|
|
Post by scienceisgod on Aug 1, 2017 23:12:45 GMT
The scientific authorities say homosexuals make better parents than heterosexuals. How long until they insist transgenders are better at giving birth than cisgenders? Think of all the resources/carbon dioxide wasted on this. Wouldn't they have been better spent finding a way to prevent transgenderism? It's a very expensive disorder to have, and preventing it might involve cleaning up our environment, a win-win for most people, but a lose-lose for certain vested interests. It's not expensive to have the disorder. It's only expensive to have surgery etc. But that's only because of the fncked up way that we've structured our economy. That's what needs to be fixed. Pedophilia is good, it's just the child rape that's bad. That's what it sounds like you're saying. Big Pharma disagrees with you. They know that these people are an extrmely lucrative market because they will be customers for life, for hormone pills, required psychiatric therapy sessions, probably surgeries, probably anti-depressants, painkillers, etc... You don't go into a shop at the mall, walk out with a sex change, and that's the end of it. You need to be monitored for life, to fill and refill dozens of prescriptions. These things aren't good for your health, which wasn't good to begin with having a condition necessitating medical intervention. Like someone else asked, can this person breastfeed? Soy infant formula will ensure that the kid is a customer for life too. You said in another thread that the only reason transgenders are prone to depression is because society is mean to them. But depression is a disease of affluence. Blacks aren't more likely to be depressed than whites. It's the opposite. Transgenders are more likely to be depressed because they have deranged endocrine systems. So too, it's not our economic system that makes transgenderism expensive. It's biology. No amount of restructuring our economy to suit the needs of a special interest will change that. |
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Aug 1, 2017 23:25:20 GMT
It's not expensive to have the disorder. It's only expensive to have surgery etc. But that's only because of the fncked up way that we've structured our economy. That's what needs to be fixed. Pedophilia is good, it's just the child rape that's bad. That's what it sounds like you're saying. Not that I'm disagreeing or agreeing with that, but it makes no sense that you'd be reading me that way. I didn't say anything about transgenderism being good or bad. I said something about it being expensive. It's the surgery that's expensive. |
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Aug 1, 2017 23:27:46 GMT
You said in another thread that the only reason transgenders are prone to depression is because society is mean to them. I wouldn't have said that. Do you have a link? |
|
|
|
Post by scienceisgod on Aug 1, 2017 23:55:17 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by femalefan on Aug 2, 2017 0:32:44 GMT
Since men lack the parts to bear children, it was a woman pretending to be a man who gave birth.
|
|
|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Aug 2, 2017 0:40:01 GMT
Bigotry in 5...4...3...2...1...GO! Oh dude you should see the comments sections on the news sites reporting it. So many people so damn pissed that this couple is happy as can be. How could people having no idea what words mean even their own not be a reason for a party? |
|
|
|
Post by theauxphou on Aug 2, 2017 8:07:08 GMT
Did he impregnate himself, or? 🤔
|
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Aug 2, 2017 8:29:44 GMT
Oh dude you should see the comments sections on the news sites reporting it. So many people so damn pissed that this couple is happy as can be. How could people having no idea what words mean even their own not be a reason for a party? Deep. |
|
|
|
Post by Karl Aksel on Aug 2, 2017 13:05:27 GMT
Did he impregnate himself, or? 🤔 After so many instances of "go fuck yourself" throughout history, it was bound to happen one day. |
|
|
|
Post by theauxphou on Aug 2, 2017 13:22:51 GMT
|
|
The Lost One
Junior Member
@lostkiera
Posts: 2,707
Likes: 1,343
|
Post by The Lost One on Aug 2, 2017 16:22:18 GMT
Oh dude you should see the comments sections on the news sites reporting it. So many people so damn pissed that this couple is happy as can be. How could people having no idea what words mean even their own not be a reason for a party? Maybe they argued with dictionaries and won. |
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Aug 2, 2017 17:50:08 GMT
Iit kind of is a sad story. People's confusions being exploited for media clicks or whatever. Perhaps even this story does a disservice to the transgender agenda. Makes it look more like the transgender person is confused about what having a male body entails. If the person wanted a body with a womb then what made them believe there was a man trapped in their female body? Just the opposite really. It's a "man" with female genitalia and reproductive organs. That's the definition of confused. |
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Aug 2, 2017 18:05:54 GMT
They don't seem at all confused or unhappy. Just the opposite really. It's a man" with female genitalia and reproductive organs. That's the definition of confused. Best adjust. As tech gets us further and further away from the primal existence that required two separate gender roles, we're probably only going to see more and more people eschewing those roles. |
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Aug 2, 2017 18:21:16 GMT
It's a man" with female genitalia and reproductive organs. That's the definition of confused. Best adjust. As tech gets us further and further away from the primal existence that required two separate gender roles, we're probably only going to see more and more people eschewing those roles. You spelled natural wrong. |
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Aug 2, 2017 19:25:31 GMT
Best adjust. As tech gets us further and further away from the primal existence that required two separate gender roles, we're probably only going to see more and more people eschewing those roles. You spelled natural wrong. Cute. But it doesn't really speak to the changes we've seen going from tribal hunter-gatherers to large population centers and mutual cooperation. Just not as much need for chest pounders vs. child-rearing house maids any more. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 2, 2017 19:54:13 GMT
You spelled natural wrong. Cute. But it doesn't really speak to the changes we've seen going from tribal hunter-gatherers to large population centers and mutual cooperation. Just not as much need for chest pounders vs. child-rearing house maids any more. Oh the terrible trap of believing the caveman myth that man pre recorded history was in some way inferior to what man is today. No proof. It is without basis to suggest that our forefathers were more 'Chest pounders' and backward. It is demeaning to refer to our ancestors as mere chest beaters or house maids. They were no more or less human than you or I. If you think them inferior without basis, you think man in the current century as superior without basis too. |
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Aug 2, 2017 20:30:05 GMT
I don't think fixed gender roles (which have varied widely by culture) becoming somewhat outdated and less necessary makes their initial iteration "inferior". It was simply necessary for its time, less so now.
I think you're taking some flip phrasing a little too literally. The fact is it takes less of what we think of as "masculinity" to sit at a keyboard flying a drone than it did to don a full suit of armor, mount a horse and ride off to pound some skulls in defense of one's kingdom. Tech progresses, culture changes - the idea that gender roles (or even, given time, biological sex) would remain stagnant in the face of that seems forced. Even such things as women shrugging off the "stay at home baby caretaker" and pushing their way into the work force and leadership roles over the past century is an example of discarding "standard" gender roles. Times change.
Definitely going overboard, man. No one is "dehumanizing" anyone.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Aug 2, 2017 20:32:48 GMT
It's not expensive to have the disorder. It's only expensive to have surgery etc. But that's only because of the fncked up way that we've structured our economy. That's what needs to be fixed. Pedophilia is good, it's just the child rape that's bad. That's what it sounds like you're saying.  Awesome. Because fucking a kid's body and changing one's own are just parallels, y'all. |
|
|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Aug 3, 2017 0:08:34 GMT
How could people having no idea what words mean even their own not be a reason for a party? Maybe they argued with dictionaries and won. Yeah, there's a lot of that going around. |
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Aug 3, 2017 16:35:59 GMT
tpfkar It's a "man" with female genitalia and reproductive organs. That's the definition of confused. I don't know why it's hard to conceive of people's brains not lining up with their sex organs. We're made up of all kinds of physical ranges and in-betweens that we ceaselessly work to direct and constrain socially.
AIS |
|
