|
Post by anthonyrocks on Nov 21, 2017 3:53:02 GMT
A CLASSIC Science Fiction Horror Movie with a lot of Surprisingly Funny Lines and Moments in it as well.
|
|
|
Post by pippinmaniac on Nov 21, 2017 5:22:20 GMT
A CLASSIC Science Fiction Horror Movie with a lot of Surprisingly Funny Lines and Moments in it as well. Agreed. I really enjoy this film.
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Nov 21, 2017 10:59:48 GMT
One of the best 50's sci-fi films One of the worst book to film adaptations ever.
|
|
|
Post by anthonyrocks on Nov 21, 2017 13:59:42 GMT
I also really liked Both the 1982 John Carpenter Movie and the 2011 Prequel to it.
|
|
|
Post by koskiewicz on Nov 21, 2017 17:35:42 GMT
It is hard to believe the the giant walking carrot in the '51 film was James Arness of Gunsmoke fame. Excellent and very creepy film...
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Nov 21, 2017 17:37:31 GMT
So... who directed it? Hawks or Nyby? (Hey, someone had to ask! )
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Nov 21, 2017 18:05:04 GMT
It's grown on me over the years. I thought it was slow but on repeat viewing, I appreciate the acting and suspense better.
|
|
|
Post by teleadm on Nov 21, 2017 19:03:35 GMT
It's been too long ago since I've seen it to judge it correct. Behind the scenes pic.
|
|
|
Post by anthonyrocks on Nov 21, 2017 19:26:49 GMT
So... who directed it? Hawks or Nyby? (Hey, someone had to ask! ) WIKIPEDIA (which I know is not always reliable) gives the credit to both men.
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Nov 21, 2017 22:02:55 GMT
I love it. One of my all time favorite scifi movies. I used to watch it every time it came on TV when I was kid. Now I have it on DVD.
The acting is great. The story is brilliant and the atmosphere is very creepy.
|
|
|
Post by anthonyrocks on Nov 21, 2017 22:42:28 GMT
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Nov 21, 2017 22:46:26 GMT
I prefer it in the original glorious black and white.
|
|
|
Post by Doghouse6 on Nov 22, 2017 2:14:10 GMT
What does everybody else here think ? Since you asked, I'd say it represents a pinnacle of the decade in the sci-fi genre. It's got everything: suspense and shock; intelligence and humor; pace and action. I've loved it since my first viewing at probably no more than the age of six, yet it reveals more and more to appreciate as one matures, still satisfying me at the midway point between sixty and seventy. If I may, I'll add to teleadm's behind-the-scenes pic with one of my own below, depicting the RKO Ranch in Encino, CA where the exterior scenes of the spacecraft discovery (and subsequent inadvertent destruction) were shot. Running horizontally along the bottom of the image is Burbank Blvd; the diagonal construction at the top is a concrete-lined portion of the Los Angeles River. Just below it, a little left of top center, you'll observe what appear to be wide, blank, billboard-like structures joined together. This served as a backdrop in numerous productions, onto which could be painted mountains and sky or whatever background was required, and before which the wonderful scene involving the spacecraft below the ice was staged. Just right-of-center in the image, recognizable by its three Gothic arches, is the portion of the Notre Dame cathedral constructed for The Hunchback Of Notre Dame (1939), and somewhere on that acreage was also the main street of Bedford Falls ( It's A Wonderful Life, 1946). From '55-'60, I lived about a mile due south, yet had no inkling at the time that what I was seeing on the TV screen at such a young age had taken place so nearby.
|
|
|
Post by spooner5020 on Nov 23, 2017 17:56:08 GMT
What does everybody else here think ? I love it. I could have totally seen this being scary in the day. I love the remake also,and yes it is a remake. John carpenter even admitted it even though he also said it was closer to the novella.
|
|
|
Post by mattgarth on Nov 23, 2017 19:16:00 GMT
So... who directed it? Hawks or Nyby? (Hey, someone had to ask! ) A few years back I got the opportunity to do a radio interview with the actor who played ' Lieut. McPherson' who was appearing in a nearby regional theater stage production. I posed that very same question (I think he gets asked that a lot). He verified that it was almost all Hawks working with the performers, with Nyby handling technical stuff (Hawks wanting to give his favorite editor a directing screen credit). Other Hawks touches -- overlapping dialogue, isolated group, guys bounded by and respecting one another's professionalism, wise-cracking female who is 'one of the boys.' None of these appear in any of Nyby's other later work.
|
|
|
Post by RiP, IMDb on Nov 23, 2017 19:51:26 GMT
LOVE-IT! Easily one of the BEST and one of my FAVORITE of the 1950s science-fiction films. Although the BEST and my FAVORITE is either The War of the Worlds (1953) or Forbidden Planet (1956). The Day the Earth Stood Still (also from 1951 just like TTfAW) ranks amongst the BEST and one of my FAVORITES.
|
|
Eλευθερί
Junior Member
@eleutheri
Posts: 3,710
Likes: 1,670
|
Post by Eλευθερί on Nov 24, 2017 0:30:12 GMT
So, so bad. Can't hold a candle to the Carpenter version.
|
|
|
Post by drystyx on Nov 24, 2017 0:43:52 GMT
One has to remember that the original story was crap, which is why Carpenter's willingness to go with the original was inferior to the 1951 movie. The Carpenter movie was high in character development, though, and probably the best use of sound and score ever in any film.
For atmosphere and fun, the 1951 beats it hands down. Thank God they took risks and avoided the Hollywood hate formula, which was still formula in those days, though not as abundant as the depressing, worthless seventies and eighties movement.
The stark sets of the fifties made for better stage drama, and better science fiction. Less distraction is always better, because distraction is overused and abused in cinema.
Still, not as great as the true classics. The characters and the theatrics weren't near as great as THEM1, WAR OF THE WORLDS, UNKNOWN WORLD, FIRST SPACESHIP TO VENUS, 12 TO THE MOON, ISLAND OF THE BURNING DOOMED, ISLAND OF TERROR, THE UNKNOWN TERROR, and many other classics of the fifties and early sixties.
7.3/10. A good film. The Carpenter version gets 6.8/10, both getting points for different reasons.
|
|
|
Post by petrolino on Nov 25, 2017 0:45:35 GMT
Awesome movie!
|
|
|
Post by them1ghtyhumph on Nov 25, 2017 1:10:15 GMT
Great acting, great dialogue, great movie.
But I like the 1981 version MUCH better.
|
|