|
Post by scabab on Nov 16, 2017 1:40:31 GMT
ArArArchStantonYou don't have to be interested in enjoying it but you don't need to be interested in making half a dozen topics a day talking about how negative it is just to bait people who are genuinely looking forward to it either. Studios don't actively go out of their way to make bad movies. People not seeing them won't stop them from still being made. Plenty of people might actually really enjoy this movie as well.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Nov 16, 2017 1:48:07 GMT
ArArArchStanton You don't have to be interested in enjoying it but you don't need to be interested in making half a dozen topics a day talking about how negative it is just to bait people who are genuinely looking forward to it either. Studios don't actively go out of their way to make bad movies. People not seeing them won't stop them from still being made. Plenty of people might actually really enjoy this movie as well. I understand, but if we were talking about why a film you didn't care about failed, you wouldn't be accusing me of baiting. We would just be discussing why that film failed.
You're seeing it from your perspective and not mine. It has nothing to do with baiting you or anything. I actually enjoy the processes of a film turning out poorly. It's interesting to discuss what happened to lead to a film not working. It's interesting to discuss how people react to it. It's interesting to discuss what will happen in the future, what will happen to actors and directors, etc. It's not about you. It's about the film and it's production.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2017 3:27:50 GMT
I read the reviews online and it just sounds BAD. But then I watched Chris Stuckmann's and The Schmoes Know reviews on YouTube and all three of them liked it and made it sound like my cup of tea. On top of that, nearly every review makes it sound like a fun ride. $1 billion may not be all that unrealistic. On a side note, according to Stuckmann, WB put a mandate on this movie to make it 2 hours or less. If that's true, then they're even worse at what they do than I thought. Some reviews are saying that it could be really good if it wasn't so rushed. WB can just be so damn ignorant sometimes.If true, that's extremely annoying. Maybe we'll get a extended cut on the blu ray?
|
|
|
Post by sdrew13163 on Nov 16, 2017 4:27:15 GMT
I read the reviews online and it just sounds BAD. But then I watched Chris Stuckmann's and The Schmoes Know reviews on YouTube and all three of them liked it and made it sound like my cup of tea. On top of that, nearly every review makes it sound like a fun ride. $1 billion may not be all that unrealistic. On a side note, according to Stuckmann, WB put a mandate on this movie to make it 2 hours or less. If that's true, then they're even worse at what they do than I thought. Some reviews are saying that it could be really good if it wasn't so rushed. WB can just be so damn ignorant sometimes.If true, that's extremely annoying. Maybe we'll get a extended cut on the blu ray? I hope so, but isn't it sad that we have to wish for an extended version instead of just seeing the real, fleshed-out vision from the get-go?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2017 4:32:16 GMT
If true, that's extremely annoying. Maybe we'll get a extended cut on the blu ray? I hope so, but isn't it sad that we have to wish for an extended version instead of just seeing the real, fleshed-out vision from the get-go? Yeah, it's a shame. All because the studio thinks that people won't watch it if it's 2.5-3 hours...and the sad thing is they're probably not wrong. Wasn't the length of BvS a complaint by so many?
|
|
|
Post by sdrew13163 on Nov 16, 2017 4:44:34 GMT
I hope so, but isn't it sad that we have to wish for an extended version instead of just seeing the real, fleshed-out vision from the get-go? Yeah, it's a shame. All because the studio thinks that people won't watch it if it's 2.5-3 hours...and the sad thing is they're probably not wrong. Wasn't the length of BvS a complaint by so many? Yep, the runtime is apparently what caused BvS to tank. I guess they're forgetting that The Dark Knight Rises was 2 hours and 45 minutes and a theater was tragically shot up on opening weekend by a crazed lunatic, yet it still cracked $1 billion. BvS tanked because it had narrative shortcomings, but the studio put (most of) the blame on a long runtime.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2017 4:57:38 GMT
Yeah, it's a shame. All because the studio thinks that people won't watch it if it's 2.5-3 hours...and the sad thing is they're probably not wrong. Wasn't the length of BvS a complaint by so many? Yep, the runtime is apparently what caused BvS to tank. I guess they're forgetting that The Dark Knight Rises was 2 hours and 45 minutes and a theater was tragically shot up on opening weekend by a crazed lunatic, yet it still cracked $1 billion. BvS tanked because it had narrative shortcomings, but the studio put (most of) the blame on a long runtime. Don't forget Lex Zuckerberg, a jar full of piss and Martha!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2017 17:35:04 GMT
Do you think the final RT will be under or over 40%? Do you think the final Metacritic will be under or over 50%?
|
|