|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Oct 6, 2017 5:21:30 GMT
Justice League will get a 72% Fresh. Thor: Ragnorok will surprisingly get a 68% on RT. Keep dreaming, loser. What makes him think Justice League will get over 70% and Thor: Ragnarok under 70%? I mean, the Thor trailers have been better than the Justice League trailers.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2017 5:22:27 GMT
And it was the first halfway decent superheroine film, so they were obligated to go easy on it. Use the exact same script, but have an island full of Greek male warriors, and they'd have eviscerated it for being too derivative. Perhaps, the last third had the bad case of Snyder writing to me. The entire film had a bad case of Snyder writing, but Penkins' was a good enough director to work with it, somehow. I still hate the complete overhauling and invalidation of Diana's entire backstory. Revising the hero's story is something you do, like, two or three film iterations down the line, not right out of the gate.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2017 5:23:37 GMT
What makes him think Justice League will get over 70% and Thor: Ragnarok under 70%? I mean, the Thor trailers have been better than the Justice League trailers. Don't you know? He takes online course over at Bob Gray's Skuul of Sycology. That totally qualifies him to foretell the future.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2017 5:25:03 GMT
What score would Thor 3 have to get for you to be disappointed in its critical reception? Below 80%? I won't get disappointed by Thor 3's critical reception, because I've never given a toss about what stuffy old critics think. Only ever mention them to give people like mello or DC-Fan a hard time.
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Oct 6, 2017 5:27:21 GMT
What makes him think Justice League will get over 70% and Thor: Ragnarok under 70%? I mean, the Thor trailers have been better than the Justice League trailers. Don't you know? He takes online course over at Bob Gray's Skuul of Sycology. That totally qualifies him to foretell the future. He's as bad as a fortune teller as DC-Fan. That moron predicted Batman vs. Superman world have better reviews than Civil War and do better at the box office. The dumbass predicted it would gross $1.5 billion.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2017 5:29:18 GMT
Don't you know? He takes online course over at Bob Gray's Skuul of Sycology. That totally qualifies him to foretell the future. He's as bad as a fortune teller as DC-Fan. That moron predicted Batman vs. Superman world have better reviews than Civil War and do better at the box office. The dumbass predicted it would gross $1.5 billion. Yeah, DCEU fans need to stop making predictions when they have no guarantee their franchise can even do $900 million at the box office.
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Oct 6, 2017 5:31:38 GMT
What score would Thor 3 have to get for you to be disappointed in its critical reception? Below 80%? I won't get disappointed by Thor 3's critical reception, because I've never given a toss about what stuffy old critics think. Only ever mention them to give people like mello or DC-Fan a hard time. Speaking of mello, remember his Twitter meltdown? When reviews hit Batman vs Superman and its low Rotten Tomatoes score, he flipped out. "FUCK ROTTEN TOMATOES!" He said, and a bunch of nonsense saying RT is basically saying Sharknado is better than BvS. He obviously cares what critics say about the cinematic universe he champions.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2017 5:36:49 GMT
I won't get disappointed by Thor 3's critical reception, because I've never given a toss about what stuffy old critics think. Only ever mention them to give people like mello or DC-Fan a hard time. Speaking of mello, remember his Twitter meltdown? When reviews hit Batman vs Superman and its low Rotten Tomatoes score, he flipped out. "FUCK ROTTEN TOMATOES!" He said, and a bunch of nonsense saying RT is basically saying Sharknado is better than BvS. He obviously cares what critics say about the cinematic universe he champions. Well, Sharknado IS better than BvS! Hell, I'd rewatch Pumaman before I suffered through BvS again. Also...
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Oct 6, 2017 5:49:50 GMT
Speaking of mello, remember his Twitter meltdown? When reviews hit Batman vs Superman and its low Rotten Tomatoes score, he flipped out. "FUCK ROTTEN TOMATOES!" He said, and a bunch of nonsense saying RT is basically saying Sharknado is better than BvS. He obviously cares what critics say about the cinematic universe he champions. Well, Sharknado IS better than BvS! Hell, I'd rewatch Pumaman before I suffered through BvS again. Also...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2017 8:28:59 GMT
I won't get disappointed by Thor 3's critical reception, because I've never given a toss about what stuffy old critics think. Only ever mention them to give people like mello or DC-Fan a hard time. Speaking of mello, remember his Twitter meltdown? When reviews hit Batman vs Superman and its low Rotten Tomatoes score, he flipped out. "FUCK ROTTEN TOMATOES!" He said, and a bunch of nonsense saying RT is basically saying Sharknado is better than BvS. He obviously cares what critics say about the cinematic universe he champions. I remember him celebrating a "huge DC win" after BvS's opening weekend . After the huge week 2 drop off, he was still predicting BvS would take like $1.3 billion worldwide because of general audiences' "good word of mouth." Following another big drop off in week 3, he remained confident BvS would still pass the $1 billion mark . Sometime during weeks 4 and 5, reality must have set in - his IMDB account and Twitter account disappeared along with all of his deeply embarrassing proclamations and rants . Good times......never to be forgotton.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2017 15:49:35 GMT
Speaking of mello, remember his Twitter meltdown? When reviews hit Batman vs Superman and its low Rotten Tomatoes score, he flipped out. "FUCK ROTTEN TOMATOES!" He said, and a bunch of nonsense saying RT is basically saying Sharknado is better than BvS. He obviously cares what critics say about the cinematic universe he champions. I remember him celebrating a "huge DC win" after BvS's opening weekend . After the huge week 2 drop off, he was still predicting BvS would take like $1.3 billion worldwide because of general audiences' "good word of mouth." Following another big drop off in week 3, he remained confident BvS would still pass the $1 billion mark . Sometime during weeks 4 and 5, reality must have set in - his IMDB account and Twitter account disappeared along with all of his deeply embarrassing proclimations and rants . Good times......never to be forgotton. You should have copypasted them, so you can post them and we experience them all again, together.
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Oct 6, 2017 20:28:45 GMT
Well, Wonder Woman received critical acclaim, but maybe because it wasn't a Zack Snyder movie. And it was the first halfway decent superheroine film, so they were obligated to go easy on it. Use the exact same script, but have an island full of Greek male warriors, and they'd have eviscerated it for being too derivative. Or the majority of critics simply considered it a good movie.
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Oct 6, 2017 20:40:48 GMT
Alright, old chaps. I'm jumping back in!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2017 21:03:39 GMT
And it was the first halfway decent superheroine film, so they were obligated to go easy on it. Use the exact same script, but have an island full of Greek male warriors, and they'd have eviscerated it for being too derivative. Or the majority of critics simply considered it a good movie. Maybe in 2007, but not 2017.
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Oct 6, 2017 21:40:56 GMT
Or the majority of critics simply considered it a good movie. Maybe in 2007, but not 2017. So what about the audiences? It had better legs than any other CBM of the 21st century. Did the general public have some kind of PC agenda when they decided to watch the movie multiple times?
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Oct 6, 2017 22:20:57 GMT
Maybe in 2007, but not 2017. So what about the audiences? It had better legs than any other CBM of the 21st century. Did the general public have some kind of PC agenda when they decided to watch the movie multiple times? The artificial boost it got from being the first decent (not GOOD, just decent) DCEU movie was enough to attract plenty of audience-goers. It washed away the bad taste of SS and BvS.
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Oct 6, 2017 22:23:31 GMT
So what about the audiences? It had better legs than any other CBM of the 21st century. Did the general public have some kind of PC agenda when they decided to watch the movie multiple times? The artificial boost it got from being the first decent (not GOOD, just decent) DCEU movie was enough to attract plenty of audience-goers. It washed away the bad taste of SS and BvS. Don’t you ever get tired of calling everything an “artificial booster”?
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Oct 6, 2017 22:54:20 GMT
The artificial boost it got from being the first decent (not GOOD, just decent) DCEU movie was enough to attract plenty of audience-goers. It washed away the bad taste of SS and BvS. Don’t you ever get tired of calling everything an “artificial booster”? Not when that's what they are.
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Oct 6, 2017 22:55:50 GMT
Don’t you ever get tired of calling everything an “artificial booster”? Not when that's what they are. Wouldn’t it be easier to just acknowledge that people like WW, instead of coming up with all these excuses for why it did so well?
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Oct 6, 2017 23:17:28 GMT
Not when that's what they are. Wouldn’t it be easier to just acknowledge that people like WW, instead of coming up with all these excuses for why it did so well? Because the artificial boosters are too obvious.
|
|