|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Mar 5, 2017 13:22:48 GMT
However, the biggest problem still remains the news organizations reliance on him for headlines no matter how retarded his statements are. He really needs to become the least reported on president ever instead of the most reported on president ever. We have already established that he is a lying, cheating, womanizing, dementia level, doodoo head unworthy of any respect from anyone other than his employees. There's no reason to do anything other than footnotes establishing those facts. The obsession the media has on him has made NPR and other news places not worth listening to anymore. I have gone full podcast and music as news is simply synonymous with Trump News. Both the fake sites and the real sites are talking about him constantly and very little of it is about policy. Assuming people don't wise up and actually kick the man out, I can only assume this is going to be the way it is for the next 4 years.  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 5, 2017 13:42:02 GMT
It's "news organisations'" not "news organisation's'". There should be no apostrophe to denote plurality there.
And reading about Trump in the news is the best thing, or arguably only good thing about his presidency, so as long as he is president, he might as well be an entertaining one.
|
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Mar 5, 2017 13:46:38 GMT
It's "news organisations'" not "news organisation's'".
And reading about Trump in the news is the best thing, or arguably only good thing about his presidency, so as long as he is president, he might as well be an entertaining one.
Fixed. However, get used to misspellings and me. I will never be the best typer on the planet . Regarding Trump, I wish he was entertaining, but he is so one note that he's boring which makes reports about him which are written by boring people even worse and then it's repeated the exact same way across all organizations. The good thing is that it forces me to pick and choose the news. I guess that could be a bad thing too, but regardless Trump "news" will will eventually filter down to me anyway since there's so much of it. |
|
dawglf
Freshman
@dawglf
Posts: 63
Likes: 4
 
|
Post by dawglf on Mar 5, 2017 15:07:44 GMT
However, the biggest problem still remains the news organizations reliance on him for headlines no matter how retarded his statements are. He really needs to become the least reported on president ever instead of the most reported on president ever. We have already established that he is a lying, cheating, womanizing, dementia level, doodoo head unworthy of any respect from anyone other than his employees. There's no reason to do anything other than footnotes establishing those facts. The obsession the media has on him has made NPR and other news places not worth listening to anymore. I have gone full podcast and music as news is simply synonymous with Trump News. Both the fake sites and the real sites are talking about him constantly and very little of it is about policy. Assuming people don't wise up and actually kick the man out, I can only assume this is going to be the way it is for the next 4 years. What are u going to kick him out for? |
|
|
|
Post by thefleetsin on Mar 5, 2017 15:24:34 GMT
He should be reported on as often as it takes to document everything he's doing. Especially if he's planning on sending hundreds of thousands of young men and women to do his dirty work for him.
|
|
islandmur
Sophomore
All religions have messages of peace and love yet all religions are used for wars and hatred...
@islandmur
Posts: 320
Likes: 180
|
Post by islandmur on Mar 5, 2017 15:25:47 GMT
I think it's the way the news is being reported that is the problem.
Instead of the childish headlines, the punch jokes, the ridicule... his statements should be analysed and reported in a detached and clinical manner showing them for the enormity they are without fanfare.
The way they are presented now,neither followers or opposants even read through them they just react on titles, and insults.
|
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Mar 5, 2017 15:32:57 GMT
He should be reported on as often as it takes to document everything he's doing. Especially if he's planning on sending hundreds of thousands of young men and women to do his dirty work for him. I don't have any problems with him being reported on. News is, if nothing else, a paper trail. However, he no longer deserves to take up 60-70% of the news cycle when it involves his idiocy rather than his presidential decisions. A whole day discussing where that idiot accuses Obama of something that just pooped in his head is overkill. They spent a whole day talking about his horribly boring speech to Congress only because it was a speech that came closest to what he supposed to be pretending to be. It still sucked The amount of newsworthy stories not involving him has not changed, but the coverage has. His administration has done next to nothing outside of a brute force strike on immigration that was promptly shut down. The reason is purely ratings of course since both liberal and conservatives can't get enough of the guy. The news they report on changes nothing about his suckiness and it detracts from nearly every other issue regard America outside of weather reports. His tweets should be rendered to a daily column report and not mentioned again until the need for some poor journalist intern to research it at times he lies about policy. |
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Mar 5, 2017 15:42:54 GMT
I think it's the way the news is being reported that is the problem. Instead of the childish headlines, the punch jokes, the ridicule... his statements should be analysed and reported in a detached and clinical manner showing them for the enormity they are without fanfare. The way they are presented now,neither followers or opposants even read through them they just react on titles, and insults. The problem is there is no way to clinically address a time when that idiot tweets "Obama wiretapped me - Derp"* It's a moronic statement that should be kept for posterity and then dismissed as Crazy Old Trump talking crazy again. Rather than asking his staff about that repeatedly, ask him about his policies which are FAR more important unless Obama sues him for slander. Now THAT would be newsworthy. Or how about all the sexual assault lawsuits against the president? The news works so hard to be neutral regarding Trump that they are biased for him just by reporting on every little stupid thing he says or does. They simply cannot be truly neutral & detached in flatout calling him a liar and whacky person. *FAKE EDIT: To be clear, he isn't an idiot on the basis of the statement that Obama wiretapped him. After all, he could be sitting on a ton of stuff that indicates just that. It's doubtful he knows anything since he's calling for an investigation rather than revealing one on the matter. The manner at which he handles that information is what makes him an idiot and the press has nothing substantial to go on based off of the tweet and yet spend time on it as if they had mounds of evidence and leaks rather than just the tweet. |
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Mar 5, 2017 15:46:23 GMT
However, the biggest problem still remains the news organizations reliance on him for headlines no matter how retarded his statements are. He really needs to become the least reported on president ever instead of the most reported on president ever. We have already established that he is a lying, cheating, womanizing, dementia level, doodoo head unworthy of any respect from anyone other than his employees. There's no reason to do anything other than footnotes establishing those facts. The obsession the media has on him has made NPR and other news places not worth listening to anymore. I have gone full podcast and music as news is simply synonymous with Trump News. Both the fake sites and the real sites are talking about him constantly and very little of it is about policy. Assuming people don't wise up and actually kick the man out, I can only assume this is going to be the way it is for the next 4 years. What are u going to kick him out for? Impeaching him is not my problem. I did my job when I didn't vote for him partly on the basis of him being a sex assaulting, tax dodging, racist that thinks nothing of the people that would vote for him. In short, he was a criminal when he was running so not sure what he could do that would make him anymore unqualified than when he won. I assume he is going to be the president for the next 4 years even if it's revealed he personally killed that guy he was championing in his speech last week that died in a botched military operation. I have no doubt that Trumpers will protect him up to and including the US/Russian merger. |
|
dawglf
Freshman
@dawglf
Posts: 63
Likes: 4
|
Post by dawglf on Mar 5, 2017 16:32:45 GMT
What are u going to kick him out for? Impeaching him is not my problem. I did my job when I didn't vote for him partly on the basis of him being a sex assaulting, tax dodging, racist that thinks nothing of the people that would vote for him. In short, he was a criminal when he was running so not sure what he could do that would make him anymore unqualified than when he won. I assume he is going to be the president for the next 4 years even if it's revealed he personally killed that guy he was championing in his speech last week that died in a botched military operation. I have to doubt that Trumpers will protect him up to and including the US/Russian merger. So how exactly is he a criminal? |
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Mar 5, 2017 16:35:45 GMT
Impeaching him is not my problem. I did my job when I didn't vote for him partly on the basis of him being a sex assaulting, tax dodging, racist that thinks nothing of the people that would vote for him. In short, he was a criminal when he was running so not sure what he could do that would make him anymore unqualified than when he won. I assume he is going to be the president for the next 4 years even if it's revealed he personally killed that guy he was championing in his speech last week that died in a botched military operation. I have to doubt that Trumpers will protect him up to and including the US/Russian merger. So how exactly is he a criminal? I already answered that. If you are a Trumper, just assume I'm lying about it and move on to drinking the Kool Aid. |
|
dawglf
Freshman
@dawglf
Posts: 63
Likes: 4
|
Post by dawglf on Mar 5, 2017 16:58:21 GMT
So how exactly is he a criminal? I already answered that. If you are a Trumper, just assume I'm lying about it and move on to drinking the Kool Aid. First off, as a Christian conservative I did not vote for Trump. I did not vote for the she beast either. But you haven't given any proof that he was a criminal other than your useless conjecture. And the fact that you call him a racist, even though and his 30 years of public life before he ran for president nobody ever called him that comma shows you're just drinking the Kool-Aid that MSNBC feeds you |
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Mar 5, 2017 17:07:47 GMT
I already answered that. If you are a Trumper, just assume I'm lying about it and move on to drinking the Kool Aid. First off, as a Christian conservative I did not vote for Trump. I did not vote for the she beast either. But you haven't given any proof that he was a criminal other than your useless conjecture. And the fact that you call him a racist, even though and his 30 years of public life before he ran for president nobody ever called him that comma shows you're just drinking the Kool-Aid that MSNBC feeds you I'm not saying that on the basis of proof. That is also not my job either. I am merely giving my opinion based on the evidence presented by Trump himself. He avoids paying taxes and is so good at it that he goes through a years long auditing process. He blatantly admitted to grabbing women without their consent and has the lawsuits to back that up, in addition to slander, libel, and possibly treason that could rise to the level of criminal activity. Fortunately for him, none of that disqualifies you from running for the office that controls other positions where they are disqualifying offenses. Whether that legally makes him a criminal is not my concern considering the burden of doubt presented with it. What does matter is it is activity that is slimy enough to ensure I would never pick him for president, honor his opinions about others, or take anything he says beyond his worst statements as statements about himself as anything worthy of following except on the way to the garbage dump. |
|
dawglf
Freshman
@dawglf
Posts: 63
Likes: 4
|
Post by dawglf on Mar 5, 2017 17:12:00 GMT
First off, as a Christian conservative I did not vote for Trump. I did not vote for the she beast either. But you haven't given any proof that he was a criminal other than your useless conjecture. And the fact that you call him a racist, even though and his 30 years of public life before he ran for president nobody ever called him that comma shows you're just drinking the Kool-Aid that MSNBC feeds you I'm not saying that on the basis of proof. That is also not my job either. I am merely giving my opinion based on the evidence presented by Trump himself. He avoids paying taxes and is so good at it that he goes through a years long auditing process. He blatantly admitted to grabbing women without their consent and has the lawsuits to back that up, in addition to slander, libel, and possibly treason that could rise to the level of criminal activity. Fortunately for him, none of that disqualifies you from running for the office that controls other positions where they are disqualifying offenses. Whether that legally makes him a criminal is not my concern considering the burden of doubt presented with it. What does matter is it is activity that is slimy enough to ensure I would never pick him for president, honor his opinions about others, or take anything he says beyond his worst statements as statements about himself as anything worthy of following except on the way to the garbage dump. So, as I said, you have absolutely no proof. Just you're feeling. So basically you're impugning somebody because of the way that you feel. As I said, I didn't vote for him. But the way he's making liberals lose their minds, is freaking hilarious. |
|
vernuf
Sophomore
@vernuf
Posts: 310
Likes: 34
|
Post by vernuf on Mar 5, 2017 19:30:24 GMT
I'm not saying that on the basis of proof. That is also not my job either. I am merely giving my opinion based on the evidence presented by Trump himself. He avoids paying taxes and is so good at it that he goes through a years long auditing process. He blatantly admitted to grabbing women without their consent and has the lawsuits to back that up, in addition to slander, libel, and possibly treason that could rise to the level of criminal activity. Fortunately for him, none of that disqualifies you from running for the office that controls other positions where they are disqualifying offenses. Whether that legally makes him a criminal is not my concern considering the burden of doubt presented with it. What does matter is it is activity that is slimy enough to ensure I would never pick him for president, honor his opinions about others, or take anything he says beyond his worst statements as statements about himself as anything worthy of following except on the way to the garbage dump. So, as I said, you have absolutely no proof. Just you're feeling. So basically you're impugning somebody because of the way that you feel. As I said, I didn't vote for him. But the way he's making liberals lose their minds, is freaking hilarious.Something is making me question your sincerity. I'm not entirely sure what.  Oh, right. The disingenuous statement I bolded. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 5, 2017 19:30:59 GMT
However, the biggest problem still remains the news organizations reliance on him for headlines no matter how retarded his statements are. He really needs to become the least reported on president ever instead of the most reported on president ever. We have already established that he is a lying, cheating, womanizing, dementia level, doodoo head unworthy of any respect from anyone other than his employees. There's no reason to do anything other than footnotes establishing those facts. The obsession the media has on him has made NPR and other news places not worth listening to anymore. I have gone full podcast and music as news is simply synonymous with Trump News. Both the fake sites and the real sites are talking about him constantly and very little of it is about policy. Assuming people don't wise up and actually kick the man out, I can only assume this is going to be the way it is for the next 4 years. Troll. |
|
|
|
Post by Jillian on Mar 5, 2017 19:32:40 GMT
I beg you pardon?
Labeling him a troll seems unnecessary. I somewhat understand what you mean CoolJGS.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 5, 2017 19:44:06 GMT
I suspect Trump is saying/tweeting ridiculous things all the time because he enjoys all the headlines being about him. It makes him feel important, and Trump is a man who clearly desperately wants to feel like he is important.
The news reports focus on it because they thrive on sensation, because that's what gets ratings.
My hope is that eventually people will tire of reading about the latest inane spouting and change the channel. A rapid decline in Trump reporting would quickly follow.
Of course the danger there is that Trump will feel that he has to do things that are even more dramatic in order to regain the attention.
|
|
dawglf
Freshman
@dawglf
Posts: 63
Likes: 4
|
Post by dawglf on Mar 5, 2017 19:47:33 GMT
So, as I said, you have absolutely no proof. Just you're feeling. So basically you're impugning somebody because of the way that you feel. As I said, I didn't vote for him. But the way he's making liberals lose their minds, is freaking hilarious.Something is making me question your sincerity. I'm not entirely sure what. Oh, right. The disingenuous statement I bolded. I and very sincere. There's nothing disingenuous about my statement |
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Mar 5, 2017 21:41:43 GMT
I'm not saying that on the basis of proof. That is also not my job either. I am merely giving my opinion based on the evidence presented by Trump himself. He avoids paying taxes and is so good at it that he goes through a years long auditing process. He blatantly admitted to grabbing women without their consent and has the lawsuits to back that up, in addition to slander, libel, and possibly treason that could rise to the level of criminal activity. Fortunately for him, none of that disqualifies you from running for the office that controls other positions where they are disqualifying offenses. Whether that legally makes him a criminal is not my concern considering the burden of doubt presented with it. What does matter is it is activity that is slimy enough to ensure I would never pick him for president, honor his opinions about others, or take anything he says beyond his worst statements as statements about himself as anything worthy of following except on the way to the garbage dump. So, as I said, you have absolutely no proof. Just you're feeling. So basically you're impugning somebody because of the way that you feel. As I said, I didn't vote for him. But the way he's making liberals lose their minds, is freaking hilarious. Congratulations, Sherlock, on discovering something I said. Thanks for calling me a liberal though. |
|
