|
|
Post by hairybuttcheeks on Mar 4, 2017 20:40:41 GMT
CTOWN dude,this guy admitted to another poster on here in person ( i won't mention who it is for privacy reasons ) that he just does this to get a rise out of people. he is trolling, plain and simple, because he is a midget ginger with no friends and a dick that has never entered a vagina
|
|
zoilus
Junior Member
@zoilus
Posts: 2,831
Likes: 1,683
|
Post by zoilus on Mar 4, 2017 21:39:20 GMT
dcfan has neglected to reply to my last 4 posts in this thread.
Am I crazy or has he blocked me?
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Mar 5, 2017 0:36:53 GMT
The NFL did release the findings. They said no violations were found. That is a finding - no violations were found.
And it doesn't matter how many people are watching. The whole country followed the O.J. trial. The finding from the jury was Not Guilty. Did the court release a transcript or videotape of the jury deliberations? Did the court have each jury member step in front of a camera and tell the millions of people watching why they voted Not Guilty?
Nope. They just said Not Guilty and that's the only finding the public needed to know. Same with the PSI levels. The NFL said there were no violations and that's the only finding the public needs to know.
And you continue to push the bounds of stupidity. You see, in the OJ trial, we all knew what the jury knew. We saw the evidence. The reasonable doubt. The way the prosecution botched the case. What the NFL is doing is not showing any of the evidence and saying to take their word for it. Did the prosecution make their case by simply saying "He's guilty and we have the evidence to prove it, but we aren't going to show it, just take our word for it. Of course not, just like the defense didn't plead that he is not guilty and to take their word for it. The showed actuall evidence to make their case. So if there are no violations found, why doesn't the NFL show the actual evidence? I'll tell you why, because the actual evidence shows a nattural deflation of footballs in cold weather. There's no evidence to show because there were no violations. When a driver goes through a red light at an intersection monitored by a traffic camera, the driver gets a citation in the mail and a photo of the driver driving the car through the intersection while the light is red is included with the citation in the mail. But for drivers who don't go through a red light, they aren't going to get anything in the mail that says "Congratulations, we have evidence that you didn't go through a red light at this intersection."
The NFL only needs to show the evidence if there was a violation, such as in the case of DeflateGate, in which the NFL published the PSIs proving that the Patriots footballs were well under the legal limit. If there's no violation, then there's no evidence to show and no need to show any evidence.
|
|
zoilus
Junior Member
@zoilus
Posts: 2,831
Likes: 1,683
|
Post by zoilus on Mar 5, 2017 1:22:11 GMT
There's no evidence to show because there were no violations. Physically impossible. There was the Vikings-Seahawks game around 0F. This is a game the NFL said it would test pressures for. Any ball measured at 70F inside pre-game at 12.5psig then measured at halftime when it's ~0F would have its pressure drop to about 9psig. This isn't speculation, it's very simple science. If it's the NFL's (read: Goodell's) assertion that no pressure violation took place at this game, they (he) is absolutely lying. Sure there's evidence. If Goodell wanted to be transparent, he would have had the refs videotape the pressure measurements both pre-game and at halftime. Hell they could have live-streamed them. Could have used a thermal imaging camera to see the temp of the air inside each football. That would have been the scientific and transparent way to do things. |
|
