|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Oct 10, 2017 21:41:59 GMT
So you complain when the movies are too connected to one another, and then you complain when they decide to make something more standalone (although you do need to see prior films to get this one). What do you want? For you to solve the word search! What do we want? WORD SEARCH!When do we want it? NOW!!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2017 22:48:46 GMT
So you complain when the movies are too connected to one another, and then you complain when they decide to make something more standalone (although you do need to see prior films to get this one). What do you want? I myself have never complained when they’re connected to each other. And if we’re supposed to think that there is some grand plan at work (or even a little forethought) then these instalments should have some relevance to later films. If you look at the three Thor films alone they just feel like a disjointed franchise, and hardly a trilogy. That complaint only applies to Thor: The Dark World, because the first film leads directly into The Avengers. There IS a grand plan at work and a ton of forethought. Your pathetic attempt at trolling is a mild annoyance, at best. So because the Thor films have had some issues, that means the whole MCU is crap? Leave.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Oct 10, 2017 23:06:44 GMT
So you complain when the movies are too connected to one another, and then you complain when they decide to make something more standalone (although you do need to see prior films to get this one). What do you want? I myself have never complained when they’re connected to each other. And if we’re supposed to think that there is some grand plan at work (or even a little forethought) then these instalments should have some relevance to later films. If you look at the three Thor films alone they just feel like a disjointed franchise, and hardly a trilogy. Thor 1 explained the Asgardians and how they left stuff on Earth. The Tesseract, which was core to First Avenger and the Avengers (along with Loki) is one such thing. Also, Howard Stark's studies on the Tesseract is what led him to create the Arc Reactor which led to Iron Man. Then Dark World gave us another Infinity Stone and set up the Collector for GOTG. Off the top of my head.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2017 23:09:12 GMT
I myself have never complained when they’re connected to each other. And if we’re supposed to think that there is some grand plan at work (or even a little forethought) then these instalments should have some relevance to later films. If you look at the three Thor films alone they just feel like a disjointed franchise, and hardly a trilogy. Thor 1 explained the Asgardians and how they left stuff on Earth. The Tesseract, which was core to First Avenger and the Avengers (along with Loki) is one such thing. Also, Howard Stark's studies on the Tesseract is what led him to create the Arc Reactor which led to Iron Man. Then Dark World gave us another Infinity Stone and set up the Collector for GOTG. Off the top of my head. He'll ignore that, because it doesn't suit his needs. He wants to tear the MCU down a notch, and so he will substitute our reality for his.
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Oct 10, 2017 23:18:49 GMT
Thor 1 explained the Asgardians and how they left stuff on Earth. The Tesseract, which was core to First Avenger and the Avengers (along with Loki) is one such thing. Also, Howard Stark's studies on the Tesseract is what led him to create the Arc Reactor which led to Iron Man. Then Dark World gave us another Infinity Stone and set up the Collector for GOTG. Off the top of my head. He'll ignore that, because it doesn't suit his needs. He wants to tear the MCU down a notch, and so he will substitute our reality for his. Psst! Tell formersamhmd to do the word search, innit?
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Oct 11, 2017 3:45:01 GMT
So you complain when the movies are too connected to one another, and then you complain when they decide to make something more standalone (although you do need to see prior films to get this one). What do you want? I myself have never complained when they’re connected to each other. And if we’re supposed to think that there is some grand plan at work (or even a little forethought) then these instalments should have some relevance to later films. If you look at the three Thor films alone they just feel like a disjointed franchise, and hardly a trilogy. Well, Thor: Ragnarok isn't connected to the other MCU movies because Thor: Ragnarok is an Elseworlds movie (like the Joker origin movie that WB is planning). That's why Thor: Ragnarok has a version of the Hulk that can form complete sentences whereas the in the other MCU movies you can count the number of words in Hulk's entire vocabulary with just 1 hand.
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Oct 11, 2017 3:58:16 GMT
I myself have never complained when they’re connected to each other. And if we’re supposed to think that there is some grand plan at work (or even a little forethought) then these instalments should have some relevance to later films. If you look at the three Thor films alone they just feel like a disjointed franchise, and hardly a trilogy. Well, Thor: Ragnarok isn't connected to the other MCU movies because Thor: Ragnarok is an Elseworlds movie (like the Joker origin movie that WB is planning). That's why Thor: Ragnarok has a version of the Hulk that can form complete sentences whereas the in the other MCU movies you can count the number of words in Hulk's entire vocabulary with just 1 hand. So between this and Homecoming, does the MCU even have a shred of unbroken continuity left?! This is getting embarrassing. Guys, I'm worried about the MCU's continuity! Innit?
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Oct 11, 2017 5:25:41 GMT
As much as I love the MCU I have to say he really goes overboard when praising it. Well, somebody has to, because most of the other topics around here go overboard with bashing it. ^^ a criminal's logic and reasoning: the ends justify all means, all extremes are necessary because "they" are worse and "they" attacked first. In the raptor's fanatical mind this will legitimize excessive bullying, racial slurs, random insults, spreading lies and misinformation, honey trapping and soliciting via abysmal fanfic...
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Oct 11, 2017 8:16:14 GMT
I myself have never complained when they’re connected to each other. And if we’re supposed to think that there is some grand plan at work (or even a little forethought) then these instalments should have some relevance to later films. If you look at the three Thor films alone they just feel like a disjointed franchise, and hardly a trilogy. Well, Thor: Ragnarok isn't connected to the other MCU movies because Thor: Ragnarok is an Elseworlds movie. It deals directly with the fallout of Dark World. The Hulk's arrival is as a result of events in Ultron. Doctor Strange appears so there might be a connection there. Whatever happens to Thor in Ragnarok seems to result in him crossing paths with the Guardians...maybe there are connections. Maybe there aren't. Perhaps you can expand further, you seem to have some inside knowledge of the film. Please share. No the reason he can talk more is because since the events of Ultron he has been stuck in Hulk form on another planet the whole time and has increased his vocabulary. Children can increase vocab over a few years, foreigners can...why can't The Hulk, someone with an already limited vocabulary and a decent comprehension of the English language. If I had a penny for everytime you got owned I'd have enough for a magic boat.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2017 9:57:29 GMT
Thor 1 explained the Asgardians and how they left stuff on Earth. The Tesseract, which was core to First Avenger and the Avengers (along with Loki) is one such thing. Also, Howard Stark's studies on the Tesseract is what led him to create the Arc Reactor which led to Iron Man. Then Dark World gave us another Infinity Stone and set up the Collector for GOTG. Off the top of my head. He'll ignore that, because it doesn't suit his needs. He wants to tear the MCU down a notch, and so he will substitute our reality for his. I mean the Thor films themselves. They’re disjointed. The tone is inconsistent, characters are discarded and there is little to no character development.
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Oct 11, 2017 10:20:33 GMT
He'll ignore that, because it doesn't suit his needs. He wants to tear the MCU down a notch, and so he will substitute our reality for his. I mean the Thor films themselves. They’re disjointed. The tone is inconsistent, characters are discarded and there is little to no character development. To be fair, that applies eg to the Cap movie series too:
His character arc is nice-good-guy-becomes-good-guy-BEEFCAKE-by-lab-magic. The films are extremely inconsistent: first one a WW2 film with laser guns, time travel and Hail Hydra tamatohead villains (6/10), second one is a faux-70ies "Hail Hydra" conspiracy thriller with a lot of fake deaths (6.5).
And the last one...well...that was not really about Cap or his Hail Hydra fiends anymore, was it? It's more about Spiderman/Black Panther origins and Iron Man's mommy issues, and the Avengers+ coming to funny blows at an airport brawl (4/6). Better title: Captain America: Aborted or Coitus Interruptus
Really thats even messier than DC films, what happened to the Hail Hydra Nazi storyline..? Where they defeated in part 2? Where did that storyline go, iz as if after EmpireStrikesback we get a final Jedi civil war movie but without the Empire...speak about badly written villains...
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Oct 11, 2017 10:34:36 GMT
I mean the Thor films themselves. They’re disjointed. The tone is inconsistent, characters are discarded and there is little to no character development. To be fair, that applies eg to the Cap movie series too:
His character arc is nice-good-guy-becomes-good-guy-BEEFCAKE-by-lab-magic. The films are extremely inconsistent: first one a WW2 film with laser guns, time travel and Hail Hydra tamatohead villains (6/10), second one is a faux-70ies "Hail Hydra" conspiracy thriller with a lot of fake deaths (6.5).
And the last one...well...that was not really about Cap or his Hail Hydra fiends anymore, was it? It's more about Spiderman/Black Panther origins and Iron Man's mommy issues, and the Avengers+ coming to funny blows at an airport brawl (4/6). Better title: Captain America: Aborted or Coitus Interruptus
Really thats even messier than DC films, what happened to the Hail Hydra Nazi storyline..? Where they defeated in part 2? Where did that storyline go, iz as if after EmpireStrikesback we get a final Jedi civil war movie but without the Empire...speak about badly written villains... Hydra were defeated in Winter Soldier (though Hydra stories about the fallout continued in Agents Of SHIELD). They are touched upon subsequently in Ultron and Civil War(which was partly dealing with the lagcy of Hydra), they are only the main protagonist in the Cap films (and Agents Of SHIELD) and not the whole of the MCU. The individual films mostly have their own "Nemesis" - with the occasional crossover (Loki for instance) but the Big Bad for the MCU is Thanos, who seems to be a puppet master over the series.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Oct 11, 2017 11:37:23 GMT
I myself have never complained when they’re connected to each other. And if we’re supposed to think that there is some grand plan at work (or even a little forethought) then these instalments should have some relevance to later films. If you look at the three Thor films alone they just feel like a disjointed franchise, and hardly a trilogy. Well, Thor: Ragnarok isn't connected to the other MCU movies because Thor: Ragnarok is an Elseworlds movie (like the Joker origin movie that WB is planning). That's why Thor: Ragnarok has a version of the Hulk that can form complete sentences whereas the in the other MCU movies you can count the number of words in Hulk's entire vocabulary with just 1 hand. They explained that, Hulk has been Hulk ever since he was kidnapped off Earth at the end of AOU. Staying in the Hulk form that long allowed him to develop his intelligence. Honestly, try harder.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Oct 11, 2017 11:39:42 GMT
He'll ignore that, because it doesn't suit his needs. He wants to tear the MCU down a notch, and so he will substitute our reality for his. I mean the Thor films themselves. They’re disjointed. The tone is inconsistent, characters are discarded and there is little to no character development. First people complain that the MCU tone is too similar and too connected. Now you say the Thor movies are inconsistent with their tone. As for character development, the movies are more about Thor and Loki above all else (like how the X-Men movies shaft everyone except Xavier, Magneto and Logan) and they get development. What do you want?
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Oct 11, 2017 11:40:47 GMT
His character arc is nice-good-guy-becomes-good-guy-BEEFCAKE-by-lab-magic. The films are extremely inconsistent No, they just don't have him fight the same villains over and over and over again and the movies try different things. DC and FOX could learn a few things. Basically, it's like if someone at DC decided to have Batman NOT be an incompetent and he fights people outside of Gotham.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2017 12:12:06 GMT
Well, somebody has to, because most of the other topics around here go overboard with bashing it. ^^ a criminal's logic and reasoning: the ends justify all means, all extremes are necessary because "they" are worse and "they" attacked first. In the raptor's fanatical mind this will legitimize excessive bullying, racial slurs, random insults, spreading lies and misinformation, honey trapping and soliciting via abysmal fanfic... Why attack at all? Useless and it makes one look petty.
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Oct 11, 2017 12:51:43 GMT
Well, Thor: Ragnarok isn't connected to the other MCU movies because Thor: Ragnarok is an Elseworlds movie (like the Joker origin movie that WB is planning). That's why Thor: Ragnarok has a version of the Hulk that can form complete sentences whereas the in the other MCU movies you can count the number of words in Hulk's entire vocabulary with just 1 hand. They explained that, Hulk has been Hulk ever since he was kidnapped off Earth at the end of AOU. Staying in the Hulk form that long allowed him to develop his intelligence. Honestly, try harder. did they explain that in one of the movies?
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Oct 11, 2017 12:57:46 GMT
They explained that, Hulk has been Hulk ever since he was kidnapped off Earth at the end of AOU. Staying in the Hulk form that long allowed him to develop his intelligence. Honestly, try harder. did they explain that in one of the movies? The Director said so in an interview, and I haven't seen it but the movie will probably explain it.
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Oct 11, 2017 13:08:25 GMT
did they explain that in one of the movies? The Director said so in an interview, and I haven't seen it but the movie will probably explain it. ah, ok. technically they didn't explain but maybe they will
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Oct 11, 2017 13:13:33 GMT
The Director said so in an interview, and I haven't seen it but the movie will probably explain it. ah, ok. technically they didn't explain but maybe they will Well, the movie isn't out to the public yet. How can we know it won't be explained?
|
|