel). So far, I've enjoyed all 4 comic book movies. And if you expand to films that have clear comic book influences, this December is preparing us with an epic space opera that will make every single big-budget films of this year look like huge box office failures.
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Sept 13, 2017 23:03:08 GMT
Exactly, this has definitely been a great year for comic book movies from each studios (Fox, Warner Bros, and Marvel). So far, I've enjoyed all 4 comic book movies. And if you expand to films that have clear comic book influences, this December is preparing us with an epic space opera that will make every single big-budget films of this year look like huge box office failures. Christmas can't come soon enough.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Sept 13, 2017 23:10:47 GMT
Spiderman Homecoming not only beat out Wonder Women on the Tomato-meter False. SM:H92% Average Rating: 7.6/10 90% liked it Average Rating: 4.3/5WW92% Average Rating: 7.6/10 90% liked it Average Rating: 4.3/5
Silly wabbit. You think I didn't check before making that claim? Use your middle school math skills and you will see that I am correct. The true Tomato-meter percentage shows SMH beating WW.
|
|
|
Post by seahawksraawk00 on Sept 13, 2017 23:14:27 GMT
False. SM:H92% Average Rating: 7.6/10 90% liked it Average Rating: 4.3/5WW92% Average Rating: 7.6/10 90% liked it Average Rating: 4.3/5
LOL!!! A dumb MCU fan trying to use RT as proof that SMH is better than Wonder Woman. RT has Wonder Woman as the best superhero movie of all time: 50 Best Superhero Movies of All Time. Wonder Woman is the only superhero movie with an RT adjusted score over 108.
Yet, you say Guardians and Jessica Jones are terrible even tho they both have 90% on RottenTomatos. Is 90 not good?
|
|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Sept 13, 2017 23:17:11 GMT
False. SM:H92% Average Rating: 7.6/10 90% liked it Average Rating: 4.3/5WW92% Average Rating: 7.6/10 90% liked it Average Rating: 4.3/5
Silly wabbit. You think I didn't check before making that claim? Use your middle school math skills and you will see that I am correct. The true Tomato-meter percentage shows SMH beating WW. I'm sorry, but, I do not understand. I admit that I rarely use that site, but the numbers I posted are the only ones I see. I do not see anything labeled "true Tomato-meter percentage" ?
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Sept 13, 2017 23:25:08 GMT
No quite, cupcake. You found an editorial on RT that adjusts the actual RT score to favor movies that got more total reviews. SMH has the greater percentage of favorable reviews. That's what the Rotten Tomato Tomato-meter is all about.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Sept 13, 2017 23:33:12 GMT
The number you quoted is rounded. Since we are splitting hairs here, you must do the math to determine the actual percentage of favorable reviews. The numbers you need are right there on each movie's RT page (unlike the "adjusted score", which only appears in a buried editorial) SMH wins.
|
|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Sept 13, 2017 23:49:42 GMT
The number you quoted is rounded. Since we are splitting hairs here, you must do the math to determine the actual percentage of favorable reviews. The numbers you need are right there on each movie's RT page (unlike the "adjusted score", which only appears in a buried editorial) SMH wins. I still don't know what you are talking about. But, thanks for the reply.
|
|
nemesis617
Sophomore
@nemesis617
Posts: 167
Likes: 84
|
Post by nemesis617 on Sept 14, 2017 1:32:52 GMT
I wouldn't say SH flopped, but it has definitely been a disappointment, like in the same way as BvS and Suicide Squad. It hasn't been a disappointment in the slightest. Great film, great reviews, it's way outgrossed WW, and it's about to be the highest grossing Spiderman film of all time. Where do you get disappointment from? Are you just trolling? I have no idea why people make comments like you do. I was speaking in terms of domestic gross. I expected this film to do well over 400m by now, (WW has grossed 400m+ domestically) so in those terms it was a disappointment. But like a lot of films there is always the foreign markets to bail them out. Ohh and I'm not trolling ...are you?
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Sept 14, 2017 1:34:44 GMT
No quite, cupcake. You found an editorial on RT that adjusts the actual RT score to favor movies that got more total reviews. SMH has the greater percentage of favorable reviews. That's what the Rotten Tomato Tomato-meter is all about. No, it's a score that's normalized using Bayesian statistical formulas which are standard practice in the field of statistics. The Bayesan score is a more accurate reflection of the true RT score for a movie. It's similar to how the IMDb rating isn't simply an average of all votes but a weighted average to give a more accurate reflection of the vote.
Bottom line: RT has Wonder Woman rated as the best superhero movie of all time.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Sept 14, 2017 1:36:41 GMT
The number you quoted is rounded. Since we are splitting hairs here, you must do the math to determine the actual percentage of favorable reviews. The numbers you need are right there on each movie's RT page (unlike the "adjusted score", which only appears in a buried editorial) SMH wins. I still don't know what you are talking about. But, thanks for the reply. King Kong Brady is just trying to bullshit as usual. The bottom line is that RT has Wonder Woman rated as the best superhero movie of all time: 50 Best Superhero Movies of All Time.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Sept 14, 2017 1:38:02 GMT
It hasn't been a disappointment in the slightest. Great film, great reviews, it's way outgrossed WW, and it's about to be the highest grossing Spiderman film of all time. Where do you get disappointment from? Are you just trolling? I have no idea why people make comments like you do. I was speaking in terms of domestic gross. I expected this film to do well over 400m by now, (WW has grossed 400m+ domestically) so in those terms it was a disappointment. But like a lot of films there is always the foreign markets to bail them out. Ohh and I'm not trolling ...are you? I don't know why you set your expectations at 400 domestic and then claim it's disappointing. It just sounds like you disappointed yourself for having those expectations in the first place. And foreign markets don't bail them out, they are every bit as equally valid. If anything, the domestic market bailed out WW if you really want to start parsing it like that. Again, I'm not sure why you're looking at it from any of these angles, because none of them really make any sense.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Sept 14, 2017 2:41:59 GMT
If the "adjusted score" had any real relevance, then it would be listed on the main RT page of each film.
It is not.
For a good reason.
The RT score is the percentage of positive reviews. If you try to turn it into a statistical representation of a larger population, then you must factor in a confidence interval, which means there is a margin of error much larger than the tiny "adjusted score" difference in that editorial of yours.
In this case, comparison between "adjusted scores" is completely meaningless unless the difference is in the neighborhood of 5% or more. Not the 0.2% you've been wetting yourselves over.
You don't understand statistics, ok fine .... but holy Christ, we're now talking about simple math. Did you even finish high school, Ace?
SMH 268/290 = 92.41%
WW 313/340 = 92.06%
SMH wins! DC-Fan loses ... again.
|
|
nemesis617
Sophomore
@nemesis617
Posts: 167
Likes: 84
|
Post by nemesis617 on Sept 14, 2017 3:16:22 GMT
I was speaking in terms of domestic gross. I expected this film to do well over 400m by now, (WW has grossed 400m+ domestically) so in those terms it was a disappointment. But like a lot of films there is always the foreign markets to bail them out. Ohh and I'm not trolling ...are you? I don't know why you set your expectations at 400 domestic and then claim it's disappointing. It just sounds like you disappointed yourself for having those expectations in the first place. And foreign markets don't bail them out, they are every bit as equally valid. If anything, the domestic market bailed out WW if you really want to start parsing it like that. Again, I'm not sure why you're looking at it from any of these angles, because none of them really make any sense. Arch... the domestic market is where the money is at. Studios and distributors would rather see a film perform better domestically than internationally. They make more money that way because they get a larger chunk of the profits. It makes perfect sense when you think about it, considering they have to share the profits with foreign governments etc. I'm not saying the foreign market is not important, it is, but you're not seeing the bottom line. Spiderman:Homecoming is a disappointment in terms of domestic box office. Why do you always hear everyone say that BvS was a disappointment? It grossed almost 900m worldwide. That doesn't sound like a let down to me but yet the movie is still deemed "a disappointment." It is the same situation with SH.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Sept 14, 2017 3:23:47 GMT
I don't know why you set your expectations at 400 domestic and then claim it's disappointing. It just sounds like you disappointed yourself for having those expectations in the first place. And foreign markets don't bail them out, they are every bit as equally valid. If anything, the domestic market bailed out WW if you really want to start parsing it like that. Again, I'm not sure why you're looking at it from any of these angles, because none of them really make any sense. Arch... the domestic market is where the money is at. Studios and distributors would rather see a film perform better domestically than internationally. They make more money that way because they get a larger chunk of the profits. It makes perfect sense when you think about it, considering they have to share the profits with foreign governments etc. I'm not saying the foreign market is not important, it is, but you're not seeing the bottom line. Spiderman:Homecoming is a disappointment in terms of domestic box office. Why do you always hear everyone say that BvS was a disappointment? It grossed almost 900m worldwide. That doesn't sound like a let down to me but yet the movie is still deemed "a disappointment." It is the same situation with SH. Ok, and it still didn't disappoint. The explanation here about markets is irrelevant to that.
BVS isn't a disappointment because of the domestic gross. It's a disappointment because it came up 300 million short of Civil War, the film it tried to compete with and then eventually moved dates to avoid. The fact that Spiderman alone is about to pass it, is another example it BVS coming up short, and that's the same Spiderman film you're trying to say is a disappointment. A Spiderman film that is going to be right there as the highest grossing in the franchise
I honestly don't know how you think what you're saying makes any sense. Calling it a disappoint in any way, is just silly talk. I mean are you going to keep this up, seriously?
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Sept 14, 2017 4:04:57 GMT
I don't know why you set your expectations at 400 domestic and then claim it's disappointing. It just sounds like you disappointed yourself for having those expectations in the first place. And foreign markets don't bail them out, they are every bit as equally valid. If anything, the domestic market bailed out WW if you really want to start parsing it like that. Again, I'm not sure why you're looking at it from any of these angles, because none of them really make any sense. Spiderman:Homecoming is a disappointment in terms of domestic box office. Why do you always hear everyone say that BvS was a disappointment? It grossed almost 900m worldwide. That doesn't sound like a let down to me but yet the movie is still deemed "a disappointment." It is the same situation with SH. Agreed. If MCU fanboys are going to claim that BvS is a disappointment, then they also have to admit that SMH was a huge disappointment.
|
|