|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 15, 2017 18:38:16 GMT
Gigli. Paycheck. Daredevil. Pearl Harbor. Jersey Girl. Phantoms. Man About Town. Surviving Christmas. Runner Runner. To the Wonder. That is all. What of them? Him making bad movies doesn't really have anything to do with anything really. You said RDJ had a 0% movie, which one was that? |
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Nov 15, 2017 18:43:23 GMT
@weirdraptor What case? That isn't the case you brought up or what I responded to. That's just something you changed it to to shift the goalposts because you were wrong. formersamhmdJohnny Be Good. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2017 18:44:39 GMT
@weirdraptor What case? That isn't the case you brought up or what I responded to. That's just something you changed it to to shift the goalposts because you were wrong. formersamhmd Johnny Be Good. I didn't change anything. You just can't accept that people like Downey better. |
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Nov 15, 2017 18:46:40 GMT
I didn't change anything. You just can't accept that people like Downey better. You did because every single response including your comment just now has absolutely nothing to do with the one you said that I responded to. Somewhere you got very confused over all this. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2017 18:50:01 GMT
I didn't change anything. You just can't accept that people like Downey better. You did because every single response including your comment just now has absolutely nothing to do with the one you said that I responded to. Somewhere you got very confused over all this. I've already proven that Affleck has the lesser of the two careers and that his lows are lower than Downey's several times. A long string of flops, Golden Razzies, audiences being completely fed up with him for years, and even now, he's not being consistent. |
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Nov 15, 2017 19:06:32 GMT
I've already proven that Affleck has the lesser of the two careers and that his lows are lower than Downey's several times. A long string of flops, Golden Razzies, audiences being completely fed up with him for years, and even now, he's not being consistent. Yeah but that also is completely irrelevant. The only thing relevant here based n what you said and what I responded to, is Downey Jr's lows in his career and what Affleck has achieved in his career. Downey Jr has had some downright awful movies. Affleck has won Oscars and been in critically acclaimed movies. Therefore no, Downey Jr's career worst is not better than Affleck's career. Why are you getting so confused over a comment that you yourself made? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2017 19:12:38 GMT
I've already proven that Affleck has the lesser of the two careers and that his lows are lower than Downey's several times. A long string of flops, Golden Razzies, audiences being completely fed up with him for years, and even now, he's not being consistent. Yeah but that also is completely irrelevant. The only thing relevant here based n what you said and what I responded to, is Downey Jr's lows in his career and what Affleck has achieved in his career. Downey Jr has had some downright awful movies. Affleck has won Oscars and been in critically acclaimed movies. Therefore no, Downey Jr's career worst is not better than Affleck's career. Why are you getting so confused over a comment that you yourself made? That's not how it works. Affleck's recent success does not make the low of his career less bad than Downey's. His career downfall happened because of CAREER decisions. Really bad ones. Downey always made consistently good movies when he was in them. "Downey has had some downright awful movies." So has Affleck. And he's had more, actually. "Affleck has won Oscars" Not a indicator of quality. "and been in critically acclaimed movies." So has Downey. And he's actually been in more. |
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Nov 15, 2017 19:16:48 GMT
That is how it works when that is the comment that you made. This Is all completely irrelevant because it's not what you said. You made a point. I responded to that point. You are now bringing up an entirely different one in order to get away from the point you made that was wrong. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2017 19:20:29 GMT
That is how it works when that is the comment that you made. This Is all completely irrelevant because it's not what you said. You made a point. I responded to that point. You are now bringing up an entirely different one in order to get away from the point you made that was wrong. No, that isn't how it works. Everything I've said matches up with my original point perfectly. You just can't stand to see someone stating an MCU actor is better than a DCEU actor. No, I'm bringing up supporting evidence that you don't like because it contradicts your opinion. My point is completely correct. Keep it up. I once kept an argument going on the original IMDb for 18 months. Think you have that kind of fortitude? |
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Nov 15, 2017 19:26:16 GMT
No, that isn't how it works. Everything I've said matches up with my original point perfectly. You just can't stand to see someone stating an MCU actor is better than a DCEU actor. That's irrelevant. No you don't have supporting evidence. Downey Jr having acclaimed movies and Ben Affleck having shitty movies has nothing to do with what you said at all. You're having your own argument that I never even referred to in the slightest. You don't even seem to comprehend at all what you said and what I responded to. That's a truly pathetic thing to brag about. Jesus... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2017 20:11:44 GMT
No, that isn't how it works. Everything I've said matches up with my original point perfectly. You just can't stand to see someone stating an MCU actor is better than a DCEU actor. That's irrelevant. No you don't have supporting evidence. Downey Jr having acclaimed movies and Ben Affleck having shitty movies has nothing to do with what you said at all. You're having your own argument that I never even referred to in the slightest. You don't even seem to comprehend at all what you said and what I responded to. That's a truly pathetic thing to brag about. Jesus... I say its relevant. Yes, I do have supporting evidence. I have both men's careers, which speak for themselves. Er, yeah, Downey have acclaimed movies and Affleck shitty ones has everything to do with what I was saying. No, I comprehend it perfectly. At this point, you're just argument to keep it going. I'll quit if you do, but not before. |
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Nov 15, 2017 20:35:34 GMT
It doesn't really matter because it isn't. It's only relevant to the argument that you're making up. Not the one I brought up in response to your post. Downey Jr's acclaimed movies are irrelevant here because you were referring to his worst. Therefore only his worst movies and the worst of his career is relevant. Likewise because you weren't comparing it to Affleck's worst but in general then his worst is also irrelevant. The only comparison based on your comment is Affleck's best against Downey Jr's worst. Affleck's being the superior. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2017 20:52:22 GMT
It doesn't really matter because it isn't. It's only relevant to the argument that you're making up. Not the one I brought up in response to your post. Downey Jr's acclaimed movies are irrelevant here because you were referring to his worst. Therefore only his worst movies and the worst of his career is relevant. Likewise because you weren't comparing it to Affleck's worst but in general then his worst is also irrelevant. The only comparison based on your comment is Affleck's best against Downey Jr's worst. Affleck's being the superior. Blah blah blah. Its really important for you to shut up any talk of any MCU actor having an edge over a DCEU one. My points have been consistent and supported. Affleck's best is not superior. Not by a long shot. |
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Nov 15, 2017 20:56:14 GMT
Affleck's best is not superior. Not by a long shot. So you actually think Affleck's best movies and what he's achieved in his career isn't more respectable than the universally panned box office bombs that nobody has heard of that Downey Jr has made? Aka his worst. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2017 21:00:06 GMT
Affleck's best is not superior. Not by a long shot. So you actually think Affleck's best movies and what he's achieved in his career isn't more respectable than the universally panned box office bombs that nobody has heard of that Downey Jr has made? Aka his worst. The original statement is "At his worse, Downey's career is still more respectable than Affleck's." The point was never Downey's worst vs. Affleck's best. The point was Downey's career vs. Affleck's career. You obviously missed a lot of subtext. Even when Downey's star had faded, he was still making respectable movies. The same can't be said for Affleck, who has always had his resume riddled with a mix of some good and a lot of bad, even now. Downey was always more consistent in solid projects. Downey wins. |
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Nov 15, 2017 21:08:15 GMT
So you actually think Affleck's best movies and what he's achieved in his career isn't more respectable than the universally panned box office bombs that nobody has heard of that Downey Jr has made? Aka his worst. The original statement is "At his worse, Downey's career is still more respectable than Affleck's." The point was never Downey's worst vs. Affleck's best. The point was Downey's career vs. Affleck's career. You obviously missed a lot of subtext. Even when Downey's star had faded, he was still making respectable movies. The same can't be said for Affleck, who has always had his resume riddled with a mix of some good and a lot of bad, even now. Downey was always more consistent in solid projects. Downey wins. If that was the point then merely saying Downey Jr's career is still more respectable than Affleck's. However you pointed out "at his worse." At Downey Jr's worse, he was making awful movies that were financial failures. Movies your average joe has never heard of. Affleck's career has seen him be a lead star in huge blockbusters, won two Oscars, won and been nominated for numerous other awards and directed a Best Picture winner. That is more respectable than Downey Jr's career at his worst. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2017 21:13:07 GMT
The original statement is "At his worse, Downey's career is still more respectable than Affleck's." The point was never Downey's worst vs. Affleck's best. The point was Downey's career vs. Affleck's career. You obviously missed a lot of subtext. Even when Downey's star had faded, he was still making respectable movies. The same can't be said for Affleck, who has always had his resume riddled with a mix of some good and a lot of bad, even now. Downey was always more consistent in solid projects. Downey wins. If that was the point then merely saying Downey Jr's career is still more respectable than Affleck's. However you pointed out "at his worse." At Downey Jr's worse, he was making awful movies that were financial failures. Movies your average joe has never heard of. Affleck's career has seen him be a lead star in huge blockbusters, won two Oscars, won and been nominated for numerous other awards and directed a Best Picture winner. That is more respectable than Downey Jr's career at his worst. Alright, I can see there was a misunderstanding between the two of us here. I didn't think to add the word "career" to the end of "At his worse, Downey's career is still more respectable than Affleck's." I failed to catch that you misunderstood me, and that's on me. I'm not going to reply to those last three statements, because that's not what I point was. My point is Downey's career is still more respectable than Affleck'es career, even the down points. |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 15, 2017 22:17:43 GMT
The original statement is "At his worse, Downey's career is still more respectable than Affleck's." The point was never Downey's worst vs. Affleck's best. The point was Downey's career vs. Affleck's career. You obviously missed a lot of subtext. Even when Downey's star had faded, he was still making respectable movies. The same can't be said for Affleck, who has always had his resume riddled with a mix of some good and a lot of bad, even now. Downey was always more consistent in solid projects. Downey wins. If that was the point then merely saying Downey Jr's career is still more respectable than Affleck's. However you pointed out "at his worse." At Downey Jr's worse, he was making awful movies that were financial failures. Movies your average joe has never heard of. Affleck's career has seen him be a lead star in huge blockbusters, won two Oscars, won and been nominated for numerous other awards and directed a Best Picture winner. That is more respectable than Downey Jr's career at his worst. I think it's not offensive to say the Affleck is very good at being a filmmaker while RDJ is a better actor. |
|
