|
Post by miike80 on Nov 30, 2017 12:52:17 GMT
In other words, you're just disrespectful. Let it go,it's pointless to argue with him...he thinks that if a villain is interesting it's lazy writing
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 30, 2017 13:03:15 GMT
In other words, you're just disrespectful. Let it go,it's pointless to argue with him...he thinks that if a villain is interesting it's lazy writing I think it's lazy when the hero is sidelined by the villain. Heroes should be more than ciphers who are there only to oppose the villain.
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Nov 30, 2017 13:09:00 GMT
Let it go,it's pointless to argue with him...he thinks that if a villain is interesting it's lazy writing I think it's lazy when the hero is sidelined by the villain. Heroes should be more than ciphers who are there only to oppose the villain. Then you'll surely hate Infinity War since Feige said that Thanos is the main character in that
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Nov 30, 2017 13:09:06 GMT
In all seriousness, I appreciated that the IW trailer didn't go for yucks. I hope they take things as seriously as the trailer made it out to be. Give it some real stakes. But it won't be better than The Dark Knight or Logan. Agreed, but to be fair, those are legit character studies while IW is the definition of a popcorn blockbuster with tons of action and an ensemble cast. The films have different objectives, so 'better' a relative term.
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Nov 30, 2017 13:24:51 GMT
This shit is part of what I hate in regards to DC vs Marvel. I understand that you're an Admin and I have no issue with what you do but this just shows your favoritism. (Fuck me if somebody like Weirdraptor likes this or something because I hate you all the same) but in what way qualifies you to make such a statement? It's this culture that because Heath Ledger was so great (My favorite comic book performance ever and MADE The Dark Knight for me) means that nothing can equal it. You say it looks fantastic but you immediately have to try and discredit it because to you it won't ever equal The Dark Knight. Oh don't misunderstand, it was just my opinion after all and my comment was mainly just in response to what Dennis Reynolds, King Kong Brady and formersamhmd were discussing rather than me randomly bringing up the movie just to discredit Infinity War.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2017 13:48:17 GMT
In all seriousness, I appreciated that the IW trailer didn't go for yucks. I hope they take things as seriously as the trailer made it out to be. Give it some real stakes. But it won't be better than The Dark Knight or Logan. Agreed, but to be fair, those are legit character studies while IW is the definition of a popcorn blockbuster with tons of action and an ensemble cast. The films have different objectives, so 'better' a relative term. I wouldn't disagree with that.
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Nov 30, 2017 13:56:25 GMT
Let it go,it's pointless to argue with him...he thinks that if a villain is interesting it's lazy writing I think it's lazy when the hero is sidelined by the villain. Heroes should be more than ciphers who are there only to oppose the villain. Batman as a character is stoic and brooding. His persona goes hand in hand with his costume and he doesn't have any larger than life superpowers. He's riveting but not dynamic as a personality. To counterbalance this, his best villains are always bombastic and over the top, and from a cinematic point of view-- scene stealing. That formula works perfectly for the character. The unstoppable force-- the villain; the chaos of the Joker-- vs. the immovable object-- the hero's resolve, which is a huge selling point with Batman due to his lack of superpowers, which can't be overstated as a factor in the medium of superhero storytelling. The fate of the world is not in the balance; the story is more personal. More grounded. It's a perfect storm of narrative elements that lead Batman villains (the best ones anyway) to dominate the story more often than not. One of the problems WB/DC has is thinking all CBMs work the way Batman stories do. The problem is they don't know how to make their villains (outside of Joker, to be honest) interesting, so they just make their heroes bland by comparison. Always frowning. Always brooding. Always trying to be Batman. They finally hit a home run with Wonder Woman, only to give her some of the hammiest villains you're ever going to see onscreen. But you know what? It was a price I was willing to pay because I'm there to see Wonder Woman, not Ares. That's why I gave them a pass with Justice League. Steppenwolf is the ultimate stock villain, but I was happy to finally see DC heroes who wanted to be heroes! Don't try to humanize a clown like Steppenwolf and don't try to turn the JL into the X-Men, always complaining about how nobody likes them. The X-Men are outcasts for a reason. You chose to be heroes, now go be heroes. They got it right this time around, thankfully.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 30, 2017 14:00:56 GMT
I think it's lazy when the hero is sidelined by the villain. Heroes should be more than ciphers who are there only to oppose the villain. Then you'll surely hate Infinity War since Feige said that Thanos is the main character in that We'll have to wait and see.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 30, 2017 14:03:56 GMT
Batman as a character is stoic and brooding. Which is why I've always seen him as less a character, more an archetype. We could be getting great stories driven by the internal conflicts he could have with Alfred and Lucius Fox and Gordon but no one ever bothers. Agree, although it isn't helped by Superman not having a great Rogues' Gallery to begin with. Frankly, she doesn't have a great Rogues Gallery either. But Steve Trevor made up for that by being a great supporting character. Although Diana seems to be a bit flat as a character herself, at least she got more than Superman did.
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Nov 30, 2017 14:04:01 GMT
Then you'll surely hate Infinity War since Feige said that Thanos is the main character in that We'll have to wait and see. Sure, i can't wait for it. Can it be released before Black Panther? i wouldn't mind But that's what Feige said about IW
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 30, 2017 14:05:16 GMT
We'll have to wait and see. Sure, i can't wait for it. Can it be release before Black Panther? i wouldn't mind But that's what Feige said about IW Like I said, we need to wait. Although I'm very much looking forward to BP.
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Nov 30, 2017 14:08:10 GMT
Agree, although it isn't helped by Superman not having a great Rogues' Gallery to begin with.
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Nov 30, 2017 14:09:38 GMT
Sure, i can't wait for it. Can it be release before Black Panther? i wouldn't mind But that's what Feige said about IW Like I said, we need to wait. Although I'm very much looking forward to BP. It looks interesting, and i trust Coogler, it's just that i'm much more pumped for IW. And i really hope they work some more on the CGI on Thanos
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 30, 2017 14:11:26 GMT
Agree, although it isn't helped by Superman not having a great Rogues' Gallery to begin with. I'd love to see someone do a movie with Mr Mxyzsptlk.
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Nov 30, 2017 14:16:11 GMT
Batman as a character is stoic and brooding. Which is why I've always seen him as less a character, more an archetype. We could be getting great stories driven by the internal conflicts he could have with Alfred and Lucius Fox and Gordon but no one ever bothers. Agree, although it isn't helped by Superman not having a great Rogues' Gallery to begin with. Frankly, she doesn't have a great Rogues Gallery either. But Steve Trevor made up for that by being a great supporting character. Although Diana seems to be a bit flat as a character herself, at least she got more than Superman did. The thing is, the more powerful a character is, the harder it is to find a compatible villain. Honestly that's why I've never been a Superman fan, anyway. He's a one man Justice League, I don't know why he needs a team. There was plenty of internal conflict in Nolan's Batfilms. They were the lifeblood of that franchise, it's what lifted BB and TDK to crime drama status for me, not mere action films. Of course TDKR was total crap but Nolan was bowing to studio pressure when he made it anyway. In a lot of ways Diana is the ultimate archetype, I mean she's an ancient warrior god. Complexity isn't going to be that character's strong suit. No family drama, no insecurities, no daily stress. It's tough to build frailties into a character like that.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 30, 2017 14:28:59 GMT
Honestly that's why I've never been a Superman fan, anyway. He's a one man Justice League, I don't know why he needs a team. He doesn't, which is what made the JL movie turn out to be nearly useless movie once he came back. DC's never been good at creating a world where all their characters can co-exist without one making all the others unnecessary, as opposed to Marvel. I disagree, there was hints of it but not really true conflict. Yep. There WOULD be potential there if Jenkins hadn't killed off all the Olympians for whatever reason.
|
|
|
Post by DSDSquared on Nov 30, 2017 14:39:10 GMT
The Dark Knight is not a DCEU film. It is a Nolan film. People seem to forget this. Sure, they were great movies, but the DCEU has proven so far that they cannot make a movie near that caliber. The MCU, on the other hand, has made The Avengers, The Winter Soldier, and Iron Man, which are all very good movies in their own right.
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Nov 30, 2017 14:46:14 GMT
The Dark Knight is not a DCEU film. It is a Nolan film. People seem to forget this. Sure, they were great movies, but the DCEU has proven so far that they cannot make a movie near that caliber. The MCU, on the other hand, has made The Avengers, The Winter Soldier, and Iron Man, which are all very good movies in their own right. I don't think anyone forgets that. The fact remains the potential is there to make great films with that character. The trick is how to keep the character interesting now that we've seen Nolan's version. It's either going to be a rehash or something so radically different most people won't be interested (BvS comes to mind).
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 30, 2017 14:56:21 GMT
The Dark Knight is not a DCEU film. It is a Nolan film. People seem to forget this. Sure, they were great movies, but the DCEU has proven so far that they cannot make a movie near that caliber. The MCU, on the other hand, has made The Avengers, The Winter Soldier, and Iron Man, which are all very good movies in their own right. I don't think anyone forgets that. The fact remains the potential is there to make great films with that character. The trick is how to keep the character interesting now that we've seen Nolan's version. It's either going to be a rehash or something so radically different most people won't be interested (BvS comes to mind). Nolan's Batman wasn't her interesting....Nolan fell into the trap of making the villains the real stars of his movies.
|
|
|
Post by DSDSquared on Nov 30, 2017 16:57:35 GMT
I don't think anyone forgets that. The fact remains the potential is there to make great films with that character. The trick is how to keep the character interesting now that we've seen Nolan's version. It's either going to be a rehash or something so radically different most people won't be interested (BvS comes to mind). Nolan's Batman wasn't her interesting....Nolan fell into the trap of making the villains the real stars of his movies. I can get behind that a little, but they were still great movies. I felt Bale was a good Bruce, but a bad Batman. I still prefer Keaton. Still, The Dark Knight is objectively the best Batman movie.
|
|